Peter Navarro planned conspiracy with Steve Bannon by ‘lining up over 100 congressmen’ to overthrow the election

Are you saying the commies didn't coordinate beforehand when they objected to EC votes when Trump was elected? Are they traitors as well? You commies are such hypocrites. LMAO

.
Objecting to votes wasn’t the entire plan. They wanted to drag out the certification long enough that Pence would feel so pressured to end the process and adjourn without certifying Biden’s win for “a few weeks” meaning they would violate the constitution to maintain Trump’s presidency.
 
Objecting to votes wasn’t the entire plan. They wanted to drag out the certification long enough that Pence would feel so pressured to end the process and adjourn without certifying Biden’s win for “a few weeks” meaning they would violate the constitution to maintain Trump’s presidency.


And they were planning to do this with less than 20% of congressional votes? Really?

.
 
Objecting to votes wasn’t the entire plan. They wanted to drag out the certification long enough that Pence would feel so pressured to end the process and adjourn without certifying Biden’s win for “a few weeks” meaning they would violate the constitution to maintain Trump’s presidency.
Following the Constitution isn't violating it, dipschitt.
 
In 2016, several House Reps objected to a number of states. No senators concurred. No objections went through.

Sure didn't seem like there was any coordination.
 
lock up this traitor

You mean he ran a conspiracy to obey the law?
 
And they were planning to do this with less than 20% of congressional votes? Really?

.
If you have one Senator and one Rep, you can object to any state. An objection triggers up to two hours of debate.

Two committed Congressmembers could slow the process down to the point that it literally takes days.

Why Pence would end the process for “several weeks” appears to have been their delusional hope. Putting pressure on Pence to do something unconstitutional was everyone’s focus that day. I think that’s what the goal of the mob was (by and large).
 
If you have one Senator and one Rep, you can object to any state. An objection triggers up to two hours of debate.

Two committed Congressmembers could slow the process down to the point that it literally takes days.

Why Pence would end the process for “several weeks” appears to have been their delusional hope. Putting pressure on Pence to do something unconstitutional was everyone’s focus that day. I think that’s what the goal of the mob was (by and large).


Once again, didn't the commies try the same shit in 2017 and again during the cert of 43's two elections? But I know, it's always more serious and somehow wrong when republicans do it, RIGHT?

.
 
Once again, didn't the commies try the same shit in 2017 and again during the cert of 43's two elections? But I know, it's always more serious and somehow wrong when republicans do it, RIGHT?

.
They did not try the same thing in 2017.
 
Following the Constitution isn't violating it, dipschitt.
Where in the constitution does it give shitbags like Navarro & his crew the right to overthrow an election because they don't like the result?

Change your screename to Screwball.
 
Where in the constitution does it give shitbags like Navarro & his crew the right to overthrow an election because they don't like the result?

Change your screename to Screwball.
Article 2, section 1, clauses 2 & 3....Following the Constitution isn't overthrowing shit.

Change your screenname to "Ignorant Twat".
 
They did not try the same thing in 2017.


So you're saying they didn't object to the counting of roughly 10 States electors? According to you, that would have forced 20 hours of debate plus the time for the two houses to get settled in their chambers and go through the parliamentary procedures. Explain how that would be different.

.
 

Forum List

Back
Top