Political question for Leftists. What do you not like about the Constitution?

[Oddball]

I’m cool with it as written

After all, Liberals did write the Constituition

We all know you love your slaves and deny the women the right to vote

Do you know what a Liberal is compared to a political party?

Given your posts in this thread the more relevant question is : do you have any idea of what a liberal is ? because so far you've clearly demonstrated that you do NOT.

You appear to be one of those folks that just like to use the "liberal" moniker as a mask to hide your true ideology which appears to be a garden variety, partisan progressive, maybe you can fool yourself by doing so but you're not fooling anyone that has understands history and political science.

Why not just admit what you are? are you ashamed of your belief system or something?

OK....I’ll let JFK define it for you

View attachment 492186

A 1960 Liberal. Or a 2020 Progressive Socialist. Voting for free stuff is not equality.

Helping people who need help is the earmark of a great society.
Allocating tax funds to do so is how it is done

Everyone gets “free stuff”
Some just object to others getting stuff

From each according to their ability, to each according to their need.

You're not a "liberal" in the 18th or 21st centuries...You are a stone fucking Marxist.

Are you claiming only Communist countries do things to help their people?

I'm claiming that your pious virtue signaling version of "helping" involves the threat of waving a gun in peoples' faces.

That's not charity, that's looting....And you are a Marxist looter.

Taxes are the price we pay to live in a civilized society
Oliver Wendell Holmes

What's your "fair share" of what I earned, Marxist looter?

 

[progressive hunter]

I’m cool with it as written

After all, Liberals did write the Constituition

We all know you love your slaves and deny the women the right to vote

Do you know what a Liberal is compared to a political party?

Given your posts in this thread the more relevant question is : do you have any idea of what a liberal is ? because so far you've clearly demonstrated that you do NOT.

You appear to be one of those folks that just like to use the "liberal" moniker as a mask to hide your true ideology which appears to be a garden variety, partisan progressive, maybe you can fool yourself by doing so but you're not fooling anyone that has understands history and political science.

Why not just admit what you are? are you ashamed of your belief system or something?

OK....I’ll let JFK define it for you

View attachment 492186

A 1960 Liberal. Or a 2020 Progressive Socialist. Voting for free stuff is not equality.

Helping people who need help is the earmark of a great society.
Allocating tax funds to do so is how it is done

Everyone gets “free stuff”
Some just object to others getting stuff

From each according to their ability, to each according to their need.

You're not a "liberal" in the 18th or 21st centuries...You are a stone fucking Marxist.

Are you claiming only Communist countries do things to help their people?

I'm claiming that your pious virtue signaling version of "helping" involves the threat of waving a gun in peoples' faces.

That's not charity, that's looting....And you are a Marxist looter.

Taxes are the price we pay to live in a civilized society
Oliver Wendell Holmes

not when its for redistribution of wealth,,

Wealth has been redistributed upwards for 40 years

exactly,, but the 200 yrs before it wasnt,,

what else happened 40 yrs ago??

 

[struth]

I’m cool with it as written

After all, Liberals did write the Constituition

We all know you love your slaves and deny the women the right to vote

Do you know what a Liberal is compared to a political party?

Given your posts in this thread the more relevant question is : do you have any idea of what a liberal is ? because so far you've clearly demonstrated that you do NOT.

You appear to be one of those folks that just like to use the "liberal" moniker as a mask to hide your true ideology which appears to be a garden variety, partisan progressive, maybe you can fool yourself by doing so but you're not fooling anyone that has understands history and political science.

Why not just admit what you are? are you ashamed of your belief system or something?

OK....I’ll let JFK define it for you

View attachment 492186

A 1960 Liberal. Or a 2020 Progressive Socialist. Voting for free stuff is not equality.

Helping people who need help is the earmark of a great society.
Allocating tax funds to do so is how it is done

Everyone gets “free stuff”
Some just object to others getting stuff

From each according to their ability, to each according to their need.

You're not a "liberal" in the 18th or 21st centuries...You are a stone fucking Marxist.

Are you claiming only Communist countries do things to help their people?

I'm claiming that your pious virtue signaling version of "helping" involves the threat of waving a gun in peoples' faces.

That's not charity, that's looting....And you are a Marxist looter.

Taxes are the price we pay to live in a civilized society
Oliver Wendell Holmes

not when its for redistribution of wealth,,

Wealth has been redistributed upwards for 40 years

yeah that’s how it’s suppose to follow. if wealth didn’t go up, it wouldn’t be wealth

the reality is you don’t like wealth at all..libs want everyone to be poor and dependent on govt

 

[bripat9643]

I’m cool with it as written

After all, Liberals did write the Constituition

We all know you love your slaves and deny the women the right to vote

Do you know what a Liberal is compared to a political party?

Given your posts in this thread the more relevant question is : do you have any idea of what a liberal is ? because so far you've clearly demonstrated that you do NOT.

You appear to be one of those folks that just like to use the "liberal" moniker as a mask to hide your true ideology which appears to be a garden variety, partisan progressive, maybe you can fool yourself by doing so but you're not fooling anyone that has understands history and political science.

Why not just admit what you are? are you ashamed of your belief system or something?

OK....I’ll let JFK define it for you

View attachment 492186

A 1960 Liberal. Or a 2020 Progressive Socialist. Voting for free stuff is not equality.

Helping people who need help is the earmark of a great society.
Allocating tax funds to do so is how it is done

Everyone gets “free stuff”
Some just object to others getting stuff

From each according to their ability, to each according to their need.

You're not a "liberal" in the 18th or 21st centuries...You are a stone fucking Marxist.

Are you claiming only Communist countries do things to help their people?

I'm claiming that your pious virtue signaling version of "helping" involves the threat of waving a gun in peoples' faces.

That's not charity, that's looting....And you are a Marxist looter.

Taxes are the price we pay to live in a civilized society
Oliver Wendell Holmes

not when its for redistribution of wealth,,

Wealth has been redistributed upwards for 40 years

True. that's when we started swirling down the Marxist toilet bowl.

 

[progressive hunter]

it is written in absolute and literal,,

So do you believe the President's role as Commander in Chief stretches to the Air Force and newly created Space Force? The Constitution clearly provides him that responsibility regarding our land and sea forces.

those are arms of the military,,

 

[bripat9643]

I’m cool with it as written

After all, Liberals did write the Constituition

We all know you love your slaves and deny the women the right to vote

Do you know what a Liberal is compared to a political party?

Given your posts in this thread the more relevant question is : do you have any idea of what a liberal is ? because so far you've clearly demonstrated that you do NOT.

You appear to be one of those folks that just like to use the "liberal" moniker as a mask to hide your true ideology which appears to be a garden variety, partisan progressive, maybe you can fool yourself by doing so but you're not fooling anyone that has understands history and political science.

Why not just admit what you are? are you ashamed of your belief system or something?

OK....I’ll let JFK define it for you

View attachment 492186

A 1960 Liberal. Or a 2020 Progressive Socialist. Voting for free stuff is not equality.

Helping people who need help is the earmark of a great society.
Allocating tax funds to do so is how it is done

Everyone gets “free stuff”
Some just object to others getting stuff

From each according to their ability, to each according to their need.

You're not a "liberal" in the 18th or 21st centuries...You are a stone fucking Marxist.

Are you claiming only Communist countries do things to help their people?

I'm claiming that your pious virtue signaling version of "helping" involves the threat of waving a gun in peoples' faces.

That's not charity, that's looting....And you are a Marxist looter.

Taxes are the price we pay to live in a civilized society
Oliver Wendell Holmes

not when its for redistribution of wealth,,

Wealth has been redistributed upwards for 40 years

exactly,, but the 2 hundred yrs before it wasnt,,

what else happened 40 yrs ago??

He really means 80 years ago.

 

[progressive hunter]

I’m cool with it as written

After all, Liberals did write the Constituition

We all know you love your slaves and deny the women the right to vote

Do you know what a Liberal is compared to a political party?

Given your posts in this thread the more relevant question is : do you have any idea of what a liberal is ? because so far you've clearly demonstrated that you do NOT.

You appear to be one of those folks that just like to use the "liberal" moniker as a mask to hide your true ideology which appears to be a garden variety, partisan progressive, maybe you can fool yourself by doing so but you're not fooling anyone that has understands history and political science.

Why not just admit what you are? are you ashamed of your belief system or something?

OK....I’ll let JFK define it for you

View attachment 492186

A 1960 Liberal. Or a 2020 Progressive Socialist. Voting for free stuff is not equality.

Helping people who need help is the earmark of a great society.
Allocating tax funds to do so is how it is done

Everyone gets “free stuff”
Some just object to others getting stuff

From each according to their ability, to each according to their need.

You're not a "liberal" in the 18th or 21st centuries...You are a stone fucking Marxist.

Are you claiming only Communist countries do things to help their people?

I'm claiming that your pious virtue signaling version of "helping" involves the threat of waving a gun in peoples' faces.

That's not charity, that's looting....And you are a Marxist looter.

Taxes are the price we pay to live in a civilized society
Oliver Wendell Holmes

not when its for redistribution of wealth,,

Wealth has been redistributed upwards for 40 years

exactly,, but the 2 hundred yrs before it wasnt,,

what else happened 40 yrs ago??

He really means 80 years ago.

progressives work in baby steps,,

 

[bripat9643]

How about the 2nd Amendment? Do you agree with that?

I agree with it as written, and as interpreted for over 200 years.

I disagree with the Scalia interpretation where "the people" refer to different groups of people, in different parts of the constitution.

Leftwing justices have "interpreted" it out of existence.

No, the courts have preserved and followed the Constitution by prohibiting conservatives from using the power and authority of the state to violate the rights and protected liberties of the people.

FYI

"In total, there have been 408 voter suppression bills proposed in state legislatures as of May 19th. 25 have been signed into law so far."

Of course "voter suppression" refers to any bill designed to prevent election fraud.

No its designed to prevent citizens from voting.

Marxist bunk.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I've nothing against the Constitution. My problem is with people that want to cherry-pick what they want to take obsolute literally.

Yes, the wrongheaded nonsense of ‘originalism.’

“But that’s not in the Constitution” is a failed and ignorant ‘argument.’

 

[progressive hunter]

I've nothing against the Constitution. My problem is with people that want to cherry-pick what they want to take obsolute literally.

Yes, the wrongheaded nonsense of ‘originalism.’

“But that’s not in the Constitution” is a failed and ignorant ‘argument.’

god forbid we consider the original intent,,,

 

[bripat9643]

I’m cool with it as written

After all, Liberals did write the Constituition

We all know you love your slaves and deny the women the right to vote

Do you know what a Liberal is compared to a political party?

Given your posts in this thread the more relevant question is : do you have any idea of what a liberal is ? because so far you've clearly demonstrated that you do NOT.

You appear to be one of those folks that just like to use the "liberal" moniker as a mask to hide your true ideology which appears to be a garden variety, partisan progressive, maybe you can fool yourself by doing so but you're not fooling anyone that has understands history and political science.

Why not just admit what you are? are you ashamed of your belief system or something?

OK....I’ll let JFK define it for you

View attachment 492186

A 1960 Liberal. Or a 2020 Progressive Socialist. Voting for free stuff is not equality.

Helping people who need help is the earmark of a great society.
Allocating tax funds to do so is how it is done

Everyone gets “free stuff”
Some just object to others getting stuff

From each according to their ability, to each according to their need.

You're not a "liberal" in the 18th or 21st centuries...You are a stone fucking Marxist.

Are you claiming only Communist countries do things to help their people?

I'm claiming that your pious virtue signaling version of "helping" involves the threat of waving a gun in peoples' faces.

That's not charity, that's looting....And you are a Marxist looter.

Taxes are the price we pay to live in a civilized society
Oliver Wendell Holmes

What's your "fair share" of what I earned, Marxist looter?

 

[bripat9643]

I've nothing against the Constitution. My problem is with people that want to cherry-pick what they want to take obsolute literally.

Yes, the wrongheaded nonsense of ‘originalism.’

“But that’s not in the Constitution” is a failed and ignorant ‘argument.’

What's "wrong headed" about originalism?

 

[Carl in Michigan]

I’m cool with it as written

After all, Liberals did write the Constituition

No Founder agrees with the modern left. They WARNED us about you

 

[surada]

How about the 2nd Amendment? Do you agree with that?

I agree with it as written, and as interpreted for over 200 years.

I disagree with the Scalia interpretation where "the people" refer to different groups of people, in different parts of the constitution.

Leftwing justices have "interpreted" it out of existence.

No, the courts have preserved and followed the Constitution by prohibiting conservatives from using the power and authority of the state to violate the rights and protected liberties of the people.

FYI

"In total, there have been 408 voter suppression bills proposed in state legislatures as of May 19th. 25 have been signed into law so far."

Of course "voter suppression" refers to any bill designed to prevent election fraud.

No its designed to prevent citizens from voting.

Marxist bunk.

I don'thave a problem with the Constitution. What are YOU upset about?

 

[bripat9643]

How about the 2nd Amendment? Do you agree with that?

I agree with it as written, and as interpreted for over 200 years.

I disagree with the Scalia interpretation where "the people" refer to different groups of people, in different parts of the constitution.

Leftwing justices have "interpreted" it out of existence.

No, the courts have preserved and followed the Constitution by prohibiting conservatives from using the power and authority of the state to violate the rights and protected liberties of the people.

FYI

"In total, there have been 408 voter suppression bills proposed in state legislatures as of May 19th. 25 have been signed into law so far."

Of course "voter suppression" refers to any bill designed to prevent election fraud.

No its designed to prevent citizens from voting.

Marxist bunk.

I don'thave a problem with the Constitution. What are YOU upset about?

I doubt that.

 

[Oddball]

I've nothing against the Constitution. My problem is with people that want to cherry-pick what they want to take obsolute literally.

Yes, the wrongheaded nonsense of ‘originalism.’

“But that’s not in the Constitution” is a failed and ignorant ‘argument.’

Shove it up your ass, drive-by fascist scum.

 

[meaner gene]

Nope. Franklin had slaves. Jon Jay had slaves. Alexander Hamilton had slaves.

John Adams, Samuel Adams, and Thomas Paine never owned slaves.

 

[meaner gene]

Which is where stare decicis comes in.

doesnt apply when the subject is constitutionality,,

Tell that to Chief Justice John Roberts, who reversed his opinion based on stare decisis.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

How about the 2nd Amendment? Do you agree with that?

I agree with it as written, and as interpreted for over 200 years.

I disagree with the Scalia interpretation where "the people" refer to different groups of people, in different parts of the constitution.

Leftwing justices have "interpreted" it out of existence.

No, the courts have preserved and followed the Constitution by prohibiting conservatives from using the power and authority of the state to violate the rights and protected liberties of the people.

FYI

"In total, there have been 408 voter suppression bills proposed in state legislatures as of May 19th. 25 have been signed into law so far."

Of course "voter suppression" refers to any bill designed to prevent election fraud.

No its designed to prevent citizens from voting.

Marxist bunk.

I don'thave a problem with the Constitution. What are YOU upset about?

Do you support any restrictions to owning a gun?

 

[Crepitus]

Political question for Leftists. What do you not like about the Constitution?​

The fact that none of you conservative types have read it.

That is NOT TRUE
They have read the Second Amendment.

Well, half of it maybe

26 words out of something like 4500.

You don't agree with the First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, of any of the others, for that matter.

I may not agree with your twisted, low IQ interpretation of them but I do agree with them as they are written.

No you don't. What part of "shall not be abridged" do you agree with?

You're ignoring what I said.

And the word is "infringed".

Just proof that you haven't really read it.

Either way, do you support outlawing so-called "assault weapons?"

What's that got to do with the discussion at hand?

Where are the Militias?

The first sentence is explanatory. It has no legal implications.

You claimed you support the Constitution, not prove it.

What part of "shall not be infringed" do you agree with?

The first sentence iss explanatory? Who told you that nonsense?

legal scholars.

Nope. RWNJ agenda driven whackos.