Netanyahu, the Grand Mufti and 'headlining'~let's shine some truth.

teddyearp

Gold Member
Jun 9, 2014
4,846
1,068
255
Pinetop, AZ
So we have a thread here about Netanyahu's speech with Coyote as the OP. Let's start by looking at that:

Netanyahu causes uproar by linking Palestinians to Holocaust | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

"Headlining". The headlines claims that Netanyahu linked the Palestinians to the Holocaust. FALSE. Let's take another look at the article:

Netanyahu causes uproar by linking Palestinians to Holocaust

Wow, what a headline. Intended to incite anger against Israel and its leader. But let's take a look at what was actually said:

JERUSALEM (AP) — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sparked uproar in Israel on Wednesday for suggesting that a World War II-era Palestinian leader convinced the Nazis to adopt their Final Solution to exterminate European Jews.

So, let's get beyond the 'headlining'. How does one infer that Netanyahu linked all Palestinians to the Holocaust with that statement? On the other hand we all know that the Mufti was not the one to convince the Nazis to adopt their final solution; they were probably well on their way on their own.

However on the other hand, the Grand Mufti is not totally innocent at all. He was the originator (IMHO) of radical Islum against itself and the Jews. He started the game plan. He incited Arabs to murder Jews many times. Here is one example:



And he also was the first to put it into the 'play book' about the Jews wanting to destroy the Al Askya later musk. Further into the aforementioned (and linked) article:

Speaking to a group of Jewish leaders Tuesday, Netanyahu tried to use a historical anecdote to illustrate his point that Palestinian incitement surrounding Jerusalem's most sensitive holy site goes back decades.

He said the World War II-era Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Nazi sympathizer Haj Amin al-Husseini, instigated Palestinian attacks on Jews over lies that they planned to destroy the Temple Mount, known to Muslims at the Noble Sanctuary.

So the 'playbook' started with the Mufti and continued with Arafat and now Abbas is using it to incite violence over the Temple Mount.

If it were actually true that the Jews and Israel wanted to take over the Temple Mount and destroy everything there and erect their own Temple, why hasn't it happened yet? Israel certainly has the means to do so, and has had the means for quite a long time.
 
So we have a thread here about Netanyahu's speech with Coyote as the OP. Let's start by looking at that:

Netanyahu causes uproar by linking Palestinians to Holocaust | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

"Headlining". The headlines claims that Netanyahu linked the Palestinians to the Holocaust. FALSE. Let's take another look at the article:

Netanyahu causes uproar by linking Palestinians to Holocaust

Wow, what a headline. Intended to incite anger against Israel and its leader. But let's take a look at what was actually said:

JERUSALEM (AP) — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sparked uproar in Israel on Wednesday for suggesting that a World War II-era Palestinian leader convinced the Nazis to adopt their Final Solution to exterminate European Jews.

So, let's get beyond the 'headlining'. How does one infer that Netanyahu linked all Palestinians to the Holocaust with that statement? On the other hand we all know that the Mufti was not the one to convince the Nazis to adopt their final solution; they were probably well on their way on their own.

However on the other hand, the Grand Mufti is not totally innocent at all. He was the originator (IMHO) of radical Islum against itself and the Jews. He started the game plan. He incited Arabs to murder Jews many times. Here is one example:



And he also was the first to put it into the 'play book' about the Jews wanting to destroy the Al Askya later musk. Further into the aforementioned (and linked) article:

Speaking to a group of Jewish leaders Tuesday, Netanyahu tried to use a historical anecdote to illustrate his point that Palestinian incitement surrounding Jerusalem's most sensitive holy site goes back decades.

He said the World War II-era Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Nazi sympathizer Haj Amin al-Husseini, instigated Palestinian attacks on Jews over lies that they planned to destroy the Temple Mount, known to Muslims at the Noble Sanctuary.

So the 'playbook' started with the Mufti and continued with Arafat and now Abbas is using it to incite violence over the Temple Mount.

If it were actually true that the Jews and Israel wanted to take over the Temple Mount and destroy everything there and erect their own Temple, why hasn't it happened yet? Israel certainly has the means to do so, and has had the means for quite a long time.







Could it be that they are playing nice again and want to reach a fair agreement with the arab muslims , even though they know it will backfire and end up costing them many innocent lives,
 
Netanyahu causes uproar by linking Palestinians to Holocaust

You might want to ask the AP article writer about the headline. The Zionist encroached upon Palestine long before Hitler days, and started murdering, esp right after WW! when they helped alongside the Palestinians and Grand Mufti to overthrow the Ottomans.
Then the Zionist turned on the Palestinians first and then the British. No one like being used.

The Zionist went in there fighting.
 
Netanyahu causes uproar by linking Palestinians to Holocaust

You might want to ask the AP article writer about the headline. The Zionist encroached upon Palestine long before Hitler days, and started murdering, esp right after WW! when they helped alongside the Palestinians and Grand Mufti to overthrow the Ottomans.
Then the Zionist turned on the Palestinians first and then the British. No one like being used.

The Zionist went in there fighting.


The fact that you're right will do little to get through to those who have already been duped by the prevalent Zionist Mythology.

Before the massive influx of Europeans who were Jewish, the Jewish population of Palestine was only 2% Jewish. If the Arabs were innately hostile to Jews, they could have wiped them out easily.

Palestine's native population was & continues to fight a defensive battle against genocidal, Zionist, foreign invaders who came & continue to come from far away.

Of the 38 Jews who signed Israel's Declaration of Independence, only 1 was from the Region. The rest were from Europe, the US, Russia etc. Their Zionist Plan Dalet is the only "Final Solution" that is readily available.

Palestine's Native Residents had & still have only 2 choices:

1. Meekly submit to systematic extermination from foreign, genocidal, Zionist Terrorist Gangs

2. Resist the systematic extermination from foreign, genocidal, Zionist Terrorist Gangs

Netanyahu's hypocritical Pity-Mongering is only a diversion from his ongoing & genuine "holocaust"
 
Netanyahu causes uproar by linking Palestinians to Holocaust

You might want to ask the AP article writer about the headline. The Zionist encroached upon Palestine long before Hitler days, and started murdering, esp right after WW! when they helped alongside the Palestinians and Grand Mufti to overthrow the Ottomans.
Then the Zionist turned on the Palestinians first and then the British. No one like being used.

The Zionist went in there fighting.





Try getting some new history books for a change. The mufti was an Ottoman officer, and his Palestinians joined him in the fight against the British




Amin al-Husseini - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Mohammed Amin al-Husseini (Arabic: محمد أمين الحسيني‎;[5] c. 1897[6][7] – 4 July 1974) was a Palestinian Arab nationalist and Muslim leader in Mandatory Palestine.[8]

Al-Husseini was the scion of a family of Jerusalemite notables,[9] who trace their origins to the grandson of Muhammad.[10] After receiving an education in Islamic, Ottoman and Catholic schools, he went on to serve in the Ottoman army in World War I.

With the outbreak of World War I in 1914, al-Husseini received a commission in the Ottoman Army as an artillery officer and was assigned to the Forty-Seventh Brigade stationed in and around the city of Izmir. In November 1916 he obtained a three-month disability leave from the army and returned to Jerusalem.[
 
Netanyahu causes uproar by linking Palestinians to Holocaust

You might want to ask the AP article writer about the headline. The Zionist encroached upon Palestine long before Hitler days, and started murdering, esp right after WW! when they helped alongside the Palestinians and Grand Mufti to overthrow the Ottomans.
Then the Zionist turned on the Palestinians first and then the British. No one like being used.

The Zionist went in there fighting.


The fact that you're right will do little to get through to those who have already been duped by the prevalent Zionist Mythology.

Before the massive influx of Europeans who were Jewish, the Jewish population of Palestine was only 2% Jewish. If the Arabs were innately hostile to Jews, they could have wiped them out easily.

Palestine's native population was & continues to fight a defensive battle against genocidal, Zionist, foreign invaders who came & continue to come from far away.

Of the 38 Jews who signed Israel's Declaration of Independence, only 1 was from the Region. The rest were from Europe, the US, Russia etc. Their Zionist Plan Dalet is the only "Final Solution" that is readily available.

Palestine's Native Residents had & still have only 2 choices:

1. Meekly submit to systematic extermination from foreign, genocidal, Zionist Terrorist Gangs

2. Resist the systematic extermination from foreign, genocidal, Zionist Terrorist Gangs

Netanyahu's hypocritical Pity-Mongering is only a diversion from his ongoing & genuine "holocaust"





Want to argue with the Ottomans who held 3 body counts


CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA Jerusalem After 1291
"...Present condition of the City: (1907 edition)

Jerusalem (El Quds) is the capital of a sanjak and the seat of a mutasarrif directly dependent on the Sublime Porte. In the administration of the sanjak the mutasarrif is assisted by a council called majlis ida ra; the city has a municipal government (majlis baladiye) presided over by a mayor. The total population is estimated at 66,000. The Turkish census of 1905, which counts only Ottoman subjects, gives these figures:
Jews, 45,000; Moslems, 8,000; Orthodox Christians, 6000;
Latins, 2500; Armenians, 950; Protestants, 800; Melkites, 250; Copts, 150; Abyssinians, 100; Jacobites, 100; Catholic Syrians, 50. During the Nineteenth century large suburbs to the north and east have grown up, chiefly for the use of the Jewish colony. These suburbs contain nearly Half the present population...""

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Growth of Jerusalem 1838-Present

....... Jews Muslims Christians Total
1838 6,000 5,000 3,000 14,000
1844 7,120 5,760 3,390 16,270 ..... ..The First Official Ottoman Census
1876 12,000 7,560 5,470 25,030 .... .....Second """"""""""
1905 40,000 8,000 10,900 58,900 ....... Third/last, detailed in CathEncyc above
1948 99,320 36,680 31,300 167,300
1990 353,200 124,200 14,000 491,400
1992 385,000 150,000 15,000 550,000

http://www.testimony-magazine.org/jerusalem/bring.htm



By the way the sanjak of Jerusalem covers most of what is present day Israel and the west bank, and parts of Jordan


I would say that in 1905 the Jews accounted for 60% of the population, dropping to 55% by 1948. Ist life a bummer when the facts prove you wrong.......................
 
The mufti was an Ottoman officer, and his Palestinians joined him in the fight against the British

What's your point exactly?

Arab AND Jew fought against the British! :cuckoo:




The point is the islamonazi propagandist stated that the mufti fought for the British when he didn't. In other words she LIED like you do all the time.
 
The mufti was an Ottoman officer, and his Palestinians joined him in the fight against the British

What's your point exactly?

Arab AND Jew fought against the British! :cuckoo:




The point is the islamonazi propagandist stated that the mufti fought for the British when he didn't. In other words she LIED like you do all the time.

HAHAHA...

You really are quite a sour little zionut aren't you!

I haven't seen you win one argument, support one of your BS made up 'facts' on this board, and you feel like it's me who is telling lies...

I'm sure there is a name for your psychological condition Phoney!

In layman's terms I guess it would just be called LOSER!
 
The mufti was an Ottoman officer, and his Palestinians joined him in the fight against the British

What's your point exactly?

Arab AND Jew fought against the British! :cuckoo:




The point is the islamonazi propagandist stated that the mufti fought for the British when he didn't. In other words she LIED like you do all the time.

HAHAHA...

You really are quite a sour little zionut aren't you!

I haven't seen you win one argument, support one of your BS made up 'facts' on this board, and you feel like it's me who is telling lies...

I'm sure there is a name for your psychological condition Phoney!

In layman's terms I guess it would just be called LOSER!






So you did not read the link provided that showed the mufti was an officer in the Ottoman army and fought against the British in WW1.

Guess you just exist on your fantasy and islamonazi propaganda, and the need to be a complete prat, cyber bully and troll.


See it is you that is the LOSER because of your Palestinian mentality affliction.
 
The mufti was an Ottoman officer, and his Palestinians joined him in the fight against the British

What's your point exactly?

Arab AND Jew fought against the British! :cuckoo:




The point is the islamonazi propagandist stated that the mufti fought for the British when he didn't. In other words she LIED like you do all the time.

HAHAHA...

You really are quite a sour little zionut aren't you!

I haven't seen you win one argument, support one of your BS made up 'facts' on this board, and you feel like it's me who is telling lies...

I'm sure there is a name for your psychological condition Phoney!

In layman's terms I guess it would just be called LOSER!






So you did not read the link provided that showed the mufti was an officer in the Ottoman army and fought against the British in WW1.

Guess you just exist on your fantasy and islamonazi propaganda, and the need to be a complete prat, cyber bully and troll.


See it is you that is the LOSER because of your Palestinian mentality affliction.

Read the link...

The fact that the Grand Mufti was an officer in the Ottoman army has NOTHING to do with whether he was 50% responsible, along with 50% responsible with Hitler...

The fact that you don't get that diluting Hitlers' 100% responsibility pretty much sums up your insanity!

Hitler is 100% responsible for the Holocaust, lock, stock and barrel!

Trying to dilute Hitler's responsibility to ONLY 50% and pass the remaining 50% to the Grand Mufti is utter zionut insanity!

Trying to rewrite history, as given by TRUE historians, including zionut historians, is total madness!

Let's try again...

You are aware that Arabs and Jews fought against the British?

Yeah, you probably are, but, knowing your zionut mentality, you will reject that fact as some kind of "islamonazi" propaganda!

What does that make you?

Nah, I don't need to tell you, you already know you are a fuckwit!
 
The mufti was an Ottoman officer, and his Palestinians joined him in the fight against the British

What's your point exactly?

Arab AND Jew fought against the British! :cuckoo:




The point is the islamonazi propagandist stated that the mufti fought for the British when he didn't. In other words she LIED like you do all the time.

HAHAHA...

You really are quite a sour little zionut aren't you!

I haven't seen you win one argument, support one of your BS made up 'facts' on this board, and you feel like it's me who is telling lies...

I'm sure there is a name for your psychological condition Phoney!

In layman's terms I guess it would just be called LOSER!






So you did not read the link provided that showed the mufti was an officer in the Ottoman army and fought against the British in WW1.

Guess you just exist on your fantasy and islamonazi propaganda, and the need to be a complete prat, cyber bully and troll.


See it is you that is the LOSER because of your Palestinian mentality affliction.

Read the link...

The fact that the Grand Mufti was an officer in the Ottoman army has NOTHING to do with whether he was 50% responsible, along with 50% responsible with Hitler...

The fact that you don't get that diluting Hitlers' 100% responsibility pretty much sums up your insanity!

Hitler is 100% responsible for the Holocaust, lock, stock and barrel!

Trying to dilute Hitler's responsibility to ONLY 50% and pass the remaining 50% to the Grand Mufti is utter zionut insanity!

Trying to rewrite history, as given by TRUE historians, including zionut historians, is total madness!

Let's try again...

You are aware that Arabs and Jews fought against the British?

Yeah, you probably are, but, knowing your zionut mentality, you will reject that fact as some kind of "islamonazi" propaganda!

What does that make you?

Nah, I don't need to tell you, you already know you are a fuckwit!





Maybe you should try reading the posts instead of trying to insert words of your own into them. My reply was to the claim that the mufti fought for the British against the Ottomans. So you try and deflect when shown to be a moron and incapable of understanding English.
Yes I am aware, but are you aware that the "Palestinians" fought for the Ottomans against the British, and then fought with the Germans against the British.

So what does this make you in real life, a TROLLING CYBER BULLY that has met his match and you are now doing damage limitation.
 
Generalissimo Franco caused the Holocaust!

images
 
The mufti was an Ottoman officer, and his Palestinians joined him in the fight against the British

What's your point exactly?

Arab AND Jew fought against the British! :cuckoo:
Indeed, The British fucked up the Mandate so bad that they were being shot at from both sides. They just threw up their hands and left Palestine. They still can't figure out that they were that stupid and still push to continue the conflict.
 
Last edited:
So we have a thread here about Netanyahu's speech with Coyote as the OP. Let's start by looking at that:

Netanyahu causes uproar by linking Palestinians to Holocaust | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

"Headlining". The headlines claims that Netanyahu linked the Palestinians to the Holocaust. FALSE. Let's take another look at the article:

Netanyahu causes uproar by linking Palestinians to Holocaust

Wow, what a headline. Intended to incite anger against Israel and its leader. But let's take a look at what was actually said:

JERUSALEM (AP) — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sparked uproar in Israel on Wednesday for suggesting that a World War II-era Palestinian leader convinced the Nazis to adopt their Final Solution to exterminate European Jews.

So, let's get beyond the 'headlining'. How does one infer that Netanyahu linked all Palestinians to the Holocaust with that statement? On the other hand we all know that the Mufti was not the one to convince the Nazis to adopt their final solution; they were probably well on their way on their own.

However on the other hand, the Grand Mufti is not totally innocent at all. He was the originator (IMHO) of radical Islum against itself and the Jews. He started the game plan. He incited Arabs to murder Jews many times. Here is one example:



And he also was the first to put it into the 'play book' about the Jews wanting to destroy the Al Askya later musk. Further into the aforementioned (and linked) article:

Speaking to a group of Jewish leaders Tuesday, Netanyahu tried to use a historical anecdote to illustrate his point that Palestinian incitement surrounding Jerusalem's most sensitive holy site goes back decades.

He said the World War II-era Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Nazi sympathizer Haj Amin al-Husseini, instigated Palestinian attacks on Jews over lies that they planned to destroy the Temple Mount, known to Muslims at the Noble Sanctuary.

So the 'playbook' started with the Mufti and continued with Arafat and now Abbas is using it to incite violence over the Temple Mount.

If it were actually true that the Jews and Israel wanted to take over the Temple Mount and destroy everything there and erect their own Temple, why hasn't it happened yet? Israel certainly has the means to do so, and has had the means for quite a long time.

Looks Netanyahu was right.

The Associated Press is lying.

250px-Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1987-004-09A%2C_Amin_al_Husseini_und_Adolf_Hitler.jpg

Haj Amin al-Husseini meeting with Adolf Hitler (December 1941).

On 20 November, al-Husseini met the German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop[159] and was officially received by Adolf Hitler on 28 November.[160] He asked Adolf Hitler for a public declaration that 'recognized and sympathized with the Arab struggles for independence and liberation, and that would support the elimination of a national Jewish homeland'.[161] Hitler refused to make such a public announcement, saying that it would strengthen the Gaullists against the Vichy France,[162] but asked al-Husseini 'to lock ...deep in his heart' the following points, which Christopher Browning summarizes as follows, that

‘Germany has resolved, step by step, to ask one European nation after the other to solve its Jewish problem, and at the proper time, direct a similar appeal to non-European nations as well'. When Germany had defeated Russia and broken through the Caucasus into the Middle East, it would have no further imperial goals of its own and would support Arab liberation... But Hitler did have one goal. "Germany’s objective would then be solely the destruction of the Jewish element residing in the Arab sphere under the protection of British power". (Das deutsche Ziel würde dann lediglich die Vernichtung des im arabischen Raum unter der Protektion der britischen Macht lebenden Judentums sein). In short, Jews were not simply to be driven out of the German sphere but would be hunted down and destroyed even beyond it.’[163]

Amin al-Husseini - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
So we have a thread here about Netanyahu's speech with Coyote as the OP. Let's start by looking at that:

Netanyahu causes uproar by linking Palestinians to Holocaust | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

"Headlining". The headlines claims that Netanyahu linked the Palestinians to the Holocaust. FALSE. Let's take another look at the article:

Netanyahu causes uproar by linking Palestinians to Holocaust

Wow, what a headline. Intended to incite anger against Israel and its leader. But let's take a look at what was actually said:

JERUSALEM (AP) — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sparked uproar in Israel on Wednesday for suggesting that a World War II-era Palestinian leader convinced the Nazis to adopt their Final Solution to exterminate European Jews.

So, let's get beyond the 'headlining'. How does one infer that Netanyahu linked all Palestinians to the Holocaust with that statement? On the other hand we all know that the Mufti was not the one to convince the Nazis to adopt their final solution; they were probably well on their way on their own.

However on the other hand, the Grand Mufti is not totally innocent at all. He was the originator (IMHO) of radical Islum against itself and the Jews. He started the game plan. He incited Arabs to murder Jews many times. Here is one example:



And he also was the first to put it into the 'play book' about the Jews wanting to destroy the Al Askya later musk. Further into the aforementioned (and linked) article:

Speaking to a group of Jewish leaders Tuesday, Netanyahu tried to use a historical anecdote to illustrate his point that Palestinian incitement surrounding Jerusalem's most sensitive holy site goes back decades.

He said the World War II-era Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Nazi sympathizer Haj Amin al-Husseini, instigated Palestinian attacks on Jews over lies that they planned to destroy the Temple Mount, known to Muslims at the Noble Sanctuary.

So the 'playbook' started with the Mufti and continued with Arafat and now Abbas is using it to incite violence over the Temple Mount.

If it were actually true that the Jews and Israel wanted to take over the Temple Mount and destroy everything there and erect their own Temple, why hasn't it happened yet? Israel certainly has the means to do so, and has had the means for quite a long time.


...and Edwin Black goes on my list of complete idiots not worth bothering with. Pity really, I meant to get hold of his "The Transfer Agreement": The Nazi- Zionist alliance, but based on that You-tube appearance, the man has absolutely no idea of what he's talking about. Well that's an hour of my life I won't get back. (Yes I saw it twice; couldn't believe my ears the first time round and the interviewer was just too funny...seems the CBN caters for utter morons.)
 
Last edited:
Oh, the bastard Nazis, and that bastard, Hitler, were all hot-and-bothered over the idea of slaughtering the Jews.

The Grand Poobah of Jerusalem wasn't responsible for planting the seed of the Holocaust.

He merely contributed his own watering-can, as one of dozens, to encourage the Gardener to grow the seed.

He was scum... but only one of dozens of high-profile leaders of the times who encouraged the slaughter of the Jews... merely part of The Scum Club.

But... given his influence upon the events of 1948-1949... and upon the later leadership of the PLO et al... it's no wonder that their successors are the scum they are.
 
The mufti was an Ottoman officer, and his Palestinians joined him in the fight against the British

What's your point exactly?

Arab AND Jew fought against the British! :cuckoo:




The point is the islamonazi propagandist stated that the mufti fought for the British when he didn't. In other words she LIED like you do all the time.

HAHAHA...

You really are quite a sour little zionut aren't you!

I haven't seen you win one argument, support one of your BS made up 'facts' on this board, and you feel like it's me who is telling lies...

I'm sure there is a name for your psychological condition Phoney!

In layman's terms I guess it would just be called LOSER!






So you did not read the link provided that showed the mufti was an officer in the Ottoman army and fought against the British in WW1.

Guess you just exist on your fantasy and islamonazi propaganda, and the need to be a complete prat, cyber bully and troll.


See it is you that is the LOSER because of your Palestinian mentality affliction.

Read the link...

The fact that the Grand Mufti was an officer in the Ottoman army has NOTHING to do with whether he was 50% responsible, along with 50% responsible with Hitler...

The fact that you don't get that diluting Hitlers' 100% responsibility pretty much sums up your insanity!

Hitler is 100% responsible for the Holocaust, lock, stock and barrel!

Trying to dilute Hitler's responsibility to ONLY 50% and pass the remaining 50% to the Grand Mufti is utter zionut insanity!

Trying to rewrite history, as given by TRUE historians, including zionut historians, is total madness!

Let's try again...

You are aware that Arabs and Jews fought against the British?

Yeah, you probably are, but, knowing your zionut mentality, you will reject that fact as some kind of "islamonazi" propaganda!

What does that make you?

Nah, I don't need to tell you, you already know you are a fuckwit!

Personally I think its time we dilute some of Hitler's responsibility for the "start" of WWII, as this was a Zionist plan since before WWI. Judea declared war on Germany in 1933, the Zionist made out like fat cats, and lets not forget the agreement they made with Hitler, Transfer Agreement. The only jews in Poland the Zionist gave 10 cents about were the young able one able to fight or the ones with money, as most of them were Haredi Jews (religious) which the Zionist wanted a secular state.... but they have learned being a Jewish state brings in more money and sympathy from the evangelicals. Getting tired of all these lies.
 
Oh, the bastard Nazis, and that bastard, Hitler, were all hot-and-bothered over the idea of slaughtering the Jews.

The Grand Poobah of Jerusalem wasn't responsible for planting the seed of the Holocaust.

He merely contributed his own watering-can, as one of dozens, to encourage the Gardener to grow the seed.

He was scum... but only one of dozens of high-profile leaders of the times who encouraged the slaughter of the Jews... merely part of The Scum Club.

But... given his influence upon the events of 1948-1949... and upon the later leadership of the PLO et al... it's no wonder that their successors are the scum they are.

He did what any leader of people being attacked would do, he sided with the enemy of his people's attackers. It's no different than the native Americans that sided with the French in the French and Indian War.
 

Forum List

Back
Top