Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So OCTAs still refuse to provide any facts to support the claim in post #2. Don't worry....nobody expects you guys to admit you don't have any facts to support it either.
nice analogybentdick refuses to admit the proof is included in this post95% of it was recovered.
CNN.com - FBI finished with Pennsylvania crash site probe - September 24, 2001
Exactly, that is why I stopped responding to the poor stupid bastard. Post 2 contained it's own proof, and when i figured out how futile it was to argue with curvey i just let him have his delusions. of course i am laughing at him the whole time.
he is like the Black Knight guarding the bridge in Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Even though he is defeated, by having his arms, then his legs chopped off, he still insists on challenging the knights of the round table.
Curvey is like a cross between that black knight and baghdad bob.....
bentdick refuses to admit the proof is included in this post95% of it was recovered.
CNN.com - FBI finished with Pennsylvania crash site probe - September 24, 2001
bentdick refuses to admit the proof is included in this post95% of it was recovered.
CNN.com - FBI finished with Pennsylvania crash site probe - September 24, 2001
Exactly, that is why I stopped responding to the poor stupid bastard. Post 2 contained it's own proof, and when i figured out how futile it was to argue with curvey i just let him have his delusions. of course i am laughing at him the whole time.
he is like the Black Knight guarding the bridge in Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Even though he is defeated, by having his arms, then his legs chopped off, he still insists on challenging the knights of the round table.
Curvey is like a cross between that black knight and baghdad bob.....
bentdick refuses to admit the proof is included in this post95% of it was recovered.
CNN.com - FBI finished with Pennsylvania crash site probe - September 24, 2001
Hey dumbass, where is the proof supporting the fbi's claim?
bentdick refuses to admit the proof is included in this post
Hey dumbass, where is the proof supporting the fbi's claim?
why do we need proof to support the FBI's claim? they are the lead investigative agency. they are in the perfect position to know exactly how much was recovered. are you claiming they are lying?
Hey dumbass, where is the proof supporting the fbi's claim?
why do we need proof to support the FBI's claim? they are the lead investigative agency. they are in the perfect position to know exactly how much was recovered. are you claiming they are lying?
So you don't have any facts to support the fbi's claim?
bentdick refuses to admit the proof is included in this post
Exactly, that is why I stopped responding to the poor stupid bastard. Post 2 contained it's own proof, and when i figured out how futile it was to argue with curvey i just let him have his delusions. of course i am laughing at him the whole time.
he is like the Black Knight guarding the bridge in Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Even though he is defeated, by having his arms, then his legs chopped off, he still insists on challenging the knights of the round table.
Curvey is like a cross between that black knight and baghdad bob.....
Where is the proof supporting the fbi's claim?
why do we need proof to support the FBI's claim? they are the lead investigative agency. they are in the perfect position to know exactly how much was recovered. are you claiming they are lying?
So you don't have any facts to support the fbi's claim?
nope. you have anything to refute them?
So you don't have any facts to support the fbi's claim?
nope. you have anything to refute them?
Thank you for admitting you don't have any facts to support a claim.
the claim made in post #2 was that the FBI said itbentdick refuses to admit the proof is included in this post95% of it was recovered.
CNN.com - FBI finished with Pennsylvania crash site probe - September 24, 2001
Hey dumbass, where is the proof supporting the fbi's claim?
the claim made in post #2 was that the FBI said itbentdick refuses to admit the proof is included in this post
Hey dumbass, where is the proof supporting the fbi's claim?
that is proof they did'
you are a fucking idiot
the proof for that is every post you make
ask the FBI, dipshitthe claim made in post #2 was that the FBI said itHey dumbass, where is the proof supporting the fbi's claim?
that is proof they did'
you are a fucking idiot
the proof for that is every post you make
The claim I'm talking about in post 2 is the fbi's claim they recovered 95% you sooper stoopid ****.
the claim made in post #2 was that the FBI said itHey dumbass, where is the proof supporting the fbi's claim?
that is proof they did'
you are a fucking idiot
the proof for that is every post you make
The claim I'm talking about in post 2 is the fbi's claim they recovered 95% you sooper stoopid ****.
the claim made in post #2 was that the FBI said it
that is proof they did'
you are a fucking idiot
the proof for that is every post you make
The claim I'm talking about in post 2 is the fbi's claim they recovered 95% you sooper stoopid ****.
One more time:
The FBI was the lead investigating agency.
They made a statement.
Since most of the sane world believes them no one has asked them fro proof that it is true.
Since you think they lied about it, prove that they lied.
Or just shut the fuck up because you are only digging deeper.
the claim made in post #2 was that the FBI said it
that is proof they did'
you are a fucking idiot
the proof for that is every post you make
The claim I'm talking about in post 2 is the fbi's claim they recovered 95% you sooper stoopid ****.
One more time:
The FBI was the lead investigating agency.
They made a statement.
Since most of the sane world believes them no one has asked them fro proof that it is true.
Since you think they lied about it, prove that they lied.
Or just shut the fuck up because you are only digging deeper.
Ya..by all means shut up. Cuz these fuckwits are friggin gods of the high thought proccess.
I wouldn't trust these guys to investigate the cause of an ingrown hair. Why?... because they are appologists...ass licking morons. Nary a one is an independant thinker. Not bad people..just not equipped to study any subject without running it through thier hack political filters. Carry on free thinkers...never let these pathetic bully boys break your stride!!!! It may be that these dweebs are right in the end but it won't be because they added to the knowledge. The only ties the have to truth is dumb luck.
The claim I'm talking about in post 2 is the fbi's claim they recovered 95% you sooper stoopid ****.
One more time:
The FBI was the lead investigating agency.
They made a statement.
Since most of the sane world believes them no one has asked them fro proof that it is true.
Since you think they lied about it, prove that they lied.
Or just shut the fuck up because you are only digging deeper.
Ya..by all means shut up. Cuz these fuckwits are friggin gods of the high thought proccess.
I wouldn't trust these guys to investigate the cause of an ingrown hair. Why?... because they are appologists...ass licking morons. Nary a one is an independant thinker. Not bad people..just not equipped to study any subject without running it through thier hack political filters. Carry on free thinkers...never let these pathetic bully boys break your stride!!!! It may be that these dweebs are right in the end but it won't be because they added to the knowledge. The only ties the have to truth is dumb luck.[/QUOTE
I was wrong about you huggy. It's too bad. At first it looked as though you would offer something constructive, but you haven't.
Let's go through this;
The FBI was quoted as saying they recovered 95% of the plane in Shanksville.
The point was disputed by 911nutjob and curvey, with no reason given except that the FBI said it and the rest of us were stooopid ***** or dupes.
You said you had seen things that made you think otherwise, then claimed you "didn't have time" to discuss it, and seemed to expect credibility for that statement and attacked the credibility of the FBI, their statement, and those that accept the statement from the FBI.
So far the only reason given by any of the twoofers, and you, is that the statement came form the FBI.
That isn't debate, that is spreading propaganda. Specifically that is spreading the "islamo-fascist narrative".
From;
Ex Extremist Fights Jihadist Ideology - 60 Minutes - CBS News
""How many of you believe it is U.S. policy to be at war with Islam and to destroy Islam?" Stahl asked.
About a third of them believed it.
When a student got up to ask her a question about the 9/11 bombing of the World Trade Center, Stahl got a feel for how much we can talk past each other.
"So you're telling me that al Qaeda didn't do 9/11? Is that what you're saying?" Stahl asked.
"Yeah," the student replied. "We all know that al Qaeda was created by the CIA."
He was saying it was the CIA that told Osama bin Laden to attack on 9/11.
"Now we attacked our own Pentagon and the World Trade Center to have a justification to go into Afghanistan? Do you really believe that?" Stahl asked.
"Yeah, yeah, I do," the student said.
They believe we attacked ourselves so we could go to Afghanistan and kill Muslims. "What Im sensing is that there is an enormous amount of anti-Americanism. Am I right?" Stahl asked.
"Give us one single reason to love America and we will forget about the rest of the millions of reasons to hate America," the student replied.
After a statement like that, you begin to question whether even a former extremist can uproot the idea in places like Peshawar that the West is out to destroy Islam. "
There is more, here is a video of a former extremist who is working to spread the truth to counteract the lies he spread for years.
Extra: What Is The Narrative? - 60 Minutes - CBS News
http://cnettv.cnet.com/av/video/cbsnews/atlantis2/player
http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...fers-support-the-islamofascist-narrative.html
Too bad, I had higher expectations, I should have known better.
Ya..by all means shut up. Cuz these fuckwits are friggin gods of the high thought proccess.
I wouldn't trust these guys to investigate the cause of an ingrown hair. Why?... because they are appologists...ass licking morons. Nary a one is an independant thinker. Not bad people..just not equipped to study any subject without running it through thier hack political filters. Carry on free thinkers...never let these pathetic bully boys break your stride!!!! It may be that these dweebs are right in the end but it won't be because they added to the knowledge. The only ties the have to truth is dumb luck.
ok tough guy....
what facts do you have that the info was wrong? show me ONE.
until then, shut the fuck up about your "free thinking" bullshit and start using LOGIC.
