Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
4 or 5 JUDGES said. NOWHERE in the Constitution does the term gay or homosexual show up. Interpretations are often wrong.Gay marriage is not in the Constitution, gun ownership is.Doesn't matter if it was fair. It was unconstitutional.The people in California voted to ban gay marriage. Was that fair?Sure it's fair. The people voted for it. You could always move to Bumfuck, Missouri if you want an arsenal.You heard me. Right now in NYC I have to spend $1000 and wait 3-6 months for a home handgun permit. Do you think that is fair?
Fail
Actually, the court said that gay marriage is covered in the 14th amendment
Seriously?
Do you actually read what you post?
Elected public officials= Khmer Rouge?
I will say....if the CIA knew a domestic war was coming and needed Americans to get scared, load up on guns and ammo, buy storage food, and even take private training classes.....all to strengthen America's defenses.....then Obamas presidency would be the PERFECT motivator.
Hey....maybe he's a raging conservative gun nut on the inside. Maybe his whole persona is fake. Wasn't born in Hawaii or any of that. He's agent Walter Simmons....from Detroit....planted as a liberal candidate to scare America into getting ready hahahaha!!!!
Thank you CIA agent Walter "Obama" Simmons. Your sacrifice has made America more prepared.
You have no concept of the role of the courts?
The lower Courts in the Northeast have been ignoring Heller and McDonald, and using procedural crap to slow down any challenges. The Courts can kiss my ass.
Heller applied to a ban
The fact that your community wants to make sure you are qualified to have a gun is not a ban
It's a de facto ban, even if it isn't a de jure ban. Why does it take 3-6 months and $1000 to exercise a basic right? Its a ruse to discourage gun ownership, nothing more, and you know it. You just agree with it so you ignore it like the hack you are.
Kind of like closing all the abortion clinics in a state isn't it?
you know he doesn't care about that because it's a woman's right.... not the guys who think guns substitute for their genitalia.
How many people have you missed out killing in your six months of waiting?
Hall monitor for his local junior high school ON THE WEEKENDSSeriously?
Do you actually read what you post?
Elected public officials= Khmer Rouge?
Obviously you don't read or comprehend what you reply to.
And you are claiming to be an elected official, shitfling? What is your post? Conformity officer for your mothers HOA?
Think they would do it again?The people in California voted to ban gay marriage. Was that fair?Sure it's fair. The people voted for it. You could always move to Bumfuck, Missouri if you want an arsenal.I own 2 guns and I think it's hilarious how gun nuts are so easily manipulated by gun stores and manufacturers
So "guns for me and not for thee".
Figures.
You heard me. Right now in NYC I have to spend $1000 and wait 3-6 months for a home handgun permit. Do you think that is fair?
Yes, Christian values do not suddenly disappear because of a ruling.Think they would do it again?The people in California voted to ban gay marriage. Was that fair?Sure it's fair. The people voted for it. You could always move to Bumfuck, Missouri if you want an arsenal.So "guns for me and not for thee".
Figures.
You heard me. Right now in NYC I have to spend $1000 and wait 3-6 months for a home handgun permit. Do you think that is fair?
The lower Courts in the Northeast have been ignoring Heller and McDonald, and using procedural crap to slow down any challenges. The Courts can kiss my ass.
Heller applied to a ban
The fact that your community wants to make sure you are qualified to have a gun is not a ban
It's a de facto ban, even if it isn't a de jure ban. Why does it take 3-6 months and $1000 to exercise a basic right? Its a ruse to discourage gun ownership, nothing more, and you know it. You just agree with it so you ignore it like the hack you are.
Kind of like closing all the abortion clinics in a state isn't it?
you know he doesn't care about that because it's a woman's right.... not the guys who think guns substitute for their genitalia.
I actually realize that the Texas thing is an end run around Roe, just like NYC's de facto ban is an end run around the 2nd. The difference is my right is explicit, and that right is made up, but until Roe is overturned, I can see the court ruling against Texas.
4 or 5 JUDGES said. NOWHERE in the Constitution does the term gay or homosexual show up. Interpretations are often wrong.Gay marriage is not in the Constitution, gun ownership is.Doesn't matter if it was fair. It was unconstitutional.The people in California voted to ban gay marriage. Was that fair?Sure it's fair. The people voted for it. You could always move to Bumfuck, Missouri if you want an arsenal.
Fail
Actually, the court said that gay marriage is covered in the 14th amendment
Heller applied to a ban
The fact that your community wants to make sure you are qualified to have a gun is not a ban
It's a de facto ban, even if it isn't a de jure ban. Why does it take 3-6 months and $1000 to exercise a basic right? Its a ruse to discourage gun ownership, nothing more, and you know it. You just agree with it so you ignore it like the hack you are.
Kind of like closing all the abortion clinics in a state isn't it?
you know he doesn't care about that because it's a woman's right.... not the guys who think guns substitute for their genitalia.
I actually realize that the Texas thing is an end run around Roe, just like NYC's de facto ban is an end run around the 2nd. The difference is my right is explicit, and that right is made up, but until Roe is overturned, I can see the court ruling against Texas.
no.
once again, since comprehension isn't your thing.... roe v wade is the law.
there is nothing in heller that says regulation is inappropriate. now go whine in the corner.
How many people have you missed out killing in your six months of waiting?
How many people have you killed, shitflinger?
If you ever posted a rational argument, would you burst into flames, or just be expelled from the demagogue - sociopath party?
It's a de facto ban, even if it isn't a de jure ban. Why does it take 3-6 months and $1000 to exercise a basic right? Its a ruse to discourage gun ownership, nothing more, and you know it. You just agree with it so you ignore it like the hack you are.
Kind of like closing all the abortion clinics in a state isn't it?
you know he doesn't care about that because it's a woman's right.... not the guys who think guns substitute for their genitalia.
I actually realize that the Texas thing is an end run around Roe, just like NYC's de facto ban is an end run around the 2nd. The difference is my right is explicit, and that right is made up, but until Roe is overturned, I can see the court ruling against Texas.
no.
once again, since comprehension isn't your thing.... roe v wade is the law.
there is nothing in heller that says regulation is inappropriate. now go whine in the corner.
Roe V wade can be overturned just as easily as it was created. 5 of 9 lawyers works both ways.
And 3-6 months plus $1000 is not "regulation", it is intimidation to prevent people from exercising their rights.
It's the same result you would get if you let PETA dictate animal slaughter procedures. Sure meat wouldn't be "illegal", it just wouldn't be available.
Kind of like closing all the abortion clinics in a state isn't it?
you know he doesn't care about that because it's a woman's right.... not the guys who think guns substitute for their genitalia.
I actually realize that the Texas thing is an end run around Roe, just like NYC's de facto ban is an end run around the 2nd. The difference is my right is explicit, and that right is made up, but until Roe is overturned, I can see the court ruling against Texas.
no.
once again, since comprehension isn't your thing.... roe v wade is the law.
there is nothing in heller that says regulation is inappropriate. now go whine in the corner.
Roe V wade can be overturned just as easily as it was created. 5 of 9 lawyers works both ways.
And 3-6 months plus $1000 is not "regulation", it is intimidation to prevent people from exercising their rights.
It's the same result you would get if you let PETA dictate animal slaughter procedures. Sure meat wouldn't be "illegal", it just wouldn't be available.
If $1000 is a problem, try panhandling
You can beg for money for just about anything
you know he doesn't care about that because it's a woman's right.... not the guys who think guns substitute for their genitalia.
I actually realize that the Texas thing is an end run around Roe, just like NYC's de facto ban is an end run around the 2nd. The difference is my right is explicit, and that right is made up, but until Roe is overturned, I can see the court ruling against Texas.
no.
once again, since comprehension isn't your thing.... roe v wade is the law.
there is nothing in heller that says regulation is inappropriate. now go whine in the corner.
Roe V wade can be overturned just as easily as it was created. 5 of 9 lawyers works both ways.
And 3-6 months plus $1000 is not "regulation", it is intimidation to prevent people from exercising their rights.
It's the same result you would get if you let PETA dictate animal slaughter procedures. Sure meat wouldn't be "illegal", it just wouldn't be available.
If $1000 is a problem, try panhandling
You can beg for money for just about anything
One shouldn't have to beg for Rights.
But keep being a glib twat and ignoring the actual questions.
you really believe that only righties own firearms
--LOL
No, but I believe only righties proudly brag about panic buying.
I don't own any guns & I think it's fucking hysterical how Obama's Talk about gun control with your family over Thanksgiving dinner backfired. Two background check requests EVERY TWO SECONDS after thanksgiving. Record breaking sales.you really believe that only righties own firearms
--LOL
No, but I believe only righties proudly brag about panic buying.
I find it amusing that how so many righties want to brag about getting manipulated into wasting money on panic buying.
Must be a herd thing. The rest of the righty herd panicked, so they have to charge along with them. If they don't, they either get trampled, or the herd leaves them behind.
you really believe that only righties own firearms
--LOL
Many lefties own guns - but most of them aren't NRA gun nutters.
Just look at the sales stats.
But you do know that the ones perpetrating 99% of the "gun violence" already have their gun illegally. Which means making it harder for law abiding people to get guns wouldn't change the amount of crime. It just makes liberals feel goodSo "guns for me and not for thee".
Figures.
You heard me. Right now in NYC I have to spend $1000 and wait 3-6 months for a home handgun permit. Do you think that is fair?
Works for me
And this is why we don't trust anyone who wants more laws.
The people in your community decided they had enough gun violence and made gun purchasing harder
Democracy in action....Don't like it? Elect more NRA members
