Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They probably didn't report it because it's all based on assumptions. Mueller and the DOJ haven't made any public statements about the investigation. I realize that they do report many stories on leaked/unconfirmed info, which is where the bias comes in, but this whole "Fake News" discredit the MSM campaign that Trump is leading is waaaaaaay overblownI can't answer that. Got no clue... didn't watch CNN todayMost if not all programs I see on CNN have a conservative or Trump supporter on their panels so theres most always an oppositional voice. They are usually outnumbered 4 to 1 which is a bit obnoxious but at least theres a rep from both sides during their discussions.WOW, they put a conservative OP-ED on their web site, how much air time did they give to the opinion?
.
Nice deflection, the question was how much air time did they give the story you're crowing about, my bet, not one second.
.
I do know the video in the link said nothing about it. So I seriously doubt they gave it any air time, it would contradict their narrative that Mueller has unlimited authority. Rod Rosenstein said yesterday, on Fox News Sunday, if Mueller wanted to go outside his directive, he would have to ask permission.
.
Didn't you just say:I can't answer that. Got no clue... didn't watch CNN todayMost if not all programs I see on CNN have a conservative or Trump supporter on their panels so theres most always an oppositional voice. They are usually outnumbered 4 to 1 which is a bit obnoxious but at least theres a rep from both sides during their discussions.Maybe the Trumpsters are right about all the fake/biased news coming from CNN. I mean look at this crazy article!!!
Mueller's investigation of Trump is going too far — CNN
WOW, they put a conservative OP-ED on their web site, how much air time did they give to the opinion?
.
Nice deflection, the question was how much air time did they give the story you're crowing about, my bet, not one second.
.
Fox does the same thing, put someone from the opposition on the panel as a target. Bet they pay them well.Most if not all programs I see on CNN have a conservative or Trump supporter on their panels so theres most always an oppositional voice. They are usually outnumbered 4 to 1 which is a bit obnoxious but at least theres a rep from both sides during their discussions.Maybe the Trumpsters are right about all the fake/biased news coming from CNN. I mean look at this crazy article!!!
Mueller's investigation of Trump is going too far — CNN
WOW, they put a conservative OP-ED on their web site, how much air time did they give to the opinion?
.
I watched Rosensteins interview yesterday and it didn't confirm the theory in this op ed, it contradicted itThey probably didn't report it because it's all based on assumptions. Mueller and the DOJ haven't made any public statements about the investigation. I realize that they do report many stories on leaked/unconfirmed info, which is where the bias comes in, but this whole "Fake News" discredit the MSM campaign that Trump is leading is waaaaaaay overblownI can't answer that. Got no clue... didn't watch CNN todayMost if not all programs I see on CNN have a conservative or Trump supporter on their panels so theres most always an oppositional voice. They are usually outnumbered 4 to 1 which is a bit obnoxious but at least theres a rep from both sides during their discussions.
Nice deflection, the question was how much air time did they give the story you're crowing about, my bet, not one second.
.
I do know the video in the link said nothing about it. So I seriously doubt they gave it any air time, it would contradict their narrative that Mueller has unlimited authority. Rod Rosenstein said yesterday, on Fox News Sunday, if Mueller wanted to go outside his directive, he would have to ask permission.
.
Rosenstein said yesterday, much of what was being reported is wrong, of course he wouldn't elaborate, but there is a lot of fake crap out there. Also the OP-ED was done by a former federal prosecutor who is familiar with the DOJ regulations for special counsels, and his opinions were confirmed by Rosenstein himself.
.
Maybe the Trumpsters are right about all the fake/biased news coming from CNN. I mean look at this crazy article!!!
Mueller's investigation of Trump is going too far — CNN
Meh, Trump don't have to worry about Muller. That guy will surly fuck this up like he did that Anthrax thing after 911.
Sassy was commenting about an article that I linked in the OP which he/she didn't even read. I was responding to a different question asking if CNNs cable news programs covered it. I hadn't watched CNN cable news yesterday so I couldnt answer the question.Didn't you just say:I can't answer that. Got no clue... didn't watch CNN todayMost if not all programs I see on CNN have a conservative or Trump supporter on their panels so theres most always an oppositional voice. They are usually outnumbered 4 to 1 which is a bit obnoxious but at least theres a rep from both sides during their discussions.Maybe the Trumpsters are right about all the fake/biased news coming from CNN. I mean look at this crazy article!!!
Mueller's investigation of Trump is going too far — CNN
WOW, they put a conservative OP-ED on their web site, how much air time did they give to the opinion?
.
Nice deflection, the question was how much air time did they give the story you're crowing about, my bet, not one second.
.
Then why are you commenting about it? Do you enjoy talking about things you're ignorant about?
To sassyirishlass for the same reason?
From the Rhetoric I've been hearing lately about CNN it makes no sense for an article like this to be posted on their site. Doesn't it go against their anti-trump pro-liberal agenda?He's a conservative commentator giving his opinion so it's no surprise it would be more supportive of Trump than the majority of what CNN puts out.
no. i got all that. just funny she said she didn't watch CNN you said more or less "then butt out" and a few posts later you say you didn't watch CNN.Sassy was commenting about an article that I linked in the OP which he/she didn't even read. I was responding to a different question asking if CNNs cable news programs covered it. I hadn't watched CNN cable news yesterday so I couldnt answer the question.Didn't you just say:I can't answer that. Got no clue... didn't watch CNN todayMost if not all programs I see on CNN have a conservative or Trump supporter on their panels so theres most always an oppositional voice. They are usually outnumbered 4 to 1 which is a bit obnoxious but at least theres a rep from both sides during their discussions.WOW, they put a conservative OP-ED on their web site, how much air time did they give to the opinion?
.
Nice deflection, the question was how much air time did they give the story you're crowing about, my bet, not one second.
.
Then why are you commenting about it? Do you enjoy talking about things you're ignorant about?
To sassyirishlass for the same reason?
It's not fake news. It's entertainment just like all TV news. Mainstream media is in the entertainment business. If you have ever been part of a news story and then seen it reported as news, then you will understand.They probably didn't report it because it's all based on assumptions. Mueller and the DOJ haven't made any public statements about the investigation. I realize that they do report many stories on leaked/unconfirmed info, which is where the bias comes in, but this whole "Fake News" discredit the MSM campaign that Trump is leading is waaaaaaay overblownI can't answer that. Got no clue... didn't watch CNN todayMost if not all programs I see on CNN have a conservative or Trump supporter on their panels so theres most always an oppositional voice. They are usually outnumbered 4 to 1 which is a bit obnoxious but at least theres a rep from both sides during their discussions.WOW, they put a conservative OP-ED on their web site, how much air time did they give to the opinion?
.
Nice deflection, the question was how much air time did they give the story you're crowing about, my bet, not one second.
.
I do know the video in the link said nothing about it. So I seriously doubt they gave it any air time, it would contradict their narrative that Mueller has unlimited authority. Rod Rosenstein said yesterday, on Fox News Sunday, if Mueller wanted to go outside his directive, he would have to ask permission.
.
I watched Rosensteins interview yesterday and it didn't confirm the theory in this op ed, it contradicted itThey probably didn't report it because it's all based on assumptions. Mueller and the DOJ haven't made any public statements about the investigation. I realize that they do report many stories on leaked/unconfirmed info, which is where the bias comes in, but this whole "Fake News" discredit the MSM campaign that Trump is leading is waaaaaaay overblownI can't answer that. Got no clue... didn't watch CNN todayNice deflection, the question was how much air time did they give the story you're crowing about, my bet, not one second.
.
I do know the video in the link said nothing about it. So I seriously doubt they gave it any air time, it would contradict their narrative that Mueller has unlimited authority. Rod Rosenstein said yesterday, on Fox News Sunday, if Mueller wanted to go outside his directive, he would have to ask permission.
.
Rosenstein said yesterday, much of what was being reported is wrong, of course he wouldn't elaborate, but there is a lot of fake crap out there. Also the OP-ED was done by a former federal prosecutor who is familiar with the DOJ regulations for special counsels, and his opinions were confirmed by Rosenstein himself.
.
She said she didn't read the article this entire thread is aboutno. i got all that. just funny she said she didn't watch CNN you said more or less "then butt out" and a few posts later you say you didn't watch CNN.Sassy was commenting about an article that I linked in the OP which he/she didn't even read. I was responding to a different question asking if CNNs cable news programs covered it. I hadn't watched CNN cable news yesterday so I couldnt answer the question.Didn't you just say:I can't answer that. Got no clue... didn't watch CNN todayMost if not all programs I see on CNN have a conservative or Trump supporter on their panels so theres most always an oppositional voice. They are usually outnumbered 4 to 1 which is a bit obnoxious but at least theres a rep from both sides during their discussions.
Nice deflection, the question was how much air time did they give the story you're crowing about, my bet, not one second.
.
Then why are you commenting about it? Do you enjoy talking about things you're ignorant about?
To sassyirishlass for the same reason?
not that big a deal, just the irony hit me.
Agree'dIt's not fake news. It's entertainment just like all TV news. Mainstream media is in the entertainment business. If you have ever been part of a news story and then seen it reported as news, then you will understand.They probably didn't report it because it's all based on assumptions. Mueller and the DOJ haven't made any public statements about the investigation. I realize that they do report many stories on leaked/unconfirmed info, which is where the bias comes in, but this whole "Fake News" discredit the MSM campaign that Trump is leading is waaaaaaay overblownI can't answer that. Got no clue... didn't watch CNN todayMost if not all programs I see on CNN have a conservative or Trump supporter on their panels so theres most always an oppositional voice. They are usually outnumbered 4 to 1 which is a bit obnoxious but at least theres a rep from both sides during their discussions.
Nice deflection, the question was how much air time did they give the story you're crowing about, my bet, not one second.
.
I do know the video in the link said nothing about it. So I seriously doubt they gave it any air time, it would contradict their narrative that Mueller has unlimited authority. Rod Rosenstein said yesterday, on Fox News Sunday, if Mueller wanted to go outside his directive, he would have to ask permission.
.
True, Rosie clarified the procedures taken in the investigation but didn't comment on any of the accusations of inappropriate behavior or substance that is being investigated. The Op Ed was talking about the "ifs" and he "could be" looking into inappropriate financials, spreading the narrative of the witch hunt.I watched Rosensteins interview yesterday and it didn't confirm the theory in this op ed, it contradicted itThey probably didn't report it because it's all based on assumptions. Mueller and the DOJ haven't made any public statements about the investigation. I realize that they do report many stories on leaked/unconfirmed info, which is where the bias comes in, but this whole "Fake News" discredit the MSM campaign that Trump is leading is waaaaaaay overblownI can't answer that. Got no clue... didn't watch CNN today
I do know the video in the link said nothing about it. So I seriously doubt they gave it any air time, it would contradict their narrative that Mueller has unlimited authority. Rod Rosenstein said yesterday, on Fox News Sunday, if Mueller wanted to go outside his directive, he would have to ask permission.
.
Rosenstein said yesterday, much of what was being reported is wrong, of course he wouldn't elaborate, but there is a lot of fake crap out there. Also the OP-ED was done by a former federal prosecutor who is familiar with the DOJ regulations for special counsels, and his opinions were confirmed by Rosenstein himself.
.
BS, he said Mueller knew the limits of the investigation and should he want to go beyond them he would have to clear it through Rosenstein. That's exactly what the OP-ED said.
Mueller Reined In
.
the author of the piece is a conservative, as noted at the top of the piece.Maybe the Trumpsters are right about all the fake/biased news coming from CNN. I mean look at this crazy article!!!
Mueller's investigation of Trump is going too far — CNN
If Mueller drifts into areas that go beyond Russian Interference in the election, the only recourse the administration has is to fire him and that could create a huge shit storm because the administration can't reveal any information about the grand jury investigation.I watched Rosensteins interview yesterday and it didn't confirm the theory in this op ed, it contradicted itThey probably didn't report it because it's all based on assumptions. Mueller and the DOJ haven't made any public statements about the investigation. I realize that they do report many stories on leaked/unconfirmed info, which is where the bias comes in, but this whole "Fake News" discredit the MSM campaign that Trump is leading is waaaaaaay overblownI can't answer that. Got no clue... didn't watch CNN today
I do know the video in the link said nothing about it. So I seriously doubt they gave it any air time, it would contradict their narrative that Mueller has unlimited authority. Rod Rosenstein said yesterday, on Fox News Sunday, if Mueller wanted to go outside his directive, he would have to ask permission.
.
Rosenstein said yesterday, much of what was being reported is wrong, of course he wouldn't elaborate, but there is a lot of fake crap out there. Also the OP-ED was done by a former federal prosecutor who is familiar with the DOJ regulations for special counsels, and his opinions were confirmed by Rosenstein himself.
.
BS, he said Mueller knew the limits of the investigation and should he want to go beyond them he would have to clear it through Rosenstein. That's exactly what the OP-ED said.
Mueller Reined In
.
True, Rosie clarified the procedures taken in the investigation but didn't comment on any of the accusations of inappropriate behavior or substance that is being investigated. The Op Ed was talking about the "ifs" and he "could be" looking into inappropriate financials, spreading the narrative of the witch hunt.I watched Rosensteins interview yesterday and it didn't confirm the theory in this op ed, it contradicted itThey probably didn't report it because it's all based on assumptions. Mueller and the DOJ haven't made any public statements about the investigation. I realize that they do report many stories on leaked/unconfirmed info, which is where the bias comes in, but this whole "Fake News" discredit the MSM campaign that Trump is leading is waaaaaaay overblownI do know the video in the link said nothing about it. So I seriously doubt they gave it any air time, it would contradict their narrative that Mueller has unlimited authority. Rod Rosenstein said yesterday, on Fox News Sunday, if Mueller wanted to go outside his directive, he would have to ask permission.
.
Rosenstein said yesterday, much of what was being reported is wrong, of course he wouldn't elaborate, but there is a lot of fake crap out there. Also the OP-ED was done by a former federal prosecutor who is familiar with the DOJ regulations for special counsels, and his opinions were confirmed by Rosenstein himself.
.
BS, he said Mueller knew the limits of the investigation and should he want to go beyond them he would have to clear it through Rosenstein. That's exactly what the OP-ED said.
Mueller Reined In
.
The be honest, I have no problem with the Op Ed. It is the flip side of the coin of the "fake news" that isn't really fake news that y'all accuse CNN of engaging in. I was just pointing out the simple irony of it being from CNN.
Speaking of Irony... I just flipped on CNN and wolf is talking about this right now as I type
Yes it does my guess would be stuff like this will be put out ever so often by CNN so they can claim to still be an unbiased news organization. From what I have seen of their reporting since election night they have in fact decided to challenge MSNBC for the title of the anti Trump network.From the Rhetoric I've been hearing lately about CNN it makes no sense for an article like this to be posted on their site. Doesn't it go against their anti-trump pro-liberal agenda?He's a conservative commentator giving his opinion so it's no surprise it would be more supportive of Trump than the majority of what CNN puts out.
but you were ok with hitlery's lawlessness.The point of the whole article is summed up in the last sentence.
"This would not only be out of character for a respected figure like Mueller, but also could be damaging to the President of the United States and his family -- and by extension, to the country."
The right winger who wrote the article wants to protect Trump. The rest is just bullshit. Our country won't be hurt by Trump's lawlessness being exposed. Trump and his family would be, and should be.
If Mueller drifts into areas that go beyond Russian Interference in the election, the only recourse the administration has is to fire him and that could create a huge shit storm because the administration can't reveal any information about the grand jury investigation.I watched Rosensteins interview yesterday and it didn't confirm the theory in this op ed, it contradicted itThey probably didn't report it because it's all based on assumptions. Mueller and the DOJ haven't made any public statements about the investigation. I realize that they do report many stories on leaked/unconfirmed info, which is where the bias comes in, but this whole "Fake News" discredit the MSM campaign that Trump is leading is waaaaaaay overblownI do know the video in the link said nothing about it. So I seriously doubt they gave it any air time, it would contradict their narrative that Mueller has unlimited authority. Rod Rosenstein said yesterday, on Fox News Sunday, if Mueller wanted to go outside his directive, he would have to ask permission.
.
Rosenstein said yesterday, much of what was being reported is wrong, of course he wouldn't elaborate, but there is a lot of fake crap out there. Also the OP-ED was done by a former federal prosecutor who is familiar with the DOJ regulations for special counsels, and his opinions were confirmed by Rosenstein himself.
.
BS, he said Mueller knew the limits of the investigation and should he want to go beyond them he would have to clear it through Rosenstein. That's exactly what the OP-ED said.
Mueller Reined In
.
In a grand jury investigation, the prosecutor will explain the law to the jury and work with them to gather evidence and hear testimony. Normal court room rules of evidence, exhibits and testimony do not apply. The grand jury has broad powers to see and hear almost anything they would like. They can subpoena witnesses and documents. There is no judge to tell the jury or prosecutor what they can or can't do. All workings of the grand jury are sealed. The administration can not legally reveal anything that goes on within the grand jury sessions.
How Does a Grand Jury Work? - FindLaw
