More Proof the skeptics are WINNING!!

[Billy_Bob]

Gaps like that usually happen when corporate and right wing interests spend vastly more money on their propaganda than the scientists have available for their friggin research.

Only it's government and the willing media who are spewing propaganda like it's going out of style. On Yahoo last week there was one sceptical report and FIFTEEN AGW reports.

You were saying....

So you are saying that science needs to be "fair and balanced". HA! What a joke.

No, I'm saying that science needs to be FACT DERIVED. AGW "theory" has precious few facts, and far too much science fiction.

Since climate science is fact-driven, non-sequitur. What is not fact-driven, but instead, politics-driven, is climate denialism. You know, the stuff you guys promote.

Were not the ones touting broken and failed models as empirical evidence..

 

[orogenicman]

Gaps like that usually happen when corporate and right wing interests spend vastly more money on their propaganda than the scientists have available for their friggin research.

Only it's government and the willing media who are spewing propaganda like it's going out of style. On Yahoo last week there was one sceptical report and FIFTEEN AGW reports.

You were saying....

So you are saying that science needs to be "fair and balanced". HA! What a joke.

No, I'm saying that science needs to be FACT DERIVED. AGW "theory" has precious few facts, and far too much science fiction.

Since climate science is fact-driven, non-sequitur. What is not fact-driven, but instead, politics-driven, is climate denialism. You know, the stuff you guys promote.

Were not the ones touting broken and failed models as empirical evidence..

Indeed. You couldn't construct a model if your life depended on it.

 

[westwall]

Gaps like that usually happen when corporate and right wing interests spend vastly more money on their propaganda than the scientists have available for their friggin research.

Only it's government and the willing media who are spewing propaganda like it's going out of style. On Yahoo last week there was one sceptical report and FIFTEEN AGW reports.

You were saying....

So you are saying that science needs to be "fair and balanced". HA! What a joke.

No, I'm saying that science needs to be FACT DERIVED. AGW "theory" has precious few facts, and far too much science fiction.

Since climate science is fact-driven, non-sequitur. What is not fact-driven, but instead, politics-driven, is climate denialism. You know, the stuff you guys promote.

How so completely untrue. Climate science is derived almost completely from computer models. As any thinking person KNOWS, computer models are not facts. That's why you all are so desperate to falsify the actual facts to try and make them conform to your failed theories. And yes, it is all about the politics of separating the middle class from their very hard earned money.

 

[westwall]

Only it's government and the willing media who are spewing propaganda like it's going out of style. On Yahoo last week there was one sceptical report and FIFTEEN AGW reports.

You were saying....

So you are saying that science needs to be "fair and balanced". HA! What a joke.

No, I'm saying that science needs to be FACT DERIVED. AGW "theory" has precious few facts, and far too much science fiction.

Since climate science is fact-driven, non-sequitur. What is not fact-driven, but instead, politics-driven, is climate denialism. You know, the stuff you guys promote.

Were not the ones touting broken and failed models as empirical evidence..

Indeed. You couldn't construct a model if your life depended on it.

Really? Grade school insults hurled on the playground are the best you can do? Billy Bob is absolutely correct. Not one of the computer models is worth a shit. Not one has come even remotely close to actual observed data.

 

[jc456]

Gaps like that usually happen when corporate and right wing interests spend vastly more money on their propaganda than the scientists have available for their friggin research.

Only it's government and the willing media who are spewing propaganda like it's going out of style. On Yahoo last week there was one sceptical report and FIFTEEN AGW reports.

You were saying....

So you are saying that science needs to be "fair and balanced". HA! What a joke.

No, I'm saying that science needs to be FACT DERIVED. AGW "theory" has precious few facts, and far too much science fiction.

that dude will never learn eh?

He's just a troll on a stroll!!! All of his posts are more stupid everyday. he rides around with stupid, can't shake the stupid, when he tries more stupid grows.

 

[orogenicman]

So you are saying that science needs to be "fair and balanced". HA! What a joke.

No, I'm saying that science needs to be FACT DERIVED. AGW "theory" has precious few facts, and far too much science fiction.

Since climate science is fact-driven, non-sequitur. What is not fact-driven, but instead, politics-driven, is climate denialism. You know, the stuff you guys promote.

Were not the ones touting broken and failed models as empirical evidence..

Indeed. You couldn't construct a model if your life depended on it.

Really? Grade school insults hurled on the playground are the best you can do? Billy Bob is absolutely correct. Not one of the computer models is worth a shit. Not one has come even remotely close to actual observed data.

Great. Let's see yours. Oh wait...

The fact is that you saying that they are not 'worth a shit' means nothing since you know nothing about scientific modeling.

 

[bripat9643]

No, I'm saying that science needs to be FACT DERIVED. AGW "theory" has precious few facts, and far too much science fiction.

Since climate science is fact-driven, non-sequitur. What is not fact-driven, but instead, politics-driven, is climate denialism. You know, the stuff you guys promote.

Were not the ones touting broken and failed models as empirical evidence..

Indeed. You couldn't construct a model if your life depended on it.

We know they aren't worth a shit based on the results.


Really? Grade school insults hurled on the playground are the best you can do? Billy Bob is absolutely correct. Not one of the computer models is worth a shit. Not one has come even remotely close to actual observed data.

Great. Let's see yours. Oh wait...

The fact is that you saying that they are not 'worth a shit' means nothing since you know nothing about scientific modeling.

 

[westwall]

No, I'm saying that science needs to be FACT DERIVED. AGW "theory" has precious few facts, and far too much science fiction.

Since climate science is fact-driven, non-sequitur. What is not fact-driven, but instead, politics-driven, is climate denialism. You know, the stuff you guys promote.

Were not the ones touting broken and failed models as empirical evidence..

Indeed. You couldn't construct a model if your life depended on it.

Really? Grade school insults hurled on the playground are the best you can do? Billy Bob is absolutely correct. Not one of the computer models is worth a shit. Not one has come even remotely close to actual observed data.

Great. Let's see yours. Oh wait...

The fact is that you saying that they are not 'worth a shit' means nothing since you know nothing about scientific modeling.

Really? What does CFD refer too?

 

[skookerasbil]

No, I'm saying that science needs to be FACT DERIVED. AGW "theory" has precious few facts, and far too much science fiction.

Since climate science is fact-driven, non-sequitur. What is not fact-driven, but instead, politics-driven, is climate denialism. You know, the stuff you guys promote.

Were not the ones touting broken and failed models as empirical evidence..

Indeed. You couldn't construct a model if your life depended on it.

Really? Grade school insults hurled on the playground are the best you can do? Billy Bob is absolutely correct. Not one of the computer models is worth a shit. Not one has come even remotely close to actual observed data.

Great. Let's see yours. Oh wait...

The fact is that you saying that they are not 'worth a shit' means nothing since you know nothing about scientific modeling.

How 'bout that link s0n??

 

[westwall]

No, I'm saying that science needs to be FACT DERIVED. AGW "theory" has precious few facts, and far too much science fiction.

Since climate science is fact-driven, non-sequitur. What is not fact-driven, but instead, politics-driven, is climate denialism. You know, the stuff you guys promote.

Were not the ones touting broken and failed models as empirical evidence..

Indeed. You couldn't construct a model if your life depended on it.

Really? Grade school insults hurled on the playground are the best you can do? Billy Bob is absolutely correct. Not one of the computer models is worth a shit. Not one has come even remotely close to actual observed data.

Great. Let's see yours. Oh wait...

The fact is that you saying that they are not 'worth a shit' means nothing since you know nothing about scientific modeling.

Still waiting for what CFD refers too. The clock is ticking.

 

[orogenicman]

Since climate science is fact-driven, non-sequitur. What is not fact-driven, but instead, politics-driven, is climate denialism. You know, the stuff you guys promote.

Were not the ones touting broken and failed models as empirical evidence..

Indeed. You couldn't construct a model if your life depended on it.

Really? Grade school insults hurled on the playground are the best you can do? Billy Bob is absolutely correct. Not one of the computer models is worth a shit. Not one has come even remotely close to actual observed data.

Great. Let's see yours. Oh wait...

The fact is that you saying that they are not 'worth a shit' means nothing since you know nothing about scientific modeling.

Still waiting for what CFD refers too. The clock is ticking.

Really? You are going to play the child, are you? CFD is computational Fluid Dynamics, the basis for nearly all climate models. Now, bubba, when you grow up do let us know.

 

[Kosh]

Were not the ones touting broken and failed models as empirical evidence..

Indeed. You couldn't construct a model if your life depended on it.

Really? Grade school insults hurled on the playground are the best you can do? Billy Bob is absolutely correct. Not one of the computer models is worth a shit. Not one has come even remotely close to actual observed data.

Great. Let's see yours. Oh wait...

The fact is that you saying that they are not 'worth a shit' means nothing since you know nothing about scientific modeling.

Still waiting for what CFD refers too. The clock is ticking.

Really? You are going to play the child, are you? CFD is computational Fluid Dynamics, the basis for nearly all climate models. Now, bubba, when you grow up do let us know.

The AGW cult continues to show how much they hate real science and interject AGW religious dogma..

 

[skookerasbil]

The latest goofball attempt by the global warming nutters to throw bombs and scare people...........although this one is almost as good as the time the AGW k00ks said the Japanese tsunami was caused by global warming!!!

This time?

Global warming is causing volcano's to go off >>>

Volcanoes and Climate Change How They re Linked

Just when you thought it couldn't get more absurd with these meatheads, it gets more absurd!!!

 

[bripat9643]

Were not the ones touting broken and failed models as empirical evidence..

Indeed. You couldn't construct a model if your life depended on it.

Really? Grade school insults hurled on the playground are the best you can do? Billy Bob is absolutely correct. Not one of the computer models is worth a shit. Not one has come even remotely close to actual observed data.

Great. Let's see yours. Oh wait...

The fact is that you saying that they are not 'worth a shit' means nothing since you know nothing about scientific modeling.

Still waiting for what CFD refers too. The clock is ticking.

Really? You are going to play the child, are you? CFD is computational Fluid Dynamics, the basis for nearly all climate models. Now, bubba, when you grow up do let us know.

There is more in play with climate than just Fluid Dynamics. There's also heat transfer, thermodynamics, and several other principles of physics. That's why the models always fail.

 

[orogenicman]

Indeed. You couldn't construct a model if your life depended on it.

Really? Grade school insults hurled on the playground are the best you can do? Billy Bob is absolutely correct. Not one of the computer models is worth a shit. Not one has come even remotely close to actual observed data.

Great. Let's see yours. Oh wait...

The fact is that you saying that they are not 'worth a shit' means nothing since you know nothing about scientific modeling.

Still waiting for what CFD refers too. The clock is ticking.

Really? You are going to play the child, are you? CFD is computational Fluid Dynamics, the basis for nearly all climate models. Now, bubba, when you grow up do let us know.

The AGW cult continues to show how much they hate real science and interject AGW religious dogma..

AGW religious dogma? Gee, you are using creationist tactics now? That's just sad.

 

[Kosh]

Really? Grade school insults hurled on the playground are the best you can do? Billy Bob is absolutely correct. Not one of the computer models is worth a shit. Not one has come even remotely close to actual observed data.

Great. Let's see yours. Oh wait...

The fact is that you saying that they are not 'worth a shit' means nothing since you know nothing about scientific modeling.

Still waiting for what CFD refers too. The clock is ticking.

Really? You are going to play the child, are you? CFD is computational Fluid Dynamics, the basis for nearly all climate models. Now, bubba, when you grow up do let us know.

The AGW cult continues to show how much they hate real science and interject AGW religious dogma..

AGW religious dogma? Gee, you are using creationist tactics now? That's just sad.

Says the AGW cult member that promoted 2014 as the hottest year on record..

 

[orogenicman]

Indeed. You couldn't construct a model if your life depended on it.

Really? Grade school insults hurled on the playground are the best you can do? Billy Bob is absolutely correct. Not one of the computer models is worth a shit. Not one has come even remotely close to actual observed data.

Great. Let's see yours. Oh wait...

The fact is that you saying that they are not 'worth a shit' means nothing since you know nothing about scientific modeling.

Still waiting for what CFD refers too. The clock is ticking.

Really? You are going to play the child, are you? CFD is computational Fluid Dynamics, the basis for nearly all climate models. Now, bubba, when you grow up do let us know.

There is more in play with climate than just Fluid Dynamics. There's also heat transfer, thermodynamics, and several other principles of physics. That's why the models always fail.

You really should take a class so you don't make a fool out of yourself.

 

[Kosh]

Really? Grade school insults hurled on the playground are the best you can do? Billy Bob is absolutely correct. Not one of the computer models is worth a shit. Not one has come even remotely close to actual observed data.

Great. Let's see yours. Oh wait...

The fact is that you saying that they are not 'worth a shit' means nothing since you know nothing about scientific modeling.

Still waiting for what CFD refers too. The clock is ticking.

Really? You are going to play the child, are you? CFD is computational Fluid Dynamics, the basis for nearly all climate models. Now, bubba, when you grow up do let us know.

There is more in play with climate than just Fluid Dynamics. There's also heat transfer, thermodynamics, and several other principles of physics. That's why the models always fail.

You really should take a class so you don't make a fool out of yourself.

Says the one that does not understand anything beyond the AGW religious dogma..

 

[bripat9643]

Really? Grade school insults hurled on the playground are the best you can do? Billy Bob is absolutely correct. Not one of the computer models is worth a shit. Not one has come even remotely close to actual observed data.

Great. Let's see yours. Oh wait...

The fact is that you saying that they are not 'worth a shit' means nothing since you know nothing about scientific modeling.

Still waiting for what CFD refers too. The clock is ticking.

Really? You are going to play the child, are you? CFD is computational Fluid Dynamics, the basis for nearly all climate models. Now, bubba, when you grow up do let us know.

There is more in play with climate than just Fluid Dynamics. There's also heat transfer, thermodynamics, and several other principles of physics. That's why the models always fail.

You really should take a class so you don't make a fool out of yourself.

ROFL! In other words, you don't know shit about climate modelling

 

[skookerasbil]

Back to the AGW stoning.............( this shit is fun )

So.....whats happening to coal in the next few decades?

The answer is..........nothing!!! Particularly China will be using billions of tons of it >>

Dirty Pretty Rock Foreign Policy

Globally, more coal is mined, moved, and burned today than at any time in history. And, says the International Energy Agency (IEA), global coal consumption will only keep growing another 15 percent over the next quarter-century, thanks almost entirely to big and fast-growing economies in Asia.



Like the title of the thread says...............


And bless this precious rock........as the article above describes.......it lifts many, many people out of poverty!!!

Doesn't matter to the hoax driven AGW k00k contingent............but nobody cares.