Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Meanwhile, a denier-friendly government crashes and burns in Canada, as the Liberals win in a landslide.
We rational people keep racking up the wins in the real world
In contrast, the denier kooks only have their pouty little fantasies here.
I'd tell deniers to get used to losing, but there's no need, given how practiced they are at it. I wonder how they manage to endure the years of constant humiliation? I mean, besides by drinking heavily, something which is apparent in most of their posts.
Meanwhile, a denier-friendly government crashes and burns in Canada, as the Liberals win in a landslide.
We rational people keep racking up the wins in the real world
In contrast, the denier kooks only have their pouty little fantasies here.
I'd tell deniers to get used to losing, but there's no need, given how practiced they are at it. I wonder how they manage to endure the years of constant humiliation? I mean, besides by drinking heavily, something which is apparent in most of their posts.
Hundreds of links in this thread...........hundreds all of which make the AGW k00ks look beyond stoopid. Blowing the 97% hoax to smithereens. Highlighting the laughableness of renewable energy. Exposing the hoax..................
…one wonders if the surface temperature record is now so uncertain that it is essentially little more than a political tool with most of the science adjusted out of it.
Billy.........it is amazing how many people in America have no clue that these frauds are manipulating the temperature data ALL THE TIME!!!!
Billy.........it is amazing how many people in America have no clue that these frauds are manipulating the temperature data ALL THE TIME!!!!
What is even more sad is we as a free people should be checking up on these fools and we dont demand their data..
When we see them having all the laughs and the fun, THATS a problem......but we're light years from that in here at the moment.
"Greenland is blowing away all records for ice gain this year. They have gained almost 200 billion tons of snow and ice over the past two months, which is more than 50% above normal. The surface of the ice gained more than 200 billion tons during the previous 12 months.
Five hundred billion tons of snow falls on Greenland every year. All of that has to return to the sea by either melt or glacier calving. Otherwise the ice would be piled up to the top of the atmosphere."
DMI notice just three weeks ago... The northern hemisphere is now in cooling state.
NASA study: Mass gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet greater than losses
A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.
The research challenges the conclusions of other studies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 2013 report, which says that Antarctica is overall losing land ice.
According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.
[/URL]
skooks, nice lists. Funny, you can post up those who agree with us, and yet the left can't muster up but a few. but.....97% is their response. I LOL at these fools. Thank you sir!!!!JC..........Ian..........Frank...........Billy et. al..................
Thought this gem merited inclusion into this epic thread >>>
Scientists questioning the accuracy of IPCC climate projections
These scientists have said that it is not possible to project global climate accurately enough to justify the ranges projected for temperature and sea-level rise over the next century. They may not conclude specifically that the current IPCC projections are either too high or too low, but that the projections are likely to be inaccurate due to inadequacies of current global climate modeling.
Scientists arguing that global warming is primarily caused by natural processes
- David Bellamy, botanist.[14][15][16][17]
- Lennart Bengtsson, meteorologist, Reading University.[18][unreliable source?][19]
- Judith Curry, Professor and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology.[20][21][22][23]
- Freeman Dyson, professor emeritus of the School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study; Fellow of the Royal Society [24][25]
- Steven E. Koonin, theoretical physicist and director of the Center for Urban Science and Progress at New York University[26][27]
- Richard Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan emeritus professor of atmospheric science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and member of the National Academy of Sciences[28][29][30][31]
- Craig Loehle, ecologist and chief scientist at the National Council for Air and Stream Improvement.[32][33][34][35][36][37][38]
- Patrick Moore, former president of Greenpeace Canada[39][40][41]
- Nils-Axel Mörner, retired head of the Paleogeophysics and Geodynamics Department at Stockholm University, former chairman of the INQUA Commission on Sea Level Changes and Coastal Evolution (1999–2003)[42][43]
- Garth Paltridge, retired chief research scientist, CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research and retired director of the Institute of the Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre, visiting fellow Australian National University[44][45]
- Denis Rancourt, former professor of physics at University of Ottawa, research scientist in condensed matter physics, and in environmental and soil science[46][47][48][49]
- Harrison Schmitt, geologist, Apollo 17 Astronaut, former U.S. Senator.[50]
- Peter Stilbs, professor of physical chemistry at Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm[51][52]
- Philip Stott, professor emeritus of biogeography at the University of London[53][54]
- Hendrik Tennekes, retired director of research, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute [55][56]
- Anastasios Tsonis, distinguished professor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee[57][58]
- Fritz Vahrenholt, German politician and energy executive with a doctorate in chemistry[59][60]
Graph showing the ability with which a global climate model is able to reconstruct the historical temperature record, and the degree to which those temperature changes can be decomposed into various forcing factors. It shows the effects of five forcing factors: greenhouse gases, man-made sulfate emissions, solar variability, ozone changes, and volcanic emissions.[61]
These scientists have said that the observed warming is more likely to be attributable to natural causes than to human activities. Their views on climate change are usually described in more detail in their biographical articles.
Scientists arguing that the cause of global warming is unknown
- Khabibullo Abdusamatov, astrophysicist at Pulkovo Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences[62][63]
- Sallie Baliunas, retired astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics[64][65][66]
- Timothy Ball, historical climatologist, and retired professor of geography at the University of Winnipeg[67][68][69]
- Robert M. Carter, former head of the school of earth sciences at James Cook University[70][71]
- Ian Clark, hydrogeologist, professor, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa[72][73]
- Chris de Freitas, associate professor, School of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science, University of Auckland[74][75]
- David Douglass, solid-state physicist, professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester[76][77]
- Don Easterbrook, emeritus professor of geology, Western Washington University[78][79]
- William M. Gray, professor emeritus and head of the Tropical Meteorology Project, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University[80][81]
- William Happer, physicist specializing in optics and spectroscopy; emeritus professor, Princeton University[82][83]
- Ole Humlum, professor of geology at the University of Oslo[84][85]
- Wibjörn Karlén, professor emeritus of geography and geology at the University of Stockholm.[86][87]
- William Kininmonth, meteorologist, former Australian delegate to World Meteorological Organization Commission for Climatology[88][89]
- David Legates, associate professor of geography and director of the Center for Climatic Research, University of Delaware[90][91]
- Anthony Lupo, professor of atmospheric science at the University of Missouri[92][93]
- Tad Murty, oceanographer; adjunct professor, Departments of Civil Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa[94][95]
- Tim Patterson, paleoclimatologist and professor of geology at Carleton University in Canada.[96][97][98]
- Ian Plimer, professor emeritus of mining geology, the University of Adelaide.[99][100]
- Arthur B. Robinson, American politician, biochemist and former faculty member at the University of California, San Diego[101][102]
- Murry Salby, atmospheric scientist, former professor at Macquarie University and University of Colorado[103][104]
- Nicola Scafetta, research scientist in the physics department at Duke University[105][106][107]
- Tom Segalstad, geologist; associate professor at University of Oslo[108][109]
- Nir Shaviv, professor of physics focusing on astrophysics and climate science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem[110][111]
- Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia[112][113][114][115]
- Willie Soon, astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics[116][117]
- Roy Spencer, meteorologist; principal research scientist, University of Alabama in Huntsville[118][119]
- Henrik Svensmark, physicist, Danish National Space Center[120][121]
- George H. Taylor, retired director of the Oregon Climate Service at Oregon State University[122][123]
- Jan Veizer, environmental geochemist, professor emeritus from University of Ottawa[124][125]
These scientists have said that no principal cause can be ascribed to the observed rising temperatures, whether man-made or natural.
Scientists arguing that global warming will have few negative consequences
- Syun-Ichi Akasofu, retired professor of geophysics and founding director of the International Arctic Research Center of the University of Alaska Fairbanks.[126][127]
- Claude Allègre, French politician; geochemist, emeritus professor at Institute of Geophysics (Paris).[128][129]
- Robert Balling, a professor of geography at Arizona State University.[130][131]
- Pål Brekke, solar astrophycisist, senior advisor Norwegian Space Centre.[132][133]
- John Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, contributor to several IPCC reports.[134][135][136]
- Petr Chylek, space and remote sensing sciences researcher, Los Alamos National Laboratory.[137][138]
- David Deming, geology professor at the University of Oklahoma.[139][140]
- Ivar Giaever, professor emeritus of physics at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and a Nobel laureate.[141][142]
- Vincent R. Gray, New Zealand physical chemist with expertise in coal ashes[143][144]
- Keith E. Idso, botanist, former adjunct professor of biology at Maricopa County Community College District and the vice president of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change[145][146]
- Antonino Zichichi, emeritus professor of nuclear physics at the University of Bologna and president of the World Federation of Scientists.[147][148]
These scientists have said that projected rising temperatures will be of little impact or a net positive for society or the environment.
Dead scientists
- Indur M. Goklany, science and technology policy analyst for the United States Department of the Interior[149][150][151]
- Craig D. Idso, faculty researcher, Office of Climatology, Arizona State University and founder of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change [152][153]
- Sherwood B. Idso, former research physicist, USDA Water Conservation Laboratory, and adjunct professor, Arizona State University[154][155]
- Patrick Michaels, senior fellow at the Cato Institute and retired research professor of environmental science at the University of Virginia[156][157]
This section includes deceased scientists who would otherwise be listed in the prior sections.
- August H. "Augie" Auer Jr. (1940–2007), retired New Zealand MetService Meteorologist and past professor of atmospheric science at the University of Wyoming[158]
- Reid Bryson (1920–2008), Emeritus Professor of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, said in a 2007 magazine interview that he believed global warming was primarily caused by natural processes:[159]
- Robert Jastrow (1925–2008), American astronomer, physicist and cosmologist. He was a leading NASA scientist. Together with Fred Seitz and William Nierenberg he established the George C. Marshall Institute[159] to counter the scientists who were arguing against Reagan's Starwars Initiative, arguing for equal time in the media. This institute later took the view that tobacco was having no effect, that acid rain was not caused by human emissions, that ozone was not depleted by CFCs, that pesticides were not environmentally harmful and it was also critical of the consensus view of anthropogenic global warming.[160] Jastrow acknowledged the Earth was experiencing a warming trend, but claimed that the cause was likely to be natural variation.[161]
- Harold ("Hal") Warren Lewis (1923-2011), Emeritus Professor of Physics and former department chairman at the University of California, Santa Barbara. In 2010, after 67 years of membership, Lewis resigned from the American Physical Society, writing in a letter about the "corruption" from "the money flood" of government grants.[162]
- Frederick Seitz (1911–2008), solid-state physicist and former president of the National Academy of Sciences and co-founder of the George C. Marshall Institute in 1984.[159][163]
Who's not winning and who looks stoopid????
You want to talk IPCC and Alarmist FAILURE?
Here's your sign...
