Official Mueller Report Thread

[hunarcy]

there it is boys,, read a weep! No collusion no obstruction right from the horses mouth!

No collusion by ANY American.

I guess lib-dems are innocent, too.

That must piss you off.

Now you have to acknowledge that even the Dems did not collude with russia.

That's true. Hillary colluded with the Ukrainians. As Russia collusion fades, Ukrainian plot to help Clinton emerges

 

[hunarcy]

Unfettered access and EP speaks volumes
Trump was fully cooperative
That’s the opposite of obstruction

Lol no dumbass, thats not the opposite of obstruction.

You can commit or attempt to commit the obstruction (Trump fired Comey and tasked mcGhan with Mueller firing for example), but later co-operate with the investigation.

And you are just as correct about that as you were about Russian collusion. Stop wasting our time.

 

[Defiant1]

This is the OFFICIAL Mueller Report thread.


Please put all threads about the Mueller Report here.

Mueller Report threads not in this thread could end up being deleted.

there it is boys,, read a weep! No collusion no obstruction right from the horses mouth!

He said the Trump campaign didn’t knowingly collude with the Russians.

But one thing they all agree on, is that Vladimir Putin worked hard to get Trump elected president.

Everybody can agree on that, even Republicans.

So what?

People can't have opinions now?

 

[g5000]

So I jumped to Volume II based on the statements on page 16.

On page 97 of Volume II (page 309 of the pdf), we find this:

a. Obstructive act. The President's effort to send Sessions a message through Lewandowski would qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.


Mueller then lays down the facts which proves just that in the following paragraphs, until we come to this:

c. Intent. Substantial evidence indicates that the President's efforts to have Sessions limit the scope of the Special Counsel's investigation to future election interference was intended to prevent further investigative scrutiny of the President's and his campaign's conduct.

 

[justoffal]

Nadler is dead on.

You left out the word arrival.

Jo

 

[depotoo]

I find it interesting that they left out of the report that the Russians, as they testified to before Congress, was also attempting to help Hillary’s campaign.

 

[g5000]

This is the OFFICIAL Mueller Report thread.


Please put all threads about the Mueller Report here.

Mueller Report threads not in this thread could end up being deleted.

there it is boys,, read a weep! No collusion no obstruction right from the horses mouth!

He said the Trump campaign didn’t knowingly collude with the Russians.

But one thing they all agree on, is that Vladimir Putin worked hard to get Trump elected president.

Everybody can agree on that, even Republicans.

So what?

People can't have opinions now?

If you want to show everyone you are nothing more than a brainless parroting tard, go right ahead.

 

[miketx]

52 minutes until the flood....

 

[hunarcy]

Barr’s News Presser COMPLETELY VINDICATED President Trump!

No it didn't idiot. Barr has no credibility and his word is meaningless.

The only thing that can vindicate Trump is Mueller's (NOT BARR'S) report, and Barr has speciifically said that the report DOES NOT exonorate Trump.

He has more credibility than you and your word is meaningless.

 

[Jitss617]

So I jumped to Volume II based on the statements on page 16.

On page 97 of Volume II (page 309 of the pdf), we find this:

a. Obstructive act. The President's effort to send Sessions a message through Lewandowski would qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.


Mueller then lays down the facts which proves just that in the following paragraphs, until we come to this:

c. Intent. Substantial evidence indicates that the President's efforts to have Sessions limit the scope of the Special Counsel's investigation to future election interference was intended to prevent further investigative scrutiny of the President's and his campaign's conduct.

Yes because it was all fake lol why should there be a investigation when trump did nothing wrong?

 

[g5000]

there it is boys,, read a weep! No collusion no obstruction right from the horses mouth!

Sorry, tard. You just made it plain you didn't read the report and are just a parroting hack.

Mueller quite plainly says in his report that Trump obstructed the investigation.

 

[g5000]

So I jumped to Volume II based on the statements on page 16.

On page 97 of Volume II (page 309 of the pdf), we find this:

a. Obstructive act. The President's effort to send Sessions a message through Lewandowski would qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.


Mueller then lays down the facts which proves just that in the following paragraphs, until we come to this:

c. Intent. Substantial evidence indicates that the President's efforts to have Sessions limit the scope of the Special Counsel's investigation to future election interference was intended to prevent further investigative scrutiny of the President's and his campaign's conduct.

Yes because it was all fake lol why should there be a investigation when trump did nothing wrong?

Were the words too big for you, tard? It says right there that Trump obstructed the investigation.

 

[Meathead]

Snowflakes here are already at full butthurt.

 

[AntonToo]

Barr’s News Presser COMPLETELY VINDICATED President Trump!

No it didn't idiot.

The only thing that can vindicate Trump is facts laid out in Mueller's (NOT BARR'S) report.

Barr was indeed going by facts in Mueller's Report.

He was when he said report does not exonorate Trump. He then took it upon himself to exonorate Trump and that part no one gives a shit about.

Lets see the report.

Only conspiracy theorists dont believe our intelligence agencies.
Go watch alex jones or something, tin foil boi

Idiot, Barr is not our intelligence agencies.

Barr was hired because he penned a letter to Trump assuring him that he can’t possibly commit obstruction...and surprise surprise he now says Trump did not commit obstruction.

Zero credibility.

 

[Defiant1]

Move on with the Trump Russia hoax that failed, lefties.

He was NOT EXONERATED

The DOJ can't exonerate someone who hasn't been convicted.

 

[Dick Foster]

So I jumped to Volume II based on the statements on page 16.

On page 97 of Volume II (page 309 of the pdf), we find this:

a. Obstructive act. The President's effort to send Sessions a message through Lewandowski would qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.


Mueller then lays down the facts which proves just that in the following paragraphs, until we come to this:

c. Intent. Substantial evidence indicates that the President's efforts to have Sessions limit the scope of the Special Counsel's investigation to future election interference was intended to prevent further investigative scrutiny of the President's and his campaign's conduct.

You're still in there vying for position as the boards biggest dumbass I see. At least you stick to it.

 

[Jitss617]

So I jumped to Volume II based on the statements on page 16.

On page 97 of Volume II (page 309 of the pdf), we find this:

a. Obstructive act. The President's effort to send Sessions a message through Lewandowski would qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.


Mueller then lays down the facts which proves just that in the following paragraphs, until we come to this:

c. Intent. Substantial evidence indicates that the President's efforts to have Sessions limit the scope of the Special Counsel's investigation to future election interference was intended to prevent further investigative scrutiny of the President's and his campaign's conduct.

Yes because it was all fake lol why should there be a investigation when trump did nothing wrong?

Were the words too big for you, tard? It says right there that Trump obstructed the investigation.

Lewandowski never carried out that command .. and even if he did it’s still debatable .. can you read?

 

[hunarcy]

Barr’s News Presser COMPLETELY VINDICATED President Trump!

No it didn't idiot.

The only thing that can vindicate Trump is facts laid out in Mueller's (NOT BARR'S) report.

Barr was indeed going by facts in Mueller's Report.

He was when he said report does not exonorate Trump. He then took it upon himself to exonorate Trump and that part no one gives a shit about.

Lets see the report.

Only conspiracy theorists dont believe our intelligence agencies.
Go watch alex jones or something, tin foil boi

Idiot, Barr is not our intelligence agencies or enforcement agencies. Barr was hired because he pretty much told Trump that he can’t possibly commit obstruction...and surprise surprise he now says Trump did not commit obstruction.

You are determined to be as wrong as a human can be. Again, to summarize, you have no credibility, and you are wasting our time. Go back to bed and pretend it's a bad dream.

 

[The Purge]

But as a reminder....

"Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case," Comey said.

Comey’s statement was harsh and, at times, damning:

• He said that 113 emails on Clinton’s servers contained information that was classified at the time.
• He said Clinton and her colleagues were "extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."
• He said it was "possible" that "hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal account" — the FBI didn’t find "direct evidence of this," but it would be unlikely that such direct evidence would exist.

However, despite this carelessness, Comey said, he didn’t believe the offenses here rose to the level of past prosecutions related to classified information.

"In looking back at our investigations into the mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts," he said. Past prosecutions, he said, generally involved "clearly intentional and willful mishandling," "vast quantities of materials," or "indications of disloyalty to the United States or efforts to obstruct justice."

The HYPOCRISY OF THE ABNORMALS IS BLATANT!!!

 

[AntonToo]

Barr’s News Presser COMPLETELY VINDICATED President Trump!

No it didn't idiot. Barr has no credibility and his word is meaningless.

The only thing that can vindicate Trump is Mueller's (NOT BARR'S) report, and Barr has speciifically said that the report DOES NOT exonorate Trump.

Yes it did idiot....you have no credibility and your word is meaningless. See how easy that is?

Oh and BTW you protozoan twit, if Barr has no credibility how can you believe him if he says the report doesn't exonerate Trump?
You have the IQ of a garden tomato.

Jo

Umm yes dummy, my word is meaningless, though only a bit more so than Barr’s.

That’s why we need to see the report.