Spicer Says Hitler Didn't "Use Chemical Weapons"

They were never used in combat, only in the programmed killings of the holocaust. Hitler was a gas casualty during World War I, so it has always been assumed that his reluctance to use said weapons on enemy formations stemmed from his experience with them.

The USA's atomic bombs were never used in combat either.
 
Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.

They were never used in combat, only in the programmed killings of the holocaust. Hitler was a gas casualty during World War I, so it has always been assumed that his reluctance to use said weapons on enemy formations stemmed from his experience with them.

So that makes it OK?
When are you idiots going to STOP making excuses for this POS and his peeps?
What's it going to take?
They are as dumb as a box of rocks, so what does that make you?

It makes nothing OK, what it makes is the OP's rant meaningless when it comes to the context of the statement made by Spicer.

No, it doesn't. You are rationalizing because you're so far up Trump's ass you could probably tell us what he ate for breakfast.
It was a stupid and illiterate response that Spicer made. He's out of his depth by a million light years.
No, spicer made complete sense. Hitler DIDNT use chemical weapons like they think Assad did. If you have evidence to the contrary, please post it.
HOW did the topic of Hitler come up in the first place? Was the bad media baiting him (successfully, it seems)?
 
They were never used in combat, only in the programmed killings of the holocaust. Hitler was a gas casualty during World War I, so it has always been assumed that his reluctance to use said weapons on enemy formations stemmed from his experience with them.

So that makes it OK?
When are you idiots going to STOP making excuses for this POS and his peeps?
What's it going to take?
They are as dumb as a box of rocks, so what does that make you?

It makes nothing OK, what it makes is the OP's rant meaningless when it comes to the context of the statement made by Spicer.

No, it doesn't. You are rationalizing because you're so far up Trump's ass you could probably tell us what he ate for breakfast.
It was a stupid and illiterate response that Spicer made. He's out of his depth by a million light years.
No, spicer made complete sense. Hitler DIDNT use chemical weapons like they think Assad did. If you have evidence to the contrary, please post it.
HOW did the topic of Hitler come up in the first place? Was the bad media baiting him (successfully, it seems)?
I didn't watch it. Maybe they were dogging trump over Syria and he was being defensive?
 
Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.

Well, yeah, in the Holocaust Centers.

Which, I'm assuming, was some sort of tourist attraction?

Do you REALLY claim that a gas which must be confined in a nearly airtight vault and which dissipates within 5 minutes, leaving the space safe for workers with no protection to remove the bodies is a "chemical weapon?"

That is utterly absurd. That is like claiming that the guillotine is a siege weapon. Zyklon B was carefully designed to murder captive people in a tightly enclosed space. It was designed to become inert once out of that space. It is the OPPOSITE of a chemical weapon, utterly useless against enemy troops.


I believe they're claiming that Assad just used a chemical weapon to slaughter 100 people and that WAS NOT done in an enclosed area--was it?

The point is we know that Hitler used Chemical weapons aka the infamous gas chambers of concentration camps. Spicer never qualified his statement that Hitler would not use it on enemy troops--and here you are in this futile attempt to defend the indefensible. Now you're actually put in a position where you have to defend Adolf Hilter.

This is going to be your world until Trump is removed from office. Always defending the indefensible, and I am going to enjoy every single second of it.

trump-stupid-people-groups.jpg

Nope, poison is not chemical weapons. Cannot be deployed in a fight.

Try again.
 
As you may know, today Sean Spicer said that Hitler did not use chemical weapons on his own people, but he killed German Jews, after stripping them of their citizenship. Spicer also said Hitler didn't use weapons in combat, but the Chemical Weapons Convention does not require that gas be dropped from planes or shot from cannons. Hitler would have been in violation of the Convention anyway.

Politifact therefore gives the prolific liar Sean Spicer a Pants on Fire rating.
Spicer wrongly says Hitler didn't use chemical weapons
 
Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.

Why does the press even bother to attend Spicer's "Baghdad Bob" briefings? You know Spicer is lying when his lips are moving. He is uncommonly stupid - and a chronic liar. At least Spicer is good for late night comedy.

The Nazis gassed millions of Jews in concentration camps.

Sean Spicer Claims Hitler Never Used Chemical Weapons

And you do what ?

Post on an internet board.

Why don't you take a long walk on a short pier ?
 
Secrecy was paramount. Britain's imperial general staff knew there would be outrage if it became known that the government was intending to use its secret stockpile of chemical weapons. But Winston Churchill, then secretary of state for war, brushed aside their concerns. As a long-term advocate of chemical warfare, he was determined to use them against the Russian Bolsheviks. In the summer of 1919, 94 years before the devastating strike in Syria, Churchill planned and executed a sustained chemical attack on northern Russia.
Winston Churchill's shocking use of chemical weapons
 
Uh, yes -- he did you Trump ball gurgling clown.

Why does the press even bother to attend Spicer's "Baghdad Bob" briefings? You know Spicer is lying when his lips are moving. He is uncommonly stupid - and a chronic liar. At least Spicer is good for late night comedy.

The Nazis gassed millions of Jews in concentration camps.

Sean Spicer Claims Hitler Never Used Chemical Weapons

Well there is that, but you lie every time you type so you're even.
 
Ask any German what Zyklon B is. Or any Jew.
It's not a chemical weapon.

"
Zyklon B (German pronunciation:
[tsykloːn ˈbeː]; anglicized. US pronunciation: i/ˈzaɪklɒn ˈbiː/ or translated Cyclone B) was the trade name of a cyanide-based pesticide invented in Germany in the early 1920s. It consisted of hydrogen cyanide (prussic acid), as well as a cautionary eye irritant and one of several adsorbents such as diatomaceous earth. The product is infamous for its use by Nazi Germany during the Holocaust to murder approximately one million people in gas chambers installed at Auschwitz-Birkenau, Majdanek, and other extermination camps.

Hydrogen cyanide, a poisonous gas that interferes with
cellular respiration, was first used as a pesticide in California in the 1880s. Research at Degesch of Germany led to the development of Zyklon (later known as Zyklon A), a pesticide which released hydrogen cyanide upon exposure to water and heat."It was banned after a similar product was used by Germany as a chemical weapon in World War I."

Zyklon B - Wikipedia
 
Ask any German what Zyklon B is. Or any Jew.
It's not a chemical weapon.

Air freshener? Mosquito repellent? Swamp vapors?

Yes why would anyone call Zyklon B a weapon when it was only used to murder 6 million people +. Water dams were destroyed during the war that flooded and killed tens of thousands, but not a weapon.

Jesus give up on this Percy the Parser crap. It just makes anyone putting it out look ignorant as hell.
 

Forum List

Back
Top