Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I said what it meant to me, which is why I never wear one./----/ Like everything else - you're wrong wrong wrong.
Cravats
However, many historians argue that the necktie we see today is the latest evolution of the “cravat” from the seventeenth century. A cravat is a light neck scarf that was worn by Croatian mercenaries who worked for Louis XIII, and then for his successors. These cravats were colorful and helped in holding the jacket together. More than this utility, however, the French emperor was impressed by the mercenaries’ apparent fashion sense—and he wasn’t the only one!
By the time Louis XIV got onto the throne, these cravats had taken Paris by storm! Starched linen ruffs that French noblemen used to wear were quickly being replaced with bright cravats. Cravats were loose and supposedly looked better than linen ruffs.
/----/ Anyone else notice how the conversation shifted from bad Republicans making women wear jackets in the Missouri House to why men shouldn't wear ties at work?Productivity will rise without a tie....big time.
./----/ Anyone else notice how the conversation shifted from bad Republicans making women wear jackets in the Missouri House to why men shouldn't wear ties at work?
Wearing a tie is pointless. No matter where it is. Pointless, unappealing, restrictive..
Makes no sense.
.
/----/ "but not a damn thing for the homeless or inflation."The legislature is now formally dressed and can tackle important issues like not allowing CRT to not be taught where it is not taught, border issues with illegals and how long hair lengths should be, but not a damn thing for the homeless or inflation.
The first order of business in any session of a legislature is to get the rules established. Who is complaining about the dress code? Every employer has one. Do the D's think that the legislators should have to wear uniforms or something?
.Wearing a tie is pointless. No matter where it is. Pointless, unappealing, restrictive.
.It's the REPUBLICANS who are all bent out of shape over what the WOMEN are wearing. They're not passing rules to control MEN!
Are the women going to have to bend over to make sure their pants aren't too low cut, like my daughter did in high school?
Wearing a tie is pointless. No matter where it is. Pointless, unappealing, restrictive.
There are 24 million civilian owned modern sporting rifles...what do you think we're doing with them if not sport shooting?'Sporting rifles'. Oh the hilarity...
.Actually, you have it backwards here. Guys doing time in the joint aren't allowed to wear neckties, only when they get out can they overcome that restriction and regain that freedom.
/----/ You've already been proven wrong. Give it up Libtard.It's the REPUBLICANS who are all bent out of shape over what the WOMEN are wearing. They're not passing rules to control MEN!
Are the women going to have to bend over to make sure their pants aren't too low cut, like my daughter did in high school?
There are 24 million civilian owned modern sporting rifles...what do you think we're doing with them if not sport shooting?
/----/ You've already been proven wrong. Give it up Libtard.
The proposal was made by a woman to clarify existing dress codes.
Men also must adhere to a dress code in the Chambers with male lawmakers required to wear "business attire, including coat, tie, dress trousers, and dress shoes or boots."
.
Your opinion is noted.
So is the message of your avatar.
My avatar represents my fellow americans in general.
.
Please explain the need for a tie. Let me get some popcorn it should be fun.
Please explain the need for a tie. Let me get some popcorn it should be fun.