strollingbones
Diamond Member
if the op wasnt such a bias person he would know this bills was supported by the gop and democrats......george hw bush signed it in 1990
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Carter and Brezinski were the cause of the Afghnaistan crisis, dickhead. Reagan cleaned up after Carter's shit and turned the country around. You were in your diapers at the time, so how would you know. Actually you still are.Carter and Brezinski's weakness and ineptitude gave the Soviets the green light to invade Afghanistan. The US had become a paper tiger under these two fuckups, there would not be a need to support any rebels because under any other president the Soviets would not have DARED invade Afghanistan.Brezinski was the idiot behind Carter's disastrous foreign policy that ushered in the Islamic revolution of Iran and the Soviet invasion of Aghanistan, which made Carter the second worst president in US history, right after Obama. Now go sit in the corner and let the adults talk, stupido.Yes, instead of sending our troops in, we let the Afghans and others repel the Russians. What is wrong with that.
Then Afghanistan became a failed state with barbaric Taliban Neanderthals running show while Bill Clinton was thumbing his nose for eight years while the Taliban were brutalizing Afghans and in effect making Afghanistan the Harvard of Islamic terrorism.
Haha, weren't you just saying Brzezinski was wrong for that, now it's okay when Reagan did that?
But you were just defending Reagan for supporting the Soviet-Afghan War, but when Brzezinski did it he was bad?
You're definitely one of the more primitive users here, and a Jew.
That piece of shit MOFO Brezkinski is the root of most of today's problems with Muslims today. It was the Carter / Brezinski manufactured Shiite Islamic Revolution of Iran that brought about a counter reactionary radical Sunni version such as Al Queda and ISIS financed by the Wahabbi Saudis.
Oh okay, when Reagan backed the Muslims against Soviets in Afghanistan it's understandable, but not when Brzezinski / Carter did it's horrible.
Reagan called them FREEDOM FIGHTERS remember?It's just that Leftist Double Standard again, when Conservatives do something it's bad, when Leftists do the same thing it's good.Oh okay, when Reagan backed the Muslims against Soviets in Afghanistan it's understandable, but not when Brzezinski / Carter did it's horrible.
Well, he didnt call THOSE PARTICULAR Muslims freedom fighters. Fighting for your freedom is one thing, fighting to eliminate the infidel is quite another.
Those are not the Muslims you are looking for.
Bill, Clinton recognized the potential risk & put together a bipartisan committee to study our vulnerability to a foreign terror attack. The Hart Rudman commission was to report to the new president.It's a well known fact that terrorists have been training in piloting the planes (and never cared about landing!) in USA for two years before they committed 9/11/01.Who was President 9/11/01? Not Obama, nor Clinton.
So, who was the president who let them in? Looks like Mr. Bill-the-Rapist.
They did their study & wrote a report.
They went to see Bush & Bush refused to meet with them. Instead, he formed his own committee headed by dick Cheney & Bush's campaign manager. Their first meeting was scheduled for late September 2001.
If George W Bush had actrually read that report instead of throwing it in the trash, we might have prevented 9-11.
'But hey, just like with Captain Bone Spur, Bush was more interested vacationing than doing his fucking job.
So don't you dare blame Bill Clinton.
Bill, Clinton recognized the potential risk & put together a bipartisan committee to study our vulnerability to a foreign terror attack. The Hart Rudman commission was to report to the new president.It's a well known fact that terrorists have been training in piloting the planes (and never cared about landing!) in USA for two years before they committed 9/11/01.Who was President 9/11/01? Not Obama, nor Clinton.
So, who was the president who let them in? Looks like Mr. Bill-the-Rapist.
They did their study & wrote a report.
They went to see Bush & Bush refused to meet with them. Instead, he formed his own committee headed by dick Cheney & Bush's campaign manager. Their first meeting was scheduled for late September 2001.
If George W Bush had actrually read that report instead of throwing it in the trash, we might have prevented 9-11.
'But hey, just like with Captain Bone Spur, Bush was more interested vacationing than doing his fucking job.
So don't you dare blame Bill Clinton.
Oh for fucks sake. The 9/11 terrorists came in to this country while Clintoon was President and this son of a bitch came in to this country while Obamakov was President so don't be deflecting away from the facts.
I have no idea, and that's why I asked the question, why do stupid libtardos continue to defend Muslims when 90% of the world's conflicts in the last fifty years comes from Muslims fighting each other or Muslims trying to kill "infidels".
There's eight dead people today due to some political correctness bullshit.
You can't stand on top of the piles of dead bodies and rail you have the moral high ground when Trump is trying to put a stop to this madness.
Carter and Brezinski were the cause of the Afghnaistan crisis, dickhead. Reagan cleaned up after Carter's shit and turned the country around. You were in your diapers at the time, so how would you know. Actually you still are.Carter and Brezinski's weakness and ineptitude gave the Soviets the green light to invade Afghanistan. The US had become a paper tiger under these two fuckups, there would not be a need to support any rebels because under any other president the Soviets would not have DARED invade Afghanistan.Brezinski was the idiot behind Carter's disastrous foreign policy that ushered in the Islamic revolution of Iran and the Soviet invasion of Aghanistan, which made Carter the second worst president in US history, right after Obama. Now go sit in the corner and let the adults talk, stupido.Haha, weren't you just saying Brzezinski was wrong for that, now it's okay when Reagan did that?
But you were just defending Reagan for supporting the Soviet-Afghan War, but when Brzezinski did it he was bad?
You're definitely one of the more primitive users here, and a Jew.
That piece of shit MOFO Brezkinski is the root of most of today's problems with Muslims today. It was the Carter / Brezinski manufactured Shiite Islamic Revolution of Iran that brought about a counter reactionary radical Sunni version such as Al Queda and ISIS financed by the Wahabbi Saudis.
Oh okay, when Reagan backed the Muslims against Soviets in Afghanistan it's understandable, but not when Brzezinski / Carter did it's horrible.
Would one of you libtarded sycophants please explain to me WTF a "diversity" visa is?
Are we importing Muslims to the United States to meet our quota under some form of affirmative action mandate for Muslims?
In other words, suicide by political correctness.
Bullshit, St Ronnie armed Osama Bin Laden, you can't get more Al Queda than that!!!!!Reagan called Shah Massoud's group freedom fighters. Not the Taliban or Al Queda.
Like I said there was no direct connection, however we did arm ALL rebel groups as a whole.Bullshit, St Ronnie armed Osama Bin Laden, you can't get more Al Queda than that!!!!!Reagan called Shah Massoud's group freedom fighters. Not the Taliban or Al Queda.
So Reagan cleaned up the mess Carter and Brezinski created. Case closed.Carter and Brezinski were the cause of the Afghnaistan crisis, dickhead. Reagan cleaned up after Carter's shit and turned the country around. You were in your diapers at the time, so how would you know. Actually you still are.Carter and Brezinski's weakness and ineptitude gave the Soviets the green light to invade Afghanistan. The US had become a paper tiger under these two fuckups, there would not be a need to support any rebels because under any other president the Soviets would not have DARED invade Afghanistan.Brezinski was the idiot behind Carter's disastrous foreign policy that ushered in the Islamic revolution of Iran and the Soviet invasion of Aghanistan, which made Carter the second worst president in US history, right after Obama. Now go sit in the corner and let the adults talk, stupido.
But you were just defending Reagan for supporting the Soviet-Afghan War, but when Brzezinski did it he was bad?
You're definitely one of the more primitive users here, and a Jew.
That piece of shit MOFO Brezkinski is the root of most of today's problems with Muslims today. It was the Carter / Brezinski manufactured Shiite Islamic Revolution of Iran that brought about a counter reactionary radical Sunni version such as Al Queda and ISIS financed by the Wahabbi Saudis.
Oh okay, when Reagan backed the Muslims against Soviets in Afghanistan it's understandable, but not when Brzezinski / Carter did it's horrible.
You mean the most effective, and least costly military operation in U.S.A history?
The tricking of Soviets to invade Afghanistan, and fail?
Which Reagan did the same thing in backing Afghan rebels against Soviets?
And by "we" you mean REAGAN!!!Like I said there was no direct connection, however we did arm ALL rebel groups as a whole.Bullshit, St Ronnie armed Osama Bin Laden, you can't get more Al Queda than that!!!!!Reagan called Shah Massoud's group freedom fighters. Not the Taliban or Al Queda.
If by "cleaned up" you mean creating Al Queda you might have a point.So Reagan cleaned up the mess Carter and Brezinski created. Case closed.
Yeah...and? It's either let the Soviets gain a foothold one step closer to most of the world's oil reserves and secure a warm water port right in the middle of it, or, arm a bunch of rag tag Neanderthals and let them make the necessary sacrifices to save their country. There was no win win choice there and Reagan clearly made the right one. Duh!And by "we" you mean REAGAN!!!Like I said there was no direct connection, however we did arm ALL rebel groups as a whole.Bullshit, St Ronnie armed Osama Bin Laden, you can't get more Al Queda than that!!!!!Reagan called Shah Massoud's group freedom fighters. Not the Taliban or Al Queda.
http://www.ocweekly.com/features/features/dr-frankenbacher/22375/
"These weren’t American weapons," said Rohrabacher. "By and large, it was done with Russian equipment bought from Egypt or one of the other states that was once allied with Russia but was now friendly to us. About the only American weapons they had were the Stinger missiles."...
... the majority of U.S. military-aid recipients were unsavory, even unstable characters. The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), which coordinated the efforts on the ground in Afghanistan, was never very choosy about who got arms.
Roughly half the weapons the CIA supplied went to fundamentalist Afghan leader Gulbeddin Hekmatyar—"one of the most stridently anti-Western of the resistance leaders," according to Mary Ann Weaver’s May 1996 article in The Atlantic Monthly. Another arms customer was the blind Sheikh Omar Abdul-Rahman, later convicted of involvement in the 1993 botched bombing of the World Trade Center. Oh, and Osama bin Laden, the man whom George W. Bush says was behind the Sept. 11 attacks.
Would one of you libtarded sycophants please explain to me WTF a "diversity" visa is?
Are we importing Muslims to the United States to meet our quota under some form of affirmative action mandate for Muslims?
In other words, suicide by political correctness.
Your Russian buddies were faring no better in Afghanistan before Reagan created Al Queda than we are now after 16 years.Yeah...and? It's either let the Soviets gain a foothold one step closer to most of the world's oil reserves and secure a warm water port right in the middle of it, or, arm a bunch of rag tag Neanderthals and let them make the necessary sacrifices to save their country. There was no win win choice there and Reagan clearly made the right one. Duh!And by "we" you mean REAGAN!!!Like I said there was no direct connection, however we did arm ALL rebel groups as a whole.Bullshit, St Ronnie armed Osama Bin Laden, you can't get more Al Queda than that!!!!!Reagan called Shah Massoud's group freedom fighters. Not the Taliban or Al Queda.
http://www.ocweekly.com/features/features/dr-frankenbacher/22375/
"These weren’t American weapons," said Rohrabacher. "By and large, it was done with Russian equipment bought from Egypt or one of the other states that was once allied with Russia but was now friendly to us. About the only American weapons they had were the Stinger missiles."...
... the majority of U.S. military-aid recipients were unsavory, even unstable characters. The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), which coordinated the efforts on the ground in Afghanistan, was never very choosy about who got arms.
Roughly half the weapons the CIA supplied went to fundamentalist Afghan leader Gulbeddin Hekmatyar—"one of the most stridently anti-Western of the resistance leaders," according to Mary Ann Weaver’s May 1996 article in The Atlantic Monthly. Another arms customer was the blind Sheikh Omar Abdul-Rahman, later convicted of involvement in the 1993 botched bombing of the World Trade Center. Oh, and Osama bin Laden, the man whom George W. Bush says was behind the Sept. 11 attacks.
Again, Al Queda aka Sunni Wahabbi radical Islam was a response to the Shiite Islamic Revolution in Iran instigated by and presided over by no. 2 worse president in US history, Jimmy Carter. No. 1 being non other than Hussein Obama.If by "cleaned up" you mean creating Al Queda you might have a point.So Reagan cleaned up the mess Carter and Brezinski created. Case closed.
Russians invaded Afghanistan because they viewed Carter as a do nothing, weak, paper tiger president.Your Russian buddies were faring no better in Afghanistan before Reagan created Al Queda than we are now after 16 years.Yeah...and? It's either let the Soviets gain a foothold one step closer to most of the world's oil reserves and secure a warm water port right in the middle of it, or, arm a bunch of rag tag Neanderthals and let them make the necessary sacrifices to save their country. There was no win win choice there and Reagan clearly made the right one. Duh!And by "we" you mean REAGAN!!!Like I said there was no direct connection, however we did arm ALL rebel groups as a whole.Bullshit, St Ronnie armed Osama Bin Laden, you can't get more Al Queda than that!!!!!Reagan called Shah Massoud's group freedom fighters. Not the Taliban or Al Queda.
http://www.ocweekly.com/features/features/dr-frankenbacher/22375/
"These weren’t American weapons," said Rohrabacher. "By and large, it was done with Russian equipment bought from Egypt or one of the other states that was once allied with Russia but was now friendly to us. About the only American weapons they had were the Stinger missiles."...
... the majority of U.S. military-aid recipients were unsavory, even unstable characters. The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), which coordinated the efforts on the ground in Afghanistan, was never very choosy about who got arms.
Roughly half the weapons the CIA supplied went to fundamentalist Afghan leader Gulbeddin Hekmatyar—"one of the most stridently anti-Western of the resistance leaders," according to Mary Ann Weaver’s May 1996 article in The Atlantic Monthly. Another arms customer was the blind Sheikh Omar Abdul-Rahman, later convicted of involvement in the 1993 botched bombing of the World Trade Center. Oh, and Osama bin Laden, the man whom George W. Bush says was behind the Sept. 11 attacks.
The big elephant in the room is that our own European ally the United Kingdom has long had this new policy of only issuing long term visas to "highly skilled migrants". But somehow when the US wants to do what's good for the country, it's OUTRAGEOUS.Would one of you libtarded sycophants please explain to me WTF a "diversity" visa is?
Are we importing Muslims to the United States to meet our quota under some form of affirmative action mandate for Muslims?
In other words, suicide by political correctness.
Well, as a liberal I think that visas should be given out for the right reasons. For people who offer something to the country, not just any old person.
So Reagan cleaned up the mess Carter and Brezinski created. Case closed.Carter and Brezinski were the cause of the Afghnaistan crisis, dickhead. Reagan cleaned up after Carter's shit and turned the country around. You were in your diapers at the time, so how would you know. Actually you still are.Carter and Brezinski's weakness and ineptitude gave the Soviets the green light to invade Afghanistan. The US had become a paper tiger under these two fuckups, there would not be a need to support any rebels because under any other president the Soviets would not have DARED invade Afghanistan.But you were just defending Reagan for supporting the Soviet-Afghan War, but when Brzezinski did it he was bad?
You're definitely one of the more primitive users here, and a Jew.
That piece of shit MOFO Brezkinski is the root of most of today's problems with Muslims today. It was the Carter / Brezinski manufactured Shiite Islamic Revolution of Iran that brought about a counter reactionary radical Sunni version such as Al Queda and ISIS financed by the Wahabbi Saudis.
Oh okay, when Reagan backed the Muslims against Soviets in Afghanistan it's understandable, but not when Brzezinski / Carter did it's horrible.
You mean the most effective, and least costly military operation in U.S.A history?
The tricking of Soviets to invade Afghanistan, and fail?
Which Reagan did the same thing in backing Afghan rebels against Soviets?