i was wrong about that, it was the dissent in the app. ct.
why don't YOU point out the precedent...i already said i read it and failed to see any binding precedent that you and ravi claim exists....back it up lawboy...surely you know how do to that
Where did I say that?
you tool....you just said to see the precedents cited by the district court
you also said this earlier in the flame zone:
The USSC had ruled on a similar case before. She followed the precedent that the prior case set.
.
It was 2nd circuit precedent, for the most part. And yeah, you can check out the cases the district court cited.