Spread the wealth - one boat, a few boats, or many boats?

[Brain357]

Yes but when the largest employer in the country pays so little that employees are on welfare that is a problem.

so tell the liberals to stop giving the welfare to Apple and Walmart.

Tell the Waltons to share a little of the wealth.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Yes but when the largest employer in the country pays so little that employees are on welfare that is a problem.

so tell the liberals to stop giving the welfare to Apple and Walmart.

Tell the Waltons to share a little of the wealth.

Yes but when the largest employer in the country pays so little that employees are on welfare that is a problem.

so tell the liberals to stop giving the welfare to Apple and Walmart.

Tell the Waltons to share a little of the wealth.

tell Apple too! Just making all those great gadgets that we can afford is not enough!!

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

good point genius liberal they save Americans trillions and they are greedy!! Pure ignorance as always.

Oh they do? Do they save trillions over Amazon pricing? Over Costco?

who can say they sell some different and some overlaping items and the convenience is better or worse for different customers. The point is Walmart is endangered as old fashioned bricks and mortar while Amazon is growing at 25% a year still. The idiot soviet could make a better case against Amazon with few employees and few stores and little investment compared to Walmart. See why we say stupid??

Are Amazon employees on welfare?

Apple employees make $10 an hour too or maybe a touch more but on far far more profit at Apple than Walmart. Does the soviet libturd care about that??

Are apple employees on welfare?

dear they make about the same and its all relative anyway. In Bangledesh they make $66/ month. A libturd can decide any wage is a living wage- right? Did you hear what happenend in Cambodia. Worker commie violence forced them to raise wages from $80 to $124 per month and the new orders dryed up!! N0w a few make the big buck and the rest slowly starve

 

[Brain357]

Yes but when the largest employer in the country pays so little that employees are on welfare that is a problem.

so tell the liberals to stop giving the welfare to Apple and Walmart.

Tell the Waltons to share a little of the wealth.

Yes but when the largest employer in the country pays so little that employees are on welfare that is a problem.

so tell the liberals to stop giving the welfare to Apple and Walmart.

Tell the Waltons to share a little of the wealth.

tell Apple too! Just making all those great gadgets that we can afford is not enough!!

According to this they are averaging $11.91 an hour with some benefits.
Don t Expect Much Sympathy for Apple s Low Paid Retail Workers - The Wire

 

[Brain357]

Oh they do? Do they save trillions over Amazon pricing? Over Costco?

who can say they sell some different and some overlaping items and the convenience is better or worse for different customers. The point is Walmart is endangered as old fashioned bricks and mortar while Amazon is growing at 25% a year still. The idiot soviet could make a better case against Amazon with few employees and few stores and little investment compared to Walmart. See why we say stupid??

Are Amazon employees on welfare?

Apple employees make $10 an hour too or maybe a touch more but on far far more profit at Apple than Walmart. Does the soviet libturd care about that??

Are apple employees on welfare?

dear they make about the same and its all relative anyway. In Bangledesh they make $66/ month. A libturd can decide any wage is a living wage- right? Did you hear what happenend in Cambodia. Worker commie violence forced them to raise wages from $80 to $124 per month and the new orders dryed up!! N0w a few make the big buck and the rest slowly starve

Yes like I care about Bangledesh and Cambodia. I think a living wage is enough that you can't collect welfare. Lets start there.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Yes but when the largest employer in the country pays so little that employees are on welfare that is a problem.

so tell the liberals to stop giving the welfare to Apple and Walmart.

Tell the Waltons to share a little of the wealth.

Yes but when the largest employer in the country pays so little that employees are on welfare that is a problem.

so tell the liberals to stop giving the welfare to Apple and Walmart.

Tell the Waltons to share a little of the wealth.

tell Apple too! Just making all those great gadgets that we can afford is not enough!!

According to this they are averaging $11.91 an hour with some benefits.
Don t Expect Much Sympathy for Apple s Low Paid Retail Workers - The Wire

so, dopey, its barely ahead of Walmart, and Apple has 10 times as much wealth to share!!
War on Apple?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Yes like I care about Bangledesh and Cambodia..

dear, the liberal is a bigot, he is morally superior because he cares about everyone in sweatshops where ever they are!! You don't feel bad that the Fat cats in Cambodia makes $124/month and the poor devils in Bangledesh make only $66??

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Yes like I care about Bangledesh and Cambodia..

dear, the liberal is a bigot, he is morally superior because he cares about everyone in sweatshops where ever they are!! You don't feel bad that the Fat cats in Cambodia makes $124/month and the poor devils in Bangledesh make only $66??

what would be a fair living wage in Bangledesh?? I mean they should have smart phones and 4k tvs too -right?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

who can say they sell some different and some overlaping items and the convenience is better or worse for different customers. The point is Walmart is endangered as old fashioned bricks and mortar while Amazon is growing at 25% a year still. The idiot soviet could make a better case against Amazon with few employees and few stores and little investment compared to Walmart. See why we say stupid??

Are Amazon employees on welfare?

Apple employees make $10 an hour too or maybe a touch more but on far far more profit at Apple than Walmart. Does the soviet libturd care about that??

Are apple employees on welfare?

dear they make about the same and its all relative anyway. In Bangledesh they make $66/ month. A libturd can decide any wage is a living wage- right? Did you hear what happenend in Cambodia. Worker commie violence forced them to raise wages from $80 to $124 per month and the new orders dryed up!! N0w a few make the big buck and the rest slowly starve

Yes like I care about Bangledesh and Cambodia. I think a living wage is enough that you can't collect welfare. Lets start there.

and does the libturb commie get to decide what a living wage is??
The following are facts about persons defined as “poor” by the Census Bureau, taken from a variety of government reports:

46 percent of all poor households actually own their own homes. The average home owned by persons classified as poor by the Census Bureau is a three-bedroom house with one-and-a-half baths, a garage, and a porch or patio.

80 percent of poor households have air conditioning. By contrast, in 1970, only 36 percent of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air conditioning.

Only six percent of poor households are overcrowded; two thirds have more than two rooms per person.

The typical poor American has more living space than the average individual living in Paris, London, Vienna, Athens, and other cities throughout Europe. (These comparisons are to the average citizens in foreign countries, not to those classified as poor.)

Nearly three quarters of poor households own a car; 31 percent own two or more cars.

97 percent of poor households have a color television; over half own two or more color televisions.

78 percent have a VCR or DVD player.

62 percent have cable or satellite TV reception.

89 percent own microwave ovens, more than half have a stereo, and a more than a third have an automatic dishwasher.As a group, America’s poor are far from being chronically undernourished. The average consumption of protein, vitamins, and minerals is virtually the same for poor and middle-class children and, in most cases, is well above recommended norms. Poor children actually consume more meat than do higher-income children and have average protein intakes 100-percent above recommended levels. Most poor children today are, in fact, super-nourished and grow up to be, on average, one inch taller and ten pounds heavier than the GIs who stormed the beaches of Normandy in World War II.While the poor are generally well-nourished, some poor families do experience temporary food shortages. But, even this condition is relatively rare; 89 percent of the poor report their families have “enough” food to eat, while only two percent say they “often” do not have enough to eat.Overall, the typical American defined as poor by the government has a car, air conditioning, a refrigerator, a stove, a clothes washer and dryer, and a microwave. He has two color televisions, cable or satellite TV reception, a VCR, or DVD player, and a stereo. He is able to obtain medical care. His home is in good repair and is not overcrowded. By his own report, his family is not hungry, and he had sufficient funds in the past year to meet his family’s essential needs. While this individual’s life is not opulent, it is far from the popular images of dire poverty conveyed by the press, liberal activists, and politicians.Of course, the living conditions of the average poor American should not be taken as representing all of the nation’s poor: There is a wide range of living conditions among the poor. A third of “poor” households have both cell and land-line telephones. A third also telephone answering machines. At the other extreme, approximately one-tenth of families in poverty have no phone at all. Similarly, while the majority of poor households do not experience significant material problems, roughly a third do experience at least one problem such as overcrowding, temporary hunger, or difficulty getting medical care.Much official poverty that does exist in the United States can be reduced, particularly among children. There are two main reasons that American children are poor: Their parents don’t work much, and their fathers are absent from the home.

 

[Brain357]

Yes but when the largest employer in the country pays so little that employees are on welfare that is a problem.

so tell the liberals to stop giving the welfare to Apple and Walmart.

Tell the Waltons to share a little of the wealth.

Yes but when the largest employer in the country pays so little that employees are on welfare that is a problem.

so tell the liberals to stop giving the welfare to Apple and Walmart.

Tell the Waltons to share a little of the wealth.

tell Apple too! Just making all those great gadgets that we can afford is not enough!!

According to this they are averaging $11.91 an hour with some benefits.
Don t Expect Much Sympathy for Apple s Low Paid Retail Workers - The Wire

so, dopey, its barely ahead of Walmart, and Apple has 10 times as much wealth to share!!
War on Apple?

Sure. Mcdonalds too!

 

[thereisnospoon]

A simple notion that so many still reject. Why is a million dollar boat not as good as ten $100,000 boats, and 100 $10,000 boats is even better, and 1,000 $1,000 boats is much, much better still. Now, why is that? It has to do with the economic activity created by such a thing.

The bottom line....It's none of your business how others spend THEIR money

 

[bripat9643]

Nope. We would prefer you take care of yourselves.

I would love all of you Progressive sponges to be able to afford my $1,000,000 yacht. If y'all could, I could sell a thousand of them every year instead of 10 and employ 100 times as many workers.
Yes I'd likely have some minimum wage workers sweeping floors or flipping burgers in the cafeteria, but most of these jobs would be skilled positions worth far more than $10.10/hour.
They would be shopping at Macy's instead of Walmart.

Take care of your self! Have some pride, for Christ's sake. Keep your mind and body clean, get an education and stay out of jail and you can buy my boat and avoid Walmart all you want.

So you prefer people take care of themselves, but you are ok with the largest company in the country paying so little that people can't?

too stupid if they raise wages people can afford to buy less and people lose their jobs. Think!!

They can afford to pay people more. As long as the Waltons are making BILLIONS each year they can afford to pay more.

Walmart's profit margin could go to zero, and it still wouldn't be enough to pay a "living wage." Why do you think they are obligated to pay any more than what the traffic will bear? Where is it written that when you start a business you are obligated to pay a given wage?

So you think tax dollars should go to subsidize their workers while the Waltons make billions?

If you don't like paying welfare to Walmart's employees, there's a very simple solution: vote out the politicians who approve this stuff. This schema to pin the blame on Walmart is beyond stupid. Only gullible turds like you are fooled.

 

[Brain357]

So you prefer people take care of themselves, but you are ok with the largest company in the country paying so little that people can't?

too stupid if they raise wages people can afford to buy less and people lose their jobs. Think!!

They can afford to pay people more. As long as the Waltons are making BILLIONS each year they can afford to pay more.

Walmart's profit margin could go to zero, and it still wouldn't be enough to pay a "living wage." Why do you think they are obligated to pay any more than what the traffic will bear? Where is it written that when you start a business you are obligated to pay a given wage?

So you think tax dollars should go to subsidize their workers while the Waltons make billions?

If you don't like paying welfare to Walmart's employees, there's a very simple solution: vote out the politicians who approve this stuff. This schema to pin the blame on Walmart is beyond stupid. Only gullible turds like you are fooled.

That's not going to happen. If there are poor people needing the government is always going to give them something. The only way the government is going to get smaller is if employers start taking care of employees again. Why don't you want the employers to take care of employees? The only other option is big government.

 

[bripat9643]

Nope. We would prefer you take care of yourselves.

I would love all of you Progressive sponges to be able to afford my $1,000,000 yacht. If y'all could, I could sell a thousand of them every year instead of 10 and employ 100 times as many workers.
Yes I'd likely have some minimum wage workers sweeping floors or flipping burgers in the cafeteria, but most of these jobs would be skilled positions worth far more than $10.10/hour.
They would be shopping at Macy's instead of Walmart.

Take care of your self! Have some pride, for Christ's sake. Keep your mind and body clean, get an education and stay out of jail and you can buy my boat and avoid Walmart all you want.

So you prefer people take care of themselves, but you are ok with the largest company in the country paying so little that people can't?

too stupid if they raise wages people can afford to buy less and people lose their jobs. Think!!

They can afford to pay people more. As long as the Waltons are making BILLIONS each year they can afford to pay more.

Walmart's profit margin could go to zero, and it still wouldn't be enough to pay a "living wage." Why do you think they are obligated to pay any more than what the traffic will bear? Where is it written that when you start a business you are obligated to pay a given wage?

So you think tax dollars should go to subsidize their workers while the Waltons make billions?

If you don't want the government to pay money to Walmart's employees, then simply vote down these programs.

 

[bripat9643]

who can say they sell some different and some overlaping items and the convenience is better or worse for different customers. The point is Walmart is endangered as old fashioned bricks and mortar while Amazon is growing at 25% a year still. The idiot soviet could make a better case against Amazon with few employees and few stores and little investment compared to Walmart. See why we say stupid??

Are Amazon employees on welfare?

Apple employees make $10 an hour too or maybe a touch more but on far far more profit at Apple than Walmart. Does the soviet libturd care about that??

Are apple employees on welfare?

dear they make about the same and its all relative anyway. In Bangledesh they make $66/ month. A libturd can decide any wage is a living wage- right? Did you hear what happenend in Cambodia. Worker commie violence forced them to raise wages from $80 to $124 per month and the new orders dryed up!! N0w a few make the big buck and the rest slowly starve

Yes like I care about Bangledesh and Cambodia. I think a living wage is enough that you can't collect welfare. Lets start there.

If you don't care about Bangladesh or Cambodia, then why do you care about Walmart employees?

 

[Brain357]

Are Amazon employees on welfare?

Apple employees make $10 an hour too or maybe a touch more but on far far more profit at Apple than Walmart. Does the soviet libturd care about that??

Are apple employees on welfare?

dear they make about the same and its all relative anyway. In Bangledesh they make $66/ month. A libturd can decide any wage is a living wage- right? Did you hear what happenend in Cambodia. Worker commie violence forced them to raise wages from $80 to $124 per month and the new orders dryed up!! N0w a few make the big buck and the rest slowly starve

Yes like I care about Bangledesh and Cambodia. I think a living wage is enough that you can't collect welfare. Lets start there.

If you don't care about Bangladesh or Cambodia, then why do you care about Walmart employees?

I don't live in either of those countries.

 

[Brain357]

So you prefer people take care of themselves, but you are ok with the largest company in the country paying so little that people can't?

too stupid if they raise wages people can afford to buy less and people lose their jobs. Think!!

They can afford to pay people more. As long as the Waltons are making BILLIONS each year they can afford to pay more.

Walmart's profit margin could go to zero, and it still wouldn't be enough to pay a "living wage." Why do you think they are obligated to pay any more than what the traffic will bear? Where is it written that when you start a business you are obligated to pay a given wage?

So you think tax dollars should go to subsidize their workers while the Waltons make billions?

If you don't want the government to pay money to Walmart's employees, then simply vote down these programs.

Simply? Right. Vote them down and then the next vote they will be right back. You aren't going to get smaller government that way. Get serious.

 

[bripat9643]

too stupid if they raise wages people can afford to buy less and people lose their jobs. Think!!

They can afford to pay people more. As long as the Waltons are making BILLIONS each year they can afford to pay more.

Walmart's profit margin could go to zero, and it still wouldn't be enough to pay a "living wage." Why do you think they are obligated to pay any more than what the traffic will bear? Where is it written that when you start a business you are obligated to pay a given wage?

So you think tax dollars should go to subsidize their workers while the Waltons make billions?

If you don't like paying welfare to Walmart's employees, there's a very simple solution: vote out the politicians who approve this stuff. This schema to pin the blame on Walmart is beyond stupid. Only gullible turds like you are fooled.

That's not going to happen. If there are poor people needing the government is always going to give them something.

Well then, you've made up your mind. You're content to pay welfare to Walmart's employees. Don't go blaming Walmart for that decision, like some petulant child.

The only way the government is going to get smaller is if employers start taking care of employees again. Why don't you want the employers to take care of employees? The only other option is big government.

ROFL! Stop pretending that you and your ilk want to make the government smaller. You don't do that by making it more powerful. Taking care of employees isn't Walmart's job. It's not a Welfare agency. It pays the market rate for a given quantity and quality of labor. Anyone who doesn't like the deal is free to find a better one elsewhere.

Big government isn't the "only other option." I already pointed out another option. What you really mean is that your option is the only one you and your ilk will accept. Of course, things don't always go the way petulant children insist they have to go.

 

[bripat9643]

too stupid if they raise wages people can afford to buy less and people lose their jobs. Think!!

They can afford to pay people more. As long as the Waltons are making BILLIONS each year they can afford to pay more.

Walmart's profit margin could go to zero, and it still wouldn't be enough to pay a "living wage." Why do you think they are obligated to pay any more than what the traffic will bear? Where is it written that when you start a business you are obligated to pay a given wage?

So you think tax dollars should go to subsidize their workers while the Waltons make billions?

If you don't want the government to pay money to Walmart's employees, then simply vote down these programs.

Simply? Right. Vote them down and then the next vote they will be right back. You aren't going to get smaller government that way. Get serious.

Voting down liberal big government social programs is the only way to get smaller government. I do find your belief that they are as inevitable as the sun coming up to be utterly charming.

 

[bripat9643]

Apple employees make $10 an hour too or maybe a touch more but on far far more profit at Apple than Walmart. Does the soviet libturd care about that??

Are apple employees on welfare?

dear they make about the same and its all relative anyway. In Bangledesh they make $66/ month. A libturd can decide any wage is a living wage- right? Did you hear what happenend in Cambodia. Worker commie violence forced them to raise wages from $80 to $124 per month and the new orders dryed up!! N0w a few make the big buck and the rest slowly starve

Yes like I care about Bangledesh and Cambodia. I think a living wage is enough that you can't collect welfare. Lets start there.

If you don't care about Bangladesh or Cambodia, then why do you care about Walmart employees?

I don't live in either of those countries.

You don't work at Walmart, do you?