Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is big country, when you say nobody you are displaying extreme ignorance.
The second is about individual rights you uneducated retard
You absolutely lost that ignorant argument years ago and you know it
Stupid is believing that we “need laws” to regulate human reproduction. Living creatures (including humans) were reproducing LONG before power-hungry maggots decided to play god and began passing laws to regulate it.That's clearly a stupid argument with even just the slightest bit of critical thinking. If this was innate to human nature then you wouldn't need laws regulating it. It would be impossible for us to do. We can't do things we have no natural or innate ability to do. Naturally.
What the fuck are you even talking about anymore?Stupid is believing that we “need laws” to regulate human reproduction. Living creatures (including humans) were reproducing LONG before power-hungry maggots decided to play god and began passing laws to regulate it.
Many young women are coerced and/or scared into getting an abortion. Abortion is big business, and it's within the best interest of the bloodthirsty abortionist to “sell” the benefits of an abortion while omitting the benefits of family and child-rearing.I said "no one is forced to get an abortion", and I stand by that.
No one is forced to get an abortion. They choose to go to the doctors, they choose to put their feet in the stirrups,and they choose to let the doctor suck little globby out of their uterus.
did you respond to the right comment?That's clearly a stupid argument with even just the slightest bit of critical thinking. If this was innate to human nature then you wouldn't need laws regulating it. It would be impossible for us to do. We can't do things we have no natural or innate ability to do. Naturally.
Sorry you're having difficulty keeping up. You're the one who said that a 1970s study can't have any validity. You're the one saying that laws are necessary to regulate reproduction. I'm simply offering an alternative viewpoint.What the fuck are you even talking about anymore?
Yep. If all women innately loved their children or the fetuses gestating inside them then mothers would never drive their cars into rivers with their children strapped in or seek abortions. That's pretty easy logic to follow, Morons.did you respond to the right comment?
That's not what I said you idiot. I said that the culture of the 1970s isn't the same culture of today.Sorry you're having difficulty keeping up. You're the one who said that a 1970s study can't have any validity. You're the one saying that laws are necessary to regulate reproduction. I'm simply offering an alternative viewpoint.
you entitled to be wrongI said "no one is forced to get an abortion", and I stand by that.
No one is forced to get an abortion. They choose to go to the doctors, they choose to put their feet in the stirrups,and they choose to let the doctor suck little globby out of their uterus.
Many young women are coerced and/or scared into getting an abortion. Abortion is big business, and it's within the best interest of the bloodthirsty abortionist to “sell” the benefits of an abortion while omitting the benefits of family and child-rearing.
Yes, correct, partially, the militia was the people and the guns they owned, not the states militia.The Second is about militias. The Founders didn't want the great unwashed to have guns.
you think Tommy Jefferson wanted Sally Hemmings to have a gun and decide she wasn't in the mood?
you entitled to be wrong
Except when the Founders said, "the people" they meant white, land-owning males, not the great unwashed.Yes, correct, partially, the militia was the people and the guns they owned, not the states militia.
More than you, apparently.Oh, what books have you read about this.
Naw, I don't make stupid statements about women being weak things who can't control their own bodies.Why not, you are stupid in public
Wrong DUMBASS it is about individuals and yes they didThe Second is about militias. The Founders didn't want the great unwashed to have guns.
you think Tommy Jefferson wanted Sally Hemmings to have a gun and decide she wasn't in the mood?
They meant the people DUMBASSExcept when the Founders said, "the people" they meant white, land-owning males, not the great unwashed.
NoneOh, what books have you read about this.
