No Education Nor Intellect Required...

[Rustic]

I'm not a socialist. I'm also not pretending to be something I'm not on a message board. I'm a fiscal conservative, and a social liberal.

You're all over the map politically, but anything that promotes Trump or Putin, and you're on board with it.

Your lack of, in no particular order, education, ambition, energy, resourcefulness, sociability, honesty, reliability, and general humanity would probably rule you out in any other grouping but 'Liberal."

At least I'm smart enough not to vote for a lying conman who is in the thrall of Vladimir Putin. Who spouts Putin's retelling of the Russian war in Afghanistan, and who had fractured all of the US military alliances and trade deals, largely to the benefit of China and Russia.

A man who is criminally profitting from the Presidency, selling both access to the President, and taking bribes from hostile foreign entitlies, while openly obstructing the investigation of his ties and relationships with Russia. 17 investigations are currently underway against every business or entity in Trump's world, and it is very likely that he will be facing criminal indictments either the moment he leaves office, or before.

I guess my "limited intellect", and my "liberal education", were sufficiently offset by a more than 40 year career, first in banking, and then in law, starting in a small uptown law office, and ending up working for the top law firms on Bay Street, on deals which change the economies of nations, including the Fiat purchase of Chysler, the Windsor/Detroit truck tunnel, and a number of IPO's for multi-national corporations.

I know how business and the economy work - how they REALLY work, not how you think they work. I know the processes for getting things done. Every time I read one of your little diatribes, I laugh and laugh, at the depth of your ignorance and your assertions that you know what you're talking about, when in fact, all you're doing is cutting and pasting your talking points.

When refuted, you deny the information posted, and repost your OP, over and over and over. Repetition of the lies and idiocy of your OP doesn't disappear each time you post it. Quite the opposite, your inability to defend your OP, other than to repeat it, shows you've been cornered and have nothing.

I'm counting down how many more posts you'll try before you run like a rabbit from your own thread. now that you've lost control of the discussion.

Socialism does not work in the real world… It’s truly a pretender

Tell that to Norway and Sweden.

Canada, the Netherlands, Germany, Belgium, Finland, New Zealand, Australia - any country in the top 10 of the Best Countries to live in. The USA dropped of this list years ago, primarily because of the low quality of public education, lack of universal health care, or worker friendly legislation, coupled with deteriorating infrastructure.

Conservatives cannot exist in a socialist environment like European socialism… It’s a slow and extraordinarily painful death.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Lol
Says a socialist

I'm not a socialist. I'm also not pretending to be something I'm not on a message board. I'm a fiscal conservative, and a social liberal.

You're all over the map politically, but anything that promotes Trump or Putin, and you're on board with it.

Your lack of, in no particular order, education, ambition, energy, resourcefulness, sociability, honesty, reliability, and general humanity would probably rule you out in any other grouping but 'Liberal."

At least I'm smart enough not to vote for a lying conman who is in the thrall of Vladimir Putin. Who spouts Putin's retelling of the Russian war in Afghanistan, and who had fractured all of the US military alliances and trade deals, largely to the benefit of China and Russia.

A man who is criminally profitting from the Presidency, selling both access to the President, and taking bribes from hostile foreign entitlies, while openly obstructing the investigation of his ties and relationships with Russia. 17 investigations are currently underway against every business or entity in Trump's world, and it is very likely that he will be facing criminal indictments either the moment he leaves office, or before.

I guess my "limited intellect", and my "liberal education", were sufficiently offset by a more than 40 year career, first in banking, and then in law, starting in a small uptown law office, and ending up working for the top law firms on Bay Street, on deals which change the economies of nations, including the Fiat purchase of Chysler, the Windsor/Detroit truck tunnel, and a number of IPO's for multi-national corporations.

I know how business and the economy work - how they REALLY work, not how you think they work. I know the processes for getting things done. Every time I read one of your little diatribes, I laugh and laugh, at the depth of your ignorance and your assertions that you know what you're talking about, when in fact, all you're doing is cutting and pasting your talking points.

When refuted, you deny the information posted, and repost your OP, over and over and over. Repetition of the lies and idiocy of your OP doesn't disappear each time you post it. Quite the opposite, your inability to defend your OP, other than to repeat it, shows you've been cornered and have nothing.

I'm counting down how many more posts you'll try before you run like a rabbit from your own thread. now that you've lost control of the discussion.

Socialism does not work in the real world… It’s truly a pretender

Tell that to Norway and Sweden.

You are an imbecile.

I'd tell you to stick to posting about stuff you know....but then you'd be mute.

Myth Socialism works spectacularly in Nordic countries.


The problem here is the equating socialist redistribution programs, with socialist economies. The Scandinavian nations are not socialist economies; Denmark has a freer economy than does the USA. Higher tax rates to support the redistributionist part, but far less business regulation than America.



“Speaking at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, Danish PM Lars Løkke Rasmussen told students that he had “absolutely no wish to interfere the presidential debate in the US” but nonetheless attempted to set the record straight about his country.



"I know that some people in the US associate the Nordic model with some sort of socialism. Therefore I would like to make one thing clear. Denmark is far from a socialist planned economy. Denmark is a market economy,” Rasmussen said.



“The Nordic model is an expanded welfare state which provides a high level of security for its citizens, but it is also a successful market economy with much freedom to pursue your dreams and live your life as you wish,” he added.


The PM’s comments come after US presidential hopefuls Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton used part of the first Democratic debate to discuss how the United States could emulate Scandinavia.” Danish PM in US: Denmark is not socialist




Check out the rankings of economic freedom, here: Country Rankings: World & Global Economy Rankings on Economic Freedom

Ready to admit you're an imbecile???????

 

[Rustic]

There is a reason why Socialism has never worked long term, it’s been tried for centuries...
A Famous dude once said something like, trying something over and over again and expecting different results is insanity.
But what’s worse socialism has to be forced on people that want nothing to do with it... that makes it evil

 

[Dragonlady]

I vote for Democratic candidates because the party doesn’t deny science for political expediency.

Hardly.
You're no more than a trained seal.... vote Democrat and get a fish tossed to you.

You must really like fish, huh?




Science????

1. Progressives regularly claim that it is their beliefs that are based on science, and that conservatives are anti-science….even claiming that progressivism and science are one and the same, or they may conflate technological progress with political progressivism.
   1. Leftists at the Center for American Progress have a website called Your Genes Not for Sale They claim: “Through this work we are building piece by piece the progressive narrative of science and technology policy.”

1. Let’s take a look at who is ‘anti-science’: 93 % of scientists acknowledge the necessity of animal research, as do 62 % of Republicans, but only 48% of Democrats. Section 5: Evolution, Climate Change and Other Issues
   1. Nuclear power plants? 70 % of scientists favor, as do 62 % of Republicans, but only 45% of Democrats Ibid.
   2. The National Academy of Sciences found that genetically engineered food is safe. So say more Republicans (48%) than Democrats (42%) Who’s More Anti-Science: Republicans or Democrats?

4. “Republicans are more scientifically literate than Democrats or independents are”…with respect to belief in astrology, the need for control groups, probability, antibiotics, exposure to radioactivity….Check out the list at The Audacious Epigone: Republicans are more scientifically literate than Democrats or independents are


Turns out you're wrong again, huh?

As proof of your assertions, you post from an alternative media website that boasts that it "A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media", which of course is code for "bullshit we can't get published elsewhere".

Liberals aren't teaching their children that the earth is 6000 years old, that evolution doesn't exist, and Einstein didn't know what he was talking about, although those self same people use GPS which is based, in part, on Einstein's theories. More importantly, it isn't liberals who are denying climate change, who are rolling back standards for clean air and water in a country where clean drinking water is already starting to become an issue.

 

[Pilot1]

As proof of your assertions, you post from an alternative media website that boasts that it "A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media", which of course is code for "bullshit we can't get published elsewhere".

Liberals aren't teaching their children that the earth is 6000 years old, that evolution doesn't exist, and Einstein didn't know what he was talking about, although those self same people use GPS which is based, in part, on Einstein's theories. More importantly, it isn't liberals who are denying climate change, who are rolling back standards for clean air and water in a country where clean drinking water is already starting to become an issue.

You are again talking in the EXTREME purely to demonize, and be dishonest. MOST conservatives aren't teaching that either. They want clean air, and clean water just not unnecessary regulation which strangles the economy. We aren't creating environmental problems just a VIBRANT ECONOMY, and JOBS.

More Government and BIG Government is not the answer to every problem.

 

[Rustic]

I vote for Democratic candidates because the party doesn’t deny science for political expediency.

Hardly.
You're no more than a trained seal.... vote Democrat and get a fish tossed to you.

You must really like fish, huh?




Science????

1. Progressives regularly claim that it is their beliefs that are based on science, and that conservatives are anti-science….even claiming that progressivism and science are one and the same, or they may conflate technological progress with political progressivism.
   1. Leftists at the Center for American Progress have a website called Your Genes Not for Sale They claim: “Through this work we are building piece by piece the progressive narrative of science and technology policy.”

1. Let’s take a look at who is ‘anti-science’: 93 % of scientists acknowledge the necessity of animal research, as do 62 % of Republicans, but only 48% of Democrats. Section 5: Evolution, Climate Change and Other Issues
   1. Nuclear power plants? 70 % of scientists favor, as do 62 % of Republicans, but only 45% of Democrats Ibid.
   2. The National Academy of Sciences found that genetically engineered food is safe. So say more Republicans (48%) than Democrats (42%) Who’s More Anti-Science: Republicans or Democrats?

4. “Republicans are more scientifically literate than Democrats or independents are”…with respect to belief in astrology, the need for control groups, probability, antibiotics, exposure to radioactivity….Check out the list at The Audacious Epigone: Republicans are more scientifically literate than Democrats or independents are


Turns out you're wrong again, huh?

As proof of your assertions, you post from an alternative media website that boasts that it "A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media", which of course is code for "bullshit we can't get published elsewhere".

Liberals aren't teaching their children that the earth is 6000 years old, that evolution doesn't exist, and Einstein didn't know what he was talking about, although those self same people use GPS which is based, in part, on Einstein's theories. More importantly, it isn't liberals who are denying climate change, who are rolling back standards for clean air and water in a country where clean drinking water is already starting to become an issue.

Lol
We get it, you’re a fucking control freak...

 

[Rustic]

I vote for Democratic candidates because the party doesn’t deny science for political expediency.

Hardly.
You're no more than a trained seal.... vote Democrat and get a fish tossed to you.

You must really like fish, huh?




Science????

1. Progressives regularly claim that it is their beliefs that are based on science, and that conservatives are anti-science….even claiming that progressivism and science are one and the same, or they may conflate technological progress with political progressivism.
   1. Leftists at the Center for American Progress have a website called Your Genes Not for Sale They claim: “Through this work we are building piece by piece the progressive narrative of science and technology policy.”

1. Let’s take a look at who is ‘anti-science’: 93 % of scientists acknowledge the necessity of animal research, as do 62 % of Republicans, but only 48% of Democrats. Section 5: Evolution, Climate Change and Other Issues
   1. Nuclear power plants? 70 % of scientists favor, as do 62 % of Republicans, but only 45% of Democrats Ibid.
   2. The National Academy of Sciences found that genetically engineered food is safe. So say more Republicans (48%) than Democrats (42%) Who’s More Anti-Science: Republicans or Democrats?

4. “Republicans are more scientifically literate than Democrats or independents are”…with respect to belief in astrology, the need for control groups, probability, antibiotics, exposure to radioactivity….Check out the list at The Audacious Epigone: Republicans are more scientifically literate than Democrats or independents are


Turns out you're wrong again, huh?

As proof of your assertions, you post from an alternative media website that boasts that it "A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media", which of course is code for "bullshit we can't get published elsewhere".

Liberals aren't teaching their children that the earth is 6000 years old, that evolution doesn't exist, and Einstein didn't know what he was talking about, although those self same people use GPS which is based, in part, on Einstein's theories. More importantly, it isn't liberals who are denying climate change, who are rolling back standards for clean air and water in a country where clean drinking water is already starting to become an issue.

 

[Rustic]

As proof of your assertions, you post from an alternative media website that boasts that it "A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media", which of course is code for "bullshit we can't get published elsewhere".

Liberals aren't teaching their children that the earth is 6000 years old, that evolution doesn't exist, and Einstein didn't know what he was talking about, although those self same people use GPS which is based, in part, on Einstein's theories. More importantly, it isn't liberals who are denying climate change, who are rolling back standards for clean air and water in a country where clean drinking water is already starting to become an issue.

You are again talking in the EXTREME purely to demonize, and be dishonest. MOST conservatives aren't teaching that either. They want clean air, and clean water just not unnecessary regulation which strangles the economy. We aren't creating environmental problems just a VIBRANT ECONOMY, and JOBS.

More Government and BIG Government is not the answer to every problem.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Not a single one of the Leftists/Liberals has put a dent in my premise.....fact, actually.....that no one of 'em can defend the Democrat insanity.


What is the result of having the education system under the control of Liberals?

This: alexandria ocasio-cortez


1. AOC is being pushed as the fresh new face of the Democrat Party: her plan- The Green New Deal

2. First, every industrial and residential building to be retrofitted with every technological advance.

3. Eliminate greenhouse gases



4. Form a committee that would have a mandate to push union membership; and a national jobs force to move people into green jobs, guaranteeing living wage jobs

5. Universal income and medicare for all.

6. So….the federal government take over and regulate all industries, unionize all industries, ..

7. Has this ever been tried before in human history? How’d it work out?

Yup….Democrats select a bartender to decide on how to run the economy. Hence, the title of this thread.




8. And to pay for this? Raise taxes massively on the ‘rich.’ 60 or 70% tax rates….Ocasio: ”If that’s radical, call me a radical.”

9. BTW,….those in the top 20%, incomes of $150,000, that’s 52% of all income, pay 87% of all income taxes.
America has the most progressive income tax system of any industrialized nation: the more you make, the more you pay.

10. If ,Ocasio, and the Democrats, had to pay for all of the above, they would have to raise taxes on those far lower on the income scale.




Or, as the Left does so frequently....simply kill them.

 

[G.T.]

Of course, she's much more highly educated than you will ever be.

She, like you, has no education.

The etymology of the term, 'education,' proves itself.

'e ducare' means to lead out of, presumably, lead out of ignorance.



The proof of the ignorance is here:
1. AOC is being pushed as the fresh new face of the Democrat Party: her plan- The Green New Deal

2. First, every industrial and residential building to be retrofitted with every technological advance.

3. Eliminate greenhouse gases



4. Form a committee that would have a mandate to push union membership; and a national jobs force to move people into green jobs, guaranteeing living wage jobs

5. Universal income and medicare for all.

6. So….the federal government take over and regulate all industries, unionize all industries, ..

7. Has this ever been tried before in human history? How’d it work out?

Yup….Democrats select a bartender to decide on how to run the economy. Hence, the title of this thread.




8. And to pay for this? Raise taxes massively on the ‘rich.’ 60 or 70% tax rates….Ocasio: ”If that’s radical, call me a radical.”

9. BTW,….those in the top 20%, incomes of $150,000, that’s 52% of all income, pay 87% of all income taxes.
America has the most progressive income tax system of any industrialized nation: them you make, the more you pay.

10. If Ocasio, and the Democrats, had to pay for all of the above, they would have to raise taxes on those far lower on the income scale.


And, of course, you couldn't defend it.

First you posted a whole lot of bullshit and lies about Ms. Cortez, who she is and what she stands for, all of which are your paraphrasing of things she said, not actual quotes from her, and then you want us to defend the stances you say she has?

This is where you trip yourself stupid little self up every time. We are under no requirement to accept the bullshit in any of your OP's as fact because they're generally fact-free. If we are unwilling to accept your lies as the basis of our discussion, you've lost control of the discussion.

Trying post FACTS, not right wing talking points, and we'll respond appropriately. But you don't want honest discussions. You want to trip people up and humiliate them. Sadly for you, you're the one who ends up fleeing your own thread, because you've lost control, or you've been humilated and laughed off.

"First you posted a whole lot of bullshit and lies about Ms. Cortez, who she is and what she stands for, all of which are your paraphrasing of things she said, not actual quotes from her,....."



Just to smash another custard pie in your ugly kisser, note that everything I've said is in the Atlantic article....


Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal Is a Winning Climate Strategy - The Atlantic,





Now, ugly......should I wait for your apology??????

Oh....and try to refrain from the vulgarity....it's a give-away of what you are.

The irony of you calling someone ugly was quote worthy to enshrine it in the messageboarding hall of shame. Youve been crowned.

I can tell you're sensitive about the term 'ugly.'


Look at the bright side...your face is your fortune! Drug stores'll pay you to stand in front, and make people sick.

I dont think you want me to stoop to your level and tell you the truth about your looks, kiddo.

 

[PoliticalChic]

She, like you, has no education.

The etymology of the term, 'education,' proves itself.

'e ducare' means to lead out of, presumably, lead out of ignorance.



The proof of the ignorance is here:
1. AOC is being pushed as the fresh new face of the Democrat Party: her plan- The Green New Deal

2. First, every industrial and residential building to be retrofitted with every technological advance.

3. Eliminate greenhouse gases



4. Form a committee that would have a mandate to push union membership; and a national jobs force to move people into green jobs, guaranteeing living wage jobs

5. Universal income and medicare for all.

6. So….the federal government take over and regulate all industries, unionize all industries, ..

7. Has this ever been tried before in human history? How’d it work out?

Yup….Democrats select a bartender to decide on how to run the economy. Hence, the title of this thread.




8. And to pay for this? Raise taxes massively on the ‘rich.’ 60 or 70% tax rates….Ocasio: ”If that’s radical, call me a radical.”

9. BTW,….those in the top 20%, incomes of $150,000, that’s 52% of all income, pay 87% of all income taxes.
America has the most progressive income tax system of any industrialized nation: them you make, the more you pay.

10. If Ocasio, and the Democrats, had to pay for all of the above, they would have to raise taxes on those far lower on the income scale.


And, of course, you couldn't defend it.

First you posted a whole lot of bullshit and lies about Ms. Cortez, who she is and what she stands for, all of which are your paraphrasing of things she said, not actual quotes from her, and then you want us to defend the stances you say she has?

This is where you trip yourself stupid little self up every time. We are under no requirement to accept the bullshit in any of your OP's as fact because they're generally fact-free. If we are unwilling to accept your lies as the basis of our discussion, you've lost control of the discussion.

Trying post FACTS, not right wing talking points, and we'll respond appropriately. But you don't want honest discussions. You want to trip people up and humiliate them. Sadly for you, you're the one who ends up fleeing your own thread, because you've lost control, or you've been humilated and laughed off.

"First you posted a whole lot of bullshit and lies about Ms. Cortez, who she is and what she stands for, all of which are your paraphrasing of things she said, not actual quotes from her,....."



Just to smash another custard pie in your ugly kisser, note that everything I've said is in the Atlantic article....


Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal Is a Winning Climate Strategy - The Atlantic,





Now, ugly......should I wait for your apology??????

Oh....and try to refrain from the vulgarity....it's a give-away of what you are.

The irony of you calling someone ugly was quote worthy to enshrine it in the messageboarding hall of shame. Youve been crowned.

I can tell you're sensitive about the term 'ugly.'


Look at the bright side...your face is your fortune! Drug stores'll pay you to stand in front, and make people sick.

I dont think you want me to stoop to your level and tell you the truth about your looks, kiddo.

Face facts....you're so ugly when you walk into a bank, they turn the cameras off! -

 

[G.T.]

First you posted a whole lot of bullshit and lies about Ms. Cortez, who she is and what she stands for, all of which are your paraphrasing of things she said, not actual quotes from her, and then you want us to defend the stances you say she has?

This is where you trip yourself stupid little self up every time. We are under no requirement to accept the bullshit in any of your OP's as fact because they're generally fact-free. If we are unwilling to accept your lies as the basis of our discussion, you've lost control of the discussion.

Trying post FACTS, not right wing talking points, and we'll respond appropriately. But you don't want honest discussions. You want to trip people up and humiliate them. Sadly for you, you're the one who ends up fleeing your own thread, because you've lost control, or you've been humilated and laughed off.

"First you posted a whole lot of bullshit and lies about Ms. Cortez, who she is and what she stands for, all of which are your paraphrasing of things she said, not actual quotes from her,....."



Just to smash another custard pie in your ugly kisser, note that everything I've said is in the Atlantic article....


Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal Is a Winning Climate Strategy - The Atlantic,





Now, ugly......should I wait for your apology??????

Oh....and try to refrain from the vulgarity....it's a give-away of what you are.

The irony of you calling someone ugly was quote worthy to enshrine it in the messageboarding hall of shame. Youve been crowned.

I can tell you're sensitive about the term 'ugly.'


Look at the bright side...your face is your fortune! Drug stores'll pay you to stand in front, and make people sick.

I dont think you want me to stoop to your level and tell you the truth about your looks, kiddo.

Face facts....you're so ugly when you walk into a bank, they turn the cameras off! -

hrrrrrrmmm...that seems like a diss on a 6th grade level. It's also copacetic with your intelligence-level in accurately deciphering propoganda, should we be concerned?

Most humans I meet call me handsome, for whatever reason.

You? Called a poster "ugly" and aren't that great. In fact, if I wanted to be a cock about it - I could be more precise....buuuuuuut.....I kinda don't fuckin' feel like it.

 

[Dragonlady]

First you posted a whole lot of bullshit and lies about Ms. Cortez, who she is and what she stands for, all of which are your paraphrasing of things she said, not actual quotes from her, and then you want us to defend the stances you say she has?

This is where you trip yourself stupid little self up every time. We are under no requirement to accept the bullshit in any of your OP's as fact because they're generally fact-free. If we are unwilling to accept your lies as the basis of our discussion, you've lost control of the discussion.

Trying post FACTS, not right wing talking points, and we'll respond appropriately. But you don't want honest discussions. You want to trip people up and humiliate them. Sadly for you, you're the one who ends up fleeing your own thread, because you've lost control, or you've been humilated and laughed off.

"First you posted a whole lot of bullshit and lies about Ms. Cortez, who she is and what she stands for, all of which are your paraphrasing of things she said, not actual quotes from her,....."



Just to smash another custard pie in your ugly kisser, note that everything I've said is in the Atlantic article....


Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal Is a Winning Climate Strategy - The Atlantic,





Now, ugly......should I wait for your apology??????

Oh....and try to refrain from the vulgarity....it's a give-away of what you are.

The irony of you calling someone ugly was quote worthy to enshrine it in the messageboarding hall of shame. Youve been crowned.

I can tell you're sensitive about the term 'ugly.'


Look at the bright side...your face is your fortune! Drug stores'll pay you to stand in front, and make people sick.

I dont think you want me to stoop to your level and tell you the truth about your looks, kiddo.

Face facts....you're so ugly when you walk into a bank, they turn the cameras off! -

So now you've completely abandoned any pretense of intellectual discussion and are going for straight up 12 year old behaviour.

Nothing denotes a paucity of ideas than commenting on the "looks" or the purported lack thereof, of a poster you've never seen.

 

[Winston]

Not a single one of the Leftists/Liberals has put a dent in my premise.....fact, actually.....that no one of 'em can defend the Democrat insanity.


What is the result of having the education system under the control of Liberals?

This: alexandria ocasio-cortez


1. AOC is being pushed as the fresh new face of the Democrat Party: her plan- The Green New Deal

2. First, every industrial and residential building to be retrofitted with every technological advance.

3. Eliminate greenhouse gases



4. Form a committee that would have a mandate to push union membership; and a national jobs force to move people into green jobs, guaranteeing living wage jobs

5. Universal income and medicare for all.

6. So….the federal government take over and regulate all industries, unionize all industries, ..

7. Has this ever been tried before in human history? How’d it work out?

Yup….Democrats select a bartender to decide on how to run the economy. Hence, the title of this thread.




8. And to pay for this? Raise taxes massively on the ‘rich.’ 60 or 70% tax rates….Ocasio: ”If that’s radical, call me a radical.”

9. BTW,….those in the top 20%, incomes of $150,000, that’s 52% of all income, pay 87% of all income taxes.
America has the most progressive income tax system of any industrialized nation: the more you make, the more you pay.

10. If ,Ocasio, and the Democrats, had to pay for all of the above, they would have to raise taxes on those far lower on the income scale.




Or, as the Left does so frequently....simply kill them.

Well, you prove you are an idiot with number 9.

BTW,….those in the top 20%, incomes of $150,000, that’s 52% of all income, pay 87% of all income taxes.
America has the most progressive income tax system of any industrialized nation: the more you make, the more you pay.

It is a type of "statistic" that brain dead righties spout all the time. And I am going to surprise you. I think that stat is absolutely terrible. The "rich" are carrying way to much of the total tax burden. So, in order to rectify that situation I only have to point to number 8.

8. And to pay for this? Raise taxes massively on the ‘rich.’ 60 or 70% tax rates….Ocasio: ”If that’s radical, call me a radical.”

See, when marginal tax rates on the wealthier were much higher than they are today, well the wealthy actually carried less of the total tax burden. I would be happy to explain to you how and why it works out that way but I highly doubt you have either the intelligence or the integrity to warrant my time.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

She, like you, has no education.

The etymology of the term, 'education,' proves itself.

'e ducare' means to lead out of, presumably, lead out of ignorance.



The proof of the ignorance is here:
1. AOC is being pushed as the fresh new face of the Democrat Party: her plan- The Green New Deal

2. First, every industrial and residential building to be retrofitted with every technological advance.

3. Eliminate greenhouse gases



4. Form a committee that would have a mandate to push union membership; and a national jobs force to move people into green jobs, guaranteeing living wage jobs

5. Universal income and medicare for all.

6. So….the federal government take over and regulate all industries, unionize all industries, ..

7. Has this ever been tried before in human history? How’d it work out?

Yup….Democrats select a bartender to decide on how to run the economy. Hence, the title of this thread.




8. And to pay for this? Raise taxes massively on the ‘rich.’ 60 or 70% tax rates….Ocasio: ”If that’s radical, call me a radical.”

9. BTW,….those in the top 20%, incomes of $150,000, that’s 52% of all income, pay 87% of all income taxes.
America has the most progressive income tax system of any industrialized nation: them you make, the more you pay.

10. If Ocasio, and the Democrats, had to pay for all of the above, they would have to raise taxes on those far lower on the income scale.


And, of course, you couldn't defend it.

First you posted a whole lot of bullshit and lies about Ms. Cortez, who she is and what she stands for, all of which are your paraphrasing of things she said, not actual quotes from her, and then you want us to defend the stances you say she has?

This is where you trip yourself stupid little self up every time. We are under no requirement to accept the bullshit in any of your OP's as fact because they're generally fact-free. If we are unwilling to accept your lies as the basis of our discussion, you've lost control of the discussion.

Trying post FACTS, not right wing talking points, and we'll respond appropriately. But you don't want honest discussions. You want to trip people up and humiliate them. Sadly for you, you're the one who ends up fleeing your own thread, because you've lost control, or you've been humilated and laughed off.

"First you posted a whole lot of bullshit and lies about Ms. Cortez, who she is and what she stands for, all of which are your paraphrasing of things she said, not actual quotes from her,....."



Just to smash another custard pie in your ugly kisser, note that everything I've said is in the Atlantic article....


Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal Is a Winning Climate Strategy - The Atlantic,





Now, ugly......should I wait for your apology??????

Oh....and try to refrain from the vulgarity....it's a give-away of what you are.

The irony of you calling someone ugly was quote worthy to enshrine it in the messageboarding hall of shame. Youve been crowned.

I can tell you're sensitive about the term 'ugly.'


Look at the bright side...your face is your fortune! Drug stores'll pay you to stand in front, and make people sick.

I dont think you want me to stoop to your level and tell you the truth about your looks, kiddo.

Considering what you think of your pod cast and compositions your judgement of others appearances would be humorous at best BB.

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[G.T.]

First you posted a whole lot of bullshit and lies about Ms. Cortez, who she is and what she stands for, all of which are your paraphrasing of things she said, not actual quotes from her, and then you want us to defend the stances you say she has?

This is where you trip yourself stupid little self up every time. We are under no requirement to accept the bullshit in any of your OP's as fact because they're generally fact-free. If we are unwilling to accept your lies as the basis of our discussion, you've lost control of the discussion.

Trying post FACTS, not right wing talking points, and we'll respond appropriately. But you don't want honest discussions. You want to trip people up and humiliate them. Sadly for you, you're the one who ends up fleeing your own thread, because you've lost control, or you've been humilated and laughed off.

"First you posted a whole lot of bullshit and lies about Ms. Cortez, who she is and what she stands for, all of which are your paraphrasing of things she said, not actual quotes from her,....."



Just to smash another custard pie in your ugly kisser, note that everything I've said is in the Atlantic article....


Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal Is a Winning Climate Strategy - The Atlantic,





Now, ugly......should I wait for your apology??????

Oh....and try to refrain from the vulgarity....it's a give-away of what you are.

The irony of you calling someone ugly was quote worthy to enshrine it in the messageboarding hall of shame. Youve been crowned.

I can tell you're sensitive about the term 'ugly.'


Look at the bright side...your face is your fortune! Drug stores'll pay you to stand in front, and make people sick.

I dont think you want me to stoop to your level and tell you the truth about your looks, kiddo.

Considering what you think of your pod cast and compositions your judgement of others appearances would be humorous at best BB.

*****CHUCKLE*****

Considering you don't know what 'composition' means, or you're 107, and my "podcast" wasnt a "podcast"..... but a USMB call-in show..... that's had over 20 members call in AT ONCE, it seems like you're the retard.

So, retard, can you kindly say something funny once in a while, or does your doorknob personality require the you-tubes to compensate for your ummm...."lack" of cognition?

 

[Tax Man]

...to be a Democrat voter.


What is the result of having the education system under the control of Liberals?

This: alexandria ocasio-cortez


1. AOC is being pushed as the fresh new face of the Democrat Party: her plan- The Green New Deal

2. First, every industrial and residential building to be retrofitted with every technological advance.

3. Eliminate greenhouse gases



4. Form a committee that would have a mandate to push union membership; and a national jobs force to move people into green jobs, guaranteeing living wage jobs

5. Universal income and medicare for all.

6. So….the federal government take over and regulate all industries, unionize all industries, ..

7. Has this ever been tried before in human history? How’d it work out?

Yup….Democrats select a bartender to decide on how to run the economy. Hence, the title of this thread.




8. And to pay for this? Raise taxes massively on the ‘rich.’ 60 or 70% tax rates….Ocasio: ”If that’s radical, call me a radical.”

9. BTW,….those in the top 20%, incomes of $150,000, that’s 52% of all income, pay 87% of all income taxes.
America has the most progressive income tax system of any industrialized nation: them you make, the more you pay.

10. If Ocasio, and the Democrats, had to pay for all of the above, they would have to raise taxes on those far lower on the income scale.




Or, as the Left does so frequently....simply kill them.


I expect the usual import from our board Leftists: vulgarity, or "Oh, yeah....sez you!"

Proof of the thread title.

Republicans are the lowest intellectuals on earth.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

"First you posted a whole lot of bullshit and lies about Ms. Cortez, who she is and what she stands for, all of which are your paraphrasing of things she said, not actual quotes from her,....."



Just to smash another custard pie in your ugly kisser, note that everything I've said is in the Atlantic article....


Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal Is a Winning Climate Strategy - The Atlantic,





Now, ugly......should I wait for your apology??????

Oh....and try to refrain from the vulgarity....it's a give-away of what you are.

The irony of you calling someone ugly was quote worthy to enshrine it in the messageboarding hall of shame. Youve been crowned.

I can tell you're sensitive about the term 'ugly.'


Look at the bright side...your face is your fortune! Drug stores'll pay you to stand in front, and make people sick.

I dont think you want me to stoop to your level and tell you the truth about your looks, kiddo.

Considering what you think of your pod cast and compositions your judgement of others appearances would be humorous at best BB.

*****CHUCKLE*****

Considering you don't know what 'composition' means, or you're 107, and my "podcast" wasnt a "podcast"..... but a USMB call-in show..... that's had over 20 members call in AT ONCE, it seems like you're the retard.

So, retard, can you kindly say something funny once in a while, or does your doorknob personality require the you-tubes to compensate for your ummm...."lack" of cognition?

Wow! Twenty whole members. I'll bet that includes the one's who never call in anymore. At least my eyesight isn't going like yours. Making mistakes about how many actually call in instead of total number of who have called, then never called back, explains a lot about the comments you've been making about PoliticalChic..... I guess we'll have to be nice to you since you're disabled.

*****CHUCKLE*****





BTW the thread topic is definitely you.

 

[G.T.]

The irony of you calling someone ugly was quote worthy to enshrine it in the messageboarding hall of shame. Youve been crowned.

I can tell you're sensitive about the term 'ugly.'


Look at the bright side...your face is your fortune! Drug stores'll pay you to stand in front, and make people sick.

I dont think you want me to stoop to your level and tell you the truth about your looks, kiddo.

Considering what you think of your pod cast and compositions your judgement of others appearances would be humorous at best BB.

*****CHUCKLE*****

Considering you don't know what 'composition' means, or you're 107, and my "podcast" wasnt a "podcast"..... but a USMB call-in show..... that's had over 20 members call in AT ONCE, it seems like you're the retard.

So, retard, can you kindly say something funny once in a while, or does your doorknob personality require the you-tubes to compensate for your ummm...."lack" of cognition?

Wow! Twenty whole members. I'll bet that includes the one's who never call in anymore. At least my eyesight isn't going like yours. Making mistakes about how many actually call in instead of total number of who have called, then never called back, explains a lot about the comments you've been making about PoliticalChic..... I guess we'll have to be nice to you since you're disabled.

*****CHUCKLE*****





BTW the thread topic is definitely you.

You shouldn't be doing Meth before you post, DerpEagle. It makes you gross and emotional.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

I can tell you're sensitive about the term 'ugly.'


Look at the bright side...your face is your fortune! Drug stores'll pay you to stand in front, and make people sick.

I dont think you want me to stoop to your level and tell you the truth about your looks, kiddo.

Considering what you think of your pod cast and compositions your judgement of others appearances would be humorous at best BB.

*****CHUCKLE*****

Considering you don't know what 'composition' means, or you're 107, and my "podcast" wasnt a "podcast"..... but a USMB call-in show..... that's had over 20 members call in AT ONCE, it seems like you're the retard.

So, retard, can you kindly say something funny once in a while, or does your doorknob personality require the you-tubes to compensate for your ummm...."lack" of cognition?

Wow! Twenty whole members. I'll bet that includes the one's who never call in anymore. At least my eyesight isn't going like yours. Making mistakes about how many actually call in instead of total number of who have called, then never called back, explains a lot about the comments you've been making about PoliticalChic..... I guess we'll have to be nice to you since you're disabled.

*****CHUCKLE*****





BTW the thread topic is definitely you.

You shouldn't be doing Meth before you post, DerpEagle. It makes you gross and emotional.

I see you're at a loss for intelligent come backs there BB. Since that covers the second part of the threads title (at least the lack of) we can postulate that the half of it holds true for you too.

*****CHUCKLE*****