daveman
Diamond Member
I agree, if by "simple-mindedness" you mean "unwillingness to swallow leftist horseshit".Is the simple-mindedness of conservatives any more evident than this thread?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
I agree, if by "simple-mindedness" you mean "unwillingness to swallow leftist horseshit".Is the simple-mindedness of conservatives any more evident than this thread?
Because, as we all know, truth has a liberal bias.
Clinton Rape of Broaddrick ONLY 3 stories in 3 days...
Following Kathleen Willey's July 1997 claims of being groped by the President, there were a mere three reports. For Juanita Broaddrick, who came forward in February 1999 to say Clinton raped her, only three stories followed charges appearing in the Wall Street Journal.
50 Cain anonymous harassment stories in 3 days..
Networks Hit Cain Story 50 Times in Less Than Four Days; Ignored Clinton Scandals
NONE of you racist Cain haters will admit it but the white man Clinton while PRESIDENT had 3 stories! 3 stories of RAPE by a sitting President!
And you say there is no MSM bias???
At least you Cain haters could at least admit the obvious.. the MSM is racist and biased towards white democrat politician!
I know, huh?Because, as we all know, truth has a liberal bias.
The National Enquirer certainly agrees.
Umm the net was young when the clinton accusations came forward, so not as much info will be there about that. Nor was the media in as much of a enquireristic mode.
Comparing how the media reacted then to now is not a fair comparison.
A Lexis Nexus search shows almost a 1000 hits for Juanita Broderick. Those are news stories bub. Hell, she rode her tear-soaked 60 minutes interview for months...I guess the MSM gives more respect/weight to anonymous people than it does to people willing to face their scrutiny. More so based upon political party witch hunting.
Clinton Rape of Broaddrick ONLY 3 stories in 3 days...
Following Kathleen Willey's July 1997 claims of being groped by the President, there were a mere three reports. For Juanita Broaddrick, who came forward in February 1999 to say Clinton raped her, only three stories followed charges appearing in the Wall Street Journal.
50 Cain anonymous harassment stories in 3 days..
Networks Hit Cain Story 50 Times in Less Than Four Days; Ignored Clinton Scandals
NONE of you racist Cain haters will admit it but the white man Clinton while PRESIDENT had 3 stories! 3 stories of RAPE by a sitting President!
And you say there is no MSM bias???
At least you Cain haters could at least admit the obvious.. the MSM is racist and biased towards white democrat politician!
A Lexis Nexus search shows almost a 1000 hits for Juanita Broderick. Those are news stories bub. Hell, she rode her tear-soaked 60 minutes interview for months...I guess the MSM gives more respect/weight to anonymous people than it does to people willing to face their scrutiny. More so based upon political party witch hunting.
And that poor poor raped woman never filed charges, did she. Nope.
Face it: Broderick was a proven liar.
End of story.
I know, huh?Because, as we all know, truth has a liberal bias.
The National Enquirer certainly agrees.
You're asking for a degree of introspection that's simply not possible.A Lexis Nexus search shows almost a 1000 hits for Juanita Broderick. Those are news stories bub. Hell, she rode her tear-soaked 60 minutes interview for months...I guess the MSM gives more respect/weight to anonymous people than it does to people willing to face their scrutiny. More so based upon political party witch hunting.
And that poor poor raped woman never filed charges, did she. Nope.
Face it: Broderick was a proven liar.
End of story.
As opposed to the anonymous women that also never filed rape charges against Mr Cain?
The point is, that some faced the media, and now, some don't. Do you not find it odd that the media gives so much weight to those that remain hidden?
MRC is Brent Bozell's baby. He also runs CNS News. Right wing Propaganda on steroids. Anyone familiar with Bozell's history knows what a shill he is.MRC seems to be deliberately biasing their sample for propaganda effect.
Best moments in televison wingnut history is when he is on C-Span's Washington Journal and figgits in his chair like a 5 year old chocolate stained toddler when people call in with his lies and idiocy and he has no place to Foxrun. Hilarity!"He and the organizations that he foundes reap millions in PR money annually by selling the political carcinogens of extremist Right billionaires wrapped in the flag, mom, and apple pie. It’s the political Joe Camel and the Marlboro Man trying to put one past the American people.
Bozell, a second generation Right-wing reactionary following in his father Jr.’s footsteps, is a nephew of the late William F. Buckley and the grandson of advertising/PR agency magnate Leo Bozell. He one of many of the Christian media Don Quixotes marching off to joust with their big windmill: Liberal America.
More: (Good article) :: Dissecting Right Wing Political Extremism «
Irrelevant. The medium may have change, the actions did not.How long ago were the Clinton stories? Around 20 years ago, right?
Experience.Why do you think you can compare the situation then and now and call it bias by the media?
In other words, it's not "news", it's hackery regardless of your opinion.The habits of news reporting are much different now then they were 20 years ago. News reporting has become much more sensationalist. People nowadays are constantly looking for the next update. There are more extant news networks nowadays, and several of them regularly cycle the same headlines throughout the day. The public appetite to remain abreast of political scandals has increased dramatically over the years as the public has become much more partisan.
Your biased opinion does not make it so.The truth is that there is a litany of factors that can easily and adequately explain who Cain's current scandals are receiving so much comparative attention, and Clinton's so little. The fact that you automatically cry out about bias demonstrates that you, yourself, are biased.
So it is OK for the MSM to influence voters about Cain negatively by writing 50 more stories in 3 days then they did about a sitting President being accused of Rape?
Irrelevant. The medium may have change, the actions did not.How long ago were the Clinton stories? Around 20 years ago, right?
Experience.Why do you think you can compare the situation then and now and call it bias by the media?
In other words, it's not "news", it's hackery regardless of your opinion.The habits of news reporting are much different now then they were 20 years ago. News reporting has become much more sensationalist. People nowadays are constantly looking for the next update. There are more extant news networks nowadays, and several of them regularly cycle the same headlines throughout the day. The public appetite to remain abreast of political scandals has increased dramatically over the years as the public has become much more partisan.
Your biased opinion does not make it so.The truth is that there is a litany of factors that can easily and adequately explain who Cain's current scandals are receiving so much comparative attention, and Clinton's so little. The fact that you automatically cry out about bias demonstrates that you, yourself, are biased.
You're asking for a degree of introspection that's simply not possible.
Yeah, no bias there, huh?MRC is Brent Bozell's baby. He also runs CNS News. Right wing Propaganda on steroids. Anyone familiar with Bozell's history knows what a shill he is.MRC seems to be deliberately biasing their sample for propaganda effect.
I've been following him for well over a decade. Skunk extraordinaire.
A little background:
Best moments in televison wingnut history is when he is on C-Span's Washington Journal and figgits in his chair like a 5 year old chocolate stained toddler when people call in with his lies and idiocy and he has no place to Foxrun. Hilarity!"He and the organizations that he foundes reap millions in PR money annually by selling the political carcinogens of extremist Right billionaires wrapped in the flag, mom, and apple pie. Its the political Joe Camel and the Marlboro Man trying to put one past the American people.
Bozell, a second generation Right-wing reactionary following in his father Jr.s footsteps, is a nephew of the late William F. Buckley and the grandson of advertising/PR agency magnate Leo Bozell. He one of many of the Christian media Don Quixotes marching off to joust with their big windmill: Liberal America.
More: (Good article) :: Dissecting Right Wing Political Extremism «
You're asking for a degree of introspection that's simply not possible.