National Archives Say Biden Is a Liar

Double standards. Many of those women met Trump. You are willing to pick apart inconsistencies if the accused is an R but you believe it wholesale if the accused is a D.

You keep bringing up the Larry King call as if it’s proof. Look at wording and tell me she it actually said? The only person identifying it is Reade. If this was an R would you say the same? Doubtful.

I don't believe anyone is saying that the appearance on the Larry King show is proof of anything other than that she had told other people about the incident many years ago. This wasn't something that just came up now like all of the false accusations against Bret Kavanaugh. Funny how you guys want to forget the fact that the hatchet job attempt on Kavanaugh ever existed!


The only thing the Larry King call shows is this.

AN incident occurred. Not THE incident. To some one.

and that Reade and only Reade, claims it is her mother.
So you think Biden molested another staffer as well. You aren't doing a good job of defending your Pedo hero.
Is that what the phone all claimed liar?
Nope. But you are claiming it isn't Reade's mom, so it must be the mom of another staffer. Apparently, logic isn't your strong suit, Dummy. :iyfyus.jpg:
Ah. Ok. So you are now admitting the phone call said nothing about a sexual assault.

Now, how do we know it is her mother?

View attachment 331122
Hey you lunatic, I said nothing about what happened.

I simply pointed out the fact that your claim it wasn't Reade's mom on the call would logically mean there was another staffer Creepy Joe molested.

I have no idea how you are so fucking stupid you can't figure out where you went wrong with your defense of Creepy Joe. :iyfyus.jpg:

hmmm...you just denied the phone call said anything about a sexual assault. Your words: “nope”.

Now, let’s move on. How do you know it was her mother?
Now, let’s move on. How do you know it was her mother?

It's either her mother, or someone else's mother that Creepy Joe molested. Which is it Coyote her mother, or someone else's mother he molested?
Simple question for a simpleton.
 
If you mean would it make me vote for Trump? No. I would hold my nose and vote for Biden.

Would it change your mind if there was proof of a sexual assault by Trump? Probably not.

But truth does matter.

If there was any evidence that Trump did sexually assault somebody, yes, it would change my mind. But these bimbos come out of the woodwork once somebody makes a claim. We've seen it repeatedly not only in politics, but in entertainment as well.


You meep saying this “you” shit. Like it means something. It doesn’t. Because you haven’t a clue as to what I have said regarding Kavanaugh.

No, I don't remember, but I can search for it if you like. Yes, you. You are part of the left. There is no denying that.

Yes. I am a leftist. Please search for it.

Can I assume since you are a rightest you are ok with sexual assault as long as your candidate denies it?

Sure seems like you on the left are. You weren't with the Kavanaugh situation.
 
Double standards. Many of those women met Trump. You are willing to pick apart inconsistencies if the accused is an R but you believe it wholesale if the accused is a D.

You keep bringing up the Larry King call as if it’s proof. Look at wording and tell me she it actually said? The only person identifying it is Reade. If this was an R would you say the same? Doubtful.

I don't believe anyone is saying that the appearance on the Larry King show is proof of anything other than that she had told other people about the incident many years ago. This wasn't something that just came up now like all of the false accusations against Bret Kavanaugh. Funny how you guys want to forget the fact that the hatchet job attempt on Kavanaugh ever existed!


The only thing the Larry King call shows is this.

AN incident occurred. Not THE incident. To some one.

and that Reade and only Reade, claims it is her mother.
So you think Biden molested another staffer as well. You aren't doing a good job of defending your Pedo hero.
Is that what the phone all claimed liar?
Nope. But you are claiming it isn't Reade's mom, so it must be the mom of another staffer. Apparently, logic isn't your strong suit, Dummy. :iyfyus.jpg:
Ah. Ok. So you are now admitting the phone call said nothing about a sexual assault.

Now, how do we know it is her mother?

View attachment 331122
Hey you lunatic, I said nothing about what happened.

I simply pointed out the fact that your claim it wasn't Reade's mom on the call would logically mean there was another staffer Creepy Joe molested.

I have no idea how you are so fucking stupid you can't figure out where you went wrong with your defense of Creepy Joe. :iyfyus.jpg:

hmmm...you just denied the phone call said anything about a sexual assault. Your words: “nope”.

Now, let’s move on. How do you know it was her mother?
Let's see if I can dumb this down to your moronic level............

You posted this:

Ah. Ok. So you are now admitting the phone call said nothing about a sexual assault.

To which I responded:

'Nope"

So, exactly how does your single digit IQ mind get that I denied the call said anything about sexual assault?

Take a break, get some air. You are embarrassing yourself here............more than you normally do, and that's saying something. :abgg2q.jpg:
Well then. If it described a sexual assault please post the transcript. :)
 
If you mean would it make me vote for Trump? No. I would hold my nose and vote for Biden.

Would it change your mind if there was proof of a sexual assault by Trump? Probably not.

But truth does matter.

If there was any evidence that Trump did sexually assault somebody, yes, it would change my mind. But these bimbos come out of the woodwork once somebody makes a claim. We've seen it repeatedly not only in politics, but in entertainment as well.


You meep saying this “you” shit. Like it means something. It doesn’t. Because you haven’t a clue as to what I have said regarding Kavanaugh.

No, I don't remember, but I can search for it if you like. Yes, you. You are part of the left. There is no denying that.

Yes. I am a leftist. Please search for it.

Can I assume since you are a rightest you are ok with sexual assault as long as your candidate denies it?

Sure seems like you on the left are. You weren't with the Kavanaugh situation.
Provide proof of your claim. Third time you have claimed this.
 
Double standards. Many of those women met Trump. You are willing to pick apart inconsistencies if the accused is an R but you believe it wholesale if the accused is a D.

You keep bringing up the Larry King call as if it’s proof. Look at wording and tell me she it actually said? The only person identifying it is Reade. If this was an R would you say the same? Doubtful.

I don't believe anyone is saying that the appearance on the Larry King show is proof of anything other than that she had told other people about the incident many years ago. This wasn't something that just came up now like all of the false accusations against Bret Kavanaugh. Funny how you guys want to forget the fact that the hatchet job attempt on Kavanaugh ever existed!


The only thing the Larry King call shows is this.

AN incident occurred. Not THE incident. To some one.

and that Reade and only Reade, claims it is her mother.
So you think Biden molested another staffer as well. You aren't doing a good job of defending your Pedo hero.
Is that what the phone all claimed liar?
Nope. But you are claiming it isn't Reade's mom, so it must be the mom of another staffer. Apparently, logic isn't your strong suit, Dummy. :iyfyus.jpg:
Ah. Ok. So you are now admitting the phone call said nothing about a sexual assault.

Now, how do we know it is her mother?

View attachment 331122
Hey you lunatic, I said nothing about what happened.

I simply pointed out the fact that your claim it wasn't Reade's mom on the call would logically mean there was another staffer Creepy Joe molested.

I have no idea how you are so fucking stupid you can't figure out where you went wrong with your defense of Creepy Joe. :iyfyus.jpg:

hmmm...you just denied the phone call said anything about a sexual assault. Your words: “nope”.

Now, let’s move on. How do you know it was her mother?
Let's see if I can dumb this down to your moronic level............

You posted this:

Ah. Ok. So you are now admitting the phone call said nothing about a sexual assault.

To which I responded:

'Nope"

So, exactly how does your single digit IQ mind get that I denied the call said anything about sexual assault?

Take a break, get some air. You are embarrassing yourself here............more than you normally do, and that's saying something. :abgg2q.jpg:
Well then. If it described a sexual assault please post the transcript. :)
That's the best ya got after getting owned so severely? Really? :abgg2q.jpg: :iyfyus.jpg: :abgg2q.jpg: :iyfyus.jpg:
 
Double standards. Many of those women met Trump. You are willing to pick apart inconsistencies if the accused is an R but you believe it wholesale if the accused is a D.

You keep bringing up the Larry King call as if it’s proof. Look at wording and tell me she it actually said? The only person identifying it is Reade. If this was an R would you say the same? Doubtful.

I don't believe anyone is saying that the appearance on the Larry King show is proof of anything other than that she had told other people about the incident many years ago. This wasn't something that just came up now like all of the false accusations against Bret Kavanaugh. Funny how you guys want to forget the fact that the hatchet job attempt on Kavanaugh ever existed!


The only thing the Larry King call shows is this.

AN incident occurred. Not THE incident. To some one.

and that Reade and only Reade, claims it is her mother.
So you think Biden molested another staffer as well. You aren't doing a good job of defending your Pedo hero.
Is that what the phone all claimed liar?
Nope. But you are claiming it isn't Reade's mom, so it must be the mom of another staffer. Apparently, logic isn't your strong suit, Dummy. :iyfyus.jpg:
Ah. Ok. So you are now admitting the phone call said nothing about a sexual assault.

Now, how do we know it is her mother?

View attachment 331122
Hey you lunatic, I said nothing about what happened.

I simply pointed out the fact that your claim it wasn't Reade's mom on the call would logically mean there was another staffer Creepy Joe molested.

I have no idea how you are so fucking stupid you can't figure out where you went wrong with your defense of Creepy Joe. :iyfyus.jpg:

hmmm...you just denied the phone call said anything about a sexual assault. Your words: “nope”.

Now, let’s move on. How do you know it was her mother?
Now, let’s move on. How do you know it was her mother?

It's either her mother, or someone else's mother that Creepy Joe molested. Which is it Coyote her mother, or someone else's mother he molested?
Simple question for a simpleton.

Simple answer for our resident simpleton.

Where in the phone call did it mention:

a) Molestation
b) Biden
 
Double standards. Many of those women met Trump. You are willing to pick apart inconsistencies if the accused is an R but you believe it wholesale if the accused is a D.

You keep bringing up the Larry King call as if it’s proof. Look at wording and tell me she it actually said? The only person identifying it is Reade. If this was an R would you say the same? Doubtful.

I don't believe anyone is saying that the appearance on the Larry King show is proof of anything other than that she had told other people about the incident many years ago. This wasn't something that just came up now like all of the false accusations against Bret Kavanaugh. Funny how you guys want to forget the fact that the hatchet job attempt on Kavanaugh ever existed!


The only thing the Larry King call shows is this.

AN incident occurred. Not THE incident. To some one.

and that Reade and only Reade, claims it is her mother.
So you think Biden molested another staffer as well. You aren't doing a good job of defending your Pedo hero.
Is that what the phone all claimed liar?
Nope. But you are claiming it isn't Reade's mom, so it must be the mom of another staffer. Apparently, logic isn't your strong suit, Dummy. :iyfyus.jpg:
Ah. Ok. So you are now admitting the phone call said nothing about a sexual assault.

Now, how do we know it is her mother?

View attachment 331122
Hey you lunatic, I said nothing about what happened.

I simply pointed out the fact that your claim it wasn't Reade's mom on the call would logically mean there was another staffer Creepy Joe molested.

I have no idea how you are so fucking stupid you can't figure out where you went wrong with your defense of Creepy Joe. :iyfyus.jpg:

hmmm...you just denied the phone call said anything about a sexual assault. Your words: “nope”.

Now, let’s move on. How do you know it was her mother?
Let's see if I can dumb this down to your moronic level............

You posted this:

Ah. Ok. So you are now admitting the phone call said nothing about a sexual assault.

To which I responded:

'Nope"

So, exactly how does your single digit IQ mind get that I denied the call said anything about sexual assault?

Take a break, get some air. You are embarrassing yourself here............more than you normally do, and that's saying something. :abgg2q.jpg:
Well then. If it described a sexual assault please post the transcript. :)
That's the best ya got after getting owned so severely? Really? :abgg2q.jpg: :iyfyus.jpg: :abgg2q.jpg: :iyfyus.jpg:
Are you saying you are incapable of posting the transcript?
 
Yes. I am a leftist. Please search for it.

Can I assume since you are a rightest you are ok with sexual assault as long as your candidate denies it?

That's where you want to go? JFK, Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, and the list goes on. As you know, for Democrats, these "little" things are resume enhancements.
 
Double standards. Many of those women met Trump. You are willing to pick apart inconsistencies if the accused is an R but you believe it wholesale if the accused is a D.

You keep bringing up the Larry King call as if it’s proof. Look at wording and tell me she it actually said? The only person identifying it is Reade. If this was an R would you say the same? Doubtful.

I don't believe anyone is saying that the appearance on the Larry King show is proof of anything other than that she had told other people about the incident many years ago. This wasn't something that just came up now like all of the false accusations against Bret Kavanaugh. Funny how you guys want to forget the fact that the hatchet job attempt on Kavanaugh ever existed!


The only thing the Larry King call shows is this.

AN incident occurred. Not THE incident. To some one.

and that Reade and only Reade, claims it is her mother.
So you think Biden molested another staffer as well. You aren't doing a good job of defending your Pedo hero.
Is that what the phone all claimed liar?
Nope. But you are claiming it isn't Reade's mom, so it must be the mom of another staffer. Apparently, logic isn't your strong suit, Dummy. :iyfyus.jpg:
Ah. Ok. So you are now admitting the phone call said nothing about a sexual assault.

Now, how do we know it is her mother?

View attachment 331122
Hey you lunatic, I said nothing about what happened.

I simply pointed out the fact that your claim it wasn't Reade's mom on the call would logically mean there was another staffer Creepy Joe molested.

I have no idea how you are so fucking stupid you can't figure out where you went wrong with your defense of Creepy Joe. :iyfyus.jpg:

hmmm...you just denied the phone call said anything about a sexual assault. Your words: “nope”.

Now, let’s move on. How do you know it was her mother?

Correct me if I'm wrong but didnt her mother say it was the reason?
Quote please.

I know dogs are smart and all but they cant read.....like you apparently.
 
Yes. I am a leftist. Please search for it.

Can I assume since you are a rightest you are ok with sexual assault as long as your candidate denies it?

That's where you want to go? JFK, Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, and the list goes on. As you know, for Democrats, these "little" things are resume enhancements.
I am not a democrat.

And I fully acknowledge neither party holds the highroad in sexual affairs.

Do you?
 
Double standards. Many of those women met Trump. You are willing to pick apart inconsistencies if the accused is an R but you believe it wholesale if the accused is a D.

You keep bringing up the Larry King call as if it’s proof. Look at wording and tell me she it actually said? The only person identifying it is Reade. If this was an R would you say the same? Doubtful.

I don't believe anyone is saying that the appearance on the Larry King show is proof of anything other than that she had told other people about the incident many years ago. This wasn't something that just came up now like all of the false accusations against Bret Kavanaugh. Funny how you guys want to forget the fact that the hatchet job attempt on Kavanaugh ever existed!


The only thing the Larry King call shows is this.

AN incident occurred. Not THE incident. To some one.

and that Reade and only Reade, claims it is her mother.
So you think Biden molested another staffer as well. You aren't doing a good job of defending your Pedo hero.
Is that what the phone all claimed liar?
Nope. But you are claiming it isn't Reade's mom, so it must be the mom of another staffer. Apparently, logic isn't your strong suit, Dummy. :iyfyus.jpg:
Ah. Ok. So you are now admitting the phone call said nothing about a sexual assault.

Now, how do we know it is her mother?

View attachment 331122
Hey you lunatic, I said nothing about what happened.

I simply pointed out the fact that your claim it wasn't Reade's mom on the call would logically mean there was another staffer Creepy Joe molested.

I have no idea how you are so fucking stupid you can't figure out where you went wrong with your defense of Creepy Joe. :iyfyus.jpg:

hmmm...you just denied the phone call said anything about a sexual assault. Your words: “nope”.

Now, let’s move on. How do you know it was her mother?

Correct me if I'm wrong but didnt her mother say it was the reason?
Quote please.

I know dogs are smart and all but they cant read.....like you apparently.


Are you saying someone has posted a transcript of the call? Where?
 
Double standards. Many of those women met Trump. You are willing to pick apart inconsistencies if the accused is an R but you believe it wholesale if the accused is a D.

You keep bringing up the Larry King call as if it’s proof. Look at wording and tell me she it actually said? The only person identifying it is Reade. If this was an R would you say the same? Doubtful.

I don't believe anyone is saying that the appearance on the Larry King show is proof of anything other than that she had told other people about the incident many years ago. This wasn't something that just came up now like all of the false accusations against Bret Kavanaugh. Funny how you guys want to forget the fact that the hatchet job attempt on Kavanaugh ever existed!


The only thing the Larry King call shows is this.

AN incident occurred. Not THE incident. To some one.

and that Reade and only Reade, claims it is her mother.
So you think Biden molested another staffer as well. You aren't doing a good job of defending your Pedo hero.
Is that what the phone all claimed liar?
Nope. But you are claiming it isn't Reade's mom, so it must be the mom of another staffer. Apparently, logic isn't your strong suit, Dummy. :iyfyus.jpg:
Ah. Ok. So you are now admitting the phone call said nothing about a sexual assault.

Now, how do we know it is her mother?

View attachment 331122
Hey you lunatic, I said nothing about what happened.

I simply pointed out the fact that your claim it wasn't Reade's mom on the call would logically mean there was another staffer Creepy Joe molested.

I have no idea how you are so fucking stupid you can't figure out where you went wrong with your defense of Creepy Joe. :iyfyus.jpg:

hmmm...you just denied the phone call said anything about a sexual assault. Your words: “nope”.

Now, let’s move on. How do you know it was her mother?
Now, let’s move on. How do you know it was her mother?

It's either her mother, or someone else's mother that Creepy Joe molested. Which is it Coyote her mother, or someone else's mother he molested?
Simple question for a simpleton.

Simple answer for our resident simpleton.

Where in the phone call did it mention:

a) Molestation
b) Biden
Poor Coyote, you are on TILT! :iyfyus.jpg:
 
2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden said Friday morning that the National Archives would hold his personnel records, but the National Archives have denied this.

He’s trying to bullshit his way thru this. But he won’t survive until June.



He probably doesn't know. Personnel records, and certainly official complaints sent to the Senate wouldn't be kept in Biden's possession. There are central repositories for that sort of stuff.

With all the shit rolling towards Biden you dont think he's taken the time to find out where those records are and if he can keep them hidden?
I mean we all know Biden is a moron be even he's not that stupid.

He has no control over them. Don’t start yet another conspiracy theory.

Like barry had no control of his college records?
I hope you get the mange coyote....
View attachment 331105

Talk about apples and oranges. Do you have a clue how things work?

Probably not given the way you confuse fact and fiction.

Obama (and you, and I, andTrump...) control who has access to their/our academic records. For some reason...you seem to feel you have some right to them. Wait...not “them”...just one of “them”.

That is not the case with formal complaints of misconduct. Whether federal or state there are legal procedures and requirements that have to be followed. I can’t think of any incidences where a formal complaint against a boss is stored with that boss or even directly given to the boss. Typicalprocedures are that comp,a it’s go to HR, an IG type office and from there, investigated for merit. The one being complaining Ed about does not receive a copy of that complaint but may receive information about it as well as some sort of action should it be found to have merit. Official records would be kept withHR or similar.

you may wish mange on me, but unfortunately I can’t wish forant further retardation on your part, you have already set the bar far below any sort of intellectual limbo.

Is that why you clowns screamed for Trumps taxes incessantly?
Another faux comparison. Candidates releasing their taxes has become an established norm. Trump broke with it.

College transcripts have never been a norm or expectation.

Any other blanks to shoot?

The man bitch produced Trumps taxes.
Unfortunately for you it made you look like a dumbass.
Surely you remember that?

You mean the 1995 ones and two pages of 2005?

So why was your man bitch so excited?
It actually proved Trump paid his taxes,and if you think the IRS wasn't watching Trump like a hawk you're far dumber than I ever thought.
That coyote is smarter than you are.
 
Double standards. Many of those women met Trump. You are willing to pick apart inconsistencies if the accused is an R but you believe it wholesale if the accused is a D.

You keep bringing up the Larry King call as if it’s proof. Look at wording and tell me she it actually said? The only person identifying it is Reade. If this was an R would you say the same? Doubtful.

I don't believe anyone is saying that the appearance on the Larry King show is proof of anything other than that she had told other people about the incident many years ago. This wasn't something that just came up now like all of the false accusations against Bret Kavanaugh. Funny how you guys want to forget the fact that the hatchet job attempt on Kavanaugh ever existed!


The only thing the Larry King call shows is this.

AN incident occurred. Not THE incident. To some one.

and that Reade and only Reade, claims it is her mother.
So you think Biden molested another staffer as well. You aren't doing a good job of defending your Pedo hero.
Is that what the phone all claimed liar?
Nope. But you are claiming it isn't Reade's mom, so it must be the mom of another staffer. Apparently, logic isn't your strong suit, Dummy. :iyfyus.jpg:
Ah. Ok. So you are now admitting the phone call said nothing about a sexual assault.

Now, how do we know it is her mother?

View attachment 331122
Hey you lunatic, I said nothing about what happened.

I simply pointed out the fact that your claim it wasn't Reade's mom on the call would logically mean there was another staffer Creepy Joe molested.

I have no idea how you are so fucking stupid you can't figure out where you went wrong with your defense of Creepy Joe. :iyfyus.jpg:

hmmm...you just denied the phone call said anything about a sexual assault. Your words: “nope”.

Now, let’s move on. How do you know it was her mother?
Let's see if I can dumb this down to your moronic level............

You posted this:

Ah. Ok. So you are now admitting the phone call said nothing about a sexual assault.

To which I responded:

'Nope"

So, exactly how does your single digit IQ mind get that I denied the call said anything about sexual assault?

Take a break, get some air. You are embarrassing yourself here............more than you normally do, and that's saying something. :abgg2q.jpg:
Well then. If it described a sexual assault please post the transcript. :)
That's the best ya got after getting owned so severely? Really? :abgg2q.jpg: :iyfyus.jpg: :abgg2q.jpg: :iyfyus.jpg:
Are you saying you are incapable of posting the transcript?
Transcript of what? Where did I mention any transcript?

Man, you are floundering you fucking lunatic.:abgg2q.jpg:
 
Double standards. Many of those women met Trump. You are willing to pick apart inconsistencies if the accused is an R but you believe it wholesale if the accused is a D.

You keep bringing up the Larry King call as if it’s proof. Look at wording and tell me she it actually said? The only person identifying it is Reade. If this was an R would you say the same? Doubtful.

I don't believe anyone is saying that the appearance on the Larry King show is proof of anything other than that she had told other people about the incident many years ago. This wasn't something that just came up now like all of the false accusations against Bret Kavanaugh. Funny how you guys want to forget the fact that the hatchet job attempt on Kavanaugh ever existed!


The only thing the Larry King call shows is this.

AN incident occurred. Not THE incident. To some one.

and that Reade and only Reade, claims it is her mother.
So you think Biden molested another staffer as well. You aren't doing a good job of defending your Pedo hero.
Is that what the phone all claimed liar?
Nope. But you are claiming it isn't Reade's mom, so it must be the mom of another staffer. Apparently, logic isn't your strong suit, Dummy. :iyfyus.jpg:
Ah. Ok. So you are now admitting the phone call said nothing about a sexual assault.

Now, how do we know it is her mother?

View attachment 331122
Hey you lunatic, I said nothing about what happened.

I simply pointed out the fact that your claim it wasn't Reade's mom on the call would logically mean there was another staffer Creepy Joe molested.

I have no idea how you are so fucking stupid you can't figure out where you went wrong with your defense of Creepy Joe. :iyfyus.jpg:

hmmm...you just denied the phone call said anything about a sexual assault. Your words: “nope”.

Now, let’s move on. How do you know it was her mother?

Correct me if I'm wrong but didnt her mother say it was the reason?
Quote please.

I know dogs are smart and all but they cant read.....like you apparently.


Are you saying someone has posted a transcript of the call? Where?

Read my post you stupid ****.
 
If you mean would it make me vote for Trump? No. I would hold my nose and vote for Biden.

Would it change your mind if there was proof of a sexual assault by Trump? Probably not.

But truth does matter.

If there was any evidence that Trump did sexually assault somebody, yes, it would change my mind. But these bimbos come out of the woodwork once somebody makes a claim. We've seen it repeatedly not only in politics, but in entertainment as well.


You meep saying this “you” shit. Like it means something. It doesn’t. Because you haven’t a clue as to what I have said regarding Kavanaugh.

No, I don't remember, but I can search for it if you like. Yes, you. You are part of the left. There is no denying that.

Yes. I am a leftist. Please search for it.

Can I assume since you are a rightest you are ok with sexual assault as long as your candidate denies it?

Sure seems like you on the left are. You weren't with the Kavanaugh situation.
Provide proof of your claim. Third time you have claimed this.

methinks-M.jpg
 
2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden said Friday morning that the National Archives would hold his personnel records, but the National Archives have denied this.

He’s trying to bullshit his way thru this. But he won’t survive until June.



He probably doesn't know. Personnel records, and certainly official complaints sent to the Senate wouldn't be kept in Biden's possession. There are central repositories for that sort of stuff.
He probably doesn't know? The idiot has been in DC for 50 years, and he still doesn't know where they keep his records?

"His" records...or the personnel records and records of complaints? A formal complaint is not going to be given to the one being complained about to keep.
Why wouldn't he get a copy to defend himself during the investigation? Or are you saying they covered up for him?

He has been in DC for 50 years, and has had months to craft his excuse. He couldn't even come up with an excuse/defense that lasted 24 hours before falling apart. :iyfyus.jpg:
Yes, he's been in DC for 50 years....how convenient that this pops up.........................just now.
 
For the idiots who can’t read...or are too cowardly to post it...this was the call:

KING: San Luis Obispo, California, hello.

CALLER: Yes, hello. I’m wondering what a staffer would do besides go to the press in Washington? My daughter has just left there, after working for a prominent senator, and could not get through with her problems at all, and the only thing she could have done was go to the press, and she chose not to do it out of respect for him.

KING: In other words, she had a story to tell but, out of respect for the person she worked for, she didn’t tell it?

CALLER: That’s true.
 
2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden said Friday morning that the National Archives would hold his personnel records, but the National Archives have denied this.

He’s trying to bullshit his way thru this. But he won’t survive until June.



He probably doesn't know. Personnel records, and certainly official complaints sent to the Senate wouldn't be kept in Biden's possession. There are central repositories for that sort of stuff.
He probably doesn't know? The idiot has been in DC for 50 years, and he still doesn't know where they keep his records?

"His" records...or the personnel records and records of complaints? A formal complaint is not going to be given to the one being complained about to keep.
Why wouldn't he get a copy to defend himself during the investigation? Or are you saying they covered up for him?

He has been in DC for 50 years, and has had months to craft his excuse. He couldn't even come up with an excuse/defense that lasted 24 hours before falling apart. :iyfyus.jpg:
Yes, he's been in DC for 50 years....how convenient that this pops up.........................just now.

And he's done what in those 50 years?
 
Double standards. Many of those women met Trump. You are willing to pick apart inconsistencies if the accused is an R but you believe it wholesale if the accused is a D.

You keep bringing up the Larry King call as if it’s proof. Look at wording and tell me she it actually said? The only person identifying it is Reade. If this was an R would you say the same? Doubtful.

I don't believe anyone is saying that the appearance on the Larry King show is proof of anything other than that she had told other people about the incident many years ago. This wasn't something that just came up now like all of the false accusations against Bret Kavanaugh. Funny how you guys want to forget the fact that the hatchet job attempt on Kavanaugh ever existed!


The only thing the Larry King call shows is this.

AN incident occurred. Not THE incident. To some one.

and that Reade and only Reade, claims it is her mother.
So you think Biden molested another staffer as well. You aren't doing a good job of defending your Pedo hero.
Is that what the phone all claimed liar?
Nope. But you are claiming it isn't Reade's mom, so it must be the mom of another staffer. Apparently, logic isn't your strong suit, Dummy. :iyfyus.jpg:
Ah. Ok. So you are now admitting the phone call said nothing about a sexual assault.

Now, how do we know it is her mother?

View attachment 331122
Hey you lunatic, I said nothing about what happened.

I simply pointed out the fact that your claim it wasn't Reade's mom on the call would logically mean there was another staffer Creepy Joe molested.

I have no idea how you are so fucking stupid you can't figure out where you went wrong with your defense of Creepy Joe. :iyfyus.jpg:

hmmm...you just denied the phone call said anything about a sexual assault. Your words: “nope”.

Now, let’s move on. How do you know it was her mother?
Now, let’s move on. How do you know it was her mother?

It's either her mother, or someone else's mother that Creepy Joe molested. Which is it Coyote her mother, or someone else's mother he molested?
Simple question for a simpleton.

Simple answer for our resident simpleton.

Where in the phone call did it mention:

a) Molestation
b) Biden
Poor Coyote, you are on TILT! :iyfyus.jpg:

I posted the call that you were incapable doing. Care to answer the question?
 

Forum List

Back
Top