jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,229
- 29,151
- 2,180
you asked what were the consequences. it's called spending cuts. I figured since you couldn't mention that, you didn't know that was a possibility.why not cut spending? why is that such a hard progressive step for you libs?Isn't it a hoot to hear these stupid Democrats bitch about tax cuts? Only an idiot would bitch about having taxes reduced.
I bet every one of the little bastards will sure as hell spend the money that get back in reduced taxes.
If they really believed the stupid shit they spout they would not participate in the tax reductions by sending in the money to the Treasury.
Some of us aren't over 50 years old. Some of us are in our 20's. Some of us actually have to build a life in this country still.
I understand how it's easy not to think long-term when you don't have that long of a term left, but for others, the future is everything. And while things are okay now, this much incompetence in government, and this disgusting tax bill ... it's going to hurt later on, big time.
But no one really expects boomers to care about anyone but themselves. Doesn't surprise me they can't see more than a few years down the road.
It sounds like you are a confused Moon Bat.
Lower taxes are good for everybody. They are good for me being a Baby Boomer. Even as a retiree I pay a ton in taxes and that is despicable. It is good for my working age children that is burdened with tremendous taxes and good for my grandchildren.
Good for how long? A few years? Sure. Can't argue with that. But when the debt blossoms even more out of control ... we're paying interest on that ... healthcare costs skyrocket ... we have to pay for the people without insurance in the ER ... etc. Things are not so simple. Everything has a consequence, and those consequences have consequences.
I'm all about cutting spending where it makes sense. Where did I say otherwise?