mdk
Diamond Member
- Sep 6, 2014
- 40,558
- 14,042
- 2,630
Isn't it hilarious to hear a lib whine about losing the Senate because of Republican gerrymandering!!!!You live in a bubble. many races are won by a slim margin. I never once heard of Libertarians spoiling it for a Democrat so they must be closer to Republicans. The Green party screwed the pooch years ago and they learned a lesson, better to influence a winning party from within rather than standing out in the cold looking in.Why do you think those votes would automatically go the GOP? The Libertarian Party is made up of disgruntled voters from both parties. If you want my vote then you have to earn it. The GOP and the Democrats have failed to do so. This what happens when they continually ignore our concerns, we take our votes elsewhere. If your candidate was good they would win regardless of a 3rd party candidate.
I agree with many Libertarian principles but their leaders are typically whack jobs like Ron Paul. But at least he smartened up and went Republican knowing he had no chance at all 3rd party.
No actually most elections are not decided by very slim margins. Gross gerrymandering as made most districts far too safe for one party or the other. Only 40 House races were competitive this time around. That's absurd. Again, those votes do belong to the GOP. They have to be earned.
Gerrymandering only affects one of three elected entities and it was completely irrelevant in the GOP taking the Senate this year.
Nice try.
I am not a lib and never once did I claim gerrymandering effects the Senate. I am well aware of how the political system works. As I have stated before the reason why the GOP won the Senate is because they ran better candidates.
This need to label someone (lib or con or whatever) for daring to have a differing view is stupid.