NotYourBody
Gold Member
- May 25, 2019
- 2,237
- 492
Yes, they are putting more people in danger.So you think that simply because they are doing something in a diffrent place that they are putting more people in danger. Yet somehow you skip over the fact that they are doing those same things while at home. That little fifteen hundred foot cabin uses less resources compared to the large house but there might be a slight chance that they might run across someone and infect them instead of the normal people they come in contact with.I'm responding the the statement as written -So you are saying that these same people are not going out to buy groceries or fuel or even toilet paper? Sorry not only do I call that BS but I will say that is likely one of the dumbest posts all week.Just straight to the cabin. No stops required for gas or food supplies or anything else at all? No contact with any other person that is not immediate family? Bullshit.While I would agree with most of what you are saying I think you are missing one thing here. Most of them are upset that they can not go out on a lake, can not go to cabins that they have in the woods. Both of these do not require anyone but immediate family around them. In fact in most cases they would be farther apart then the so called social distancing of six feet.I understand the protests against tyranny. I understand fighting against being told you have to stay home.
What I don't get is why those idiots have to be told to stay home. The experts, and I mean real experts in virology and communicative diseases, have said the best way to prevent our medical system from being overwhelmed is to stay home and practice social distancing. I'm not talking about Dr Phil here, but people who work at the CDC ect.
Those people screaming about being told what to do are threatening American lives. Why aren't they willing to stay home on their own? Why is the gov't forced to tell them they HAVE to stay home.
Spring breakers wanted to go to the beach. They did and there was a surge in COVID-19 cases.
South Dakota refused to quarantine, and now they are a new hotspot for COVID-19 cases.
How many of those people who decided attending church services were more important than listening to experts are now sick?
These spoiled little assholes demand that they be able to go to the bar, go boating on the lake, play at the beach.
And they take this shit back to people who have compromised immune system. To the elderly.
And they want to call that patriotic? Patriots like that are killing people. American citizens!
"Most of them are upset that they can not go out on a lake, can not go to cabins that they have in the woods. Both of these do not require anyone but immediate family around them."
Simply not true. Depending on where the cabin is located, their giant SUV will require at least one tank of gas, probably more.
They'll need a trip to the grocery store.
Probably a trip to Walmart to stock up on ammo in case any libs try to invade.
20 miles into the trip, Liddle' Tiffany will need to pee.
40 miles in, Meemaw will get thirsty demand to stop for a Big Gulp.
45 miles in Meemaw needs to pee. Meemaw refuses to pee on the side of the road. Meemaw's a real bitch so you're gonna have to stop.
You get the picture. The best laid plans.
They're putting all kinds of people at risk because their feelings are hurt that they can't go play on the lake, or play at their cabin in the woods.
I really wonder how many of today's people would have gotten of the ships during DDay.
If they are taking the whole family, including Meemaw, to the the grocery store, and the gas station, and the places they need to go pee, and the Walmarts, every time they need something, then they are just fucking stupid.
And if anything happens on their little family adventure to the woods that causes them to need help, then they've potentially spread the infection further. That's how a virus works.
I do wonder what would happen to northern Michigan and the UP if the down-staters are allowed to spread north.