SO GLAD the Newtown Parents Are Coming Forward

then stay the fuck out of my house

ps no accident

Oh, I'd stay out of your house because you're a crazy person who masturbates at the thought of shooting someone.

But that's the point. People like you shouldn't have guns from the get go.



I have a hammer and an anvil

no need to masturbate


you don't get to decide one way or another


no confiscation

pretty easy

stay the fuck out
 
Last edited:
[

Owning a gun is not irresponsible.

In fact 99.999% of all gun owners will never harm themselves or anyone else with a gun

To deny people the right to effectively defend themselves because a fraction of a percent of people will be criminals is stupid that's why sheep are known for being delicious and not smart.

Again, a gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill someone in the home than a bad guy.

I think you need to look up the word "effective" and find out what it means. If something fails 43 times and only works right once, that's not "effective."

Just sayin'.

Once again you think people care about the 43 times comment.

Acceptable risk

Hey Joe- Did you hear about the mass killing in China? 36 killed?

Gasp... The evil blade

Report: 36 killed after knife gang attacks China police station - World News

'Knife-wielding assailants killed nine policemen and 17 civilians in a bloody attack that only ended after 10 attackers were shot dead in western China early Wednesday'
 
[

Owning a gun is not irresponsible.

In fact 99.999% of all gun owners will never harm themselves or anyone else with a gun

To deny people the right to effectively defend themselves because a fraction of a percent of people will be criminals is stupid that's why sheep are known for being delicious and not smart.

Again, a gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill someone in the home than a bad guy.

I think you need to look up the word "effective" and find out what it means. If something fails 43 times and only works right once, that's not "effective."

Just sayin'.

Once again you think people care about the 43 times comment.

Acceptable risk

Hey Joe- Did you hear about the mass killing in China? 36 killed?

Gasp... The evil blade

Report: 36 killed after knife gang attacks China police station - World News

'Knife-wielding assailants killed nine policemen and 17 civilians in a bloody attack that only ended after 10 attackers were shot dead in western China early Wednesday'

In a region of China that has been fighting against Chinese occupation for centuries? Really?

Sorry, man, a bunch of Uighers are not going to break into your house tonight. You don't need a gun.

(Frankly, it's pronounced "Weee-Gurs", which is why I think they are mad.)
 
Again, a gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill someone in the home than a bad guy.

I think you need to look up the word "effective" and find out what it means. If something fails 43 times and only works right once, that's not "effective."

Just sayin'.

Once again you think people care about the 43 times comment.

Acceptable risk

Hey Joe- Did you hear about the mass killing in China? 36 killed?

Gasp... The evil blade

Report: 36 killed after knife gang attacks China police station - World News

'Knife-wielding assailants killed nine policemen and 17 civilians in a bloody attack that only ended after 10 attackers were shot dead in western China early Wednesday'

In a region of China that has been fighting against Chinese occupation for centuries? Really?

Sorry, man, a bunch of Uighers are not going to break into your house tonight. You don't need a gun.

(Frankly, it's pronounced "Weee-Gurs", which is why I think they are mad.)

But some other criminals enabled by society requiring swift justice might. :razz:

I'll be ready, and they will be dead.

Simple process of elimination

Now to the point at hand- And of course the socialist will blow off this mass murder.. But you see.

You validate my assertion that it's the person(s) doing the killing right? It's this "group that has been fighting in the region for years" and not the blade?

BRAVO! You are getting it

It was the 'person(s) that also committed the same killings here in America, regardless of tool used.

-snort-

-Geaux
 
Guy, no Weeee-gurs or anything else that ends in "ger" are going to break into your house tonight.

You don't need a gun.

And frankly, your anticipation of wanting to shoot someone for breaking into your house kind of makes my point.

You guys have way too much bloodlust.
 
Guy, no Weeee-gurs or anything else that ends in "ger" are going to break into your house tonight.

You don't need a gun.

And frankly, your anticipation of wanting to shoot someone for breaking into your house kind of makes my point.

You guys have way too much bloodlust.

Your right, it's the person(s) not the tool. I agree with you for what is a seldom occurrence

-Geaux
 
[

Owning a gun is not irresponsible.

In fact 99.999% of all gun owners will never harm themselves or anyone else with a gun

To deny people the right to effectively defend themselves because a fraction of a percent of people will be criminals is stupid that's why sheep are known for being delicious and not smart.

Again, a gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill someone in the home than a bad guy.

I think you need to look up the word "effective" and find out what it means. If something fails 43 times and only works right once, that's not "effective."

Just sayin'.

Again that's a bullshit stat from a ridiculously small sample

And I do not live my life by questionable statistics like a sheep.
 
Guy, no Weeee-gurs or anything else that ends in "ger" are going to break into your house tonight.

You don't need a gun.

And frankly, your anticipation of wanting to shoot someone for breaking into your house kind of makes my point.

You guys have way too much bloodlust.

Why are you of the opinion I want someone to break into my home?

This is fun

-Geaux
 
I must be your worst nightmare. Delusional paranoia and recurring major depression and I own firearms. Legally. Have my whole life I am 55 and have had access to firearms my entire life owned them since I was 19.

Guess what dumb ass, I have shot no one and no one in my house has been harmed by my firearms. Raised 2 children.
 
Guy, no Weeee-gurs or anything else that ends in "ger" are going to break into your house tonight.

You don't need a gun.

And frankly, your anticipation of wanting to shoot someone for breaking into your house kind of makes my point.

You guys have way too much bloodlust.

Why are you of the opinion I want someone to break into my home?

This is fun

-Geaux

I think you guys fantasize about it all the time.

I mean, jesus, if you just wanted to protect your home, you could do that with a big dog or a Louisville Slugger.

But it's pretty clear, you just want to shoot someone.

The problem is, it's 43 times more likely it will be someone you care about.

I've known too many people who've had to bury a family member who killed themselves with that gun they bought to protect their family.
 
Guy, no Weeee-gurs or anything else that ends in "ger" are going to break into your house tonight.

You don't need a gun.

And frankly, your anticipation of wanting to shoot someone for breaking into your house kind of makes my point.

You guys have way too much bloodlust.

Why are you of the opinion I want someone to break into my home?

This is fun

-Geaux

I think you guys fantasize about it all the time.

I mean, jesus, if you just wanted to protect your home, you could do that with a big dog or a Louisville Slugger.

But it's pretty clear, you just want to shoot someone.

The problem is, it's 43 times more likely it will be someone you care about.

I've known too many people who've had to bury a family member who killed themselves with that gun they bought to protect their family.

So it is ok if I beat someone to death? Or have a dog maul them to death?
 
Guy, no Weeee-gurs or anything else that ends in "ger" are going to break into your house tonight.

You don't need a gun.

And frankly, your anticipation of wanting to shoot someone for breaking into your house kind of makes my point.

You guys have way too much bloodlust.

Why are you of the opinion I want someone to break into my home?

This is fun

-Geaux

I think you guys fantasize about it all the time.

I mean, jesus, if you just wanted to protect your home, you could do that with a big dog or a Louisville Slugger.

But it's pretty clear, you just want to shoot someone.

The problem is, it's 43 times more likely it will be someone you care about.

I've known too many people who've had to bury a family member who killed themselves with that gun they bought to protect their family.

Joe- My guess is you may be a frustrated 'prohibitive person(s)' on the ATF list that can't buy a gun.. So if you can't have one, we can't

If not, there are drugs for your condition.

30mg of Lithium could do wonders

-Geaux
 
[

So it is ok if I beat someone to death? Or have a dog maul them to death?

NOt really. But you probably would need to use excessive force.

How's this for a simple proposal. We let private citizens have non-lethal guns-

Tasers, tear gas, whatever.

But you guys seem to have your hearts set on shooting someone.

Just as soon as you manage to change the amendment through the amendment process.
 
[

Joe- My guess is you may be a frustrated 'prohibitive person(s)' on the ATF list that can't buy a gun.. So if you can't have one, we can't

If not, there are drugs for your condition.

30mg of Lithium could do wonders

-Geaux

Guy, I was in the army for 11 years. And My MOS was 76Y which means I've probably handled more guns than your biggest fantasy would allow.

I could go my whole life and never see another gun and be perfectly happy.

But my REAL hostility towards you gun nuts is that you aided and abetted the Plutocrats in destroying the middle class in this country. You cased the joints, and the religious right drove the getaway car.

This is about revenge. I lost something I care about, you guys lose something you care about.
 
Guy, no Weeee-gurs or anything else that ends in "ger" are going to break into your house tonight.

You don't need a gun.

And frankly, your anticipation of wanting to shoot someone for breaking into your house kind of makes my point.

You guys have way too much bloodlust.

Why are you of the opinion I want someone to break into my home?

This is fun

-Geaux

I think you guys fantasize about it all the time.

I mean, jesus, if you just wanted to protect your home, you could do that with a big dog or a Louisville Slugger.

But it's pretty clear, you just want to shoot someone.

The problem is, it's 43 times more likely it will be someone you care about.

I've known too many people who've had to bury a family member who killed themselves with that gun they bought to protect their family.

[

Joe- My guess is you may be a frustrated 'prohibitive person(s)' on the ATF list that can't buy a gun.. So if you can't have one, we can't

If not, there are drugs for your condition.

30mg of Lithium could do wonders

-Geaux

Guy, I was in the army for 11 years. And My MOS was 76Y which means I've probably handled more guns than your biggest fantasy would allow.

I could go my whole life and never see another gun and be perfectly happy.

But my REAL hostility towards you gun nuts is that you aided and abetted the Plutocrats in destroying the middle class in this country. You cased the joints, and the religious right drove the getaway car.

This is about revenge. I lost something I care about, you guys lose something you care about.

:clap2:

Now the gloves came off Joe. I'll give you credit for that.

Keep fighting for what you believe in

-Geaux
 
[

:clap2:

Now the gloves came off Joe. I'll give you credit for that.

Keep fighting for what you believe in

-Geaux

Guy, if you've been paying the least bit attention, that is always what I've been about here.

From 1980 to 2007, I was a hard core Republican. Brought up in a Union home with a father who thought Nixon was a great guy.

And I went along with all the GOP bullshit for years. In 2006, I would have been totally on your side on this argument.

Then I realized that the gun nuts, like the abortion nuts, are just "rubes". They cling to their guns and their bibles because they can't control the things that are really important in their lives. I figured this out when after I required expensive medical operations, my employer engaged in a one year campaign to get me off the payroll despite six years of hard work for their company. "I'm glad I don't have to deal with a union", my boss smirked. He also like to fire ladies when they got pregnant and thought Mitt Romney would be a wonderful president.

30 years of Republican war on the Middle class has done that.

Get the guns and the abortion issues put to bed, the Plutocrats would have to run naked. And they'd get maybe 20% of the vote.

So, yeah, I'll point out that you guys are tools of the gun industry, an industry that does not give a fuck about your safety, that will gladly sell Nancy Lanza the gun her son uses to kill her.
 
Guy, no Weeee-gurs or anything else that ends in "ger" are going to break into your house tonight.

You don't need a gun.

And frankly, your anticipation of wanting to shoot someone for breaking into your house kind of makes my point.

You guys have way too much bloodlust.

Why are you of the opinion I want someone to break into my home?

This is fun

-Geaux

I think you guys fantasize about it all the time.

I mean, jesus, if you just wanted to protect your home, you could do that with a big dog or a Louisville Slugger.

But it's pretty clear, you just want to shoot someone.

The problem is, it's 43 times more likely it will be someone you care about.

I've known too many people who've had to bury a family member who killed themselves with that gun they bought to protect their family.

Bs. Same thing every thread. Your numbers are massaged by their publishers and there are still things in a house way more dangerous then guns.
 

Forum List

Back
Top