Kari Lake calls for imprisoning Maricopa County election officials

  1. Kari Lake’s Election Lawsuit Just Took One Step Forward—And …

    Web1 day ago · Kari Lake’s Election Lawsuit Just Took One Step Forward—And Two Steps Back. While a judge allowed 2 of her 10 claims to proceed, critics say that the legal offensive …

Kari is fucked and will likely be sanctioned.

She has to prove 1) INTENTIONAL sabotage 2) with the intent to turn the election results against her 3) that actually disenfranchised so many voters 4) that it would have changed the election outcome.

Kari is stuck on point 1. And has presented jack shit to support it, or points 2 through 4. She hasn't been able to cite so much as a SINGLE voter who was disenfranchised.

And she needs at least 17,000 of them.
 
Kari is fucked and will likely be sanctioned.

She has to prove 1) INTENTIONAL sabotage 2) with the intent to turn the election results against her 3) that actually disenfranchised so many voters 4) that it would have changed the election outcome.

Kari is stuck on point 1. And has presented jack shit to support it, or points 2 through 4. She hasn't been able to cite so much as a SINGLE voter who was disenfranchised.

And she needs at least 17,000 of them.
42.5% of the ballots checked were screwed up on purpose.
Nevermind all of the eye witnesses that have testified already about what went on.
 
42.5% of the ballots checked were screwed up on purpose.
Nevermind all of the eye witnesses that have testified already about what went on.

Screwed up on purpose.....according to who?

Quote the witnesses who testified that this was intentional to prevent Lake from winning. Who was disenfranchised? What's your evidence that the outcome of the election would have been different?

You can't back ANY of these claims. Its the same conjecture and allegation offered as 'evidence' that your ilk always leans into
 
Screwed up on purpose.....according to who?

Quote the witnesses who testified that this was intentional to prevent Lake from winning. Who was disenfranchised? What's your evidence that the outcome of the election would have been different?

You can't back ANY of these claims. Its the same conjecture and allegation offered as 'evidence' that your ilk always leans into
Fuck you.
They supplied the refs.....do your own research, prick.
 
Fuck you.
I supplied the refs.....do your own research, prick.

You supplied the accusations. And cited yourself on intentionality. Not witnesses. Not the people working the machines.

You cited yourself.


Worse for your argument, Kari has to meet ALL 4 points. 1) INTENTIONAL sabotage 2) with the intent to turn the election results against her 3) that actually disenfranchised so many voters 4) that it would have changed the election outcome.

And she can't prove even one of those points.
 
You supplied the accusations. And cited yourself on intentionality. Not witnesses. Not the people working the machines.

You cited yourself.

Worse for your argument, Kari has to meet ALL 4 points. 1) INTENTIONAL sabotage 2) with the intent to turn the election results against her 3) that actually disenfranchised so many voters 4) that it would have changed the election outcome.

And she can't prove even one of those points.
Again. Do your own research.

They proved #1 this week and proved #2 & #3 last month....and now their inspections are proving that 42.5% of the ballots are unreadable. The exact number of votes that means is still to be determined.
 
Again. Do your own research.

They proved #1 this week and proved #2 & #3 last month....and now their inspections are proving that 42.5% of the ballots are unreadable. The exact number of votes that means is still to be determined.

Having unreadable ballots doesn't prove intentionality. It doesn't prove fraud. It doesn't even prove disenfranchisement. As the county had backup methods to vote. The folks that had printer problems used a back up method.

Kari Lake has yet to cite even ONE person who was disenfranchised. And she needs 17000, bare minimum. She can't establish intentionality. She can't establish the intention being to rob her of votes. She can't establish disenfranchisement, she can't establish that the outcome would have been different.

So, what conspiracy are you going to invent when Kari predictably fails?

The MAGA tear-fueled tsunami of impotent batshit is going to be both dramatic and entertaining. Will it be your standard 'deep state' schtick? Or some of that really creative 'North Korea snuck Biden ballots via Submarine through Maine' level
nonsense?
 
Last edited:
Wow, the shit revealed in this trial is stunning. Election should be overturned for Maricopa County.




They did not have any documents for chain of custody for Election Day, violating Arizona law. These scum bags need to go to jail.

Drain the lake!

Drain the lake!
 
You must have missed the trial.

Oh, no. Kari is having her ass handed to her in the hearing as well.

She has to prove 1) INTENTIONAL sabotage of voting machines 2) with the intent of robbing her of votes 3) that disenfranchisement so many voters that 4) the outcome of the election would have been different.

And she hasn't come remotely close to proving any of them.

Lake is probably going to be sanctioned for a frivolous lawsuit.
 
Laughing........apparently you're following the 'impotent internet rage fueled conspiracy' technique of 'doing something about it.

How's that working out for you?


Apparently you are stupid.

Yup, you are.
 

Forum List

Back
Top