‘Mr. Wonderful’ slams Trump ruling: ‘You might as well find guilty every real estate developer on Earth’

Of course they have to do with this case since it’s a case about a fraudulent financial statement which is governed by the GAAP standard.

GAAP standards have zero to do with it, you've been parroting inflated appraisal values the entire thread, GAAP has nothing to do with them.

You keep reiterating that he committed fraud, but have no explanation for why he wasn't charged with fraud.
 
No, it was not answered. And you're completely incurious as to why he wasn't criminally charged. I guess you don't care, as long as he was fined and the story is all over the news, that's all you care about.
I don’t know is an answer. An honest one.

It also has nothing to do with the facts of the case.
 
GAAP standards have zero to do with it, you've been parroting inflated appraisal values the entire thread, GAAP has nothing to do with them.

You keep reiterating that he committed fraud, but have no explanation for why he wasn't charged with fraud.
GAAP standards govern financial statements.

That’s a fact.

Are you denying this?
 
GAAP standards govern financial statements.

That’s a fact.

Are you denying this?

You state the obvious, but the obvious has nothing to do with what we are discussing. GAAP standards have nothing to do with appraisal values.
 
You state the obvious, but the obvious has nothing to do with what we are discussing. GAAP standards have nothing to do with appraisal values.
Actually they do because GAAP standards say that current market value has to reflect the price of an asset in its current condition.

Trump was using values for his properties which reflected the value of the property assuming things which had not happened.

Trump’s accountants knew this and stated in court they would not have agreed to put out the statements if they had been aware of how Trump was valuing his properties.

It also has to do with Trump’s inappropriate listing of his investment in Vornado as cash.
 
There are only 2 people that made that call, the same 2 people who prosecuted him.

Appraisals and valuations are subjective, for as many people you could find to say a price was over inflated, you'll find just as many to find that they were right on target. You have zero knowledge of the business, all you 'know' is what a corrupted judge said in a corrupted trial. And it will be thrown out on appeal, so enjoy it while you can. :dunno:
subjective or within reason, is one thing...

but the Trump org over evaluated his asset properties by 800% to 2000%, each and every loan applied for... every year for 10 plus years.
 
Actually they do because GAAP standards say that current market value has to reflect the price of an asset in its current condition.

Trump was using values for his properties which reflected the value of the property assuming things which had not happened.

Trump’s accountants knew this and stated in court they would not have agreed to put out the statements if they had been aware of how Trump was valuing his properties.

It also has to do with Trump’s inappropriate listing of his investment in Vornado as cash.

Then you better call up Letitia James and let her know she dropped the ball on obvious criminal fraud charges against Trump, you obviously know better than she does. :laughing0301:
 
Actually they do because GAAP standards say that current market value has to reflect the price of an asset in its current condition.

Trump was using values for his properties which reflected the value of the property assuming things which had not happened.

Trump’s accountants knew this and stated in court they would not have agreed to put out the statements if they had been aware of how Trump was valuing his properties.

It also has to do with Trump’s inappropriate listing of his investment in Vornado as cash.

I think it's amusing that you think Trump sat down and put his own statements together as well, or even came up with the values that were submitted, you also seem to think that Trump's accountants didn't know how he was valuing his properties. All quite amusing.
 
Then you better call up Letitia James and let her know she dropped the ball on obvious criminal fraud charges against Trump, you obviously know better than she does. :laughing0301:
You’re retreating from your previous claim and avoiding any rebuttal to what I posted.
 
I think it's amusing that you think Trump sat down and put his own statements together as well, or even came up with the values that were submitted, you also seem to think that Trump's accountants didn't know how he was valuing his properties. All quite amusing.
Well, that’s what they said in court.

Trump (and when he was president, Eric Trump) signed off on the valuations. Weisselberg submitted the valuations to Mazars. Mazars compiled them into the financial statement.

What’s funny is that Weisselberg and the Trump’s stated they didn’t know shit about GAAP standards. These people have no one to blame
but themselves.
 

When you have to go to a word salad like this, you are just making shit up. Being a judge doesn't make it right.

“As the court explained in its recent decision denying Mr Trump’s motion for a new trial on damages and other relief [in the New York case] … based on all of the evidence at trial and the jury’s verdict as a whole, the jury’s finding that Mr Trump ‘sexually abused’ Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.”
 
No, actually everyone does not know that. He's been the most heavily investigated person for the last 8 years, no other politician could withstand such scrutiny under an honest justice system. All you know is what the corrupt and vile 'media' have told you.

Right, clearly I just listen to what the media say, you on the other hand get your information from... from... from where exactly?

Funny how you missed the rest of the post I wrote as well.

Maybe I should have just said "Anyone who is sensible knows....."
 
And this is the crux of your problem here in your comment below. Ahh right so innocent until proven guilty , does noy apply to certain people. And most people feel this way because of what they got from the media which had been an extension of the Democrat party and intelligence agencys that were leaking information to segments of the news media.
The fake Russian dossier for one. All bullshit but played over and over again with Democrat politicians expressing it as fact. AND now we know, Trump is guilty of all kind of crimes! we just have to find out what they are !

And there you go. This is how you try to take down a political opponent if you live in a bannana Republic.
How about you all stop trying to take us there?

Everyone knows Trump is as dodgy as hell. Going after him is done knowing full well he's guilty of plenty of crimes, you just need to figure out how to get him for them.

How many people do you think thought Pablo Escobar was innocent? Zero? Maybe his mother thought he was innocent because... a proper Latino mother thinks all their kids are the best. Beyond that.

You need to live in reality here. Trump did dodgy things his whole career. He did "pay to play" in NY in the 1980s, only seeming to stop when they made BRIBERY, because that's exactly what it was, illegal.

You don't super rich like this without bribing people, manipulating things, having fall guys who'll do anything for quick money, including ending up in prison, just so their patron doesn't.

And for the sanctimonious on here who say "innocent until proven guilty", yeah, going after Biden.. how... well going after his son and homing some shit falls off that... right... as I said, sanctimonious.
 
This ruling WILL GUT THE NYC REAL ESTATE MARKET. They have no idea how bad it is going to get. As one guy stated, “it’s like being convicted of murder and no one is dead”


Everybody does it has never been a valid legal defense.
 

Forum List

Back
Top