Plurality Of Voters Believe News Media Fabricate Stories About Trump

[martybegan]

Then why don't they press civil charges?

They didn't accuse him of being boorish they accused him of harassment or assault.

If there was actually something there SOMEONE in the press would have found enough evidence to nail him, but they didn't.

You have NOTHING, you lose, good day sir.

In order to press civil charges you need to prove damages
The women were not harmed, they were just insulted by boorish behavior

They chose to just let it go and just get on with their lives. It was only when Trump claimed "I do not act that way" that the women said......"Yes you do"

Nice revisionist history there.

More Women Accuse Trump of Groping and Sexual Harassment

The other woman, Rachel Crooks, said she was a 22-year-old receptionist working for a separate real-estate company located in Trump Tower in 2005 when he kissed her on the mouth immediately after meeting her for the first time. “I was so upset that he thought I was so insignificant that he could do that,” she told the Times

One, Jessica Leeds,74, told the Times that Trump groped her more than three decades ago, when they were seated next to each other in first-class on a commercial flight. “He was like an octopus,” she said, recounting how he grabbed her breasts and tried to put his hand up her skirt. “His hands were everywhere.”

These seem like actionable harassment to me, especially if they take place in a work environment.

And as Weinstein's case is showing guys like him don't stop at 10 or 20, they keep going and going and going, and they do things that can eventually be proven because they get so brazen.

Yet once the press dug into these stories they found not even one shred of proof for them.

Unfortunately, women in our society deal with inappropriate behavior from men all the time. They have a hard enough time proving a he said/she said accusation of rape in a court of law

Very few will file charges because of an unwanted kiss or roving hands

Trump is a creep. His statements about women, his choices of the women he surrounds himself with and anecdotal evidence affirms it

Why did Hillary cover for Weinstein for so many years?
Why did Hillary cover for Bill for so many years?

Hillary is a sexual predator enabler.

Hillary would have had no idea about Harvey Weinstein. Lots of people who worked with him didn't know because what happened went on behind closed doors. Unless you witness something, you don't know what really happened.

Bill Clinton is not a sexual predator in the same way as Donald Trump is a sexual predator. Clinton is a sexual opportunist. Regardless of how Repulicans try to paint it, Clinton doesn't force himself on women but he doesn't pass up opportunities. There is a difference. He doesn't force himself on women when they say "No".

Bullshit. Just like at our sites when we know the functioning alcoholics even though you don't see them drink, people around these assholes know they are cads. They just wilfully ignore it for political expediency, job expediency or whatever other justification they can come up with.

And your justification of Billy Boy just shows that you are part of the problem, and your castigation of Trump solely because you don't like him politically puts you in the same boat as any other enabler hack on the progressive side.

 

[martybegan]

Nice revisionist history there.

More Women Accuse Trump of Groping and Sexual Harassment

These seem like actionable harassment to me, especially if they take place in a work environment.

And as Weinstein's case is showing guys like him don't stop at 10 or 20, they keep going and going and going, and they do things that can eventually be proven because they get so brazen.

Yet once the press dug into these stories they found not even one shred of proof for them.

That's because this stuff only happens when others don't see it happening you dolt.

Sexual assault isn't done in broad daylight when everyone can see. That's because decent people would stop it. It happens in private so that the assailant can plausibly deny it later.

Then how come they are currently nailing Weinstein?

Harvey isn't as powerful as he once was and women are gaining more power in Hollywood. The woman who opened the floodgates, is a highly respected actress and an award winning director.

Notice that the women telling the stories all begin with "When I was just starting out in Hollywood". They were "nobodies" at the time. Reese Witherspoon was 16 and had just been given her first big movie role. The women he assaulted may be big stars now but they weren't anyone you would have heard of then.

Sarah Polley told her story about meeting Harvey Weinstein. She was 19 and her agent went with her, telling her she would not leave the room. Polley said that told her "everything she needed to know about Harvey Weinstein". He offered to make her a big star, if she "cooperated". She declined.

Many women did speak out about Harvey Weinstein. He crushed them like bugs. He planted stories about them in the Hollywood press, labelled them "demanding" and "difficult to work with", and made sure that they never got acting jobs again.

And maybe this will lead to more doing so in the future. It still doesn't excuse the ones who allowed it to continue for decades.

Anyone who enabled the creep needs to step up and admit their culpability, and the reason they let him slide all these years, be it fear or expediency.

Those who allowed it to continue for decades are his business partners, the studios he worked with, and the agents and the Hollywood press who knew it was going on and covered up the story.

Ronan Farrow tried to do an expose on Weinstein and the network quashed the story. Lots of women came forward with allegations and had their careers crushed.

Men who make other people big money are always protected by those who benefit. Just like you're protecting Donald Trump now.

There were Women protecting him as well, don't try to gloss over their involvement or complicity.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Oh, for the sake of math, if a plurality believes the media fabricates stories about Trump,

that means that the majority doesn't believe that.

 

[sartre play]

The National Enquirer is more accurate than the network/cable fake news.

The N Enquirer is more accurate ONLY if you believe that Elvis is alive & two headed aliens from mars walk among us

 

[Weatherman2020]

Nice revisionist history there.

More Women Accuse Trump of Groping and Sexual Harassment

These seem like actionable harassment to me, especially if they take place in a work environment.

And as Weinstein's case is showing guys like him don't stop at 10 or 20, they keep going and going and going, and they do things that can eventually be proven because they get so brazen.

Yet once the press dug into these stories they found not even one shred of proof for them.

That's because this stuff only happens when others don't see it happening you dolt.

Sexual assault isn't done in broad daylight when everyone can see. That's because decent people would stop it. It happens in private so that the assailant can plausibly deny it later.

Then how come they are currently nailing Weinstein?

Harvey isn't as powerful as he once was and women are gaining more power in Hollywood. The woman who opened the floodgates, is a highly respected actress and an award winning director.

Notice that the women telling the stories all begin with "When I was just starting out in Hollywood". They were "nobodies" at the time. Reese Witherspoon was 16 and had just been given her first big movie role. The women he assaulted may be big stars now but they weren't anyone you would have heard of then.

Sarah Polley told her story about meeting Harvey Weinstein. She was 19 and her agent went with her, telling her she would not leave the room. Polley said that told her "everything she needed to know about Harvey Weinstein". He offered to make her a big star, if she "cooperated". She declined.

Many women did speak out about Harvey Weinstein. He crushed them like bugs. He planted stories about them in the Hollywood press, labelled them "demanding" and "difficult to work with", and made sure that they never got acting jobs again.

And maybe this will lead to more doing so in the future. It still doesn't excuse the ones who allowed it to continue for decades.

Anyone who enabled the creep needs to step up and admit their culpability, and the reason they let him slide all these years, be it fear or expediency.

Those who allowed it to continue for decades are his business partners, the studios he worked with, and the agents and the Hollywood press who knew it was going on and covered up the story.

Ronan Farrow tried to do an expose on Weinstein and the network quashed the story. Lots of women came forward with allegations and had their careers crushed.

Men who make other people big money are always protected by those who benefit. Just like you're protecting Donald Trump now.

Democrats have pulled out all the stops to defend their sexual predator comrades:

Democrat Congresscritter: Harvey Weinstein’s Victims Also To Blame Because Of How They Dress

When the accusations leveled against Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein came to light, U.S. Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson says she was angry and disappointed in the man who supported many of her Democratic colleagues in D.C.

She also believes women bear as much responsibility for preventing sexual harassment and assault.

“I grew up in a time when it was as much the woman’s responsibility as it was a man’s — how you were dressed, what your behavior was,” said Johnson, who represents Texas’ 30th Congressional District. “I’m from the old school that you can have behaviors that appear to be inviting. It can be interpreted as such. That’s the responsibility, I think, of the female. I think that males have a responsibility to be professional themselves.”

TX Congresswoman Weighs in on Harvey Weinstein Controversy

 

[Dragonlady]

In order to press civil charges you need to prove damages
The women were not harmed, they were just insulted by boorish behavior

They chose to just let it go and just get on with their lives. It was only when Trump claimed "I do not act that way" that the women said......"Yes you do"

Nice revisionist history there.

More Women Accuse Trump of Groping and Sexual Harassment

The other woman, Rachel Crooks, said she was a 22-year-old receptionist working for a separate real-estate company located in Trump Tower in 2005 when he kissed her on the mouth immediately after meeting her for the first time. “I was so upset that he thought I was so insignificant that he could do that,” she told the Times

One, Jessica Leeds,74, told the Times that Trump groped her more than three decades ago, when they were seated next to each other in first-class on a commercial flight. “He was like an octopus,” she said, recounting how he grabbed her breasts and tried to put his hand up her skirt. “His hands were everywhere.”

These seem like actionable harassment to me, especially if they take place in a work environment.

And as Weinstein's case is showing guys like him don't stop at 10 or 20, they keep going and going and going, and they do things that can eventually be proven because they get so brazen.

Yet once the press dug into these stories they found not even one shred of proof for them.

Unfortunately, women in our society deal with inappropriate behavior from men all the time. They have a hard enough time proving a he said/she said accusation of rape in a court of law

Very few will file charges because of an unwanted kiss or roving hands

Trump is a creep. His statements about women, his choices of the women he surrounds himself with and anecdotal evidence affirms it

Why did Hillary cover for Weinstein for so many years?
Why did Hillary cover for Bill for so many years?

Hillary is a sexual predator enabler.

Hillary would have had no idea about Harvey Weinstein. Lots of people who worked with him didn't know because what happened went on behind closed doors. Unless you witness something, you don't know what really happened.

Bill Clinton is not a sexual predator in the same way as Donald Trump is a sexual predator. Clinton is a sexual opportunist. Regardless of how Repulicans try to paint it, Clinton doesn't force himself on women but he doesn't pass up opportunities. There is a difference. He doesn't force himself on women when they say "No".

Bullshit. Just like at our sites when we know the functioning alcoholics even though you don't see them drink, people around these assholes know they are cads. They just wilfully ignore it for political expediency, job expediency or whatever other justification they can come up with.

And your justification of Billy Boy just shows that you are part of the problem, and your castigation of Trump solely because you don't like him politically puts you in the same boat as any other enabler hack on the progressive side.

I didn't justify Bill Clinton's actions. Monica Lewinsky, Gennifer Flowers and all the others have admitted the acts were consenual. Anita Broaddrick denied vehemently that Bill raped her until Ken Starr and the FBI threatened to charge her with perjury if she didn't recant her affidavit in the Paula Jones trial. Even Jones says that she declined Bill's advances and left the room.

There's a huge difference between men who are hound dogs, like Bill Clinton, and those who are serial predators like Weinstein, Cosby or Trump. For starters, they respect the word "No".

I knew a guy when I was single who was a total hound dog. He propositioned every woman he met. He was relentless. But if you said "No", he moved on.

You're still blaming others for the actions of these predators. But when it comes to Trump, you say there's no evidence he did these things. So you're enabling his behaviour, and so is everyone who voted for him after he confessed to sexually assaulting women. Why didn't YOU hold Donald Trump accountable? He ADMITTED he assaults women and gets away with it, but you still voted for him.

 

[martybegan]

Nice revisionist history there.

More Women Accuse Trump of Groping and Sexual Harassment

These seem like actionable harassment to me, especially if they take place in a work environment.

And as Weinstein's case is showing guys like him don't stop at 10 or 20, they keep going and going and going, and they do things that can eventually be proven because they get so brazen.

Yet once the press dug into these stories they found not even one shred of proof for them.

Unfortunately, women in our society deal with inappropriate behavior from men all the time. They have a hard enough time proving a he said/she said accusation of rape in a court of law

Very few will file charges because of an unwanted kiss or roving hands

Trump is a creep. His statements about women, his choices of the women he surrounds himself with and anecdotal evidence affirms it

Why did Hillary cover for Weinstein for so many years?
Why did Hillary cover for Bill for so many years?

Hillary is a sexual predator enabler.

Hillary would have had no idea about Harvey Weinstein. Lots of people who worked with him didn't know because what happened went on behind closed doors. Unless you witness something, you don't know what really happened.

Bill Clinton is not a sexual predator in the same way as Donald Trump is a sexual predator. Clinton is a sexual opportunist. Regardless of how Repulicans try to paint it, Clinton doesn't force himself on women but he doesn't pass up opportunities. There is a difference. He doesn't force himself on women when they say "No".

Bullshit. Just like at our sites when we know the functioning alcoholics even though you don't see them drink, people around these assholes know they are cads. They just wilfully ignore it for political expediency, job expediency or whatever other justification they can come up with.

And your justification of Billy Boy just shows that you are part of the problem, and your castigation of Trump solely because you don't like him politically puts you in the same boat as any other enabler hack on the progressive side.

I didn't justify Bill Clinton's actions. Monica Lewinsky, Gennifer Flowers and all the others have admitted the acts were consenual. Anita Broaddrick denied vehemently that Bill raped her until Ken Starr and the FBI threatened to charge her with perjury if she didn't recant her affidavit in the Paula Jones trial. Even Jones says that she declined Bill's advances and left the room.

There's a huge difference between men who are hound dogs, like Bill Clinton, and those who are serial predators like Weinstein, Cosby or Trump. For starters, they respect the word "No".

I knew a guy when I was single who was a total hound dog. He propositioned every woman he met. He was relentless. But if you said "No", he moved on.

You're still blaming others for the actions of these predators. But when it comes to Trump, you say there's no evidence he did these things. So you're enabling his behaviour, and so is everyone who voted for him after he confessed to sexually assaulting women. Why didn't YOU hold Donald Trump accountable? He ADMITTED he assaults women and gets away with it, but you still voted for him.

YOU HAVE NO PROOF TRUMP ASSAULTED ANYONE.

Stop trying the star trek trick.

My God, you are such a hack that you just keep trying to make Cosby and Weinstein Equivalent to Trump without any proof whatsoever.

He admitted nothing, you are stretching a statement into an admission.

And I love how you just gloss over adultery just because the women were OK with it.

I am blaming others because they allowed him to continue for DECADES just to protect their own asses.

 

[rightwinger]

In order to press civil charges you need to prove damages
The women were not harmed, they were just insulted by boorish behavior

They chose to just let it go and just get on with their lives. It was only when Trump claimed "I do not act that way" that the women said......"Yes you do"

Nice revisionist history there.

More Women Accuse Trump of Groping and Sexual Harassment

The other woman, Rachel Crooks, said she was a 22-year-old receptionist working for a separate real-estate company located in Trump Tower in 2005 when he kissed her on the mouth immediately after meeting her for the first time. “I was so upset that he thought I was so insignificant that he could do that,” she told the Times

One, Jessica Leeds,74, told the Times that Trump groped her more than three decades ago, when they were seated next to each other in first-class on a commercial flight. “He was like an octopus,” she said, recounting how he grabbed her breasts and tried to put his hand up her skirt. “His hands were everywhere.”

These seem like actionable harassment to me, especially if they take place in a work environment.

And as Weinstein's case is showing guys like him don't stop at 10 or 20, they keep going and going and going, and they do things that can eventually be proven because they get so brazen.

Yet once the press dug into these stories they found not even one shred of proof for them.

Unfortunately, women in our society deal with inappropriate behavior from men all the time. They have a hard enough time proving a he said/she said accusation of rape in a court of law

Very few will file charges because of an unwanted kiss or roving hands

Trump is a creep. His statements about women, his choices of the women he surrounds himself with and anecdotal evidence affirms it

Why did Hillary cover for Weinstein for so many years?
Why did Hillary cover for Bill for so many years?

Hillary is a sexual predator enabler.

Did she?

Did Weinstein sexually harass her?

I would say you are playing stupid but we all know it is not an act.

You are the one making the ridiculous claim about Hillary

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

There's no way you're this person and nobody knows... they all knew.

 

[BluesLegend]

The National Enquirer is more accurate than the network/cable fake news.

The N Enquirer is more accurate ONLY if you believe that Elvis is alive & two headed aliens from mars walk among us

It was a joke knucklehead. Lost, sense of humor, if found contact Sartre.

 

[martybegan]

There's no way you're this person and nobody knows... they all knew.

Exactly. They just followed the nature of people to ignore unpleasant realities unless they stare them directly in the face.

It's why Joe Paterno ignored the Sandusky evidence.

It's why Germans turned a blind eye to their Jewish Neighbors being "evacuated/deported"

It's why cops turn a blind eye to other cops being dirty

It's all the same gut reaction, "don't rock the boat, don't risk my standing, don't make MYSELF a target....
"

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Our President fabricated stories about:

Obama's birth certificate
Thousands of Muslims dancing in the streets of NJ on 9-11
The size of his inauguration crowd
Obama tapping his wires


Can anyone point to a story about Trump that the media fabricated?

As I stated, its less about fabrication, and more about embellishment.

As an example, yes Trump did say the whole "grab em by the pussy" thing, but by the way its projected by the MSM, bloggers and many posters on this board, one would think he actually did it, and the video is proof that he did it.

The video is proof he said it, nothing more.

He said he did it, dope.

he said he did "what" specifically?

Sexually assaults women.

 

[Dragonlady]

Unfortunately, women in our society deal with inappropriate behavior from men all the time. They have a hard enough time proving a he said/she said accusation of rape in a court of law

Very few will file charges because of an unwanted kiss or roving hands

Trump is a creep. His statements about women, his choices of the women he surrounds himself with and anecdotal evidence affirms it

Why did Hillary cover for Weinstein for so many years?
Why did Hillary cover for Bill for so many years?

Hillary is a sexual predator enabler.

Hillary would have had no idea about Harvey Weinstein. Lots of people who worked with him didn't know because what happened went on behind closed doors. Unless you witness something, you don't know what really happened.

Bill Clinton is not a sexual predator in the same way as Donald Trump is a sexual predator. Clinton is a sexual opportunist. Regardless of how Repulicans try to paint it, Clinton doesn't force himself on women but he doesn't pass up opportunities. There is a difference. He doesn't force himself on women when they say "No".

Bullshit. Just like at our sites when we know the functioning alcoholics even though you don't see them drink, people around these assholes know they are cads. They just wilfully ignore it for political expediency, job expediency or whatever other justification they can come up with.

And your justification of Billy Boy just shows that you are part of the problem, and your castigation of Trump solely because you don't like him politically puts you in the same boat as any other enabler hack on the progressive side.

I didn't justify Bill Clinton's actions. Monica Lewinsky, Gennifer Flowers and all the others have admitted the acts were consenual. Anita Broaddrick denied vehemently that Bill raped her until Ken Starr and the FBI threatened to charge her with perjury if she didn't recant her affidavit in the Paula Jones trial. Even Jones says that she declined Bill's advances and left the room.

There's a huge difference between men who are hound dogs, like Bill Clinton, and those who are serial predators like Weinstein, Cosby or Trump. For starters, they respect the word "No".

I knew a guy when I was single who was a total hound dog. He propositioned every woman he met. He was relentless. But if you said "No", he moved on.

You're still blaming others for the actions of these predators. But when it comes to Trump, you say there's no evidence he did these things. So you're enabling his behaviour, and so is everyone who voted for him after he confessed to sexually assaulting women. Why didn't YOU hold Donald Trump accountable? He ADMITTED he assaults women and gets away with it, but you still voted for him.

YOU HAVE NO PROOF TRUMP ASSAULTED ANYONE.

Stop trying the star trek trick.

My God, you are such a hack that you just keep trying to make Cosby and Weinstein Equivalent to Trump without any proof whatsoever.

He admitted nothing, you are stretching a statement into an admission.

And I love how you just gloss over adultery just because the women were OK with it.

I am blaming others because they allowed him to continue for DECADES just to protect their own asses.

Trump admitted to sexually assaulting women. You heard his words in that tape. 12 women have confirmed what he said.

Trump told Howard Stern he was able to walk into the dressing room with underage beauty contestants in the Miss Teen USA contest in various stages of undress, because he owned the production. This was also confirmed by said contestants.

There are also numerous accounts of women who worked on the Celebrity Apprentice who claim that Trump sexually harassed them.

There's your evidence, which you choose to ignore.

That's more evidence than is available in either the Weinstein case or the Cosby case and you're wilfully ignoring it, and choosing to say it never happened.

 

[martybegan]

Our President fabricated stories about:

Obama's birth certificate
Thousands of Muslims dancing in the streets of NJ on 9-11
The size of his inauguration crowd
Obama tapping his wires


Can anyone point to a story about Trump that the media fabricated?

As I stated, its less about fabrication, and more about embellishment.

As an example, yes Trump did say the whole "grab em by the pussy" thing, but by the way its projected by the MSM, bloggers and many posters on this board, one would think he actually did it, and the video is proof that he did it.

The video is proof he said it, nothing more.

He said he did it, dope.

he said he did "what" specifically?

Sexually assaults women.

Can't play it at work, again, what did he say he did? when did he say he did it, and since he "admitted it" why isn't the woman suing the shit out of him?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Our President fabricated stories about:

Obama's birth certificate
Thousands of Muslims dancing in the streets of NJ on 9-11
The size of his inauguration crowd
Obama tapping his wires


Can anyone point to a story about Trump that the media fabricated?

As I stated, its less about fabrication, and more about embellishment.

As an example, yes Trump did say the whole "grab em by the pussy" thing, but by the way its projected by the MSM, bloggers and many posters on this board, one would think he actually did it, and the video is proof that he did it.

The video is proof he said it, nothing more.

He said he did it, dope.

he said he did "what" specifically?

Sexually assaults women.

Can't play it at work, again, what did he say he did? when did he say he did it, and since he "admitted it" why isn't the woman suing the shit out of him?

Can't play it at work

Not my problem.

 

[martybegan]

Why did Hillary cover for Weinstein for so many years?
Why did Hillary cover for Bill for so many years?

Hillary is a sexual predator enabler.

Hillary would have had no idea about Harvey Weinstein. Lots of people who worked with him didn't know because what happened went on behind closed doors. Unless you witness something, you don't know what really happened.

Bill Clinton is not a sexual predator in the same way as Donald Trump is a sexual predator. Clinton is a sexual opportunist. Regardless of how Repulicans try to paint it, Clinton doesn't force himself on women but he doesn't pass up opportunities. There is a difference. He doesn't force himself on women when they say "No".

Bullshit. Just like at our sites when we know the functioning alcoholics even though you don't see them drink, people around these assholes know they are cads. They just wilfully ignore it for political expediency, job expediency or whatever other justification they can come up with.

And your justification of Billy Boy just shows that you are part of the problem, and your castigation of Trump solely because you don't like him politically puts you in the same boat as any other enabler hack on the progressive side.

I didn't justify Bill Clinton's actions. Monica Lewinsky, Gennifer Flowers and all the others have admitted the acts were consenual. Anita Broaddrick denied vehemently that Bill raped her until Ken Starr and the FBI threatened to charge her with perjury if she didn't recant her affidavit in the Paula Jones trial. Even Jones says that she declined Bill's advances and left the room.

There's a huge difference between men who are hound dogs, like Bill Clinton, and those who are serial predators like Weinstein, Cosby or Trump. For starters, they respect the word "No".

I knew a guy when I was single who was a total hound dog. He propositioned every woman he met. He was relentless. But if you said "No", he moved on.

You're still blaming others for the actions of these predators. But when it comes to Trump, you say there's no evidence he did these things. So you're enabling his behaviour, and so is everyone who voted for him after he confessed to sexually assaulting women. Why didn't YOU hold Donald Trump accountable? He ADMITTED he assaults women and gets away with it, but you still voted for him.

YOU HAVE NO PROOF TRUMP ASSAULTED ANYONE.

Stop trying the star trek trick.

My God, you are such a hack that you just keep trying to make Cosby and Weinstein Equivalent to Trump without any proof whatsoever.

He admitted nothing, you are stretching a statement into an admission.

And I love how you just gloss over adultery just because the women were OK with it.

I am blaming others because they allowed him to continue for DECADES just to protect their own asses.

Trump admitted to sexually assaulting women. You heard his words in that tape. 12 women have confirmed what he said.

Trump told Howard Stern he was able to walk into the dressing room with underage beauty contestants in the Miss Teen USA contest in various stages of undress, because he owned the production. This was also confirmed by said contestants.

There are also numerous accounts of women who worked on the Celebrity Apprentice who claim that Trump sexually harassed them.

There's your evidence, which you choose to ignore.

That's more evidence than is available in either the Weinstein case or the Cosby case and you're wilfully ignoring it, and choosing to say it never happened.

Then it should be easy for him to be convicted or at least sued civilly, right?

You have an axe to grind, so you accept anything if it gets you your goal of getting rid of trump. But you KNOW you want to give idiots like Weinstein a pass because you like his politics and the money he spreads around to organizations you like as well.

You enabler you.

 

[martybegan]

As I stated, its less about fabrication, and more about embellishment.

As an example, yes Trump did say the whole "grab em by the pussy" thing, but by the way its projected by the MSM, bloggers and many posters on this board, one would think he actually did it, and the video is proof that he did it.

The video is proof he said it, nothing more.

He said he did it, dope.

he said he did "what" specifically?

Sexually assaults women.

Can't play it at work, again, what did he say he did? when did he say he did it, and since he "admitted it" why isn't the woman suing the shit out of him?

Can't play it at work

Not my problem.

No your problem is you are a political hack-twat.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

He said he did it, dope.

he said he did "what" specifically?

Sexually assaults women.

Can't play it at work, again, what did he say he did? when did he say he did it, and since he "admitted it" why isn't the woman suing the shit out of him?

Can't play it at work

Not my problem.

No your problem is you are a political hack-twat.

That's right, act like you don't know what he said on that bus.

 

[usmbguest5318]

Plurality Of Voters Believe News Media Fabricate Stories About Trump

People are willing to believe all sorts of things. Believing something is so does not make it so.

 

[martybegan]

he said he did "what" specifically?

Sexually assaults women.

Can't play it at work, again, what did he say he did? when did he say he did it, and since he "admitted it" why isn't the woman suing the shit out of him?

Can't play it at work

Not my problem.

No your problem is you are a political hack-twat.

That's right, act like you don't know what he said on that bus.

SAID, he said a hell of a lot more on other times he was on Stern's show. But that doesn't prove he did anything, and in the current climate if there was any real proof beyond some blowhard words he would be facing impeachment by now.