Let’s not pretend conservatives are banning books in school libraries simply because of graphic sexual content

[Zincwarrior]

That isn't a valid argument.

Sure it is. But live in your bubble world. Be sure to call everyone who disagrees with you a groomer, Grandpa.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Your defense of this is disturbing

It is much more than merely disturbing.

There is only one reason why anyone would defend exposing minors to this sort of material; only one kind of subhuman piece of shit that would defend exposing minors to this kind of material.

One thing about threads like this, is that they do bring the childfuckers out into the open where everyone can see who they are.

 

[BS Filter]

Sure it is. But live in your bubble world. Be sure to call everyone who disagrees with you a groomer, Grandpa.

I live in a world where parents run the education system, not the deranged corrupt Marxist filth. Dick breath.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

It is much more than merely disturbing.

There is only one reason why anyone would defend exposing minors to this sort of material; only one kind of subhuman piece of shit that would defend exposing minors to this kind of material.

One thing about threads like this, is that the do bring the childfuckers out into the open where everyone can see who they are.

It is much more than merely disturbing.

There is only one reason why anyone would defend exposing minors to this sort of material; only one kind of subhuman piece of shit that would defend exposing minors to this kind of material.

One thing about threads like this, is that they do bring the childfuckers out into the open where everyone can see who they are.

It sure brought out one of them

 

[Seymour Flops]

? I

Ok that's helpful. What age group?

The age group of the characters in the Evison book is about 10 years old. The libraries it has been reported in have been high school libraries, so age 14 and up.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The age group of the characters in the Evison book is about 10 years old. The libraries it has been reported in have been high school libraries, so age 14 and up.

To leftists that's acceptable, 8-10 would be better

 

[Zincwarrior]

Only with you. I explained my stance you illiterate noob


Stop flaming threads, jackass

Cool, then I will explain mine. In school libraries, books should be age appropriate. However, books should not be banned just because the subject matter offends the ChristoMAGAs.

 

[Zincwarrior]

The age group of the characters in the Evison book is about 10 years old. The libraries it has been reported in have been high school libraries, so age 14 and up.

High school, then don't see the issue. Those aren't "children."

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Cool, then I will explain mine. In school libraries, books should be age appropriate. However, books should not be banned just because the subject matter offends the ChristoMAGAs.

You're disturbing... there's that.

Why don't you retreat while you have any dignity

 

[Zincwarrior]

You're disturbing... there's that.

Why don't you retreat while you have any dignity

It's disturbing that books should be age appropriate? Ok Boomer.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

It's disturbing that books should be age appropriate? Ok Boomer.

Dude, you've made your bed, now you're sleeping in it.

Ya shoulda known better than pull your shit... but you'll learn

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Cool, then I will explain mine. In school libraries, books should be age appropriate. However, books should not be banned just because the subject matter offends the ChristoMAGAs.

Apparently, you define “ChristoMAGAs” as anyone who objects to the sexual abuse of children.

How is a book that contains explicit pictures of one underage boy sucking another underage boy's penis age-appropriate for any minor?

How is such a book anything other than child pornography the mere possession of which, ought to get anyone charged with a crime, thrown in prison, and labeled for life as a sex offender?

 

[Zincwarrior]

Dude, you've made your bed, now you're sleeping in it.

Ya shoulda known better than pull your shit... but you'll learn

Again, age appropriate is bad? Boomer worried da high schoolers gonna be reading and getting dem strange city folk ideas.

 

[Seymour Flops]

High school, then don't see the issue. Those aren't "children."

A fourteen year old is maybe the worst age at which to read a book that sexualizes pre-teens. Fourteen is right when their sexuality is forming and they may be questioning it, and experimenting with it. That book encourages them to think of ten year olds as potential sex partners, at age at which they have access to ten year olds, as siblings, cousins, or in the school next door.

Absent that particular book, "Lawn Boy," they may not have imagined getting a ten year old boy to perform oral sex on them. But, now they have a book provided by adult educators that celebrates a ten year old boy performing oral sex.

 

[Oddball]

The age group of the characters in the Evison book is about 10 years old. The libraries it has been reported in have been high school libraries, so age 14 and up.

Personally, I couldn't care less.

Kids will have their entire adult lives to concern themselves with who sticks their dick where, and why....It doesn't need to be in school curricula, where we're already graduating functional illiterates from HS.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

High school, then don't see the issue. Those aren't "children."

A fourteen year old is maybe the worst age at which to read a book that sexualizes pre-teens. Fourteen is right when their sexuality is forming and they may be questioning it, and experimenting with it. That book encourages them to think of ten year olds as potential sex partners, at age at which they have access to ten year olds, as siblings, cousins, or in the school next door.

Absent that particular book, "Lawn Boy," they may not have imagined getting a ten year old boy to perform oral sex on them. But, now they have a book provided by adult educators that celebrates a ten year old boy performing oral sex.

And I am given to understand that there are certain subsets of faggots, “pederasts”, that prefer their prey in the young teen range. Fourteen would be just about prime for them. No surprise that there's literature out there, being defended by one of these types, that seems specifically aimed at grooming young teenaged boys in this direction.

 

[lantern2814]

I don't think they even want to wait until they're adults.

A lot of faggots, especially, like them young. One of the worst examples of this forum has expressed unhealthy sexual interest in boys as young as three.

And we're learning of children being groomed, that young, into transsexuality as well.

It’s gotten so bad with these groomer types that even gays are turning on them. Though the Gays Against Groomers group keeps getting banned from social media, then having to be reinstated.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Have we got someone abusing his power as a moderator, here, to silence posts that he disagrees with?

It seems to me that in the past quarter-hour or so, several perfectly legitimate posts have vanished from this thread.

 

[BS Filter]

Cool, then I will explain mine. In school libraries, books should be age appropriate. However, books should not be banned just because the subject matter offends the ChristoMAGAs.

It's a Constitutional right to believe in God and freedom of political beliefs. Parents are the ones who decide what is appropriate for their children. What about that is difficult for you to understand?

 

[BS Filter]

Again, age appropriate is bad? Boomer worried da high schoolers gonna be reading and getting dem strange city folk ideas.

The question is who do the children belong to? The state or the parents.