o blah ma...Lol. HOW MANY PROMISES HAS OBAMA KEPT?

Ok. How do you explain the bailouts?
How do you explain the bailouts? Last I checked, bailouts are Socialist, too. They were allowed to do poorly because they knew the government would bail them out. The government shouldn't have interfered, as I've been saying the entire time.


And yet ..... across "both" "conservative" and "liberal" administrations. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm .....
We haven't had a Conservative administration in many years, you seem very confused.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, you have no issue with intellectual dishonesty on here do ya.
 
Ok. How do you explain the bailouts?
How do you explain the bailouts? Last I checked, bailouts are Socialist, too. They were allowed to do poorly because they knew the government would bail them out. The government shouldn't have interfered, as I've been saying the entire time.


And yet ..... across "both" "conservative" and "liberal" administrations. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm .....
We haven't had a Conservative administration in many years, you seem very confused.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, you have no issue with intellectual dishonesty on here do ya.
Name just one conservative that has been in office recently. Go ahead.
 
Pumpkin?....How do you create a healthy economy?
I already replied to your post. The Private Sector does that, the government stands back and watches, only interfering to break up monopolies should they occur. The government doesn't make the economy healthy, and it doesn't create jobs. Capitalism regulates itself and is always strong so long as the government doesn't interfere.
How does capitalism regulate itself?
Because in order for them to profit, they have to pay their employees enough to afford their products. Everyone who has a job also buys things, everyone who buys things has a job.

No, not really, not at all. All they need is desperate folk.
 
Pumpkin?....How do you create a healthy economy?
I already replied to your post. The Private Sector does that, the government stands back and watches, only interfering to break up monopolies should they occur. The government doesn't make the economy healthy, and it doesn't create jobs. Capitalism regulates itself and is always strong so long as the government doesn't interfere.
How does capitalism regulate itself?

Regulation defeats the purpose of capitalism. That's Econ 101
Capitalism relies on regulation and government intervention

Capitalism does not exist without government

Economics 101
 
ok, pumpkin, FDR started SS, started unemployment, started massive gov infrastructure building program, taxed the rich, regulated wall street and put in place consumer protections. This is what he did and is indisputable. Buty you deny it happened?
Not a single one of those is a good thing. Are you high?
 
Ok. How do you explain the bailouts?
How do you explain the bailouts? Last I checked, bailouts are Socialist, too. They were allowed to do poorly because they knew the government would bail them out. The government shouldn't have interfered, as I've been saying the entire time.


And yet ..... across "both" "conservative" and "liberal" administrations. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm .....
We haven't had a Conservative administration in many years, you seem very confused.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, you have no issue with intellectual dishonesty on here do ya.
Name just one conservative that has been in office recently. Go ahead.

We're onto you hon, you'll just claim they weren't really, too childish even for you.
 
ok, pumpkin, FDR started SS, started unemployment, started massive gov infrastructure building program, taxed the rich, regulated wall street and put in place consumer protections. This is what he did and is indisputable. Buty you deny it happened?
Not a single one of those is a good thing. Are you high?

You are, conventional wisom hon, sorry reality conflicts with your religion.
 
So, lol, if they werent bailed out...they would have....I dunno....FAILED.....FAIL. They would have failed but were bailed out with tax payer moneys and who pays taxes? Local biz and the working so, the working bailed out capitalism just like it has time and time again then you say capitalism never fails....lol, wow.
They only started failing because they knew the government would bail them out. A business only starts failing when there isn't a demand for them. That's how Capitalism works. If there's no demand for a business, they deserve to fail, because they aren't fulfilling their purpose properly. A business failing doesn't mean capitalism is failing, it means that business wasn't being run properly.
 
How do you explain the bailouts? Last I checked, bailouts are Socialist, too. They were allowed to do poorly because they knew the government would bail them out. The government shouldn't have interfered, as I've been saying the entire time.


And yet ..... across "both" "conservative" and "liberal" administrations. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm .....
We haven't had a Conservative administration in many years, you seem very confused.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight, you have no issue with intellectual dishonesty on here do ya.
Name just one conservative that has been in office recently. Go ahead.

We're onto you hon, you'll just claim they weren't really, too childish even for you.
So, you're saying you can't name a Conservative that was in office? I guess that means your claim was bogus.
 
Pumpkin?....How do you create a healthy economy?
I already replied to your post. The Private Sector does that, the government stands back and watches, only interfering to break up monopolies should they occur. The government doesn't make the economy healthy, and it doesn't create jobs. Capitalism regulates itself and is always strong so long as the government doesn't interfere.
How does capitalism regulate itself?

Regulation defeats the purpose of capitalism. That's Econ 101
Capitalism relies on regulation and government intervention

Capitalism does not exist without government

Economics 101

You're too stupid to be in this thread. Now run along to the FZ where you're more at home, loon. It's obvious you're an economic illiterate with that garbage
 

Onto your Socialist ideal. Hey, Windship, what's it called when money is taken from someone against their will and given to someone else? Last I checked, THAT was actual stealing.
[/QUOTE]

Onto your Socialist ideal. Hey, Windship, what's it called when money is taken from someone against their will and given to someone else? Last I checked, THAT was actual stealing.

Ah, so for example, like when we steal money from tax payers to biuld lavish stadiums for for millionaire sports team owners then.[/QUOTE]
 
ok, pumpkin, FDR started SS, started unemployment, started massive gov infrastructure building program, taxed the rich, regulated wall street and put in place consumer protections. This is what he did and is indisputable. Buty you deny it happened?
Not a single one of those is a good thing. Are you high?

You are, conventional wisom hon, sorry reality conflicts with your religion.
All of those are government taking control of things they shouldn't. Government expansion for the sake of it, and damaging our economy.
 
So, lol, if they werent bailed out...they would have....I dunno....FAILED.....FAIL. They would have failed but were bailed out with tax payer moneys and who pays taxes? Local biz and the working so, the working bailed out capitalism just like it has time and time again then you say capitalism never fails....lol, wow.
They only started failing because they knew the government would bail them out. A business only starts failing when there isn't a demand for them. That's how Capitalism works. If there's no demand for a business, they deserve to fail, because they aren't fulfilling their purpose properly. A business failing doesn't mean capitalism is failing, it means that business wasn't being run properly.

They were bailed out so your entire economic system wouldn't collapse actually, because capitalism got too deregulated.
 
When Obama was first elected he promised this grand infrastructure rebuilding....it never happened. Perhaps one of you "economic geniuses" can tell me why it didn't? Hint: It's not "obstruction"
 
ok, pumpkin, FDR started SS, started unemployment, started massive gov infrastructure building program, taxed the rich, regulated wall street and put in place consumer protections. This is what he did and is indisputable. Buty you deny it happened?
Not a single one of those is a good thing. Are you high?

You are, conventional wisom hon, sorry reality conflicts with your religion.
All of those are government taking control of things they shouldn't. Government expansion for the sake of it, and damaging our economy.

Corporate control of your govt is the issue love, run amok american style capitalism
 
Well he has ruined the best health care of any country, and he has put us deeper in debt than all presidents before him, and he did break his promise of no boots on the ground with sending troops back to Iraq, and he has made life so much better for the Iranian terrorist now disclosing he sent them in total over 2 trillion dollars, and he...getting tired of writing all the great things he's done!
 
No President can make "Promises"

They have to rely on Congress to pass needed legislation. What the can do is propose an agenda

Obama has delivered on most of his
 

Forum List

Back
Top