- Mar 23, 2013
- 29,838
- 16,700
George Soros said so....Cause Trump said so…
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
George Soros said so....Cause Trump said so…
Ignorance among bed wetters in general is a willful and deliberate pursuit. Though they're not happy just being stupid by themselves. They feel compelled to block information from getting to everyone else.Slade is a Democrat. There’s a lot he doesn’t understand,
What if a defendant lies to his lawyers about having documents with classification markers, something those lawyers then attest to in response to a federal subpoena. Is that obstruction of justice?
These clueless discussion board legal analysts suckIf bank robbers walk into a bank and attempt to rob a bank, then they get charged with attempted bank robbery. Not for robbing the bank.
Of course it is. What planet do you live on?No, why would it be?
The charge is that he attempted to delete security footage.Could be, might be, maybe, and it's damning
That remains to be seenIf the tapes were not deleted, it will be pretty tough to prove that Trump ordered them to be deleted. Especially with the left's claim that Trump is constantly surrounded by a worshipful cult.
And here with are with more of the phone call heresy bullshitaccused the former president of being a part of a scheme to delete Mar-a-Lago security tapes.
Not a single person has argued they were deleted. This is little more than an attempt to deflect what happened. Trump tried to get the person over the tapes to delete them but in the end the guy did not delete them.
In comparison it would be more like a person hiring another to kill someone but that person turns them in instead. This is likely what has happened. Not wanting to get in trouble themselves, they ratted out Trump.
The phone call you fucking clowns haven't learnedThat remains to be seen
Which case is in D.C.? The 1/6 and before case against Trump? Has there been indictments yet, on this case? Or they are still just expected to?That's why they're trying the case in DC.
If you attempt to destroy subpoenaed evidence that is obstruction of Justice. If you tell someone to do it that’s conspiracy.How? Be specific.
Mark Levin?
Jesus dude.
If you attempt to destroy subpoenaed evidence that is obstruction of Justice. If you tell someone to do it that’s conspiracy.
You think not?
Again you have it wrong.You mean like Hillary actually did? The question in this case is someone told Trumps attorneys something that may or may not be true.
Those attorneys told Smith, which is a breach of ethics. Sounds like team Trump was figuring out who was a traitor.
And it was TRUMP that told those attorneys that there were no docs marked classified.You mean like Hillary actually did? The question in this case is someone told Trumps attorneys something that may or may not be true.
Those attorneys told Smith, which is a breach of ethics. Sounds like team Trump was figuring out who was a traitor.
Which also exposed more unethical behavior on the part of Smith.
A true scumbag in every way.
I don’t CARE what he said. He’s a bigger liar than TuckemsRefute anything he said?