Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Typical right wing nonsense. You would easily lose that argument on policy and economic principles, and you would not successfully and directly argue that people should vote against their own economic interests.Rational humans understand that wealth envy is not rational and is the basis for most of the "tax the rich" rhetoric.
The government isn't there to serve our "economic interests". Certainly not some economic interests at the expense of others.Typical right wing nonsense. You would easily lose that argument on policy and economic principles, and you would not successfully and directly argue that people should vote against their own economic interests.
Look at mac shaming people who do research and read!! Ahh whittle Mac tdsingYep, they just gave up and handed things over to a thug.
As bad as that is, it's worse that they just won't admit it.
Actually it is. That's one of the reasons every first world country has a progressive tax. So if you want to have an argument you lost 150 years ago, find a mirror and knock yourself out.The government isn't there to serve our "economic interests". Certainly not some economic interests at the expense of others.
Nope. Government is there to maintain order and liberty. It's not there to hand out perks and favors. You may want that, but that's shitty government.Actually it is.
Says you. I say otherwise. And all of reality agrees with me. Go check.Nope. Government is there to maintain order and liberty. It's not there to hand out perks and favors. You may want that, but that's shitty government.
You're a socialist. There's no reality there. Just dismal, totalitarian government.Says you. I say otherwise. And all of reality agrees with me. Go check.
Progressive tax isn't socialism. And you clearly don't know what that word means. You're embarrassing yourself.You're a socialist. There's no reality there. Just dismal, totalitarian government.
Wrong. I don't believe government is there to serve my "self interest". I can manage that myself. Government is there to maintain justice and liberty. Not cater to anyone's "interests". Try to think outside your own petty personal desires.Wampus Dblack can’t figure out which of the two US political parties serves his economic self/interest.
Do you have any posts where you fairly and equitably qualified that same argument, for any anti-Liberal voters, whenever Democrats beg them to pleeease vote against their own interests?and you would not successfully and directly argue that people should vote against their own economic interests.
The desire to see government controlling the economy is wrong, regardless of how you label it.Progressive tax isn't socialism
Skip the shell game. I'm not playing.. And you clearly don't know what that word means. You're embarrassing yourself.
Irrelevant. I was talking about something very specific. And it was not relegated only to republican voters. Your reflexive partisanship got thee best of you.Do you have any posts where you fairly and equitably qualified that same argument, for any anti-Liberal voters, whenever Democrats beg them to pleeease vote against their own interests?
Such as, TX voters. Or, AZ voters. Or, NM voters.
Those non-Liberal voters feel like that their economic their political and their social interests are all suffering... thanks to the reality of their locale's illegal imm committing violent crimes fraud crimes and plus the housing expenses their taxes pay for those illegal imms.
Therefore, they vote against everything Democrats attempt, concerning the border. Do you ever commend them for REFUSING to vote against their own economic interests?
If so... can you drop some links to those posts of yours where you showed such a fair mindset?
And if you have commended them, for refusing to vote against their economic interests since Nov 2020? Do you now comprehend, how it is proof that Republicans have NO NEED to con 10s of millions into voting against their own economic interests??
A very silly non sequitur. Regulating parts of an economy is not the same as controlling it.The desire to see government controlling the economy is wrong, regardless of how you label it.
Cool post that linkActually it is. That's one of the reasons every first world country has a progressive tax. So if you want to have an argument you lost 150 years ago, find a mirror and knock yourself out.
You think he's Muslim or Buddhist??Yes, Trump pretends to be Christian
You are incorrect, I believe. You EXACTLY did not talk any specifics. In fact, your exact words were "and you would not successfully and directly argue that people should vote against their own economic interests."Irrelevant. I was talking about something very specific
Once again, you gave no group no sect no org --so I used one, could have been anyone, to exemplify your concept your model your claim, so to learn if I experienced fair reasoning in your claim..And it was not relegated only to republican voters.
Your reflexive partisanship got thee best of you.
