Mississippi pass most anti-LGBT bill to date

[Tommy Tainant]

Mississippi pass most anti-LGBT bill to date

It claims that the law could see a woman fired from her job for wearing trousers, a counsellor on a suicide line refuse to speak to an LGBT teenager or even an adoption agency refuse to place a child with a family because the parents lived together before they were married.

This is lunacy on a majestic scale.Is the South so far behind the civilised world ?

Honestly, if I were you I would relax. The war is going very well for their side. You have won almost all the battles since the 60s. This mississippi thing is but a very minor and temporary irritant that will get overruled. Just like when 30 out of 30 states all voted against gay marriage in referendums not more than 10 years ago. It wasn't long before our courts took over and righted that "wrong."

Secularism rules. Perversion rules. Christians have become pariahs and their beliefs are roundly mocked and ostracized.

Our only chance of prevailing or gaining any ground is if our "hunch" about Jesus returning comes true.

Theocracies dont have a great track record.

It strikes me that the injured Christian defence has been used before.

Wasnt slavery defended by the Baptists using citations from the bible ? Eventually they had to admit that they were wrong.

Now its the turn of Gay people because ,lets face it,ignorant people have to hate somebody.

Again a couple of passages in the Bible are used to support this.

Its a nonsense. The Bible has a stance on just about everything. And yet its the Gays who are the target.

Why is there is no law to enable the baker to refuse service to the car thief ?

Or the Buddhist or Muslim or Hindu. How do followers of a "False God" rank in front of Christian Gays ?

How does the straight drug dealer get more respect than the Gay heart surgeon ?

In my view its very straightforward.

Its because there is a dwindling group of people who are uncomfortable with change and also have an unhealthy attitude to sex.

They select passages from the scriptures to back up their sickness and use it to oppress all of us.

Theocracies dont have a great track record.

So, no one is asking for a theocracy or even discussing one.


It strikes me that the injured Christian defence has been used before.

Well, whatever. I don’t know what you are talking about.


Wasnt slavery defended by the Baptists using citations from the bible ? Eventually they had to admit that they were wrong.

Admit it to who? To the greater Christian movement that was the main force trying to route out slavery. I am not conceding Baptists were this element you are accusing them of, it does not matter. But I love how the modern day unbelievers love to judge and indict Christians of centuries ago for not living their lives of a 21st century denizen of this planet. Of course those passing judgment on ancient Christians do not ever consider what the heathens were doing back then, and how nations were dealing with adversities, etc. It’s all this new age ethics should have all been known then and no other elements may have dictated how life was lived. It’s really lame, imo, to have to keep hearing that as their main argument.


Now its the turn of Gay people because ,lets face it,ignorant people have to hate somebody.

Not sure how much time I can spend addressing your stupidity.


Again a couple of passages in the Bible are used to support this.Its a nonsense. The Bible has a stance on just about everything. And yet its the Gays who are the target.

What passage did I use? You are the one who needs to put words in our mouths to make your own case look better. Lame. I may very well provide evidence for God and from that provide evidence for the Catholic Church as God’s representative here on earth. Now if you can refute my evidence for God, then you may have some merit. But I am not worried about that.


Why is there is no law to enable the baker to refuse service to the car thief ?

It is your side who is more interested in punishing and routing out Christians than you are in making sure a gay person can get a cake baked at any bakery of his choice. After all, if that was your push, then you would have the courage to go harass Muslim bakeries. But you don’t. You and/or this gay movement want to destroy Christianity and the one true God --- that is your mission – because Christianity makes you all so uncomfortable and you just will not have your egos and your pleasures challenged.


Or the Buddhist or Muslim or Hindu. How do followers of a "False God" rank in front of Christian Gays ?

I do not think you are ready as a student to listen fairly to an answer. But if you insist I will provide one.


How does the straight drug dealer get more respect than the Gay heart surgeon ? In my view its very straightforward. It’s because there is a dwindling group of people who are uncomfortable with change and also have an unhealthy attitude to sex. They select passages from the scriptures to back up their sickness and use it to oppress all of us.

No, that is not it at all. The fact the “group” may be “dwindling” provides not even an iota of greater evidence for your case. Ok? The vast majority of people do not believe in purgatory either, that is hardly going to make any impression on Catholic teaching.

So what was your next point?... oh, that we have an “unhealthy” attitude toward sex. Oh, yes. According to who? According to all those who want to have their sex served as they demand and without any consequence or repercussions for it. Well, that sounds convenient. Look, I already told you --- our understanding come from knowing there is extremely well documented empirical evidence for the Judeo-Christian God. And His messages have been given in a myriad of ways, none so strong as what the Catholic Church teaches and what the saints have revealed. And the saints have provided amazing signs and wonders to validate their words. So there is no need for us to look any further than to know 1) legalized abortion is very wrong and sinful, and 2) gay marriage is wrong and a pox on society. We as a society shall pay dearly for telling God --- “yes, we hear you God, we are simply not interested in what you want of us.”

You havent really addressed any of my points.

My case is this.Those who are pushing for a religious exemption are very selective in who they are targeting.

Let me reduce it to a simple question.

Why do the religious bigots target Gays and not other groups who are condemned in the bible ?

I provided some examples for you. Here is another.

How does a murderer get his cake but the Gay cop doesnt ?

Unless you can give a credible answer then you have no case.

 

[nicolondon]

Maybe they should relocate the state to the Middle East. What a backward step, who are these imbeciles who vote through this legislation. Probably hypocritical men who are shagging their secretaries or paying for male escorts on the side and then try and dictate how others live.

 

[Katzndogz]

Mississippi pass most anti-LGBT bill to date

It claims that the law could see a woman fired from her job for wearing trousers, a counsellor on a suicide line refuse to speak to an LGBT teenager or even an adoption agency refuse to place a child with a family because the parents lived together before they were married.

This is lunacy on a majestic scale.Is the South so far behind the civilised world ?

Honestly, if I were you I would relax. The war is going very well for their side. You have won almost all the battles since the 60s. This mississippi thing is but a very minor and temporary irritant that will get overruled. Just like when 30 out of 30 states all voted against gay marriage in referendums not more than 10 years ago. It wasn't long before our courts took over and righted that "wrong."

Secularism rules. Perversion rules. Christians have become pariahs and their beliefs are roundly mocked and ostracized.

Our only chance of prevailing or gaining any ground is if our "hunch" about Jesus returning comes true.

Theocracies dont have a great track record.

It strikes me that the injured Christian defence has been used before.

Wasnt slavery defended by the Baptists using citations from the bible ? Eventually they had to admit that they were wrong.

Now its the turn of Gay people because ,lets face it,ignorant people have to hate somebody.

Again a couple of passages in the Bible are used to support this.

Its a nonsense. The Bible has a stance on just about everything. And yet its the Gays who are the target.

Why is there is no law to enable the baker to refuse service to the car thief ?

Or the Buddhist or Muslim or Hindu. How do followers of a "False God" rank in front of Christian Gays ?

How does the straight drug dealer get more respect than the Gay heart surgeon ?

In my view its very straightforward.

Its because there is a dwindling group of people who are uncomfortable with change and also have an unhealthy attitude to sex.

They select passages from the scriptures to back up their sickness and use it to oppress all of us.

Theocracies dont have a great track record.

So, no one is asking for a theocracy or even discussing one.


It strikes me that the injured Christian defence has been used before.

Well, whatever. I don’t know what you are talking about.


Wasnt slavery defended by the Baptists using citations from the bible ? Eventually they had to admit that they were wrong.

Admit it to who? To the greater Christian movement that was the main force trying to route out slavery. I am not conceding Baptists were this element you are accusing them of, it does not matter. But I love how the modern day unbelievers love to judge and indict Christians of centuries ago for not living their lives of a 21st century denizen of this planet. Of course those passing judgment on ancient Christians do not ever consider what the heathens were doing back then, and how nations were dealing with adversities, etc. It’s all this new age ethics should have all been known then and no other elements may have dictated how life was lived. It’s really lame, imo, to have to keep hearing that as their main argument.


Now its the turn of Gay people because ,lets face it,ignorant people have to hate somebody.

Not sure how much time I can spend addressing your stupidity.


Again a couple of passages in the Bible are used to support this.Its a nonsense. The Bible has a stance on just about everything. And yet its the Gays who are the target.

What passage did I use? You are the one who needs to put words in our mouths to make your own case look better. Lame. I may very well provide evidence for God and from that provide evidence for the Catholic Church as God’s representative here on earth. Now if you can refute my evidence for God, then you may have some merit. But I am not worried about that.


Why is there is no law to enable the baker to refuse service to the car thief ?

It is your side who is more interested in punishing and routing out Christians than you are in making sure a gay person can get a cake baked at any bakery of his choice. After all, if that was your push, then you would have the courage to go harass Muslim bakeries. But you don’t. You and/or this gay movement want to destroy Christianity and the one true God --- that is your mission – because Christianity makes you all so uncomfortable and you just will not have your egos and your pleasures challenged.


Or the Buddhist or Muslim or Hindu. How do followers of a "False God" rank in front of Christian Gays ?

I do not think you are ready as a student to listen fairly to an answer. But if you insist I will provide one.


How does the straight drug dealer get more respect than the Gay heart surgeon ? In my view its very straightforward. It’s because there is a dwindling group of people who are uncomfortable with change and also have an unhealthy attitude to sex. They select passages from the scriptures to back up their sickness and use it to oppress all of us.

No, that is not it at all. The fact the “group” may be “dwindling” provides not even an iota of greater evidence for your case. Ok? The vast majority of people do not believe in purgatory either, that is hardly going to make any impression on Catholic teaching.

So what was your next point?... oh, that we have an “unhealthy” attitude toward sex. Oh, yes. According to who? According to all those who want to have their sex served as they demand and without any consequence or repercussions for it. Well, that sounds convenient. Look, I already told you --- our understanding come from knowing there is extremely well documented empirical evidence for the Judeo-Christian God. And His messages have been given in a myriad of ways, none so strong as what the Catholic Church teaches and what the saints have revealed. And the saints have provided amazing signs and wonders to validate their words. So there is no need for us to look any further than to know 1) legalized abortion is very wrong and sinful, and 2) gay marriage is wrong and a pox on society. We as a society shall pay dearly for telling God --- “yes, we hear you God, we are simply not interested in what you want of us.”

You havent really addressed any of my points.

My case is this.Those who are pushing for a religious exemption are very selective in who they are targeting.

Let me reduce it to a simple question.

Why do the religious bigots target Gays and not other groups who are condemned in the bible ?

I provided some examples for you. Here is another.

How does a murderer get his cake but the Gay cop doesnt ?

Unless you can give a credible answer then you have no case.

What you miss is that no one is condemning gays. The complaint is that the Christian does not want to participate and commit a very personal sin. If you want a comparison to the murderer, the killer would have the right to compel the baker to be there at the site to help the killer commit the murder.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Mississippi pass most anti-LGBT bill to date

It claims that the law could see a woman fired from her job for wearing trousers, a counsellor on a suicide line refuse to speak to an LGBT teenager or even an adoption agency refuse to place a child with a family because the parents lived together before they were married.

This is lunacy on a majestic scale.Is the South so far behind the civilised world ?

Honestly, if I were you I would relax. The war is going very well for their side. You have won almost all the battles since the 60s. This mississippi thing is but a very minor and temporary irritant that will get overruled. Just like when 30 out of 30 states all voted against gay marriage in referendums not more than 10 years ago. It wasn't long before our courts took over and righted that "wrong."

Secularism rules. Perversion rules. Christians have become pariahs and their beliefs are roundly mocked and ostracized.

Our only chance of prevailing or gaining any ground is if our "hunch" about Jesus returning comes true.

Theocracies dont have a great track record.

It strikes me that the injured Christian defence has been used before.

Wasnt slavery defended by the Baptists using citations from the bible ? Eventually they had to admit that they were wrong.

Now its the turn of Gay people because ,lets face it,ignorant people have to hate somebody.

Again a couple of passages in the Bible are used to support this.

Its a nonsense. The Bible has a stance on just about everything. And yet its the Gays who are the target.

Why is there is no law to enable the baker to refuse service to the car thief ?

Or the Buddhist or Muslim or Hindu. How do followers of a "False God" rank in front of Christian Gays ?

How does the straight drug dealer get more respect than the Gay heart surgeon ?

In my view its very straightforward.

Its because there is a dwindling group of people who are uncomfortable with change and also have an unhealthy attitude to sex.

They select passages from the scriptures to back up their sickness and use it to oppress all of us.

Theocracies dont have a great track record.

So, no one is asking for a theocracy or even discussing one.


It strikes me that the injured Christian defence has been used before.

Well, whatever. I don’t know what you are talking about.


Wasnt slavery defended by the Baptists using citations from the bible ? Eventually they had to admit that they were wrong.

Admit it to who? To the greater Christian movement that was the main force trying to route out slavery. I am not conceding Baptists were this element you are accusing them of, it does not matter. But I love how the modern day unbelievers love to judge and indict Christians of centuries ago for not living their lives of a 21st century denizen of this planet. Of course those passing judgment on ancient Christians do not ever consider what the heathens were doing back then, and how nations were dealing with adversities, etc. It’s all this new age ethics should have all been known then and no other elements may have dictated how life was lived. It’s really lame, imo, to have to keep hearing that as their main argument.


Now its the turn of Gay people because ,lets face it,ignorant people have to hate somebody.

Not sure how much time I can spend addressing your stupidity.


Again a couple of passages in the Bible are used to support this.Its a nonsense. The Bible has a stance on just about everything. And yet its the Gays who are the target.

What passage did I use? You are the one who needs to put words in our mouths to make your own case look better. Lame. I may very well provide evidence for God and from that provide evidence for the Catholic Church as God’s representative here on earth. Now if you can refute my evidence for God, then you may have some merit. But I am not worried about that.


Why is there is no law to enable the baker to refuse service to the car thief ?

It is your side who is more interested in punishing and routing out Christians than you are in making sure a gay person can get a cake baked at any bakery of his choice. After all, if that was your push, then you would have the courage to go harass Muslim bakeries. But you don’t. You and/or this gay movement want to destroy Christianity and the one true God --- that is your mission – because Christianity makes you all so uncomfortable and you just will not have your egos and your pleasures challenged.


Or the Buddhist or Muslim or Hindu. How do followers of a "False God" rank in front of Christian Gays ?

I do not think you are ready as a student to listen fairly to an answer. But if you insist I will provide one.


How does the straight drug dealer get more respect than the Gay heart surgeon ? In my view its very straightforward. It’s because there is a dwindling group of people who are uncomfortable with change and also have an unhealthy attitude to sex. They select passages from the scriptures to back up their sickness and use it to oppress all of us.

No, that is not it at all. The fact the “group” may be “dwindling” provides not even an iota of greater evidence for your case. Ok? The vast majority of people do not believe in purgatory either, that is hardly going to make any impression on Catholic teaching.

So what was your next point?... oh, that we have an “unhealthy” attitude toward sex. Oh, yes. According to who? According to all those who want to have their sex served as they demand and without any consequence or repercussions for it. Well, that sounds convenient. Look, I already told you --- our understanding come from knowing there is extremely well documented empirical evidence for the Judeo-Christian God. And His messages have been given in a myriad of ways, none so strong as what the Catholic Church teaches and what the saints have revealed. And the saints have provided amazing signs and wonders to validate their words. So there is no need for us to look any further than to know 1) legalized abortion is very wrong and sinful, and 2) gay marriage is wrong and a pox on society. We as a society shall pay dearly for telling God --- “yes, we hear you God, we are simply not interested in what you want of us.”

You havent really addressed any of my points.

My case is this.Those who are pushing for a religious exemption are very selective in who they are targeting.

Let me reduce it to a simple question.

Why do the religious bigots target Gays and not other groups who are condemned in the bible ?

I provided some examples for you. Here is another.

How does a murderer get his cake but the Gay cop doesnt ?

Unless you can give a credible answer then you have no case.

What you miss is that no one is condemning gays. The complaint is that the Christian does not want to participate and commit a very personal sin. If you want a comparison to the murderer, the killer would have the right to compel the baker to be there at the site to help the killer commit the murder.

OK - I can see that you do not understand.

 

[turzovka]

Mississippi pass most anti-LGBT bill to date

It claims that the law could see a woman fired from her job for wearing trousers, a counsellor on a suicide line refuse to speak to an LGBT teenager or even an adoption agency refuse to place a child with a family because the parents lived together before they were married.

This is lunacy on a majestic scale.Is the South so far behind the civilised world ?

Honestly, if I were you I would relax. The war is going very well for their side. You have won almost all the battles since the 60s. This mississippi thing is but a very minor and temporary irritant that will get overruled. Just like when 30 out of 30 states all voted against gay marriage in referendums not more than 10 years ago. It wasn't long before our courts took over and righted that "wrong."

Secularism rules. Perversion rules. Christians have become pariahs and their beliefs are roundly mocked and ostracized.

Our only chance of prevailing or gaining any ground is if our "hunch" about Jesus returning comes true.

Theocracies dont have a great track record.

It strikes me that the injured Christian defence has been used before.

Wasnt slavery defended by the Baptists using citations from the bible ? Eventually they had to admit that they were wrong.

Now its the turn of Gay people because ,lets face it,ignorant people have to hate somebody.

Again a couple of passages in the Bible are used to support this.

Its a nonsense. The Bible has a stance on just about everything. And yet its the Gays who are the target.

Why is there is no law to enable the baker to refuse service to the car thief ?

Or the Buddhist or Muslim or Hindu. How do followers of a "False God" rank in front of Christian Gays ?

How does the straight drug dealer get more respect than the Gay heart surgeon ?

In my view its very straightforward.

Its because there is a dwindling group of people who are uncomfortable with change and also have an unhealthy attitude to sex.

They select passages from the scriptures to back up their sickness and use it to oppress all of us.

Theocracies dont have a great track record.

So, no one is asking for a theocracy or even discussing one.


It strikes me that the injured Christian defence has been used before.

Well, whatever. I don’t know what you are talking about.


Wasnt slavery defended by the Baptists using citations from the bible ? Eventually they had to admit that they were wrong.

Admit it to who? To the greater Christian movement that was the main force trying to route out slavery. I am not conceding Baptists were this element you are accusing them of, it does not matter. But I love how the modern day unbelievers love to judge and indict Christians of centuries ago for not living their lives of a 21st century denizen of this planet. Of course those passing judgment on ancient Christians do not ever consider what the heathens were doing back then, and how nations were dealing with adversities, etc. It’s all this new age ethics should have all been known then and no other elements may have dictated how life was lived. It’s really lame, imo, to have to keep hearing that as their main argument.


Now its the turn of Gay people because ,lets face it,ignorant people have to hate somebody.

Not sure how much time I can spend addressing your stupidity.


Again a couple of passages in the Bible are used to support this.Its a nonsense. The Bible has a stance on just about everything. And yet its the Gays who are the target.

What passage did I use? You are the one who needs to put words in our mouths to make your own case look better. Lame. I may very well provide evidence for God and from that provide evidence for the Catholic Church as God’s representative here on earth. Now if you can refute my evidence for God, then you may have some merit. But I am not worried about that.


Why is there is no law to enable the baker to refuse service to the car thief ?

It is your side who is more interested in punishing and routing out Christians than you are in making sure a gay person can get a cake baked at any bakery of his choice. After all, if that was your push, then you would have the courage to go harass Muslim bakeries. But you don’t. You and/or this gay movement want to destroy Christianity and the one true God --- that is your mission – because Christianity makes you all so uncomfortable and you just will not have your egos and your pleasures challenged.


Or the Buddhist or Muslim or Hindu. How do followers of a "False God" rank in front of Christian Gays ?

I do not think you are ready as a student to listen fairly to an answer. But if you insist I will provide one.


How does the straight drug dealer get more respect than the Gay heart surgeon ? In my view its very straightforward. It’s because there is a dwindling group of people who are uncomfortable with change and also have an unhealthy attitude to sex. They select passages from the scriptures to back up their sickness and use it to oppress all of us.

No, that is not it at all. The fact the “group” may be “dwindling” provides not even an iota of greater evidence for your case. Ok? The vast majority of people do not believe in purgatory either, that is hardly going to make any impression on Catholic teaching.

So what was your next point?... oh, that we have an “unhealthy” attitude toward sex. Oh, yes. According to who? According to all those who want to have their sex served as they demand and without any consequence or repercussions for it. Well, that sounds convenient. Look, I already told you --- our understanding come from knowing there is extremely well documented empirical evidence for the Judeo-Christian God. And His messages have been given in a myriad of ways, none so strong as what the Catholic Church teaches and what the saints have revealed. And the saints have provided amazing signs and wonders to validate their words. So there is no need for us to look any further than to know 1) legalized abortion is very wrong and sinful, and 2) gay marriage is wrong and a pox on society. We as a society shall pay dearly for telling God --- “yes, we hear you God, we are simply not interested in what you want of us.”

You havent really addressed any of my points.

My case is this.Those who are pushing for a religious exemption are very selective in who they are targeting.

Let me reduce it to a simple question.

Why do the religious bigots target Gays and not other groups who are condemned in the bible ?

I provided some examples for you. Here is another.

How does a murderer get his cake but the Gay cop doesnt ?

Unless you can give a credible answer then you have no case.

You haven’t really addressed any of my points.

I proposed many points or questions --- and I surely did address many of them. I will note this for my own future reference, however, that I may be wasting my valuable time.


Let me reduce it to a simple question. Why do the religious bigots target Gays and not other groups who are condemned in the bible ? I provided some examples for you. Here is another.How does a murderer get his cake but the Gay cop doesnt ? Unless you can give a credible answer then you have no case.

I am not really worried about your opinion of what is “credible,” for the record.

What gay cop would not get a cake? What person of any stripe would not get a cake? The reason the Christian bakery objects is because of what they want said on the cake or done to the cake. If some nazi came in and said he wants a chocolate cake that says best wishes he would get the cake. But if he said he wanted “Death to all Jews” written on the cake he would be refused. Same if someone asked for a cake to say “I love having sex with prostitutes.”

Are we getting through to you at all?

I have explained in detail to you what I believe this is all about. But you want to pretend I said nothing and choose not to address my challenges. So I am losing respect for your ways, not that that bothers you I am sure. But I will reiterate – you and some gay activists could not care less where you get your wedding cakes from. Your whole mission is to destroy Christianity and to render God a myth or inconsequential. And to squelch the voices of Christians having no say in legislative matters. 30 out of 30 states all voted against gay marriage in referendums, but all it took was a godless media and government and a bunch of hyper-liberal celebrities and gay activists to pressure the courts and society to think otherwise. So you bullied your way into a resolution. I am so happy for you, but I am sad for you, too. And for our world.

Finally, all sin is “targeted” to use your word. Tell me one sin that the Catholic Church would not address or has not addressed in some manner?

 

[WinterBorn]

This can easily bring back something t hat I had personal experience with.

In the 80s, there was a decision to add AIDS education to the Alabama public school curriculum. I applaud that. There was nothing pro or con about homosexuality. But, apparently, the powers that be foresaw a specific question being asked. A female student at the high school in Tuscaloosa asked "I heard you can't get AIDS from oral sex. Is that true"? The only answer the teacher was allowed to give when asked any question about oral sex was "Oral sex is illegal in the state of Alabama". So this naive young woman walked out thinking she was "safe" from HIV is she only performed oral sex.

It looks more like adding AIds education to the public school curriculum was a really bad idea.

Right. No need to teach kids anything about a lethal, incurable disease that they can get from what their teenage hormones are making them obsess over, right?

Not in school. It's disease. Get your medical advice from a doctor not a teacher.

So let kids die because they may not ask a doctor? Or even see a doctor? Great idea.

Plenty of kids die because parents don't want to take children to the doctor. That does not mean that a teacher is qualified or even should discuss medical issues with children. Teachers are not diagnosticians. If the teacher discusses butt fucking with your son and he gets AIDS are you going to sue the teacher for medical malpractice?

No one is talking about diagnosing a disease. It is a simple health issue that a school can be instrumental in helping with.

YOu are truly a bitter harpy.

 

[WinterBorn]

Incorrect. The state "advocates" for the rights of ALL people to have beliefs about marriage- yes, even if they don't agree with the LGBT version. How you can have a problem with all people being allowed to believe as they wish without punishment is perplexing.

Here's a little statistic that might help Mississippi concerning the word "ALL"..

90% is pretty impressive. One has to deduce logically that the people who voted "important" in this poll are capable of reasoning that "gay marriage" deprives children of either a mother or father for life... Poll. Please Vote. Did You Have a Mother & Father in Your Life?

90% of what? Of the people on a single political debate site who chose to vote on a poll posted by a rabid anti-homosexual? lol There is no validity at all there.

What percentage of the membership of this board voted?

 

[Katzndogz]

It looks more like adding AIds education to the public school curriculum was a really bad idea.

Right. No need to teach kids anything about a lethal, incurable disease that they can get from what their teenage hormones are making them obsess over, right?

Not in school. It's disease. Get your medical advice from a doctor not a teacher.

So let kids die because they may not ask a doctor? Or even see a doctor? Great idea.

Plenty of kids die because parents don't want to take children to the doctor. That does not mean that a teacher is qualified or even should discuss medical issues with children. Teachers are not diagnosticians. If the teacher discusses butt fucking with your son and he gets AIDS are you going to sue the teacher for medical malpractice?

No one is talking about diagnosing a disease. It is a simple health issue that a school can be instrumental in helping with.

YOu are truly a bitter harpy.

And the doctor should teach algebra,

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Mississippi pass most anti-LGBT bill to date

It claims that the law could see a woman fired from her job for wearing trousers, a counsellor on a suicide line refuse to speak to an LGBT teenager or even an adoption agency refuse to place a child with a family because the parents lived together before they were married.

This is lunacy on a majestic scale.Is the South so far behind the civilised world ?

Honestly, if I were you I would relax. The war is going very well for their side. You have won almost all the battles since the 60s. This mississippi thing is but a very minor and temporary irritant that will get overruled. Just like when 30 out of 30 states all voted against gay marriage in referendums not more than 10 years ago. It wasn't long before our courts took over and righted that "wrong."

Secularism rules. Perversion rules. Christians have become pariahs and their beliefs are roundly mocked and ostracized.

Our only chance of prevailing or gaining any ground is if our "hunch" about Jesus returning comes true.

Theocracies dont have a great track record.

It strikes me that the injured Christian defence has been used before.

Wasnt slavery defended by the Baptists using citations from the bible ? Eventually they had to admit that they were wrong.

Now its the turn of Gay people because ,lets face it,ignorant people have to hate somebody.

Again a couple of passages in the Bible are used to support this.

Its a nonsense. The Bible has a stance on just about everything. And yet its the Gays who are the target.

Why is there is no law to enable the baker to refuse service to the car thief ?

Or the Buddhist or Muslim or Hindu. How do followers of a "False God" rank in front of Christian Gays ?

How does the straight drug dealer get more respect than the Gay heart surgeon ?

In my view its very straightforward.

Its because there is a dwindling group of people who are uncomfortable with change and also have an unhealthy attitude to sex.

They select passages from the scriptures to back up their sickness and use it to oppress all of us.

Theocracies dont have a great track record.

So, no one is asking for a theocracy or even discussing one.


It strikes me that the injured Christian defence has been used before.

Well, whatever. I don’t know what you are talking about.


Wasnt slavery defended by the Baptists using citations from the bible ? Eventually they had to admit that they were wrong.

Admit it to who? To the greater Christian movement that was the main force trying to route out slavery. I am not conceding Baptists were this element you are accusing them of, it does not matter. But I love how the modern day unbelievers love to judge and indict Christians of centuries ago for not living their lives of a 21st century denizen of this planet. Of course those passing judgment on ancient Christians do not ever consider what the heathens were doing back then, and how nations were dealing with adversities, etc. It’s all this new age ethics should have all been known then and no other elements may have dictated how life was lived. It’s really lame, imo, to have to keep hearing that as their main argument.


Now its the turn of Gay people because ,lets face it,ignorant people have to hate somebody.

Not sure how much time I can spend addressing your stupidity.


Again a couple of passages in the Bible are used to support this.Its a nonsense. The Bible has a stance on just about everything. And yet its the Gays who are the target.

What passage did I use? You are the one who needs to put words in our mouths to make your own case look better. Lame. I may very well provide evidence for God and from that provide evidence for the Catholic Church as God’s representative here on earth. Now if you can refute my evidence for God, then you may have some merit. But I am not worried about that.


Why is there is no law to enable the baker to refuse service to the car thief ?

It is your side who is more interested in punishing and routing out Christians than you are in making sure a gay person can get a cake baked at any bakery of his choice. After all, if that was your push, then you would have the courage to go harass Muslim bakeries. But you don’t. You and/or this gay movement want to destroy Christianity and the one true God --- that is your mission – because Christianity makes you all so uncomfortable and you just will not have your egos and your pleasures challenged.


Or the Buddhist or Muslim or Hindu. How do followers of a "False God" rank in front of Christian Gays ?

I do not think you are ready as a student to listen fairly to an answer. But if you insist I will provide one.


How does the straight drug dealer get more respect than the Gay heart surgeon ? In my view its very straightforward. It’s because there is a dwindling group of people who are uncomfortable with change and also have an unhealthy attitude to sex. They select passages from the scriptures to back up their sickness and use it to oppress all of us.

No, that is not it at all. The fact the “group” may be “dwindling” provides not even an iota of greater evidence for your case. Ok? The vast majority of people do not believe in purgatory either, that is hardly going to make any impression on Catholic teaching.

So what was your next point?... oh, that we have an “unhealthy” attitude toward sex. Oh, yes. According to who? According to all those who want to have their sex served as they demand and without any consequence or repercussions for it. Well, that sounds convenient. Look, I already told you --- our understanding come from knowing there is extremely well documented empirical evidence for the Judeo-Christian God. And His messages have been given in a myriad of ways, none so strong as what the Catholic Church teaches and what the saints have revealed. And the saints have provided amazing signs and wonders to validate their words. So there is no need for us to look any further than to know 1) legalized abortion is very wrong and sinful, and 2) gay marriage is wrong and a pox on society. We as a society shall pay dearly for telling God --- “yes, we hear you God, we are simply not interested in what you want of us.”

You havent really addressed any of my points.

My case is this.Those who are pushing for a religious exemption are very selective in who they are targeting.

Let me reduce it to a simple question.

Why do the religious bigots target Gays and not other groups who are condemned in the bible ?

I provided some examples for you. Here is another.

How does a murderer get his cake but the Gay cop doesnt ?

Unless you can give a credible answer then you have no case.

You haven’t really addressed any of my points.

I proposed many points or questions --- and I surely did address many of them. I will note this for my own future reference, however, that I may be wasting my valuable time.


Let me reduce it to a simple question. Why do the religious bigots target Gays and not other groups who are condemned in the bible ? I provided some examples for you. Here is another.How does a murderer get his cake but the Gay cop doesnt ? Unless you can give a credible answer then you have no case.

I am not really worried about your opinion of what is “credible,” for the record.

What gay cop would not get a cake? What person of any stripe would not get a cake? The reason the Christian bakery objects is because of what they want said on the cake or done to the cake. If some nazi came in and said he wants a chocolate cake that says best wishes he would get the cake. But if he said he wanted “Death to all Jews” written on the cake he would be refused. Same if someone asked for a cake to say “I love having sex with prostitutes.”

Are we getting through to you at all?

I have explained in detail to you what I believe this is all about. But you want to pretend I said nothing and choose not to address my challenges. So I am losing respect for your ways, not that that bothers you I am sure. But I will reiterate – you and some gay activists could not care less where you get your wedding cakes from. Your whole mission is to destroy Christianity and to render God a myth or inconsequential. And to squelch the voices of Christians having no say in legislative matters. 30 out of 30 states all voted against gay marriage in referendums, but all it took was a godless media and government and a bunch of hyper-liberal celebrities and gay activists to pressure the courts and society to think otherwise. So you bullied your way into a resolution. I am so happy for you, but I am sad for you, too. And for our world.

Finally, all sin is “targeted” to use your word. Tell me one sin that the Catholic Church would not address or has not addressed in some manner?

Ok . calm down. The gay couple wanted a wedding cake. They were refused because they were gay. Why are they serving the murderer ?
Because he isnt gay and that is the current focus of hate.
Just extending your analogy I guess a muslim couple would get a knock back if they wanted a cake with a muslim message on it.
You cannot even answer my simple question without droning off into some bogus character analysis and abuse.
You guys take the biscuit.

 

[Katzndogz]

Mississippi pass most anti-LGBT bill to date

It claims that the law could see a woman fired from her job for wearing trousers, a counsellor on a suicide line refuse to speak to an LGBT teenager or even an adoption agency refuse to place a child with a family because the parents lived together before they were married.

This is lunacy on a majestic scale.Is the South so far behind the civilised world ?

Honestly, if I were you I would relax. The war is going very well for their side. You have won almost all the battles since the 60s. This mississippi thing is but a very minor and temporary irritant that will get overruled. Just like when 30 out of 30 states all voted against gay marriage in referendums not more than 10 years ago. It wasn't long before our courts took over and righted that "wrong."

Secularism rules. Perversion rules. Christians have become pariahs and their beliefs are roundly mocked and ostracized.

Our only chance of prevailing or gaining any ground is if our "hunch" about Jesus returning comes true.

Theocracies dont have a great track record.

It strikes me that the injured Christian defence has been used before.

Wasnt slavery defended by the Baptists using citations from the bible ? Eventually they had to admit that they were wrong.

Now its the turn of Gay people because ,lets face it,ignorant people have to hate somebody.

Again a couple of passages in the Bible are used to support this.

Its a nonsense. The Bible has a stance on just about everything. And yet its the Gays who are the target.

Why is there is no law to enable the baker to refuse service to the car thief ?

Or the Buddhist or Muslim or Hindu. How do followers of a "False God" rank in front of Christian Gays ?

How does the straight drug dealer get more respect than the Gay heart surgeon ?

In my view its very straightforward.

Its because there is a dwindling group of people who are uncomfortable with change and also have an unhealthy attitude to sex.

They select passages from the scriptures to back up their sickness and use it to oppress all of us.

Theocracies dont have a great track record.

So, no one is asking for a theocracy or even discussing one.


It strikes me that the injured Christian defence has been used before.

Well, whatever. I don’t know what you are talking about.


Wasnt slavery defended by the Baptists using citations from the bible ? Eventually they had to admit that they were wrong.

Admit it to who? To the greater Christian movement that was the main force trying to route out slavery. I am not conceding Baptists were this element you are accusing them of, it does not matter. But I love how the modern day unbelievers love to judge and indict Christians of centuries ago for not living their lives of a 21st century denizen of this planet. Of course those passing judgment on ancient Christians do not ever consider what the heathens were doing back then, and how nations were dealing with adversities, etc. It’s all this new age ethics should have all been known then and no other elements may have dictated how life was lived. It’s really lame, imo, to have to keep hearing that as their main argument.


Now its the turn of Gay people because ,lets face it,ignorant people have to hate somebody.

Not sure how much time I can spend addressing your stupidity.


Again a couple of passages in the Bible are used to support this.Its a nonsense. The Bible has a stance on just about everything. And yet its the Gays who are the target.

What passage did I use? You are the one who needs to put words in our mouths to make your own case look better. Lame. I may very well provide evidence for God and from that provide evidence for the Catholic Church as God’s representative here on earth. Now if you can refute my evidence for God, then you may have some merit. But I am not worried about that.


Why is there is no law to enable the baker to refuse service to the car thief ?

It is your side who is more interested in punishing and routing out Christians than you are in making sure a gay person can get a cake baked at any bakery of his choice. After all, if that was your push, then you would have the courage to go harass Muslim bakeries. But you don’t. You and/or this gay movement want to destroy Christianity and the one true God --- that is your mission – because Christianity makes you all so uncomfortable and you just will not have your egos and your pleasures challenged.


Or the Buddhist or Muslim or Hindu. How do followers of a "False God" rank in front of Christian Gays ?

I do not think you are ready as a student to listen fairly to an answer. But if you insist I will provide one.


How does the straight drug dealer get more respect than the Gay heart surgeon ? In my view its very straightforward. It’s because there is a dwindling group of people who are uncomfortable with change and also have an unhealthy attitude to sex. They select passages from the scriptures to back up their sickness and use it to oppress all of us.

No, that is not it at all. The fact the “group” may be “dwindling” provides not even an iota of greater evidence for your case. Ok? The vast majority of people do not believe in purgatory either, that is hardly going to make any impression on Catholic teaching.

So what was your next point?... oh, that we have an “unhealthy” attitude toward sex. Oh, yes. According to who? According to all those who want to have their sex served as they demand and without any consequence or repercussions for it. Well, that sounds convenient. Look, I already told you --- our understanding come from knowing there is extremely well documented empirical evidence for the Judeo-Christian God. And His messages have been given in a myriad of ways, none so strong as what the Catholic Church teaches and what the saints have revealed. And the saints have provided amazing signs and wonders to validate their words. So there is no need for us to look any further than to know 1) legalized abortion is very wrong and sinful, and 2) gay marriage is wrong and a pox on society. We as a society shall pay dearly for telling God --- “yes, we hear you God, we are simply not interested in what you want of us.”

You havent really addressed any of my points.

My case is this.Those who are pushing for a religious exemption are very selective in who they are targeting.

Let me reduce it to a simple question.

Why do the religious bigots target Gays and not other groups who are condemned in the bible ?

I provided some examples for you. Here is another.

How does a murderer get his cake but the Gay cop doesnt ?

Unless you can give a credible answer then you have no case.

You haven’t really addressed any of my points.

I proposed many points or questions --- and I surely did address many of them. I will note this for my own future reference, however, that I may be wasting my valuable time.


Let me reduce it to a simple question. Why do the religious bigots target Gays and not other groups who are condemned in the bible ? I provided some examples for you. Here is another.How does a murderer get his cake but the Gay cop doesnt ? Unless you can give a credible answer then you have no case.

I am not really worried about your opinion of what is “credible,” for the record.

What gay cop would not get a cake? What person of any stripe would not get a cake? The reason the Christian bakery objects is because of what they want said on the cake or done to the cake. If some nazi came in and said he wants a chocolate cake that says best wishes he would get the cake. But if he said he wanted “Death to all Jews” written on the cake he would be refused. Same if someone asked for a cake to say “I love having sex with prostitutes.”

Are we getting through to you at all?

I have explained in detail to you what I believe this is all about. But you want to pretend I said nothing and choose not to address my challenges. So I am losing respect for your ways, not that that bothers you I am sure. But I will reiterate – you and some gay activists could not care less where you get your wedding cakes from. Your whole mission is to destroy Christianity and to render God a myth or inconsequential. And to squelch the voices of Christians having no say in legislative matters. 30 out of 30 states all voted against gay marriage in referendums, but all it took was a godless media and government and a bunch of hyper-liberal celebrities and gay activists to pressure the courts and society to think otherwise. So you bullied your way into a resolution. I am so happy for you, but I am sad for you, too. And for our world.

Finally, all sin is “targeted” to use your word. Tell me one sin that the Catholic Church would not address or has not addressed in some manner?

The goal is to force Christians to participate in perversion then call them hypocrites because they are selling out their religious principles for a profit.

 

[Katzndogz]

Honestly, if I were you I would relax. The war is going very well for their side. You have won almost all the battles since the 60s. This mississippi thing is but a very minor and temporary irritant that will get overruled. Just like when 30 out of 30 states all voted against gay marriage in referendums not more than 10 years ago. It wasn't long before our courts took over and righted that "wrong."

Secularism rules. Perversion rules. Christians have become pariahs and their beliefs are roundly mocked and ostracized.

Our only chance of prevailing or gaining any ground is if our "hunch" about Jesus returning comes true.

Theocracies dont have a great track record.

It strikes me that the injured Christian defence has been used before.

Wasnt slavery defended by the Baptists using citations from the bible ? Eventually they had to admit that they were wrong.

Now its the turn of Gay people because ,lets face it,ignorant people have to hate somebody.

Again a couple of passages in the Bible are used to support this.

Its a nonsense. The Bible has a stance on just about everything. And yet its the Gays who are the target.

Why is there is no law to enable the baker to refuse service to the car thief ?

Or the Buddhist or Muslim or Hindu. How do followers of a "False God" rank in front of Christian Gays ?

How does the straight drug dealer get more respect than the Gay heart surgeon ?

In my view its very straightforward.

Its because there is a dwindling group of people who are uncomfortable with change and also have an unhealthy attitude to sex.

They select passages from the scriptures to back up their sickness and use it to oppress all of us.

Theocracies dont have a great track record.

So, no one is asking for a theocracy or even discussing one.


It strikes me that the injured Christian defence has been used before.

Well, whatever. I don’t know what you are talking about.


Wasnt slavery defended by the Baptists using citations from the bible ? Eventually they had to admit that they were wrong.

Admit it to who? To the greater Christian movement that was the main force trying to route out slavery. I am not conceding Baptists were this element you are accusing them of, it does not matter. But I love how the modern day unbelievers love to judge and indict Christians of centuries ago for not living their lives of a 21st century denizen of this planet. Of course those passing judgment on ancient Christians do not ever consider what the heathens were doing back then, and how nations were dealing with adversities, etc. It’s all this new age ethics should have all been known then and no other elements may have dictated how life was lived. It’s really lame, imo, to have to keep hearing that as their main argument.


Now its the turn of Gay people because ,lets face it,ignorant people have to hate somebody.

Not sure how much time I can spend addressing your stupidity.


Again a couple of passages in the Bible are used to support this.Its a nonsense. The Bible has a stance on just about everything. And yet its the Gays who are the target.

What passage did I use? You are the one who needs to put words in our mouths to make your own case look better. Lame. I may very well provide evidence for God and from that provide evidence for the Catholic Church as God’s representative here on earth. Now if you can refute my evidence for God, then you may have some merit. But I am not worried about that.


Why is there is no law to enable the baker to refuse service to the car thief ?

It is your side who is more interested in punishing and routing out Christians than you are in making sure a gay person can get a cake baked at any bakery of his choice. After all, if that was your push, then you would have the courage to go harass Muslim bakeries. But you don’t. You and/or this gay movement want to destroy Christianity and the one true God --- that is your mission – because Christianity makes you all so uncomfortable and you just will not have your egos and your pleasures challenged.


Or the Buddhist or Muslim or Hindu. How do followers of a "False God" rank in front of Christian Gays ?

I do not think you are ready as a student to listen fairly to an answer. But if you insist I will provide one.


How does the straight drug dealer get more respect than the Gay heart surgeon ? In my view its very straightforward. It’s because there is a dwindling group of people who are uncomfortable with change and also have an unhealthy attitude to sex. They select passages from the scriptures to back up their sickness and use it to oppress all of us.

No, that is not it at all. The fact the “group” may be “dwindling” provides not even an iota of greater evidence for your case. Ok? The vast majority of people do not believe in purgatory either, that is hardly going to make any impression on Catholic teaching.

So what was your next point?... oh, that we have an “unhealthy” attitude toward sex. Oh, yes. According to who? According to all those who want to have their sex served as they demand and without any consequence or repercussions for it. Well, that sounds convenient. Look, I already told you --- our understanding come from knowing there is extremely well documented empirical evidence for the Judeo-Christian God. And His messages have been given in a myriad of ways, none so strong as what the Catholic Church teaches and what the saints have revealed. And the saints have provided amazing signs and wonders to validate their words. So there is no need for us to look any further than to know 1) legalized abortion is very wrong and sinful, and 2) gay marriage is wrong and a pox on society. We as a society shall pay dearly for telling God --- “yes, we hear you God, we are simply not interested in what you want of us.”

You havent really addressed any of my points.

My case is this.Those who are pushing for a religious exemption are very selective in who they are targeting.

Let me reduce it to a simple question.

Why do the religious bigots target Gays and not other groups who are condemned in the bible ?

I provided some examples for you. Here is another.

How does a murderer get his cake but the Gay cop doesnt ?

Unless you can give a credible answer then you have no case.

You haven’t really addressed any of my points.

I proposed many points or questions --- and I surely did address many of them. I will note this for my own future reference, however, that I may be wasting my valuable time.


Let me reduce it to a simple question. Why do the religious bigots target Gays and not other groups who are condemned in the bible ? I provided some examples for you. Here is another.How does a murderer get his cake but the Gay cop doesnt ? Unless you can give a credible answer then you have no case.

I am not really worried about your opinion of what is “credible,” for the record.

What gay cop would not get a cake? What person of any stripe would not get a cake? The reason the Christian bakery objects is because of what they want said on the cake or done to the cake. If some nazi came in and said he wants a chocolate cake that says best wishes he would get the cake. But if he said he wanted “Death to all Jews” written on the cake he would be refused. Same if someone asked for a cake to say “I love having sex with prostitutes.”

Are we getting through to you at all?

I have explained in detail to you what I believe this is all about. But you want to pretend I said nothing and choose not to address my challenges. So I am losing respect for your ways, not that that bothers you I am sure. But I will reiterate – you and some gay activists could not care less where you get your wedding cakes from. Your whole mission is to destroy Christianity and to render God a myth or inconsequential. And to squelch the voices of Christians having no say in legislative matters. 30 out of 30 states all voted against gay marriage in referendums, but all it took was a godless media and government and a bunch of hyper-liberal celebrities and gay activists to pressure the courts and society to think otherwise. So you bullied your way into a resolution. I am so happy for you, but I am sad for you, too. And for our world.

Finally, all sin is “targeted” to use your word. Tell me one sin that the Catholic Church would not address or has not addressed in some manner?

Ok . calm down. The gay couple wanted a wedding cake. They were refused because they were gay. Why are they serving the murderer ?
Because he isnt gay and that is the current focus of hate.
Just extending your analogy I guess a muslim couple would get a knock back if they wanted a cake with a muslim message on it.
You cannot even answer my simple question without droning off into some bogus character analysis and abuse.
You guys take the biscuit.

You just want to be stupid. They serve the murderer because they aren't participating in the murder. They aren't required to stand over the dead body.

You have an answer to your question, you just don't like it.

 

[turzovka]

Honestly, if I were you I would relax. The war is going very well for their side. You have won almost all the battles since the 60s. This mississippi thing is but a very minor and temporary irritant that will get overruled. Just like when 30 out of 30 states all voted against gay marriage in referendums not more than 10 years ago. It wasn't long before our courts took over and righted that "wrong."

Secularism rules. Perversion rules. Christians have become pariahs and their beliefs are roundly mocked and ostracized.

Our only chance of prevailing or gaining any ground is if our "hunch" about Jesus returning comes true.

Theocracies dont have a great track record.

It strikes me that the injured Christian defence has been used before.

Wasnt slavery defended by the Baptists using citations from the bible ? Eventually they had to admit that they were wrong.

Now its the turn of Gay people because ,lets face it,ignorant people have to hate somebody.

Again a couple of passages in the Bible are used to support this.

Its a nonsense. The Bible has a stance on just about everything. And yet its the Gays who are the target.

Why is there is no law to enable the baker to refuse service to the car thief ?

Or the Buddhist or Muslim or Hindu. How do followers of a "False God" rank in front of Christian Gays ?

How does the straight drug dealer get more respect than the Gay heart surgeon ?

In my view its very straightforward.

Its because there is a dwindling group of people who are uncomfortable with change and also have an unhealthy attitude to sex.

They select passages from the scriptures to back up their sickness and use it to oppress all of us.

Theocracies dont have a great track record.

So, no one is asking for a theocracy or even discussing one.


It strikes me that the injured Christian defence has been used before.

Well, whatever. I don’t know what you are talking about.


Wasnt slavery defended by the Baptists using citations from the bible ? Eventually they had to admit that they were wrong.

Admit it to who? To the greater Christian movement that was the main force trying to route out slavery. I am not conceding Baptists were this element you are accusing them of, it does not matter. But I love how the modern day unbelievers love to judge and indict Christians of centuries ago for not living their lives of a 21st century denizen of this planet. Of course those passing judgment on ancient Christians do not ever consider what the heathens were doing back then, and how nations were dealing with adversities, etc. It’s all this new age ethics should have all been known then and no other elements may have dictated how life was lived. It’s really lame, imo, to have to keep hearing that as their main argument.


Now its the turn of Gay people because ,lets face it,ignorant people have to hate somebody.

Not sure how much time I can spend addressing your stupidity.


Again a couple of passages in the Bible are used to support this.Its a nonsense. The Bible has a stance on just about everything. And yet its the Gays who are the target.

What passage did I use? You are the one who needs to put words in our mouths to make your own case look better. Lame. I may very well provide evidence for God and from that provide evidence for the Catholic Church as God’s representative here on earth. Now if you can refute my evidence for God, then you may have some merit. But I am not worried about that.


Why is there is no law to enable the baker to refuse service to the car thief ?

It is your side who is more interested in punishing and routing out Christians than you are in making sure a gay person can get a cake baked at any bakery of his choice. After all, if that was your push, then you would have the courage to go harass Muslim bakeries. But you don’t. You and/or this gay movement want to destroy Christianity and the one true God --- that is your mission – because Christianity makes you all so uncomfortable and you just will not have your egos and your pleasures challenged.


Or the Buddhist or Muslim or Hindu. How do followers of a "False God" rank in front of Christian Gays ?

I do not think you are ready as a student to listen fairly to an answer. But if you insist I will provide one.


How does the straight drug dealer get more respect than the Gay heart surgeon ? In my view its very straightforward. It’s because there is a dwindling group of people who are uncomfortable with change and also have an unhealthy attitude to sex. They select passages from the scriptures to back up their sickness and use it to oppress all of us.

No, that is not it at all. The fact the “group” may be “dwindling” provides not even an iota of greater evidence for your case. Ok? The vast majority of people do not believe in purgatory either, that is hardly going to make any impression on Catholic teaching.

So what was your next point?... oh, that we have an “unhealthy” attitude toward sex. Oh, yes. According to who? According to all those who want to have their sex served as they demand and without any consequence or repercussions for it. Well, that sounds convenient. Look, I already told you --- our understanding come from knowing there is extremely well documented empirical evidence for the Judeo-Christian God. And His messages have been given in a myriad of ways, none so strong as what the Catholic Church teaches and what the saints have revealed. And the saints have provided amazing signs and wonders to validate their words. So there is no need for us to look any further than to know 1) legalized abortion is very wrong and sinful, and 2) gay marriage is wrong and a pox on society. We as a society shall pay dearly for telling God --- “yes, we hear you God, we are simply not interested in what you want of us.”

You havent really addressed any of my points.

My case is this.Those who are pushing for a religious exemption are very selective in who they are targeting.

Let me reduce it to a simple question.

Why do the religious bigots target Gays and not other groups who are condemned in the bible ?

I provided some examples for you. Here is another.

How does a murderer get his cake but the Gay cop doesnt ?

Unless you can give a credible answer then you have no case.

You haven’t really addressed any of my points.

I proposed many points or questions --- and I surely did address many of them. I will note this for my own future reference, however, that I may be wasting my valuable time.


Let me reduce it to a simple question. Why do the religious bigots target Gays and not other groups who are condemned in the bible ? I provided some examples for you. Here is another.How does a murderer get his cake but the Gay cop doesnt ? Unless you can give a credible answer then you have no case.

I am not really worried about your opinion of what is “credible,” for the record.

What gay cop would not get a cake? What person of any stripe would not get a cake? The reason the Christian bakery objects is because of what they want said on the cake or done to the cake. If some nazi came in and said he wants a chocolate cake that says best wishes he would get the cake. But if he said he wanted “Death to all Jews” written on the cake he would be refused. Same if someone asked for a cake to say “I love having sex with prostitutes.”

Are we getting through to you at all?

I have explained in detail to you what I believe this is all about. But you want to pretend I said nothing and choose not to address my challenges. So I am losing respect for your ways, not that that bothers you I am sure. But I will reiterate – you and some gay activists could not care less where you get your wedding cakes from. Your whole mission is to destroy Christianity and to render God a myth or inconsequential. And to squelch the voices of Christians having no say in legislative matters. 30 out of 30 states all voted against gay marriage in referendums, but all it took was a godless media and government and a bunch of hyper-liberal celebrities and gay activists to pressure the courts and society to think otherwise. So you bullied your way into a resolution. I am so happy for you, but I am sad for you, too. And for our world.

Finally, all sin is “targeted” to use your word. Tell me one sin that the Catholic Church would not address or has not addressed in some manner?

Ok . calm down. The gay couple wanted a wedding cake. They were refused because they were gay. Why are they serving the murderer ?
Because he isnt gay and that is the current focus of hate.
Just extending your analogy I guess a muslim couple would get a knock back if they wanted a cake with a muslim message on it.
You cannot even answer my simple question without droning off into some bogus character analysis and abuse.
You guys take the biscuit.

And you are not listening or are incapable of comprehending.

Until you present yourself as a more honest debater, I will not bother trying.

You also specialize in avoiding any question you do not have a good response for.

 

[rightwinger]

Again it is a question of how limited Mississippi is in protecting religious freedoms. You can claim religious objection to gay weddings but you cannot claim religious objections to mixed race weddings, interfaith weddings, marriage of divorced people or a marriage of a pregnant woman

Hypocrisy

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Theocracies dont have a great track record.

It strikes me that the injured Christian defence has been used before.

Wasnt slavery defended by the Baptists using citations from the bible ? Eventually they had to admit that they were wrong.

Now its the turn of Gay people because ,lets face it,ignorant people have to hate somebody.

Again a couple of passages in the Bible are used to support this.

Its a nonsense. The Bible has a stance on just about everything. And yet its the Gays who are the target.

Why is there is no law to enable the baker to refuse service to the car thief ?

Or the Buddhist or Muslim or Hindu. How do followers of a "False God" rank in front of Christian Gays ?

How does the straight drug dealer get more respect than the Gay heart surgeon ?

In my view its very straightforward.

Its because there is a dwindling group of people who are uncomfortable with change and also have an unhealthy attitude to sex.

They select passages from the scriptures to back up their sickness and use it to oppress all of us.

Theocracies dont have a great track record.

So, no one is asking for a theocracy or even discussing one.


It strikes me that the injured Christian defence has been used before.

Well, whatever. I don’t know what you are talking about.


Wasnt slavery defended by the Baptists using citations from the bible ? Eventually they had to admit that they were wrong.

Admit it to who? To the greater Christian movement that was the main force trying to route out slavery. I am not conceding Baptists were this element you are accusing them of, it does not matter. But I love how the modern day unbelievers love to judge and indict Christians of centuries ago for not living their lives of a 21st century denizen of this planet. Of course those passing judgment on ancient Christians do not ever consider what the heathens were doing back then, and how nations were dealing with adversities, etc. It’s all this new age ethics should have all been known then and no other elements may have dictated how life was lived. It’s really lame, imo, to have to keep hearing that as their main argument.


Now its the turn of Gay people because ,lets face it,ignorant people have to hate somebody.

Not sure how much time I can spend addressing your stupidity.


Again a couple of passages in the Bible are used to support this.Its a nonsense. The Bible has a stance on just about everything. And yet its the Gays who are the target.

What passage did I use? You are the one who needs to put words in our mouths to make your own case look better. Lame. I may very well provide evidence for God and from that provide evidence for the Catholic Church as God’s representative here on earth. Now if you can refute my evidence for God, then you may have some merit. But I am not worried about that.


Why is there is no law to enable the baker to refuse service to the car thief ?

It is your side who is more interested in punishing and routing out Christians than you are in making sure a gay person can get a cake baked at any bakery of his choice. After all, if that was your push, then you would have the courage to go harass Muslim bakeries. But you don’t. You and/or this gay movement want to destroy Christianity and the one true God --- that is your mission – because Christianity makes you all so uncomfortable and you just will not have your egos and your pleasures challenged.


Or the Buddhist or Muslim or Hindu. How do followers of a "False God" rank in front of Christian Gays ?

I do not think you are ready as a student to listen fairly to an answer. But if you insist I will provide one.


How does the straight drug dealer get more respect than the Gay heart surgeon ? In my view its very straightforward. It’s because there is a dwindling group of people who are uncomfortable with change and also have an unhealthy attitude to sex. They select passages from the scriptures to back up their sickness and use it to oppress all of us.

No, that is not it at all. The fact the “group” may be “dwindling” provides not even an iota of greater evidence for your case. Ok? The vast majority of people do not believe in purgatory either, that is hardly going to make any impression on Catholic teaching.

So what was your next point?... oh, that we have an “unhealthy” attitude toward sex. Oh, yes. According to who? According to all those who want to have their sex served as they demand and without any consequence or repercussions for it. Well, that sounds convenient. Look, I already told you --- our understanding come from knowing there is extremely well documented empirical evidence for the Judeo-Christian God. And His messages have been given in a myriad of ways, none so strong as what the Catholic Church teaches and what the saints have revealed. And the saints have provided amazing signs and wonders to validate their words. So there is no need for us to look any further than to know 1) legalized abortion is very wrong and sinful, and 2) gay marriage is wrong and a pox on society. We as a society shall pay dearly for telling God --- “yes, we hear you God, we are simply not interested in what you want of us.”

You havent really addressed any of my points.

My case is this.Those who are pushing for a religious exemption are very selective in who they are targeting.

Let me reduce it to a simple question.

Why do the religious bigots target Gays and not other groups who are condemned in the bible ?

I provided some examples for you. Here is another.

How does a murderer get his cake but the Gay cop doesnt ?

Unless you can give a credible answer then you have no case.

You haven’t really addressed any of my points.

I proposed many points or questions --- and I surely did address many of them. I will note this for my own future reference, however, that I may be wasting my valuable time.


Let me reduce it to a simple question. Why do the religious bigots target Gays and not other groups who are condemned in the bible ? I provided some examples for you. Here is another.How does a murderer get his cake but the Gay cop doesnt ? Unless you can give a credible answer then you have no case.

I am not really worried about your opinion of what is “credible,” for the record.

What gay cop would not get a cake? What person of any stripe would not get a cake? The reason the Christian bakery objects is because of what they want said on the cake or done to the cake. If some nazi came in and said he wants a chocolate cake that says best wishes he would get the cake. But if he said he wanted “Death to all Jews” written on the cake he would be refused. Same if someone asked for a cake to say “I love having sex with prostitutes.”

Are we getting through to you at all?

I have explained in detail to you what I believe this is all about. But you want to pretend I said nothing and choose not to address my challenges. So I am losing respect for your ways, not that that bothers you I am sure. But I will reiterate – you and some gay activists could not care less where you get your wedding cakes from. Your whole mission is to destroy Christianity and to render God a myth or inconsequential. And to squelch the voices of Christians having no say in legislative matters. 30 out of 30 states all voted against gay marriage in referendums, but all it took was a godless media and government and a bunch of hyper-liberal celebrities and gay activists to pressure the courts and society to think otherwise. So you bullied your way into a resolution. I am so happy for you, but I am sad for you, too. And for our world.

Finally, all sin is “targeted” to use your word. Tell me one sin that the Catholic Church would not address or has not addressed in some manner?

Ok . calm down. The gay couple wanted a wedding cake. They were refused because they were gay. Why are they serving the murderer ?
Because he isnt gay and that is the current focus of hate.
Just extending your analogy I guess a muslim couple would get a knock back if they wanted a cake with a muslim message on it.
You cannot even answer my simple question without droning off into some bogus character analysis and abuse.
You guys take the biscuit.

And you are not listening or are incapable of comprehending.

Until you present yourself as a more honest debater, I will not bother trying.

You also specialize in avoiding any question you do not have a good response for.

I think my point has been made.You will serve anybody apart from Gays.
You have no case and you have no defence.

Why dont you go and see these guys.
Gay Catholics - Church of St. Francis Xavier - New York, NY

And then check out these sites.
Gay Catholic Dating | Date Gay Catholics Online
This one is free.
Catholic Dating, Singles, Personals @ catholicmates.com
http://mingle2.com/online-dating/arkansas/catholic-point/gay-personals

This one is just for priests.
+VENERABILIS+ [ Official ]

 

[WinterBorn]

Right. No need to teach kids anything about a lethal, incurable disease that they can get from what their teenage hormones are making them obsess over, right?

Not in school. It's disease. Get your medical advice from a doctor not a teacher.

So let kids die because they may not ask a doctor? Or even see a doctor? Great idea.

Plenty of kids die because parents don't want to take children to the doctor. That does not mean that a teacher is qualified or even should discuss medical issues with children. Teachers are not diagnosticians. If the teacher discusses butt fucking with your son and he gets AIDS are you going to sue the teacher for medical malpractice?

No one is talking about diagnosing a disease. It is a simple health issue that a school can be instrumental in helping with.

YOu are truly a bitter harpy.

And the doctor should teach algebra,

What about the nutritional info they teach? You know, the food pyramid and all? Or how about the D.A.R.E. program? Or even the Stranger Danger lessons? I suppose all of those should not be in schools either? They should talk to a nutritionist, a pharmacist, and a police officer, not a teacher?

 

[Stephanie]

Right. No need to teach kids anything about a lethal, incurable disease that they can get from what their teenage hormones are making them obsess over, right?

Not in school. It's disease. Get your medical advice from a doctor not a teacher.

In other words, don't worry about kids getting AIDS. Let them be ignorant and hope for the best.

Has there been some law prohibiting parents from discussing AIDS with their children? It doesn't belong in school.

It belongs where ever we can get the info to kids before they become sexually active. Your prudishness should not cost kids their lives.

Health: Underage sex campaigner Victoria Gillick
Victoria Gillick was Britains greatest campaigner against sex education. Her daughter got pregnant whist still at school.

there's that tolerance and compassion for all people that the left crows they have so much more of than anyone in the whole world. attack people's children because you have nothing else . but it show how hateful you snobs on the left are.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Not in school. It's disease. Get your medical advice from a doctor not a teacher.

In other words, don't worry about kids getting AIDS. Let them be ignorant and hope for the best.

Has there been some law prohibiting parents from discussing AIDS with their children? It doesn't belong in school.

It belongs where ever we can get the info to kids before they become sexually active. Your prudishness should not cost kids their lives.

Health: Underage sex campaigner Victoria Gillick
Victoria Gillick was Britains greatest campaigner against sex education. Her daughter got pregnant whist still at school.

there's that tolerance and compassion for all people that the left crows they have so much more of than anyone in the whole world. attack people's children because you have nothing else . but it show how hateful you snobs on the left are.

Not really. The hypocrite was the one who used to parade her kids at every opportunity to illustrate the benefits of a strict and Christian upbringing. A truly horrible person.

 

[SeniorChief_Polock]

Mississippi pass most anti-LGBT bill to date

It claims that the law could see a woman fired from her job for wearing trousers, a counsellor on a suicide line refuse to speak to an LGBT teenager or even an adoption agency refuse to place a child with a family because the parents lived together before they were married.

This is lunacy on a majestic scale.Is the South so far behind the civilised world ?

Good. Move there and start sucking.

 

[Stephanie]

Has there been some law prohibiting parents from discussing AIDS with their children? It doesn't belong in school.

It belongs where ever we can get the info to kids before they become sexually active. Your prudishness should not cost kids their lives.

Health: Underage sex campaigner Victoria Gillick
Victoria Gillick was Britains greatest campaigner against sex education. Her daughter got pregnant whist still at school.

there's that tolerance and compassion for all people that the left crows they have so much more of than anyone in the whole world. attack people's children because you have nothing else . but it show how hateful you snobs on the left are.

Not really. The hypocrite was the one who used to parade her kids at every opportunity to illustrate the benefits of a strict and Christian upbringing. A truly horrible person.

What do you know about a decent upbringing? You were dick-fed as a child.

they were fed a bunch bull that's for sure. they should shoot their high horse. they've broken it's back from riding it all the time with their noses in the air. .

 

[Coyote]

What Tommy and PinkNews seem unable to fathom is that even people who don't celebrate everything LGBT have rights too. In essence, this bill protects the right to not jump for joy every time someone waves their genitals around in unique and nontraditional ways.

If discrimmination is a "right" then why does this bill limit the right to discrimminate to just LGBT people? Why not blacks? Jews? Women? Native Americans?