Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh please. There’s about a two point percentage difference between pro-lifers and pro-abortioners: latest is 47 to 49%. It’s pretty evenly split.Correct, it's been called " settled law " for most of the 50-year history. It's only now that a minority of malcontents are contesting it.
You keep missing the important point here. If I was in that survey, I would delicious pro life on that question. On a personal level I do not believe in abortion. It would be a last resort. Something I'd avoid. But the next question you didn't show was that 70% of Americans still think Roe versus Wade should be in place, not because they all believe in abortion or want it for themselves but because they believe women should have the right to decide their own reproductive Rights, not the courts and definitely not the state.Oh please. There’s about a two point percentage difference between pro-lifers and pro-abortioners: latest is 47 to 49%. It’s pretty evenly split.
Besides which, it doesn’t matter: the correct ruling is to reverse the earlier one handed down by an activist Court and apply the Constitution: return the decision to the people to decide, per state.
And you keep missing two important points:You keep missing the important point here. If I was in that survey, I would delicious pro life on that question. On a personal level I do not believe in abortion. It would be a last resort. Something I'd avoid. But the next question you didn't show was that 70% of Americans still think Roe versus Wade should be in place, not because they all believe in abortion or want it for themselves but because they believe women should have the right to decide their own reproductive Rights, not the courts and definitely not the state.
Well if the people are given a choice, it's not even a done deal here in Nebraska, a very Republican state, the effort to try to get a trigger Bill attached to the Roe versus Wade outcome didn't Garner enough votes to pass. People here generally live by the rule. " Live and let livliveAnd you keep missing two important points:
1) What constitutes “reproductive rights” is subject to opinion. Almost half the people think that right ends when it involves terminating the life of another. Ofherwise, you could smash the baby to smithereens as it descends through the birth canal. Or, since the head emerges first, just have the doctor ready with a machete.
2) It doesn’t matter what the majority of the nation thinks, no matter how slim that majority is. It matters what the majority of the people in each state think. That’s how the Constitution was set up.
People here generally live by the rule, " Live and let live. " In other words mind your own business, and respect other people's decisions, especially on controversial issues where one side is trying to dominate and control the other side.Well if the people are given a choice, it's not even a done deal here in Nebraska, a very Republican state, the effort to try to get a trigger Bill attached to the Roe versus Wade outcome didn't Garner enough votes to pass. People here generally live by the rule. " Live and let livlive
Fine by me, if that’s what people in Nebraska vote for. It’s not up to me to demand how other states set their laws.Well if the people are given a choice, it's not even a done deal here in Nebraska, a very Republican state, the effort to try to get a trigger Bill attached to the Roe versus Wade outcome didn't Garner enough votes to pass. People here generally live by the rule. " Live and let livlive
And it isn’t YOUR side trying to dominate and control the other side? Leftists are threatening violence - even death - to SCOTUS justices who won’t vote their way, and Biden condones it.People here generally live by the rule, " Live and let live. " In other words mind your own business, and respect other people's decisions, especially on controversial issues where one side is trying to dominate and control the other side.
The whole reason bro versus Wade came into existence was because different states were passing egregious abortion laws. Even if Roe versus Wade does go by the wayside. The same thing is about to happen all over again, so it will have to be brought back and the federal government will settle the matter once again hopefully for all time.Fine by me, if that’s what people in Nebraska vote for. It’s not up to me to demand how other states set their laws.
No, they're not. No woman's rights activist is trying to force any so-called pro-life woman to have an abortion. Your argument is totally unfounded.And it isn’t YOUR side trying to dominate and control the other side? Leftists are threatening violence - even death - to SCOTUS justices who won’t vote their way, and a Biden condones it.
it’s not Bro vs Wade. Now you’re trying to make it that it’s men against women, when YOU - a man - has launched insult after insult at women who disagree with you.The whole reason bro versus Wade came into existence was because different states were passing egregious abortion laws. Even if Roe versus Wade does go by the wayside. The same thing is about to happen all over again, so it will have to be brought back and the federal government will settle the matter once again hopefully for all time.
As I have said that was times before I use a voice machine to print out the words because I have bad arthritis in my hands. Of course it's supposed to be Roe versus Wade there's no deception intended there. And where did I say it was men against women ? I'm sorry but you're adding your thoughts to the conversation and not concentrating on what I'm saying. It's getting late maybe you're tired I know I am I had a very rewarding day and I'm about to go to bed so keep worrying about things that aren't your concern and I'm sure you'll get a lot more wrinkles and have a less satisfying life. That's about all the good it's going to do you. You see things very strangely. I'm not sure I can continue talking to you. There's no Goodwill in your tone of voice. You keep trying to put words in my mouth that you are thinking.it’s not Bro vs Wade. Now you’re trying to make it that it’s men against women, when YOU - a man - has launched insult after insult at women who disagree with you.
In fact, the ones on this thread arguing strongest for women to be able to kill their unborn children are men. I guess you like the idea of being able to knock a woman up, and just have her “get rid of it,” without your having to pay child support.
It seems to me that a 7-2 decision by judges nominated by both parties is a hell of a lot less activist than a 5-4 decision rammed through by a majority consisting exclusively of judges nominated by Conservative judges. Wouldn't you say?Oh please. There’s about a two point percentage difference between pro-lifers and pro-abortioners: latest is 47 to 49%. It’s pretty evenly split.
Besides which, it doesn’t matter: the correct ruling is to reverse the earlier one handed down by an activist Court and apply the Constitution: return the decision to the people to decide, per state.
You are aware that abortion and adoption have nothing to do with each other, right? You do understand that she doesn't want to end abortion altogether, do you?None...but unlike the hypocrites, I am not trying to stop abortion.
Of course, I've never quite understood misogynistic pricks like you, telling a woman in what manner she should have her kids. It's none of your damn business.If you can't figure that out, there is no point in attempting to answer. You're not bright enough to understand.
That doesn't change the fact that 70% of Americans believe Roe versus Wade should stay in place. If the supreme Court does reverse their opinion about it, it will be the most unpopular decision ever. And then all the problems that Roe versus Wade will resurface again and the people will demand its return.It seems to me that a 7-2 decision by judges nominated by both parties is a hell of a lot less activist than a 5-4 decision rammed through by a majority consisting exclusively of judges nominated by Conservative judges. Wouldn't you say?
Coming back to your "activism" claim. A judge that in his legal argument claim immediately puts in caveats to which his argumentation doesn't apply isn't so much making a legal argument as he is justifying activism.
As for "the people" deciding. They already do. NOBODY is forcing anybody to have an abortion.
. NOBODY is forcing anybody to have an abortion.
I wasn't disagreeing with you. It will be unpopular.That doesn't change the fact that 70% of Americans believe Roe versus Wade should stay in place. If the supreme Court does reverse their opinion about it, it will be the most unpopular decision ever. And then all the problems that Roe versus Wade will resurface again and the people will demand its return.
