Defiant1
Gold Member
- Mar 23, 2010
- 7,579
- 1,183
- 290
There is nothing socialist about the change.
Geaux has an extremely limited vocabulary and understanding.
In a consumer economy, the more money the working consumers have to spend, everyone, including owners, are better off.
You've never heard of 'passing on the cost to the consumer' I take it
That's why you're a liberal with a limited understanding of economics
-Geaux
The cost of paying a fair wage? Paying for overtime is a fair wage
Yes, that is how it is supposed to be
Let's do the math...
If as lefty Jake retorts, paying employee 'A' more money equates to more cash flow into the machine. Say you made an extra $1/hr for an hour OT, so now that you have the extra cash, you decide to go get that Bacon Burger you might not have purchased before the OT.
But wait, I just raised the cost of said burger $1.25.
See what I did there? The LIV thinks he is getting ahead but in actuality, he's just as stupid as he was when Barney Frank set him up to take a loan he couldn't afford to buy that dream home.
In summary, Employee 'A' purchased a burger that was still cost prohibitive even with the OT
-Geaux
OK lets do the math:
Calling a $23,661 burger flipper a "manager" means you can force him to work overtime and weekends at no pay.
With the money you save on wages, do you:
a. charge less for your burgers
b. keep the extra profit
There is no such thing as extra profit.