easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,150
That says a lot more about YOU than me.Coulda fooled me.Such a guess would be 'hazardous' for you, as you would be wrong.I'd hazard a guess that you weren't alive for Watergate. LOL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That says a lot more about YOU than me.Coulda fooled me.Such a guess would be 'hazardous' for you, as you would be wrong.I'd hazard a guess that you weren't alive for Watergate. LOL
That's what Trump and his people have declared. I declare that to be the one of the most idiotic Trump claims yet.
Someone give me one good argument to defend his claim.
Carl Bernstein says not.
Carl Bernstein: Clinton email review not bigger than Watergate
That's what Trump and his people have declared. I declare that to be the one of the most idiotic Trump claims yet.
Someone give me one good argument to defend his claim.
Watergate was a president trying to cover up a simple breaking and entering. It didn't have ramifications of classified, top secret or very sensitive Government documents/information being exposed. Seriously dude, you seem to have no grasp of reality at all. Are you 12 years old, do you parents know what you're doing?
Be patient....Where are the exposed secret documents off the Huma laptop?
Be patient....Where are the exposed secret documents off the Huma laptop?
you left out "enriching themselves in the process" You a Dem by chance?The motives are different though. Nixon literally was trying to cover up actual shit he did. Perhaps they didn't start out that way if you assume Ellsberg's stealing of the Pentagon Papers started Nixon's history of breakins. Ellsberg committed a crime, btw, and only escaped punishment because the gummit engaged in misconduct prosecuting him. But Nixon's motives were plain and simple to cover up his official and personal misdeeds.NEWSFLASH!!! Clinton Incs "pay-to-play" shenanigans are just as bad, if not worse.Watergate wasn't just a scandal, it was an ongoing criminal conspiracy sanctioned by Nixon, who abused the powers of the office for political gain; "emails" doesn't even compare.Okay, I suppose logically that it isn't surprising that the RWnuts who have for decades idolized G Gordon Liddy, one of those convicted in Watergate,
would not consider Watergate a scandal at all.
The Cintons' are more complex imo. Their entire lives have been about obtaining power, but the point of power is public service ... about making things better. It is, imo, a laudable goal. However, no matter how good a person's intentions may be, that does not excuse willfully doing wrong things to further them.
Are you reading with eubonics, by chance?you left out "enriching themselves in the process" You a Dem by chance?The motives are different though. Nixon literally was trying to cover up actual shit he did. Perhaps they didn't start out that way if you assume Ellsberg's stealing of the Pentagon Papers started Nixon's history of breakins. Ellsberg committed a crime, btw, and only escaped punishment because the gummit engaged in misconduct prosecuting him. But Nixon's motives were plain and simple to cover up his official and personal misdeeds.NEWSFLASH!!! Clinton Incs "pay-to-play" shenanigans are just as bad, if not worse.Watergate wasn't just a scandal, it was an ongoing criminal conspiracy sanctioned by Nixon, who abused the powers of the office for political gain; "emails" doesn't even compare.Okay, I suppose logically that it isn't surprising that the RWnuts who have for decades idolized G Gordon Liddy, one of those convicted in Watergate,
would not consider Watergate a scandal at all.
The Cintons' are more complex imo. Their entire lives have been about obtaining power, but the point of power is public service ... about making things better. It is, imo, a laudable goal. However, no matter how good a person's intentions may be, that does not excuse willfully doing wrong things to further them.
Not at all. This new revelation just broke in the last 2 - 3 days. the search Warrant to go through the emails was jut received. There are 650k emails to go through, and you want to declare because no one can tell you EXACTLY what is in those e-mails RIGHT now then there is no scandal. YOU WISH!Another admission that there is no scandal.Be patient....Where are the exposed secret documents off the Huma laptop?
Trump admits that the election system isn't as rigged as he thought.That's what Trump and his people have declared. I declare that to be the one of the most idiotic Trump claims yet.
Someone give me one good argument to defend his claim.
That's what Trump and his people have declared. I declare that to be the one of the most idiotic Trump claims yet.
Someone give me one good argument to defend his claim.
You were there, right? LOL!Like you have any clue what happened. You're just another media fed fool.Can someone explain to me why hacking into the DNC is not as bad as Watergate? I mean despite of someone encouraging the Russians to do it.
It's cyber burglary and the exact same thing really. Except of course for the idiots on the right who applaud and encourage it.
View attachment 96110
It's not cyber burglary and it's purpose was to not influence elections?
That's exactly what Watergate was fool.
That's what Trump and his people have declared. I declare that to be the one of the most idiotic Trump claims yet.
Someone give me one good argument to defend his claim.
WaterGate was something over nothing. No one lost a dime. No one got hurt. No one's lives were put in danger. No state secrets were lost.
That all can't be said for Hillary exposing national secrets, and the agents that collect them at risk.
That's what Trump and his people have declared. I declare that to be the one of the most idiotic Trump claims yet.
Someone give me one good argument to defend his claim.
WaterGate was something over nothing. No one lost a dime. No one got hurt. No one's lives were put in danger. No state secrets were lost.
That all can't be said for Hillary exposing national secrets, and the agents that collect them at risk.
Quite a few people lost their carreers, went to jail or both over " nothing".
That's what Trump and his people have declared. I declare that to be the one of the most idiotic Trump claims yet.
Someone give me one good argument to defend his claim.
WaterGate was something over nothing. No one lost a dime. No one got hurt. No one's lives were put in danger. No state secrets were lost.
That all can't be said for Hillary exposing national secrets, and the agents that collect them at risk.
Quite a few people lost their carreers, went to jail or both over " nothing".
And had I said it was nothing your point would have more validity.
WaterGate was something over nothing.
You were there, right? LOL!Like you have any clue what happened. You're just another media fed fool.Can someone explain to me why hacking into the DNC is not as bad as Watergate? I mean despite of someone encouraging the Russians to do it.
It's cyber burglary and the exact same thing really. Except of course for the idiots on the right who applaud and encourage it.
View attachment 96110
It's not cyber burglary and it's purpose was to not influence elections?
That's exactly what Watergate was fool.
Dope.
You were there, right? LOL!Like you have any clue what happened. You're just another media fed fool.It's cyber burglary and the exact same thing really. Except of course for the idiots on the right who applaud and encourage it.
View attachment 96110
It's not cyber burglary and it's purpose was to not influence elections?
That's exactly what Watergate was fool.
Dope.
Watergate was not cyber burglary you dummy. They wiretapped the DNC.
That's what Trump and his people have declared. I declare that to be the one of the most idiotic Trump claims yet.
Someone give me one good argument to defend his claim.
Watergate was a president trying to cover up a simple breaking and entering. It didn't have ramifications of classified, top secret or very sensitive Government documents/information being exposed. Seriously dude, you seem to have no grasp of reality at all. Are you 12 years old, do you parents know what you're doing?
Simple burglary. lol, too funny.
Where are the exposed secret documents off the Huma laptop?