Liberalism: "It's All About Me"

[francoHFW]

You're nuts, superdupe.

You're saying you don't see the value of making children wards of the state?

WTH are you talking about? Of course not...unless they're extremely unfortunate...

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

You're nuts, superdupe.

You're saying you don't see the value of making children wards of the state?

WTH are you talking about? Of course not...unless they're extremely unfortunate...

I guess you just haven't gotten those marching orders yet; don't worry, as a useful idiot, you'll get behind it when the time comes.

 

[francoHFW]

You're nuts, superdupe.

You're saying you don't see the value of making children wards of the state?

WTH are you talking about? Of course not...unless they're extremely unfortunate...

I guess you just haven't gotten those marching orders yet; don't worry, as a useful idiot, you'll get behind it when the time comes.

Where do you dupes get these ideas, as if I didn't know?

 

[The Professor]

Yeah.

That's a funny one.

Try telling it to the children you abort!

That zygote is not a child . But I'll give you that !

Then the baby is born. It's liberals who are for WIC and food stamp assistance to keep the baby healthy . Cons what to cut all that .

It's the cons who are for personal responsibility by not having children until they can support them and not make someone else pay for their children! A concept you clearly have no clue of!

PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY!

That's pretty selfish of you .

That's one way of looking at it. Here's another. Those who give birth expecting others to pay to raise their children are the selfish ones. Those who have one child after another expecting others to feed, clothe and support their children are the epitome of selfishness. Those who have children and do not know who the father is can't even get child support which might at least put part of the financial responsibility on the parent. It is foolish to claim that someone is selfish just because they expect others to provide for their own children.

PS: There is an indisputable and substantial correlation between criminal behavior and children raised in fatherless households but that's a story for another day.

Correlation does not mean causation!

In some cases correlation by itself is sufficient to prove causation. I don't want to hijack this thread by discussing the matter now; instead, I will start a separate thread about this in a few days and I will let you know when I post it. I think you will find it interesting.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

This is a joke right . Everyone know that liberals are for helping those in need , helping those who are routinely targetd by the majority. . While cons are selfish opportunists .

Throw out any issue and you'll see this is true .

This is for Timmy the peabrain...
Killing of unborn and born babies - issue - Democrats are for the extermination of "random jumble of cells" while Conservatives want to save the child.
Not killing of Rapists, Murderers and Child molesters - Democrats want to give these degenerates multiple chances for life, while Conservatives want justice when justice is due, rap sheets a mile long, that "animal" cannot be fixed and needs to be destroyed.

Just a few issues about liberals wanting to help the poor (stay poor or create more poor) while Conservatives want everyone to have the same opportunity to provide for themselves and their families.
Conservatives want to stop paying able bodied liberals , welfare and have them get to work(you know from Obama's economic recovery) so they can pay taxes, provide insurance, and feed themselves.
Liberals want to keep paying able bodied liberals, welfare, so they wont work, and have to rely on Guberment EBT cards so the Guberment can feed, provide phones and healthcare to the liberal scum, so they will continue to vote liberal.

You just cant get more stupid than a liberal.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I suppose the good news is that Liberalism is a self-defeating trap.
Conservatives and traditionalists have lots of children,but for Liberals, having children is a bad idea.

Of course it gets worse than that, as Leftists are all about abortion and eugenics, too.

Sooo....there should be fewer and fewer of them in the long run.




Check this out:
"Liberal columnist Jill Filipovic says having lots of kids is immoral
Jill Filipovic
✔@JillFilipovic
Having children is one of the worst things you can do for the planet. Have one less and conserve resources. https://twitter.com/guardian/status/885021119652220930 …
2:26 AM - 12 Jul 2017


That tweet isn't just a suggestion, it's an order: at the margins, having children makes you a bad person.

But sidelining the moral argument for a second, Filipovic's claim is also remarkable for its idiocy.

After all, the premise of Filipovic's argument — that Earth cannot co-exist with a growing human population — rests on the Guardian article that her tweet links to. That article references researchers who have listed all the things that produce carbon emissions."
Liberal columnist Jill Filipovic says having lots of kids is immoral


Since the view that the earth can't sustain 7 or 8 billion folks has been debunked numerous times, my presumption about the self-centeredness of Leftisim must be the case.



In fact one of the godfathers of Leftism put it this way:
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
Leon Trotsky

I have known this for quite a while now, as I see planned parenthood as the primary source of the upcoming extinction of liberals. 33,000 unborn and born babies from liberal parents are executed under the doctors scissors. Also they love to do drugs which also is having a devastating effect on their older and sometimes younger children, and instead of letting the government continue the war against drugs, the liberals are out their touting "let them be, stop the war on drugs". When all liberals are finally gone, then the world will be a better, happier place.

NWO Plans To Depopulate The Earth

There are many means and methods of depopulation that are being employed today, the 3 primary of which include; unsustainable/exploitative international development, which leads to massive hunger, starvation and famine worldwide (at least 40 million deaths annually), the fomentation of war, hatred and military procurements throughout the nations leading to millions of deaths worldwide, and finially, the creation and spread of infectious diseases leading to global pandemic, plague and pestilence on an unprecedented scale.

See? What conservatives really want is to outlaw abortion AND birth control.

 

[NYcarbineer]

It's always sadly comical to see conservatives pretending that they want the poor to have MORE children.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's the cons who are for personal responsibility by not having children until they can support them and not make someone else pay for their children! A concept you clearly have no clue of!

PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY!

That's pretty selfish of you .

HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH LIL TIMMY JUST MADE YOUR POINT FOR YOU!!! MIKE. More proof isn't needed. Murderers, just need to have abortions done on them. If they like them let them have a retroactive one.

I'll go with the Supreme Court, rather than be a wedge issue dupe of the giveaway-to-the-rich GOP, dupe. Abortion as as issue is over. Food stamps and WIC are for the unfortunate, unfortunate mainly because of GOP policy. Crap jobs, no training programs, corrupt bubbles busting, crap infrastructure, etc etc. Great job!.

Did you support the only President in nigh on a century who never had even 3% GDP growth.....with eight chances to do it?


You did?

Soooo....what are you complaining about?

Funny how righties bring up that odd stat? Very cherry picked . Never your typical economic stats .

Of court when bush drives the country into a negative GDP , it's kinda hard to have a plus 3.

1. The 'old stat' is from half a year ago.

2.Hussein was the worst failure as president in a century.

Need more 'stats'? Here's a dozen:


1... in today’s recovery — the slowest in the modern era going back to 1947 — private capital investment has lagged badly. ... so has the jobs situation, with 92 million dropping out of the workforce altogether. A labor-participation rate of 62.8% and an employment-to-population rate of 58% are historic lows indicative of the anemic jobs recovery. Big Business Swings Behind a Mantra of Growth - The New York Sun


2. Tavis Smiley: 'Black People Will Have Lost Ground in Every Single Economic Indicator' Under Obama
Tavis Smiley: 'Black People Will Have Lost Ground in Every Single Economic Indicator' Under Obama


3. . "Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession
. ...the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey ....indicate that the real (inflation-adjusted) median annual household income in America has fallen by 4.4 percent during the "recovery," after having fallen by 1.8 during the recession.
Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession


4. . In a stunning Tuesday report, Gallup CEO and Chairman Jim Clifton revealed that “for the first time in 35 years, American business deaths now outnumber business births.”Clifton says for the past six years since 2008, employer business startups have fallen below the business failure rate, spurring what he calls “an underground earthquake” that only stands to worsen as lagging U.S. Census data becomes available.
“Let’s get one thing clear: This economy is never truly coming back unless we reverse the birth and death trends of American businesses,” writes Clifton."Economic Death Spiral: More American Businesses Dying Than Starting - Breitbart


5. "Surprise: U.S. Economic Data Have Been the World's Most Disappointing
It's not only the just-released University of Michigan consumer confidence report and February retail sales on Thursday that surprised economists and investors with another dose of underwhelming news. Overall, U.S. economic data have been falling short of prognosticators' expectations by the most in six years." Surprise: U.S. Economic Data Have Been the World's Most Disappointing

6. . "That basic math is why middle class incomes have been in decline under Obama. The Census Bureau reports that since Obama became President 7 years ago, real median household income has fallen by $1,300 a year. Heritage Foundation Chief Economist Steve Moore explained in testimony before the Ways and Means Committee, “At 2 percent growth the economy doesn’t spin off enough jobs to increase wages, and tax revenues grow much too slowly to balance the budget.”
The recession officially ended more than 6 years ago. Wages and incomes have always grown in recoveries, not declined. Moreover, the American historical record is the deeper the recession, the stronger the recovery. The economy is supposed to boom in a recovery to catch up with its long term economic growth trendline. But over 6 years after the recession ended, that still has not happened. Instead, what we have gotten under President Obama is the worst recovery from a recession since the Great Depression." Realizing The Super Bowl Of American Economic Growth



7. "Even if you leave out the first quarter of 2009—when the recession that started in December 2007 was still ongoing--President Barack Obama has presided over the lowest average first-quarter GDP growth of any president who has served since 1947, which is the earliest year for which the Bureau of Economic Analysis has calculated quarterly GDP growth. " http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/terence...-obama-has-lowest-average-1stq-gdp-growth-any


8. The Obama Administration is aggressively exploiting regulation to achieve its policy agenda, issuing 157 new major rules at a cost to Americans approaching $73 billion annually....twice the annual average of his predecessor George W. Bush. And much more regulation is on the way, with another 125 major rules on the Administration’s to-do list, including dozens linked to the Dodd–Frank financial regulation law and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare. Red Tape Rising: Five Years of Regulatory Expansion


9. . "...take-home pay for many American workers has effectively fallen since the economic recovery began in 2009, according to a new study by an advocacy group that is to be released on Thursday.

The declines were greatest for the lowest-paid workers in sectors where hiring has been strong — home health care, food preparation and retailing — even though wages were already below average to begin with in those service industries.

“Stagnant wages are a problem for everyone at this point, but the imbalance in the economy has become more pronounced since the recession,”..." http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/03/b...rkers-see-biggest-drop-in-paychecks.html?_r=0


10. . "Obamacare health insurance co-ops surged past the $1 billion mark in losses this week, making history of sorts.The insolvencies, totaling $1.36 billion, mean that the co-ops have burned through more than half of the original $2 billion appropriatedin 2010 for the program under the Affordable Care Act. The funds were loaned to the start-up co-ops in 2012 and were to be repaid in 15 years, according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which manages Obamacare.


...13 of the 23 federally-financed Obamacare co-ops have officially failed in only two years. Most are in the process of default as insurance regulators attempt to pay customer’s medical bills, cover medical providers and pay other creditors.
Obamacare Co-Op Mess Causes $1.3 Billion In Losses


11. Obama is the first President never to have had a year of 3% or better economic growth: "... annual growth during Obama’s “recovery” has never topped 3%. By comparison, it never fell below 3% during the Reagan recovery. And in the nine years following the 1990-91 recession, GDP grew faster than 3% in all but two. Heck, even Jimmy Carter had some strong growth years." http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/with-gdp-downgrade-obama-growth-gap-expands/

a. "The years since 2007 have been a macroeconomic disaster for the United States of a magnitude unprecedented since the Great Depression." Obama: Always Wrong, Never In Doubt

b. ".... first president since Hoover to never have a single year above 3% GDP growth."Obama economy is 'amazing,' says hedge fund billionaire



12. ".... calculating how much the debt increased during Obama's two terms. On January 20, 2009, when he was sworn in, the debt was $10.626 trillion. On January 20, 2017, it was $19.947 trillion. That's why most people say Obama added $9 trillion to the debt, more than any other president."
How Much Did Obama Add to the Nation's Debt?




Need a couple of dozen failed foreign policy initiatives????
Say the word, dunce.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I suppose the good news is that Liberalism is a self-defeating trap.
Conservatives and traditionalists have lots of children,but for Liberals, having children is a bad idea.

Of course it gets worse than that, as Leftists are all about abortion and eugenics, too.

Sooo....there should be fewer and fewer of them in the long run.




Check this out:
"Liberal columnist Jill Filipovic says having lots of kids is immoral
Jill Filipovic
https://twitter.com/JillFilipovic
✔@JillFilipovic
Having children is one of the worst things you can do for the planet. Have one less and conserve resources. https://twitter.com/guardian/status/885021119652220930 …
2:26 AM - 12 Jul 2017


That tweet isn't just a suggestion, it's an order: at the margins, having children makes you a bad person.

But sidelining the moral argument for a second, Filipovic's claim is also remarkable for its idiocy.

After all, the premise of Filipovic's argument — that Earth cannot co-exist with a growing human population — rests on the Guardian article that her tweet links to. That article references researchers who have listed all the things that produce carbon emissions."
Liberal columnist Jill Filipovic says having lots of kids is immoral


Since the view that the earth can't sustain 7 or 8 billion folks has been debunked numerous times, my presumption about the self-centeredness of Leftisim must be the case.



In fact one of the godfathers of Leftism put it this way:
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
Leon Trotsky

White and Asian women in the US, by their forties, have had the fewest number of children:

Family Size, by Race and Ethnicity

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

It's always sadly comical to see conservatives pretending that they want the poor to have MORE children.

It isn't comical to see liberals protecting murders, rapists, and child molestors who every liberal wants to be one. What is worse is people like NY have voted for the shits.
Ted Kennedy - Murderer.
Bill Clinton - Rapist
Hillary Clinton - Enabler of a Rapist.
Victor Slava - Child molester
Disney Movie's Director a Convicted Child Molester : Hollywood: He says, 'I paid for my mistakes dearly,' but victim of incident several years ago urges boycott of 'Powder.'

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

I suppose the good news is that Liberalism is a self-defeating trap.
Conservatives and traditionalists have lots of children,but for Liberals, having children is a bad idea.

Of course it gets worse than that, as Leftists are all about abortion and eugenics, too.

Sooo....there should be fewer and fewer of them in the long run.




Check this out:
"Liberal columnist Jill Filipovic says having lots of kids is immoral
Jill Filipovic
✔@JillFilipovic
Having children is one of the worst things you can do for the planet. Have one less and conserve resources. https://twitter.com/guardian/status/885021119652220930 …
2:26 AM - 12 Jul 2017


That tweet isn't just a suggestion, it's an order: at the margins, having children makes you a bad person.

But sidelining the moral argument for a second, Filipovic's claim is also remarkable for its idiocy.

After all, the premise of Filipovic's argument — that Earth cannot co-exist with a growing human population — rests on the Guardian article that her tweet links to. That article references researchers who have listed all the things that produce carbon emissions."
Liberal columnist Jill Filipovic says having lots of kids is immoral


Since the view that the earth can't sustain 7 or 8 billion folks has been debunked numerous times, my presumption about the self-centeredness of Leftisim must be the case.



In fact one of the godfathers of Leftism put it this way:
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
Leon Trotsky

White and Asian women in the US, by their forties, have had the fewest number of children:

Family Size, by Race and Ethnicity

That is liberal white women by their forties have had the fewest number of children, because liberal women have been brainwashed to hate themselves. Nice job, when there aren't any liberals left, the world will be a better place.

 

[NYcarbineer]

It's always sadly comical to see conservatives pretending that they want the poor to have MORE children.

It isn't comical to see liberals protecting murders, rapists, and child molestors who every liberal wants to be one. What is worse is people like NY have voted for the shits.
Ted Kennedy - Murderer.
Bill Clinton - Rapist
Hillary Clinton - Enabler of a Rapist.
Victor Slava - Child molester
Disney Movie's Director a Convicted Child Molester : Hollywood: He says, 'I paid for my mistakes dearly,' but victim of incident several years ago urges boycott of 'Powder.'

WTF? lol.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I suppose the good news is that Liberalism is a self-defeating trap.
Conservatives and traditionalists have lots of children,but for Liberals, having children is a bad idea.

Of course it gets worse than that, as Leftists are all about abortion and eugenics, too.

Sooo....there should be fewer and fewer of them in the long run.




Check this out:
"Liberal columnist Jill Filipovic says having lots of kids is immoral
Jill Filipovic
✔@JillFilipovic
Having children is one of the worst things you can do for the planet. Have one less and conserve resources. https://twitter.com/guardian/status/885021119652220930 …
2:26 AM - 12 Jul 2017


That tweet isn't just a suggestion, it's an order: at the margins, having children makes you a bad person.

But sidelining the moral argument for a second, Filipovic's claim is also remarkable for its idiocy.

After all, the premise of Filipovic's argument — that Earth cannot co-exist with a growing human population — rests on the Guardian article that her tweet links to. That article references researchers who have listed all the things that produce carbon emissions."
Liberal columnist Jill Filipovic says having lots of kids is immoral


Since the view that the earth can't sustain 7 or 8 billion folks has been debunked numerous times, my presumption about the self-centeredness of Leftisim must be the case.



In fact one of the godfathers of Leftism put it this way:
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
Leon Trotsky

White and Asian women in the US, by their forties, have had the fewest number of children:

Family Size, by Race and Ethnicity

That is liberal white women by their forties have had the fewest number of children, because liberal women have been brainwashed to hate themselves. Nice job, when there aren't any liberals left, the world will be a better place.

It is? You deny that white Americans are disproportionately conservative?

Do you EVER have a thought that isn't nonsensical?

 

[PoliticalChic]

The New BS GOP hate/propaganda machine has hate and insults against Libs and Dems from every possible angle, and the dupes believe at all...like Obama was a dictator and a pussy. A disgrace.

OK, blanko....put your Dinaro where you put your dinner: Wanna justify this?

"Liberal columnist Jill Filipovic says having lots of kids is immoral
Jill Filipovic

✔@JillFilipovic
Having children is one of the worst things you can do for the planet. Have one less and conserve resources.https://twitter.com/guardian/status/885021119652220930 …
2:26 AM - 12 Jul 2017


That tweet isn't just a suggestion, it's an order:




How about this?

Zinnia Jones

✔@ZJemptv
I also don't believe the blanket claim of "straight men don't want to be with someone who has a dick!"

6:56 PM - 1 Jul 2017




These are the Libs and Dems speaking for themselves.



And you say....what?

You're distracted by BS propaganda and balogna. No orders involved...

Sooo....you won't defend these Liberal positions?

"Liberal columnist Jill Filipovic says having lots of kids is immoral
Jill Filipovic

✔@JillFilipovic
Having children is one of the worst things you can do for the planet. Have one less and conserve resources.https://twitter.com/guardian/status/885021119652220930 …
2:26 AM - 12 Jul 2017


That tweet isn't just a suggestion, it's an order:




How about this?

Zinnia Jones

✔@ZJemptv
I also don't believe the blanket claim of "straight men don't want to be with someone who has a dick!"

6:56 PM - 1 Jul 2017




Shootin' you down was really easy, huh?

They can say what they want. I agree with one to an extent and the other is nuts, and neither are Lib positions that I've heard of. Talk about distracted by bs...

"....neither are Lib positions..."

Of course they are....just as allowing grown men into the little girls' bathroom is a typical Liberal position.


The common thread is the destruction of traditional values and attitudes and morality.


Let's cut to the chase: earlier 'Liberals' and 'Progressives' were open enough to admit the basis for their doctrines:

1. There is no God:
"This concept is an essential element of Marxism. As Lenin stated: "Atheism is a natural and inseparable portion of Marxism, of the theory and practice of Scientific Socialism." If God exists and is in supreme command of the universe, He possesses discretionary power, and His actions cannot always be calculated accurately in advance. The whole edifice of Marxism collapses.

When Marx and the Communists deny the existence of God, they simultaneously deny the authority of the Ten Commandments, the existence of absolute standards of right and wrong, of good and evil; and man is left on the playing fields of the universe without a referee, without a book of rules. The winning side in any conflict can decide on what rules of conduct to apply. Morality is the creation of the victor."The Schwarz Report | Essays


2. As a result of Franklin Roosevelt's tireless efforts to make a home for communism in America, note the following and compare it to the Progressive/Liberal/Democrat view of religion in secular America:

"Just because any religious idea, any idea of any god at all, any flirtation even with a god, is the most inexpressible foulness, particularly tolerantly (and often even favourably) accepted by the democratic bourgeoisie—for that very reason it is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful “infection.” A million physicalsins, dirty tricks, acts of violence and infections are much more easily discovered by the crowd, and therefore are much less dangerous, than the nubile, spiritual idea of god, dressed up in the most attractive “ideological” costumes." Letter from Lenin to Maxim Gorky, Written on November 13 or 14, 1913 Lenin 55. TO MAXIM GORKY



This is the basis, the explanation, for every social doctrine view you've been taught in government schools, and by the secular media.

Wise up, you dolt.

 

[Moonglow]

It's always sadly comical to see conservatives pretending that they want the poor to have MORE children.

It isn't comical to see liberals protecting murders, rapists, and child molestors who every liberal wants to be one. What is worse is people like NY have voted for the shits.
Ted Kennedy - Murderer.
Bill Clinton - Rapist
Hillary Clinton - Enabler of a Rapist.
Victor Slava - Child molester
Disney Movie's Director a Convicted Child Molester : Hollywood: He says, 'I paid for my mistakes dearly,' but victim of incident several years ago urges boycott of 'Powder.'

WTF? lol.

See how the Sun bakes the brain?

 

[Moonglow]

The New BS GOP hate/propaganda machine has hate and insults against Libs and Dems from every possible angle, and the dupes believe at all...like Obama was a dictator and a pussy. A disgrace.

OK, blanko....put your Dinaro where you put your dinner: Wanna justify this?

"Liberal columnist Jill Filipovic says having lots of kids is immoral
Jill Filipovic

✔@JillFilipovic
Having children is one of the worst things you can do for the planet. Have one less and conserve resources.https://twitter.com/guardian/status/885021119652220930 …
2:26 AM - 12 Jul 2017


That tweet isn't just a suggestion, it's an order:




How about this?

Zinnia Jones

✔@ZJemptv
I also don't believe the blanket claim of "straight men don't want to be with someone who has a dick!"

6:56 PM - 1 Jul 2017




These are the Libs and Dems speaking for themselves.



And you say....what?

You're distracted by BS propaganda and balogna. No orders involved...

Sooo....you won't defend these Liberal positions?

"Liberal columnist Jill Filipovic says having lots of kids is immoral
Jill Filipovic

✔@JillFilipovic
Having children is one of the worst things you can do for the planet. Have one less and conserve resources.https://twitter.com/guardian/status/885021119652220930 …
2:26 AM - 12 Jul 2017


That tweet isn't just a suggestion, it's an order:




How about this?

Zinnia Jones

✔@ZJemptv
I also don't believe the blanket claim of "straight men don't want to be with someone who has a dick!"

6:56 PM - 1 Jul 2017




Shootin' you down was really easy, huh?

They can say what they want. I agree with one to an extent and the other is nuts, and neither are Lib positions that I've heard of. Talk about distracted by bs...

"....neither are Lib positions..."

Of course they are....just as allowing grown men into the little girls' bathroom is a typical Liberal position.


The common thread is the destruction of traditional values and attitudes and morality.


Let's cut to the chase: earlier 'Liberals' and 'Progressives' were open enough to admit the basis for their doctrines:

1. There is no God:
"This concept is an essential element of Marxism. As Lenin stated: "Atheism is a natural and inseparable portion of Marxism, of the theory and practice of Scientific Socialism." If God exists and is in supreme command of the universe, He possesses discretionary power, and His actions cannot always be calculated accurately in advance. The whole edifice of Marxism collapses.

When Marx and the Communists deny the existence of God, they simultaneously deny the authority of the Ten Commandments, the existence of absolute standards of right and wrong, of good and evil; and man is left on the playing fields of the universe without a referee, without a book of rules. The winning side in any conflict can decide on what rules of conduct to apply. Morality is the creation of the victor."The Schwarz Report | Essays


2. As a result of Franklin Roosevelt's tireless efforts to make a home for communism in America, note the following and compare it to the Progressive/Liberal/Democrat view of religion in secular America:

"Just because any religious idea, any idea of any god at all, any flirtation even with a god, is the most inexpressible foulness, particularly tolerantly (and often even favourably) accepted by the democratic bourgeoisie—for that very reason it is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful “infection.” A million physicalsins, dirty tricks, acts of violence and infections are much more easily discovered by the crowd, and therefore are much less dangerous, than the nubile, spiritual idea of god, dressed up in the most attractive “ideological” costumes." Letter from Lenin to Maxim Gorky, Written on November 13 or 14, 1913 Lenin 55. TO MAXIM GORKY



This is the basis, the explanation, for every social doctrine view you've been taught in government schools, and by the secular media.

Wise up, you dolt.

Yet FDR did not make a home for every communist as during his administration(1938) the House unAmerican Activities committee was started during his tenure as president. Lie number one...
FDR was a religious man and was ingrained with the community and it's sprituality, he may have drank high balls on Sunday but he was never a religious persecutor or purger.
Lie number two.
Just because Lenin wrote Gorky doesn't make it a matter that FDR has anything to do with it..

 

[PoliticalChic]

Clean up your language, and try again....and I'll shred your post.

you are not the boss of him or anyone else ...go make some sammiches and bring us cold beer ...

Looks like Political Chic made you her "B" again....you make it sooooo easy Tyrone.
She's smart, patient and willing to try to help those who refuse to see.....but she can only help those who allow themselves the air to breathe to feed those remaining cells in the noggin.

Why don't you stop being so hateful for just a minute and consider something she says just might change YOUR life for the better?

Thank you for that post, Human....
...and for that salient point 'just might change YOUR life for the better.'

They are an angry and bitter bunch, on the whole.

And, it fits with the presumption of the OP: to want to have children, one must have faith in the future...

And, as seen in this thread.....they seem not to.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Of what crime are you claiming the unborn is guilty?

and what crimes were these people guilty of ...Ivy LOL
Number Of Iraqis Slaughtered In US War And Occupation Of Iraq "1,455,590"

Here is the pertinent number:

TOTAL ABORTIONS SINCE 1973:
59,115,995

Based on numbers reported by the Guttmacher Institute 1973-2014, with projections of 926,190 for 2015-16. GI estimates a possible 3 percent under reporting rate, which is factored into the overall total. [1/17]

Christian Life Resources

Break that down to statistics, now many will be

• Abused
• Denied equal rights and an equal opportunity later in life
• Die before their 5th Birthday due to birth defects
• Born with a preexisting condition, and denied health care for life
• Raised in poverty
• Jailed or imprisoned
• Sold into the sex trade

And, once again, the most inept among us base their argument on the Magic 8-Ball.

You must be a Liberal, huh?

Government school grad?

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's the cons who are for personal responsibility by not having children until they can support them and not make someone else pay for their children! A concept you clearly have no clue of!

PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY!

That's pretty selfish of you .

HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH LIL TIMMY JUST MADE YOUR POINT FOR YOU!!! MIKE. More proof isn't needed. Murderers, just need to have abortions done on them. If they like them let them have a retroactive one.

I'll go with the Supreme Court, rather than be a wedge issue dupe of the giveaway-to-the-rich GOP, dupe. Abortion as as issue is over. Food stamps and WIC are for the unfortunate, unfortunate mainly because of GOP policy. Crap jobs, no training programs, corrupt bubbles busting, crap infrastructure, etc etc. Great job!.

Did you support the only President in nigh on a century who never had even 3% GDP growth.....with eight chances to do it?


You did?

Soooo....what are you complaining about?

The worst obstruction in living memory, ANOTHER GOP world depression, and brainwashed functional morons like you? We had the best economy in the world and still do...

There was never a GOP world depression.

FDR causes and extended the Depression....a Liberal Democrat.

And the mortgage meltdown was Democrat policy of invading the private housing market.


Own it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is a joke right . Everyone know that liberals are for helping those in need , helping those who are routinely targetd by the majority. . While cons are selfish opportunists .

Throw out any issue and you'll see this is true .

When have liberals ever helped anyone "in need"?

Well.....they 'needed' the votes of blacks and illegal aliens...so they 'helped' themselves to same.