Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and there it is blame the bush. it's what one does when one is incompetent to do the job of president.No, it was pretty much expected. After Bush passed the Bust tax cuts costing trillions in revenue and the GOP helped business move millions of jobs to China and close over 43,000 factories which cost trillions more, and the unpaid for wars costing trillions, the US lost all that revenue. When you knock all the revenue from the US government, the only way it could still run in by borrowing. And Republicans blocked anything Obama tried to do to raise revenue or pay down the debt.The drivers of the ObamaEconomy: Unemployment, food stamps and part time work
Try putting that on someones plate when they get hungry from not receiving time and a half. Essentially this is so indefensible the only option you have is to complain about liberals and ignore that liberals arent the only people who earn time and a half pay.
Obama's $10 Trillion debt has done more damage to the economy that anyone dared to dream
You would have to be a total tard to not know that. Not only was the history fairly recent, but Republicans boasted about doing it.
Unemployment benefits: not until Bush tax cuts pass, Senate GOP says
Republicans held millions of Republicans who lost their jobs under their GOP leadership hostage and that president couldn't let Republicans suffer because he was president for all Americans. Even when they wanted him destroyed. He is better than they are, obviously.
who was the biggest group to vote for trump? Do you even fking know? The group you just posted your stupid with. THE WORKING MAN. holy fk are you a loser. Dude, you are getting worse. You must have a virus and you can't shake it and your mind is dying.The GOP hates the working man and sucks the rich mans dick every chance they get. To hell with the GOP.
Abolish the gop and chase them out of this country.
what do you mean no one blamed trump yet. the entire thread was with the intent to blame Trump. fk, more of your stupid splashed in the forum.Thats why the title says he's SET to make those changes indicating that he's hasnt done it yet. Its right there in the title, theres no need to repeat it and get mad about it
"Under a Republican plan" is also in the title and it has nothing to do with what a federal judge has already done.
Thats why he didnt mention the federal judge either. Now you're getting it
All I see is an attempt to blame Trump for something that hasn't even happened yet. It is merely an attempt by a President to dictate the wages that private companies pay their employees and that is not in his job description.
No one blamed Trump because again it says he is SET to do it. Not that he HAS done it. But if its in his plan to do it dont you believe that plan is not a good plan for those who rely on time and a half overtime?
I mean is time and a half bad now?
You can't possibly know that as you already admitted you never tried.....
dude, it's exactly the platform Donald ran on. Make it great again. Notice the again? it's because the libs fked it up so bad it isn't recognizable. And the libs lying were out there telling you it was great. It's why Trump won.And you then believe america is so great. Lmao.
I commented on your statement.what do you mean no one blamed trump yet. the entire thread was with the intent to blame Trump. fk, more of your stupid splashed in the forum."Under a Republican plan" is also in the title and it has nothing to do with what a federal judge has already done.
Thats why he didnt mention the federal judge either. Now you're getting it
All I see is an attempt to blame Trump for something that hasn't even happened yet. It is merely an attempt by a President to dictate the wages that private companies pay their employees and that is not in his job description.
No one blamed Trump because again it says he is SET to do it. Not that he HAS done it. But if its in his plan to do it dont you believe that plan is not a good plan for those who rely on time and a half overtime?
I mean is time and a half bad now?
You're talking around the topic
I commented on your statement.what do you mean no one blamed trump yet. the entire thread was with the intent to blame Trump. fk, more of your stupid splashed in the forum.Thats why he didnt mention the federal judge either. Now you're getting it
All I see is an attempt to blame Trump for something that hasn't even happened yet. It is merely an attempt by a President to dictate the wages that private companies pay their employees and that is not in his job description.
No one blamed Trump because again it says he is SET to do it. Not that he HAS done it. But if its in his plan to do it dont you believe that plan is not a good plan for those who rely on time and a half overtime?
I mean is time and a half bad now?
You're talking around the topic
I would never take a wage or job protected position....I'm just not a slave....You can't possibly know that as you already admitted you never tried.....
Actually, yes I can. I work in a Union shop, in a job classification that's basically protected by State regulations. The only place UP I could go, is a bid position that I gave no interest in bidding to. There are more than sufficient people below me to ensure I'd still be there, even in a reduction. Next May I become wage and job protected.
I can stay in this position for the next 35 years and just do what I've done for the last 16 years.
I never had any interest in progressing past this level of employment. I'm quite content where I am. Why would I rock that boat?
ever have a candidate that didn't have uber money?The working man has no candidate when the candidates are uber wealthy. Uber wealthy folk like hip liar and rump surely care about working folk.......and if you believe that...
We do get overtime dumbass. Why can't you fucking foreigners mind your own business & find a forum about YOUR OWN COUNTRYAmerica is really terrible for the poor and workers etc. In Austria its normal to get overtime pay. I cant imagine how you work overtime hours but dont get paid. To me this is slavery.
define working man. it's what I asked. I thought the middle class didn't vote for Trump. So how is this any news about anyone voting for trump?now wait, did the middle class vote for Trump or Clinton? I'm now confused. I thought all you lefts were saying the GOP isn't for working man? Now we're concerned they might lose something they did vote for? are you sure? come on. stop playing around in here. which is it?
How is this a benefit for the working man?
but that is the OP. So what is it you're confused about. I don't care how many you said, I was referring to the everyone mentioned in the OP.isn't that the OP though? everyone?The only thing that can happen now is for people who defend Trump to start addressing the issue. "The Issue" of course will be anyone who has the nerve to complain about time and a half pay. Not the defense for why time and a half is a bad thing for the lowest people in the economy. Less than $47,000?
it isn't everyone who makes under $47k, its the threshold for being considered a salaried employee, i.e. management. I am salaried, and I make straight time when I work OT. My next promotion would remove even that, because I am a supervisor.
The threshold used to be 23K, this rule raised it to $47k.
I didnt indicate it was everyone thats why I mentioned the overtime pay showing that I know that everyone doesnt do overtime
Sine you missed it the first few times I'll say it again. No, I'm not talking about everyone. If you read that and still come to conclusion that when I say not everyone I really men everyone that's your problem. Not mine
There is also hourly pay with no extra over time pay, and this is suitable, IMO, for cases where an employee might want to work extra hours to meet a deadline, etc, without riding the clock or costing his employer an excessive rate.It is something that covers salary workers, not hourly.
....
If paying more for hours worked over 40 is mandatory, and they are not allowed to reduce the paycheck for hours not met, this is a bad deal for the company. Salary works well for both the employee and the company, it allows both to have a set dollar amount for planning purposes. paying overtime to a salary employee takes away the benefit of a fixed expense from the company. At this point, my choice of an employer would be to no longer have salary positions in the first place. If an employee was salary at 45,000 a year, I would move him to hourly at 21.65 an hour and pay him only the hours worked. (and paid vacations).
The employee would lose in that deal.
1. Anyone that has to work to keep their house, car, life style, etc, is working class.define working man. it's what I asked. I thought the middle class didn't vote for Trump. So how is this any news about anyone voting for trump?
but you libs said that trump didn't get the working man's vote. So which is it? He did or didn't?who was the biggest group to vote for trump? Do you even fking know? The group you just posted your stupid with. THE WORKING MAN. holy fk are you a loser. Dude, you are getting worse. You must have a virus and you can't shake it and your mind is dying.The GOP hates the working man and sucks the rich mans dick every chance they get. To hell with the GOP.
Abolish the gop and chase them out of this country.
The point of the post is to suggest the the WORKING MAN was fooled into voting against his interests.
The con job involves using the Culture War to cajole uninformed people into the voting booth where they pull the lever for tax, regulatory, labor and trade policies that benefit a very small group of people.
Trump added Trade Policy to the formula in order to flip Rust Belt democrats who haven't seen livable wages since Reagan dismantled their unions and overturned the postwar compact that tied American Capital to American Labor.
then why did you make the statement?I commented on your statement.what do you mean no one blamed trump yet. the entire thread was with the intent to blame Trump. fk, more of your stupid splashed in the forum.All I see is an attempt to blame Trump for something that hasn't even happened yet. It is merely an attempt by a President to dictate the wages that private companies pay their employees and that is not in his job description.
No one blamed Trump because again it says he is SET to do it. Not that he HAS done it. But if its in his plan to do it dont you believe that plan is not a good plan for those who rely on time and a half overtime?
I mean is time and a half bad now?
You're talking around the topic
And thats not the topic.
and again, that is usually rewarded with paid timeoff.There is also hourly pay with no extra over time pay, and this is suitable, IMO, for cases where an employee might want to work extra hours to meet a deadline, etc, without riding the clock or costing his employer an excessive rate.It is something that covers salary workers, not hourly.
....
If paying more for hours worked over 40 is mandatory, and they are not allowed to reduce the paycheck for hours not met, this is a bad deal for the company. Salary works well for both the employee and the company, it allows both to have a set dollar amount for planning purposes. paying overtime to a salary employee takes away the benefit of a fixed expense from the company. At this point, my choice of an employer would be to no longer have salary positions in the first place. If an employee was salary at 45,000 a year, I would move him to hourly at 21.65 an hour and pay him only the hours worked. (and paid vacations).
The employee would lose in that deal.
I never complained about itand again, that is usually rewarded with paid timeoff.There is also hourly pay with no extra over time pay, and this is suitable, IMO, for cases where an employee might want to work extra hours to meet a deadline, etc, without riding the clock or costing his employer an excessive rate.It is something that covers salary workers, not hourly.
....
If paying more for hours worked over 40 is mandatory, and they are not allowed to reduce the paycheck for hours not met, this is a bad deal for the company. Salary works well for both the employee and the company, it allows both to have a set dollar amount for planning purposes. paying overtime to a salary employee takes away the benefit of a fixed expense from the company. At this point, my choice of an employer would be to no longer have salary positions in the first place. If an employee was salary at 45,000 a year, I would move him to hourly at 21.65 an hour and pay him only the hours worked. (and paid vacations).
The employee would lose in that deal.
yeah I know, but it's a trap the left wound up in because of the OP. I know a majority of middle class people voted for trump, the disenfranchised, forgotten class from the GOP and Demoboobs politics.1. Anyone that has to work to keep their house, car, life style,e tc, is working class.define working man. it's what I asked. I thought the middle class didn't vote for Trump. So how is this any news about anyone voting for trump?
2. The middle class did vote for Trump.
3. Libtards are going to whine about a Republican no matter why.
