BlackSand
Nobody
- Oct 23, 2013
- 22,062
- 12,230
- 1,435
These Teapartiers are so full of it.Why'd you call her Lizzy then?I never said she wasn't important.
Because "Lizzy" minimizes her importance......![]()
The minimization is exactly what I am talking about ... Only that it occurs on the Progressive Liberal side.
Like the pajamas for homeless approach ... Progressive Liberals think and encourage others to support programs that make them feel good about their activities ... And like they are helping someone. In reality, the only thing a pair of pajamas will help a homeless person living in a cardboard box do ... Is freeze to death.
The same types of policies are apparent everywhere ... Short-sighted well intended feel good policies that do not provide any assistance in substance and cause more damage in the long run.
She is very important to Progressive Liberals ... Because she is very effective in enabling their ability to think they are "screwing the man" while doing nothing more than screwing everything up.
.
Since when is Welfare just a feel-good program? Conservatives are the ones that like feel-good policies, they would like do away with Welfare and Food Stamps....that really makes conservatives feel good.
Conservatives aren't getting rid of welfare any more than welfare is solving the problems at the root cause. Not to mention I didn't single out welfare and Elizabeth Warren hasn't suggested any welfare reforms.
If you think Welfare and Food Stamps are the extent of Elizabeth Warren's campaign ... You might want to call up her office and try to get her back on that page.
.
Last edited: