sherri is still afraid to mention of WHAT SAMER WAS CONVICTED I suspect that she realizes that if she does say of what he was convicted and supports
his release-----she would be supporting a PRECEDENT for release of all criminals convicted of the same crime. There are many many islamic terrorists in US jails who never actually KILLED anyone----in fact many criminals in US jails who never actually KILLED anyone. If the US released all criminals who never KILLED anyone-----and sherri were held responsible for any adverse outcome of such a move------then ----I could see her point
It was alleged he was involved in Resistance activity, but he was not convicted of attacking or killing anyone. The entire trial system in the military courts for Palestinians is filled with violations of due process rights required by intl law, so convictions in that unlawful system lack any credibility. Its like a trial in Iran, for political prisoners there, there is no such thing as a fair trial for them. And there is no such thing as a fair trial for Palestinians in Israel and Occupied Palestine. Samer was released in the prison exchange deal, so none of that matters, that prior conviction that was set aside. Samer has been charged with no new crime so his detention has no legal basis and he should be released.
Sherri lied again as an ISA RESPECTING supporter of terrorism involving the
murder of children. Samer was convicted of a crime that has lots of
isa respecting terrorists in USA jails-------that is conspiracy to engage in
terrorist acts His conviction was never "set-aside" as the lying isa-
repecter sherri claims consistent with the her "religion" He was
released as a ransom for the completely innocent person who
was kidnapped in the name of isa by isa respecting co-religionists of
sherri
Paying ransoms to disgusting isa-respecters who seek release of
their fellow criminals is never a good idea-------that the isa-respecting
scum would take advantage of it is no surprise