Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They were 100% stolen.Initial false premise alert. The papers weren’t “stolen.”
We could continue but that one alone already proves that this thread is bullshit.
1. Hillary did have classified material that the Russians hacked.
2. Trump said he declassified all those documents, and the Secret Service had them locked down at MAL.
How Young Girls and Women Must Fight Back Over Radical Gender Ideology, w/ Alex Clark & Mary Morgan
Megyn Kelly is joined by Alex Clark, host of "The Spillover," and Mary Morgan, host of "Pop Culture Crisis," to discuss how young girls and women must fight back over radical gender ideology, campus degeneracy that has become a norm, and more. LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos everyday...ussanews.com
Says the facts.Says who? Some article? You really are a derp. And he stole nothing.
And you are clueless as to what treason is in the Constitution, derp.
so when you cant counter the evidence in his link as always yo do THIS.You are babbling.
trump stole material labeled the most highly ultra top secret classified level we have. Then he stored them at Maralago, a place already infiltrated by China spies.
Trump has committed treason again...
Says the facts.
Deal with it.
Trump stole the most classified material of our government. Serious shit.
Then he carelessly stored it at Mara Lago, where China spies have already been.
China Spies might have been able to read that ultra top secret material, because of Trump.
This is extremely serious.
Excuses and more excuses for Hillary.
Hillaryâs Problem: The Government Classifies Everything
Clinton probably did mishandle classified information, but what exactly does that mean in a system where secrecy is often motivated by bureaucracy, not security?www.newyorker.com
bankerkid as ALWAYS gets a severe ass beating.
Who says? An article? Do you mean like all the articles claiming Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation? Or 4+ years of 'muh, Russia' bullshit?
Says the US government.Who says? An article? Do you mean like all the articles claiming Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation? Or 4+ years of 'muh, Russia' bullshit?
Says the US government.
What are you refuting here??
The material was labeled ultra classified, they have made that known. This is fact. Trump is fucked and comitted a serious crime.
LETS NOT FORGET: A China spy was caught at Mara Lago not too long ago... SO Trump stored ultra classified material at Mara Lago, a place targeted and infiltrated by China spies.
Trump committed an extremely serious crime.
www.usmessageboard.com
Says the US government.
What are you refuting here??
The material was labeled ultra classified, they have made that known. This is fact. Trump is fucked and comitted a serious crime.
LETS NOT FORGET: A China spy was caught at Mara Lago not too long ago... SO Trump stored ultra classified material at Mara Lago, a place targeted and infiltrated by China spies.
Trump committed an extremely serious crime.
nypost.com
Wow !No, you have no quotes from the US gov't, what you have is a Politico article based on leaks (leaks are a felony). Or are they [Politico] part of the US gov't?
and bankerkids ass beatings getting checkmated continue.About Øbama.
Crisis at the National Archives (Obama Destruction of Documents)
Yep, and the MSM, the DoJ, the FBI, and Democrats in Congress could care less about the destruction of documents by Øbama and his crew. They did nothing about it then or since. ... To support this effort, in 2014 President Obama signed the Presidential and Federal Records Act Amendments. For...
Wow !
This is a disclosure from the National archives... You big pathetic argument is that the Archives are lying...
Swing and miss.
You are getting desperate now...
the ONLY one on this thread getting desperate is YOU as we both checkmate you some more and give you more ass beatings to suffer.
Trump put our most sensitive secrets at clear risk, literally putting them in a place targeted by China spies.
www.usmessageboard.com
Idiots like our OP also ignore the fact that these hypersupersensitiveendof America documents were seen months earlier and a different FBI team did nothing except tell him to put a pad lock on the door.1. Hillary did have classified material that the Russians hacked.
2. Trump said he declassified all those documents, and the Secret Service had them locked down at MAL.
How Young Girls and Women Must Fight Back Over Radical Gender Ideology, w/ Alex Clark & Mary Morgan
Megyn Kelly is joined by Alex Clark, host of "The Spillover," and Mary Morgan, host of "Pop Culture Crisis," to discuss how young girls and women must fight back over radical gender ideology, campus degeneracy that has become a norm, and more. LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos everyday...
If they’re declassified, why are they locked down?Trump said he declassified all those documents, and the Secret Service had them locked down at MAL.
Not when they are “special access program materials" the highest level of classification.When it comes to the National Archives, history has a funny way of repeating itself. And legal experts say a decade-old case over audio tapes that Bill Clinton once kept in his sock drawer may have significant impact over the FBI search of Melania Trump's closet and Donald Trump's personal office.The case in question is titled Judicial Watch v. National Archives and Records Administration and it involved an effort by the conservative watchdog to compel the Archives to forcibly seize hours of audio recordings that Clinton made during his presidency with historian Taylor Branch.For pop culture, the case is most memorable for the revelation that the 42nd president for a time stored the audio tapes in his sock drawer at the White House. The tapes became the focal point of a 2009 book that Branch wrote.U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in Washington D.C. ultimately rejected Judicial Watch's suit by concluding there was no provision in the Presidential Records Act to force the National Archives to seize records from a former president.But Jackson's ruling — along with the Justice Department's arguments that preceded it — made some other sweeping declarations that have more direct relevance to the FBI's decision to seize handwritten notes and files Trump took with him to Mar-a-Lago. The most relevant is that a president's discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and solely his, as is his ability to declassify or destroy records at will."Under the statutory scheme established by the PRA, the decision to segregate personal materials from Presidential records is made by the President, during the President's term and in his sole discretion," Jackson wrote in her March 2012 decision, which was never appealed."Since the President is completely entrusted with the management and even the disposal of Presidential records during his time in office, it would be difficult for this Court to conclude that Congress intended that he would have less authority to do what he pleases with what he considers to be his personal records," she added.Old case over audio tapes in Bill Clinton's sock drawer could impact Mar-a-Lago search dispute
Oh, hey, look at this. And the Øbama Justice Department argued in favor of this and created precedent when the court agreed with them. The judge in the matter was an Øbama-appointed judge. So, one set of laws for Clinton and another for Trump? Is that it? And how didn't Garland and his...
