Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not quite...She most certainly is saying that we need to tax the rich more. She says it quite plainly all the time. And she justifies it with this "you didn't build that" bullshit. When liberals say "you didn't build that", they are really saying "You didn't earn that". And since you didn't earn it, it is okay to confiscate it.She did NOT say that. Anywhere.Warren is using the same tired communist argument that rich people didn't earn their money and therefore it is okay to rob them of whatever amount we please.I thought she was talking about paying taxes. If that "hunk" she wants from business is something else, I stand corrected.The first 45 seconds are identical to things Trump was saying before he decided Republicans were easier to hoax.Is there anything wrong with what she said, G?
The last 1:15 is pure, unadulterated communist horseshit.
Otherwise, I see nothing at all "communist" in anything she said It is absolutely true that all those things--roads, police, etc. are all funded by everyone's taxes. That should include the businesses, yes? Is she saying businesses should pay a lot more than they do, or what? I know a lot of times communities are so eager to get a company into town for the jobs it will provide that they cut a deal giving the business a break on taxes. Was that what she was talking against, maybe?
I'm not trying to argue; maybe I'm dense, but I'm not getting how her points were communist.
See my signature. Ronald Reagan.
So you think a person earning $16,000 per year, living in a single wide on his grandpa's property, should pay the same tax rate as Donald Trump and his business?
Explain, please.
That's the mindset at work here.
On the flipside, I am deeply opposed to tax expenditures, too. I do not believe someone should be rewarded with a refund of tax dollars for behaving the way the government wants them to behave. Those tax expenditures have to be replaced by either taxing everyone at higher rates or by borrowing.
Our government does both. It taxes all of us more, and borrows TRILLIONS. Trump has made sure our government has to borrow even more than ever.
This is why I have become more and more supportive of the Fair Tax over the years. One which has NO exemptions. No exemptions is critical.
I hate to break it to you, but very few people on earth can turn millions into billions. Many have tried.If Trump had started life poor I would support your statement but Trump is a limousine, silver spoon born in mouth trust fund baby who inherited millions.
When liberals say "you didn't build that", they are really saying "You didn't earn that". And since you didn't earn it, it is okay to confiscate it.She most certainly is saying that we need to tax the rich more. She says it quite plainly all the time. And she justifies it with this "you didn't build that" bullshit. When liberals say "you didn't build that", they are really saying "You didn't earn that". And since you didn't earn it, it is okay to confiscate it.She did NOT say that. Anywhere.Warren is using the same tired communist argument that rich people didn't earn their money and therefore it is okay to rob them of whatever amount we please.I thought she was talking about paying taxes. If that "hunk" she wants from business is something else, I stand corrected.The first 45 seconds are identical to things Trump was saying before he decided Republicans were easier to hoax.Is there anything wrong with what she said, G?
The last 1:15 is pure, unadulterated communist horseshit.
Otherwise, I see nothing at all "communist" in anything she said It is absolutely true that all those things--roads, police, etc. are all funded by everyone's taxes. That should include the businesses, yes? Is she saying businesses should pay a lot more than they do, or what? I know a lot of times communities are so eager to get a company into town for the jobs it will provide that they cut a deal giving the business a break on taxes. Was that what she was talking against, maybe?
I'm not trying to argue; maybe I'm dense, but I'm not getting how her points were communist.
See my signature. Ronald Reagan.
So you think a person earning $16,000 per year, living in a single wide on his grandpa's property, should pay the same tax rate as Donald Trump and his business?
Explain, please.
That's the mindset at work here.
On the flipside, I am deeply opposed to tax expenditures, too. I do not believe someone should be rewarded with a refund of tax dollars for behaving the way the government wants them to behave. Those tax expenditures have to be replaced by either taxing everyone at higher rates or by borrowing.
Our government does both. It taxes all of us more, and borrows TRILLIONS. Trump has made sure our government has to borrow even more than ever.
This is why I have become more and more supportive of the Fair Tax over the years. One which has NO exemptions. No exemptions is critical.
We don’t know if Trump will survive either1) she is wrong
2) Trump isn’t a good example of why she is wrong
3) she isn’t trumps opponent and never will be because she won’t survive the primary
We are talking about rich people and taxation. Trump is a fraud, but not all wealthy people are. Warren would have you believe every rich person is a fraud.Na, not reallyHorseshit.Every career that has ever existed is a fraud
That's commsymp horseshit.
There is no such thing as a flawless career politician, in fact it’s a requirement to be corrupt to the core to be a career politician
As others have pointed out, that strong society is already paid for by the wealthy.Not quite...She most certainly is saying that we need to tax the rich more. She says it quite plainly all the time. And she justifies it with this "you didn't build that" bullshit. When liberals say "you didn't build that", they are really saying "You didn't earn that". And since you didn't earn it, it is okay to confiscate it.She did NOT say that. Anywhere.Warren is using the same tired communist argument that rich people didn't earn their money and therefore it is okay to rob them of whatever amount we please.I thought she was talking about paying taxes. If that "hunk" she wants from business is something else, I stand corrected.The first 45 seconds are identical to things Trump was saying before he decided Republicans were easier to hoax.
The last 1:15 is pure, unadulterated communist horseshit.
Otherwise, I see nothing at all "communist" in anything she said It is absolutely true that all those things--roads, police, etc. are all funded by everyone's taxes. That should include the businesses, yes? Is she saying businesses should pay a lot more than they do, or what? I know a lot of times communities are so eager to get a company into town for the jobs it will provide that they cut a deal giving the business a break on taxes. Was that what she was talking against, maybe?
I'm not trying to argue; maybe I'm dense, but I'm not getting how her points were communist.
See my signature. Ronald Reagan.
So you think a person earning $16,000 per year, living in a single wide on his grandpa's property, should pay the same tax rate as Donald Trump and his business?
Explain, please.
That's the mindset at work here.
On the flipside, I am deeply opposed to tax expenditures, too. I do not believe someone should be rewarded with a refund of tax dollars for behaving the way the government wants them to behave. Those tax expenditures have to be replaced by either taxing everyone at higher rates or by borrowing.
Our government does both. It taxes all of us more, and borrows TRILLIONS. Trump has made sure our government has to borrow even more than ever.
This is why I have become more and more supportive of the Fair Tax over the years. One which has NO exemptions. No exemptions is critical.
All she is saying is that you do not accumulate wealth or preserve wealth without the benefit of a strong society.
Given that the wealthy benefit more, they should contribute more
Warren has a better than average chance of winning the nomination. I've been pointing out for years she is doing the coalition building process of someone who is gunning for the presidency. She started way back in 2014.1) she is wrong
2) Trump isn’t a good example of why she is wrong
3) she isn’t trumps opponent and never will be because she won’t survive the primary
As a matter of fact, our entire infrastructure was built by private business for over a hundred years.As others have pointed out, that strong society is already paid for by the wealthy.Not quite...She most certainly is saying that we need to tax the rich more. She says it quite plainly all the time. And she justifies it with this "you didn't build that" bullshit. When liberals say "you didn't build that", they are really saying "You didn't earn that". And since you didn't earn it, it is okay to confiscate it.She did NOT say that. Anywhere.Warren is using the same tired communist argument that rich people didn't earn their money and therefore it is okay to rob them of whatever amount we please.I thought she was talking about paying taxes. If that "hunk" she wants from business is something else, I stand corrected.
Otherwise, I see nothing at all "communist" in anything she said It is absolutely true that all those things--roads, police, etc. are all funded by everyone's taxes. That should include the businesses, yes? Is she saying businesses should pay a lot more than they do, or what? I know a lot of times communities are so eager to get a company into town for the jobs it will provide that they cut a deal giving the business a break on taxes. Was that what she was talking against, maybe?
I'm not trying to argue; maybe I'm dense, but I'm not getting how her points were communist.
See my signature. Ronald Reagan.
So you think a person earning $16,000 per year, living in a single wide on his grandpa's property, should pay the same tax rate as Donald Trump and his business?
Explain, please.
That's the mindset at work here.
On the flipside, I am deeply opposed to tax expenditures, too. I do not believe someone should be rewarded with a refund of tax dollars for behaving the way the government wants them to behave. Those tax expenditures have to be replaced by either taxing everyone at higher rates or by borrowing.
Our government does both. It taxes all of us more, and borrows TRILLIONS. Trump has made sure our government has to borrow even more than ever.
This is why I have become more and more supportive of the Fair Tax over the years. One which has NO exemptions. No exemptions is critical.
All she is saying is that you do not accumulate wealth or preserve wealth without the benefit of a strong society.
Given that the wealthy benefit more, they should contribute more
As a matter of fact, our entire infrastructure was built by private business for over a hundred years.
Warren is just another hack who justifies the theft of more property by claiming the victims deserve to have their goods taken from them.
From the founding until right about the time the Erie Canal was built, 100 percent of our infrastructure was built by private business. Steam ship lines, railroads, canals, electric power grid, etc. All privately owned and operated.As a matter of fact, our entire infrastructure was built by private business for over a hundred years.As others have pointed out, that strong society is already paid for by the wealthy.Not quite...She most certainly is saying that we need to tax the rich more. She says it quite plainly all the time. And she justifies it with this "you didn't build that" bullshit. When liberals say "you didn't build that", they are really saying "You didn't earn that". And since you didn't earn it, it is okay to confiscate it.She did NOT say that. Anywhere.Warren is using the same tired communist argument that rich people didn't earn their money and therefore it is okay to rob them of whatever amount we please.
See my signature. Ronald Reagan.
So you think a person earning $16,000 per year, living in a single wide on his grandpa's property, should pay the same tax rate as Donald Trump and his business?
Explain, please.
That's the mindset at work here.
On the flipside, I am deeply opposed to tax expenditures, too. I do not believe someone should be rewarded with a refund of tax dollars for behaving the way the government wants them to behave. Those tax expenditures have to be replaced by either taxing everyone at higher rates or by borrowing.
Our government does both. It taxes all of us more, and borrows TRILLIONS. Trump has made sure our government has to borrow even more than ever.
This is why I have become more and more supportive of the Fair Tax over the years. One which has NO exemptions. No exemptions is critical.
All she is saying is that you do not accumulate wealth or preserve wealth without the benefit of a strong society.
Given that the wealthy benefit more, they should contribute more
As a matter of fact, our entire infrastructure was built by private business for over a hundred years.
Warren is just another hack who justifies the theft of more property by claiming the victims deserve to have their goods taken from them.
What hundred years was that? I'm not sure that's accurate.
Many infrastructure projects became too big for a single company or a consortium to afford to build. That's how the government became the chief funder of public works.It is still being built by the private sector, only it has to go through the government money laundering scheme so they can get their cut. Taxes go in, the government takes its cut, then subcontracts back out to private companies. They are just the EXPENSIVE middle man. Rinse, and repeat.
Private business built and profited from huge infrastructure projects. They dis not build themAs a matter of fact, our entire infrastructure was built by private business for over a hundred years.As others have pointed out, that strong society is already paid for by the wealthy.Not quite...She most certainly is saying that we need to tax the rich more. She says it quite plainly all the time. And she justifies it with this "you didn't build that" bullshit. When liberals say "you didn't build that", they are really saying "You didn't earn that". And since you didn't earn it, it is okay to confiscate it.She did NOT say that. Anywhere.Warren is using the same tired communist argument that rich people didn't earn their money and therefore it is okay to rob them of whatever amount we please.
See my signature. Ronald Reagan.
So you think a person earning $16,000 per year, living in a single wide on his grandpa's property, should pay the same tax rate as Donald Trump and his business?
Explain, please.
That's the mindset at work here.
On the flipside, I am deeply opposed to tax expenditures, too. I do not believe someone should be rewarded with a refund of tax dollars for behaving the way the government wants them to behave. Those tax expenditures have to be replaced by either taxing everyone at higher rates or by borrowing.
Our government does both. It taxes all of us more, and borrows TRILLIONS. Trump has made sure our government has to borrow even more than ever.
This is why I have become more and more supportive of the Fair Tax over the years. One which has NO exemptions. No exemptions is critical.
All she is saying is that you do not accumulate wealth or preserve wealth without the benefit of a strong society.
Given that the wealthy benefit more, they should contribute more
As a matter of fact, our entire infrastructure was built by private business for over a hundred years.
Warren is just another hack who justifies the theft of more property by claiming the victims deserve to have their goods taken from them.
What hundred years was that? I'm not sure that's accurate.
It is still being built by the private sector, only it has to go through the government money laundering scheme so they can get their cut. Taxes go in, the government takes its cut, then subcontracts back out to private companies. They are just the EXPENSIVE middle man. Rinse, and repeat.
Not exactlyAs others have pointed out, that strong society is already paid for by the wealthy.Not quite...She most certainly is saying that we need to tax the rich more. She says it quite plainly all the time. And she justifies it with this "you didn't build that" bullshit. When liberals say "you didn't build that", they are really saying "You didn't earn that". And since you didn't earn it, it is okay to confiscate it.She did NOT say that. Anywhere.Warren is using the same tired communist argument that rich people didn't earn their money and therefore it is okay to rob them of whatever amount we please.I thought she was talking about paying taxes. If that "hunk" she wants from business is something else, I stand corrected.
Otherwise, I see nothing at all "communist" in anything she said It is absolutely true that all those things--roads, police, etc. are all funded by everyone's taxes. That should include the businesses, yes? Is she saying businesses should pay a lot more than they do, or what? I know a lot of times communities are so eager to get a company into town for the jobs it will provide that they cut a deal giving the business a break on taxes. Was that what she was talking against, maybe?
I'm not trying to argue; maybe I'm dense, but I'm not getting how her points were communist.
See my signature. Ronald Reagan.
So you think a person earning $16,000 per year, living in a single wide on his grandpa's property, should pay the same tax rate as Donald Trump and his business?
Explain, please.
That's the mindset at work here.
On the flipside, I am deeply opposed to tax expenditures, too. I do not believe someone should be rewarded with a refund of tax dollars for behaving the way the government wants them to behave. Those tax expenditures have to be replaced by either taxing everyone at higher rates or by borrowing.
Our government does both. It taxes all of us more, and borrows TRILLIONS. Trump has made sure our government has to borrow even more than ever.
This is why I have become more and more supportive of the Fair Tax over the years. One which has NO exemptions. No exemptions is critical.
All she is saying is that you do not accumulate wealth or preserve wealth without the benefit of a strong society.
Given that the wealthy benefit more, they should contribute more
As a matter of fact, our entire infrastructure was built by private business for over a hundred years.
Warren is just another hack who justifies the theft of more property by claiming the victims deserve to have their goods taken from them.
Surprising, the number of people that don't know about the source of the Trump fortune. Without, Donald Trump's granddad's whorehouses in the northwest and Canada, there would been no money for Fred Trump, Donald's father to build his fortune in real estate.The only reason why The Creature is where he is now, is due to Grandpa's Whoremongering and Daddy's Money...
One generation ran whore-houses up in British Columbia...Surprising, the number of people that don't know about the source of the Trump fortune. Without, Donald Trump's granddad's whore houses in the northwest and Canada, there would been no money for Fred Trump, Donald's father to build his fortune in real estate.The only reason why The Creature is where he is now, is due to Grandpa's Whoremongering and Daddy's Money...
Thanks for the book tip!From the founding until right about the time the Erie Canal was built, 100 percent of our infrastructure was built by private business. Steam ship lines, railroads, electric power grid, etc. All privately owned and operated.As a matter of fact, our entire infrastructure was built by private business for over a hundred years.As others have pointed out, that strong society is already paid for by the wealthy.Not quite...She most certainly is saying that we need to tax the rich more. She says it quite plainly all the time. And she justifies it with this "you didn't build that" bullshit. When liberals say "you didn't build that", they are really saying "You didn't earn that". And since you didn't earn it, it is okay to confiscate it.She did NOT say that. Anywhere.
So you think a person earning $16,000 per year, living in a single wide on his grandpa's property, should pay the same tax rate as Donald Trump and his business?
Explain, please.
That's the mindset at work here.
On the flipside, I am deeply opposed to tax expenditures, too. I do not believe someone should be rewarded with a refund of tax dollars for behaving the way the government wants them to behave. Those tax expenditures have to be replaced by either taxing everyone at higher rates or by borrowing.
Our government does both. It taxes all of us more, and borrows TRILLIONS. Trump has made sure our government has to borrow even more than ever.
This is why I have become more and more supportive of the Fair Tax over the years. One which has NO exemptions. No exemptions is critical.
All she is saying is that you do not accumulate wealth or preserve wealth without the benefit of a strong society.
Given that the wealthy benefit more, they should contribute more
As a matter of fact, our entire infrastructure was built by private business for over a hundred years.
Warren is just another hack who justifies the theft of more property by claiming the victims deserve to have their goods taken from them.
What hundred years was that? I'm not sure that's accurate.
How do you not know this?
May I recommend an awesome book to you?
https://www.amazon.com/First-Tycoon-Epic-Cornelius-Vanderbilt/dp/1400031745/&tag=ff0d01-20
Trump has been repaying his debt to those whorehousesSurprising, the number of people that don't know about the source of the Trump fortune. Without, Donald Trump's granddad's whore houses in the northwest and Canada, there would been no money for Fred Trump, Donald's father to build his fortune in real estate.The only reason why The Creature is where he is now, is due to Grandpa's Whoremongering and Daddy's Money...
