Life of the mother is not a reason to kill the baby in the womb......what 1,000 Doctors say....

[Mac-7]

Your presumption is suffocating.

Morality is suffocating to hedonists

 

[postman]

The reality is that women don’t require abortion to save their lives. As of January 2023, the Charlotte Lozier Institute found that only 0.2 percent of abortions occurred due to “risk to the woman’s life or a major bodily function” (emphasis mine).

Only 0.2% of abortions. That's one in 500

Meanwhile deaths from COVID were less than one in 1,000

Making pregnancy at least twice as deadly as COVID.

 

[postman]

then why did colorado pass a law up to 9 months for any reason???
so go the fuck away with that shit,,,

Because of things like pre-eclampsia.

Between 10 to 15 percent of maternal deaths worldwide are caused by preeclampsia

And you are talking about doctors taking extreme measures to save the womans life, that the abortion ban would preclude them from using.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Because of things like pre-eclampsia.

Between 10 to 15 percent of maternal deaths worldwide are caused by preeclampsia

And you are talking about doctors taking extreme measures to save the womans life, that the abortion ban would preclude them from using.

It is so damned fucking stupid...just for brownie points in Heaven.

 

[postman]

It's not though that body she is murdering belongs to a separate sentient being with it's own DNA. Why does the father who plays an equal part in creation of the child get no say. Please refrain from he doesn't carry it that is a well known fact before said pregnancy occurs

Pretty much the same reason the person with the pacemaker decides whether or not to have it removed, instead of the surgeon who installed it in the first place.

 

[postman]

I have already stated that mothers have an equal right to life as the unborn child has

Thats the only time they have a moral right to kill their baby

What happened to the right of self defense.

If the threat to the mothers life came from an armed gunman, you would say she had the right to kill him, without even blinking an eye.

If because of medical complication the fetus was killing the mother, and could not be safely removed intact, why shouldn't the same principle hold.

 

[Mac-7]

I didn't cast 2 votes for a rapist.

Neither did I

When you engage in bombast it hurts your arguement

 

[postman]

It is so damned fucking stupid...just for brownie points in Heaven.

The life/health of the mother exception is important, but used very rarely. But for the mother put into an life or death choice, it's her life or the babies life, an abortion law shouldn't be a death sentence.

 

[Mac-7]

What happened to the right of self defense.

If the threat to the mothers life came from an armed gunman, you would say she had the right to kill him, without even blinking an eye.

If because of medical complication the fetus was killing the mother, and could not be safely removed intact, why shouldn't the same principle hold.

I just told you that mothers have a moral right to kill their unborn child if their own life is at stake

Cant you take yes for an answer?

 

[postman]

I just told you that mothers have a moral right to kill their unborn child if their own life is at stake

Cant you take yes for an answer?

The problem is the abortion laws don't include your judgement.

 

[Pete7469]

It sounds like people are suggesting we should do away with an exception for the mother’s life. How barbaric.

I would agree that if there is a risk of death to the mother, and she is amicable to termination of the pregnancy, then so be it. There shouldn't be a need to get govt involved either.

That said, the circumstance is probably so rare that it's not a real issue. The bottom line is that the abortion is beyond barbaric itself. It's an act of a savage criminal.


.

 

[Pete7469]

Neither did I

When you engage in bombast it hurts your arguement

That imbecile isn't as bright as the horse he rode in on.

 

[Pete7469]

Which means what exactly?

You're a sick fuck looking to murder a baby and use a bullshit excuse.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Neither did I

When you engage in bombast it hurts your arguement

Right.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

 

[progressive hunter]

Because of things like pre-eclampsia.

Between 10 to 15 percent of maternal deaths worldwide are caused by preeclampsia

And you are talking about doctors taking extreme measures to save the womans life, that the abortion ban would preclude them from using.

but the law is unrestricted,, that means for no reason at all,,

thanks for stopping by and showing how braindead you are,,

 

[Mac-7]

The problem is the abortion laws don't include your judgement.

The laws reflect both our opinions

And recently more to my side than yours

 

[Mac-7]

That imbecile isn't as bright as the horse he rode in on.

You must be referring to biden

 

[Mac-7]

Right.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

The jury disagreed

 

[progressive hunter]

It is her body. Not yours.

the baby inside her isnt her body,,

 

[Pete7469]

You must be referring to biden

No, the poster. He is an imbecile. Xiden is too, but the potato isn't part of the thread.