LeftofLeft
Diamond Member
- Oct 18, 2011
- 23,057
- 13,433
- 1,405
She got to vote and was not oppressed? Amazing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Why should any of us be in favor of any system that allows for cheating? No matter who does it....
Like it or not, you have given us a great insight into who you are....
Missing the point is definitely your strong suit...It is not cheating if it is not illegal.
Good. I am happy to be known as the guy that does not think who one can vote for should be based upon party loyalties. I wear that proudly.
Yeah, but look who is TRYING to suppress her vote by making false claims about her... Right wingers and RW Media.She got to vote and was not oppressed? Amazing
Who?Yeah, but look who is TRYING to suppress her vote by making false claims about her... Right wingers and RW Media.
How is that cheating? That's the way the law is written and has been for years!Do you see how that can be used by either party as a form of cheating?
Missing the point is definitely your strong suit...
"This system allows those whose candidate has already been decided to aid in the choosing of his opponent. It allows the best interest of the party, and country to be undermined. This is not just a practice of Republicans, Democrats have similarly corrupted the process in the past. In 2007, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled that the Virginia open primary statute was unconstitutional after a group of GOPers complained that Dems were meddling in their nominating process. Go figure. Apparently, when given the power to choose an opponent, none of us can be trusted. That is why the open primary system must be abolished. It does not serve any of us to be voting in each others worst interest."
![]()
The Problem with Open Primaries
In Virginia's system each individual is allowed to degrade the process by voting for who they think will be the worst, the slowest, oldest, most inexperienced, and least qualified.www.huffpost.com
"Simply put, Open primaries are dumb. They’re dishonest. They’re too easily prone to corruption. The mere concept is supremely unethical. Bottom line: A party and it’s people (should) have the right to solely determine who will represent them in the next election. Nobody else. This is not a Trump issue, this is not a Republican or Democrat issue, this is a fairness issue for everybody. If somebody in another party intrigues you that much, change parties. Seriously."
Open (Crossover) Primaries and Why They’re Bad | The Radical Centrist™
Trump urges South Carolina Republicans to vote for Bernie Sanders THIS!!!... this right here is why I have been vehemently against open (crossover) primaries since Day One, and why I will continue to be against them until the day I die. Simply put, they're dumb. They're dishonest. They're too...radcen.net
The guy below, who erroneously filed the accusation.Who?
Remember, the DNC is on record that even something as innocuous as a reliable and accurate voter database is an "existential threat" Cheating is their lifeblood, they're finished without it
In my opinion it needs to be changed, and I have already posted why...How is that cheating? That's the way the law is written and has been for years!
The guy below, who erroneously filed the accusation.
Meet the Team - American Accountability Foundation
www.americanaccountabilityfoundation.com › ...
View attachment 721675
Tom Jones previously ran the opposition research program for Cruz for President, served as Legislative Director to Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI), Senior Policy ...
And the Daily Caller, whose journalists didn't even bother to check out the duel residencies that are LEGAL UNDER FLORIDA LAW.
Yep, we will...Why Democrats should be able to decide who Republican's candidates should be, is beyond me....So, once again you want who we can vote for to be limited by party loyalties and I do not.
We will just have to disagree on this one.
Holding someone accountable is not suppressionYeah, but look who is TRYING to suppress her vote by making false claims about her... Right wingers and RW Media.
Yep, we will...Why Democrats should be able to decide who Republican's candidates should be, is beyond me....
Your opinion is unimportant nationally. Contact your state legislators and tell them, instead of wasting your time trying to convince us.In my opinion it needs to be changed, and I have already posted why...
Don’t be so dramatic…if you’d like to have a say in a party’s nominee, then you should have to change your registration.Why people should be required to swear allegiance to one party or the other is beyond me, but damn if you people will not fight for that.
And yours is equally….I’ll do what I think is right, you do you…Your opinion is unimportant nationally. Contact your state legislators and tell them, instead of wasting your time trying to convince us.
And yours is equally….I’ll do what I think is right, you do you…
Cute though that you think this place convinces anyone. If you think it does then you truly are delusional.
Like it or not, you have given us a great insight into who you are....Uh huh....And the media would never lie, or get things wrong, right?
That’s what I said…Your state have to ask your permission to change? Your one vote …That's where you stopped reading my post, isn't it? If that's what you got from it.
You do your state and I'll keep mine like it is.
Good, although my life doesn’t hinge on your opinion either.Like it or not, you have given us a great insight into who you are....