Like I already said and posted. I rely ONLY with my own country’s intelligence which the best in the world. I will stick with that till I hear from themI was responding to Todds rebuttal. Asking me a question that is pure nonsense. Of course it’s in Iran.Our own intelligence CIA or American nuclear scientists inspectors. Provided NO such violations.No Todd. We rely on our source from the people that are handling this nuclear program. We believe in our own intelligence. Not from Russia or Qanon, or Facebook or conspiracies or unknown media. The nuclear inspectors are mostly US scientists. Did you hear any from them or any countries that are involved that Iran violated the agreement?But a wee bit less than the guy who knows Iran stopped making nuclear bombs for a while. Which is most peopleMore than me? You are dreaming my dear.You are just a Trump supporter. What do you know?In nuclear discussion and physicists that is the same. You do not get to pick and choose to fit your agenda.Hard vs heavy. You misspoke.Your evidence that they never stopped building their nuclear weapons is WHERE?Letting dangerous prisoners out of prisons ? Check.oh like RUSSIALatest attack...by whom? Flynn's lawyers? Wha? I literally just said it would fall flat. You complain about so much crap that you don't even remember what you are complaining about. You're not making sense.And when this latest attack falls, flat like the rest
IMPEACHMENT
any other attack on trump that has fallen flat and backfired.
y'all just and wait to be told what to be mad about today. fucking pathetic.
You're gonna follow Dear Leader straight the fuck off a cliff.
Enjoy the ride man - Enjoy the ride!!
Allowing babies to be aborted at late stage pregnancy ? Check.
Being authoritarian when ever get power ? Check.
Creating dependency in society beyond imagination ? Check.
Destroying an economy for millions in regards to myths and feel good assumptions ? Check.
Ignoring #metoo when it is inconvenient or detrimental to party officials ? Check.
Allowing traitor's to go free or get taxpayer funded services for elective procedures without taxpayer consent ? Check.
Promoting open borders ? Check.
Supporting illegals over American's ? Check.
Forcing taxpayers to be involved in leftist government controlled policies, it's thinking, it's cultures, and/or it's procedures as is promoted or forced by a leftist controlled government ? Check.
Destroying the economy in certain sectors by rules and regulation in an attempt to force a square peg into a round hole ? Check.
Feeling sorry for heinous criminals, otherwise that they might squirm a little when being administered the lethal drug upon execution for their heinous crimes, therefore taking not into consideration what they did to the innocent for whom they abused and terrorized prior to their deaths ? Check.
Supporting sanctuary areas/cities, and not reporting illegals to ICE, and therefore endangering American's who might be abused by an individual living off the grid for reasons of their cheap labor sought after.
On and on it goes..... Now who is following who off the cliff ??
WE'RE the party of authoritarianism when YOU elected a rat bastard who greatly prefers murderous dictators to the leaders of countries that used to be our allies? Comical!
The rest of your screed has no basis in fact either - And for the record, I'm not a Democrat, but rather one who knows the dire necessity of removing an amoral, self-absorbed, empathy and science free short-fingered vulgarian.
He "prefers" them you say? Hmm, lets look at your hero's, shall we? obummer gave the terrorist regime of Iran the bomb. They would never have had the ability if it weren't for bush, clinton, and of course obummer and his helpful idiot, john kerry. They talked tough, oh yes they talked real tough, and gave Iran everything they wanted. That is a fact.
trump comes in and talks to Iran like they are assholes (because they are0 and cancels the worst deal in world history, and kills one of their terrorist generals. In Korea, the fat little fool has been developing his rockets and nukes for decades. Once again, clinto, bush, and obummer talked tough, but the fat little bastard got everything he wanted. Trump, on the other hand, talks sweet as silk to the fat little bastard, AND GIVES HIM NOTHING!
You, are an idiot.
Well.
Under Trump did Kim Jung Un gave up his toys and stop updating his toys? Or stop firing blanks missiles towards Japan? Answer is NO.
Under Trump. Did he able stop the Iranian from making nuclear weapons? Answer is NO.
So What did Trump accomplish? NOTHING. The sad part of these, the mullahs are now building their nuclear weapons. Thanks to Trump.
.
The sad part of these, the mullahs are now building their nuclear weapons.
The sad part of these, the mullahs never stopped building their nuclear weapons.
if they didn’t stopped that was five years ago when Obama the true leader of USA stepped in they could have the weapons by now. Don't you think?
Before you talk about any topics like this nuclear programs. You NEED to understand the process. Iran has already lots of nuclear grade plutonium to make a nuclear weapons. Except the facilities that makes hard water facilities in located Arak. That was completed late last year. Thanks to Trump.
if they didn’t stopped that was five years ago when Obama the true leader of USA stepped in they could have the weapons by now.
They could.
Except the facilities that makes hard water facilities in located Arak.
Hard water? DURR
Yes my dear. You may want to check the relationship of a hard water in making nuclear weapons. It is a very important process and special facilities in making a nuclear bomb.
Heavy water looks like water, but is about 10 percent heavier. Plain water (H2O) has two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom. In heavy water there is deuterium instead of hydrogen, and while regular hydrogen has one proton in its nucleus, the deutrium has both one proton and one neutron. Thus, it becomes heavier.
So prepare for 117 pages of the toddinator pointing it out.
No. Hard water is not the same as heavy water.
Physicists don't use the terms interchangeably.
More than you.....really low bar, I know.
Yes, I know more than the guy who thinks there are "hard water" reactors out there.
Yes, your faith in the trustworthiness of the mullahs is sweet......
WHERE and WHAT is your EVIDENCE that Iran violated the agreement? You have nothing except coming from this lousy, liar and inept president.
Dat doesn’t mean we love the mullahs.
.
We rely on our source from the people that are handling this nuclear program. We believe in our own intelligence.
That's good to know. What did those sources say about nuclear research activity on Iranian military bases?
If there are or any reliable proof that Iran violated the agreement. I will publish it myself.
Who do you believe Todd’s?
.
Our own intelligence CIA or American nuclear scientists inspectors. Provided NO such violations.
And which military sites did our inspectors, or any inspectors, look at?
Dude you are a waste of my time. You are asking a question that is pure nonsense.
Let me entertain you. They inspected the nuclear reactor in Tijuana, Mexico. That’s right in Mexico.
I don't know what you are smoking, but there is no nuke in TJ. Mexico has one nuclear power plant, and it's on the opposite coast.
I said previously that I relied on our US intelligence to provide us of any reports of any such Iran violations. Our intelligence agencies are the best in the world. Am I supposed to ignored that? Then believe all these nonsense conspiracies and accusations? We have not heard any violations. Did you hear anything?
.
However you ignore the fact that the iran deal specifically prevented inspectors from inspecting military sites, and any site that was being inspected had to have at least a 24 day warning, but iran could delay them for up to 54 days. How do you expect ANY actual inspection to be going on with those sorts of limitations?
"The final agreement announced on July 14, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), does contain significant enhancements to the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) current ability to monitor Iran’s nuclear facilities. The deal, President Obama told the nation, “is not built on trust, it is built on verification.” Yet, one critical provision of the JCPOA puts unexpected limitations on inspectors’ access to certain facilities by requiring them to notify Iran first if they suspect a site might be being used for illicit nuclear activity and then undergoing a long process in order to gain entry to that site. This obstacle to inspections is worrying for several reasons:
- Iran could delay inspectors for as long as 54, not the commonly reported 24, days
- The burden of proof is on IAEA
- It chills intelligence sharing
- It discourages long shots
- It does not address a parallel enrichment program
- And it could allow for weaponization activities
Iran Deal Limits Inspectors’ Access to Suspicious Sites | Bipartisan Policy Center
The merits of the final deal's verification measures have to be judged on the basis of the authority it gives inspectors to access potential…bipartisanpolicy.org
Why is it that every time I ran into this topic they always posts that came from unknown media. If there are any truth of that. Why is Trump not using that to prove to the world that Iran is in violations? Just doesn’t make sense.
.
And I just showed you how our intelligence community has been neutered by the deal that obummer and kerry engineered. Beneficial only to the iranian regime, not the rest of the world.