Saturday Night Massacre Revisited?

Obstructing justice is a crime - So is lying under oath and conspiring with a hostile foreign entity to influence an election .. better let him know
Obstruction of Justice - FindLaw


The above is WHY Trump will NEVER testify before Mueller....Trump's attorneys would probably threaten to quit if Trump is insane enough to testify........either under oath or not does NOT make any difference when testifying before FBI agents.
 
I just want to prove these Righties wrong..I don't want Pence as president..not only is he creepy..he is an extreme right wing corrupt dangerous man..

Pence's problems will surface later as an unindicted co-conspirator (beside his problems over the scam with Carrier.).....The definition for co-conspirator is:

An unindicted co-conspirator,is a person who is alleged in an indictment to have engaged in conspiracy, but who is not charged in the same indictment. (Check out who was such during Watergate.)
You are really reaching, aren't you?

What the hell, if you are going to dream, dream big, right? :lol:
 
In the end, the difference between Watergate, and Russia-gate, is this.

Nixon got booted for obstructing justice when a real crime had been committed.

Do you think the American people will stand for booting or impeaching a president on the grounds of "obstructing justice" when no crime had been committed except by the very political enemies that are trying to indict him?



There would be revolution before the morning daybreak.
 
What he was attempting to do, was to end all of the investigations which were distracting from his presidency.

So, Trump has then NOT been able to do crap in a year since he has been "distracted"???...One then wonders how he has found the time to do this 25% to 33% of his presidency in his first year.

upload_2018-1-26_10-8-45.png
 
Obstructing justice is a crime - So is lying under oath and conspiring with a hostile foreign entity to influence an election .. better let him know
Obstruction of Justice - FindLaw


The above is WHY Trump will NEVER testify before Mueller....Trump's attorneys would probably threaten to quit if Trump is insane enough to testify........either under oath or not does NOT make any difference when testifying before FBI agents.
I think now that they have those FBI texts, there just might be a chance that he might.
 
Yes Nat, intent, prohibited and consequence are all real words but when you string them together trying to fool people in believing you are more educated than you really are is gibberish.

I never claimed to be "more educated"......however, you and your ilk may be....
View attachment 173534
/----/ I'll type slowly so you can follow along. I didn't say you "claimed" to be be better educated than you really are; I said you "acted" like it. Now misquoting me is a prohibited consequence. BWHAHAHAHAHA
 
What he was attempting to do, was to end all of the investigations which were distracting from his presidency.

So, Trump has then NOT been able to do crap in a year since he has been "distracted"???...One then wonders how he has found the time to do this 25% to 33% of his presidency in his first year.

View attachment 173536
So you don't disagree that the media, the nations and congress' attention has sort of been pre-occupied?

Maybe your opinion of him has sort of been tarnished by this made up scandal by the Deep State?
 
What he was attempting to do, was to end all of the investigations which were distracting from his presidency.

So, Trump has then NOT been able to do crap in a year since he has been "distracted"???...One then wonders how he has found the time to do this 25% to 33% of his presidency in his first year.

View attachment 173536
/----/ Why do you Libtards object to Trump exercising?
 
Do you think the American people will stand for booting or impeaching a president on the grounds of "obstructing justice" when no crime had been committed except by the very political enemies that are trying to indict him?


Just for fun....contemplate this.....

A REPUBLICAN DOJ appointed a REPUBLICAN special prosecutor to investigate a REPUBLICAN administration.......and you "conclude" that the entire scenario is instigated by "political enemies"???

If your own party is considered a "political enemy," who the hell is your "friends"???
 
Last edited:
What he was attempting to do, was to end all of the investigations which were distracting from his presidency.

So, Trump has then NOT been able to do crap in a year since he has been "distracted"???...One then wonders how he has found the time to do this 25% to 33% of his presidency in his first year.

View attachment 173536
I think you are being way to generous.

Do you serious think he gets out and gets THAT much exercise?!

I'll bet he spends far more time in front of the TV eating Mikey-D's. :lol:
 
Do you think the American people will stand for booting or impeaching a president on the grounds of "obstructing justice" when no crime had been committed except by the very political enemies that are trying to indict him?


Just for fun....contemplate this.....

A REPUBLICAN DOJ appointed a REPUBLICAN special prosecutor to investigate a REPUBLICAN administration.......and you "conclude" that the entire scenario is instigated by "political enemies"???

If your own party is considered a "political enemy,"who the hell is your "friends"???
No, I conclude it based on the preponderance of HARD EVIDENCE.

Had you bothered to read the investigative piece in post #98, you might know what is going on. Keep up.
 
Why am I not surprised that you don't understand the difference between contemplation and intent?


Shove that "contemplation" dodge somewhere else........Notice what the headlines of what is being reported state???

Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House ...

Trump denies Times report that he ordered Mueller fired

Trump ordered special counsel Robert Mueller to be fired last year ...

Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, But Backed Down: Report - NYMag

LOL, What don't you understand concerning IT DIDN'T HAPPEN? If the President's intent was to fire Mueller then Mueller would have been fired, the only thing that prevented it from happening was Trumpkin NOT following through on it because he considered the consequences of proceeding with the action.

He contemplated firing him but then changed his mind... you cannot demonstrate intent when the only thing preventing someone from doing something is their own judgement and they decide not follow through on whatever action is in question.

*** NOW BACK TO OUR REGULARLY SCHEDULED PROGRAM OF AN INFANT GRASPING AT STRAWS **

:popcorn:
 
Do you think the American people will stand for booting or impeaching a president on the grounds of "obstructing justice" when no crime had been committed except by the very political enemies that are trying to indict him?


Just for fun....contemplate this.....

A REPUBLICAN DOJ appointed a REPUBLICAN special prosecutor to investigate a REPUBLICAN administration.......and you "conclude" that the entire scenario is instigated by "political enemies"???

If your own party is considered a "political enemy," who the hell is your "friends"???
/----/ Yes. The Deep State, RINOs and Never Trumpers. Try and keep up.
 
What he was attempting to do, was to end all of the investigations which were distracting from his presidency.

So, Trump has then NOT been able to do crap in a year since he has been "distracted"???...One then wonders how he has found the time to do this 25% to 33% of his presidency in his first year.

View attachment 173536
/----/ Why do you Libtards object to Trump exercising?
For the same reason conservatives objected to Obama smoking I guess?

obama2.jpeg

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
Obstructing justice is a crime - So is lying under oath and conspiring with a hostile foreign entity to influence an election .. better let him know
Obstruction of Justice - FindLaw
From that page:

"Obstruction of justice is defined by federal statute as any "interference with the orderly administration of law and justice" and governed by 18 U.S.C. §§ 1501-1521. Federal code identifies more than 20 specific types of obstruction, including "Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees" (18 U.S.C. § 1505), the specific code section cited in the Nixon and Clinton articles of impeachment."

Ooow. You sure you want to open that can of worms?

1509:
Whoever, by threats or force, willfully prevents, obstructs, impedes, or interferes with, or willfully attempts to prevent, obstruct, impede, or interfere with, the due exercise of rights or the performance of duties under any order, judgment, or decree of a court of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
(Hilldawg and a number of others in her crime posse)

1519:
Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
(Hilldawg)

The point is, unless you are out their demanding the prosecution of Hillary and the gang, your hypocrisy is well noted, as well as your false indignation.

and conspiring with a hostile foreign entity to influence an election
Are you talking about that "thing of value" campaign contributions regulation at 11 CFR 110? That's a really weak angle that will likely get nowhere, given the that a broad interpretation and application of "thing of value" is necessary to snare Trump. Under such a broad interpretation and application, ANY communication with a foreign national during an election could be deemed a "thing of value." A mere photo-op with a foreign national could be valuable in an election, as it could sway votes.

But, even under such a broad interpretation, there is no evidence anywhere that Trump or his team received any "thing of value" from a foreign national.

This whole thing is stupid.

The election is over. It's not going to change anything. Focus on forcing Trump to do what is best for Americans and stop trying to make Pence the Commander-in-Chief.
 
oh goohoood, another thread on Trump's downfall for not firing someone. This will certainly mean his downfall. :rolleyes:
 

Forum List

Back
Top