Catsnmeters
Gold Member
- Sep 19, 2022
- 15,218
- 5,904
- 208
No thanks, liar.Beat it, death cultist.
Why did you feel the need to lie in your own thread title?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No thanks, liar.Beat it, death cultist.
My dollars do Jack.Because dollars count more than lives.
Do you know if Texas put to vote the abortion issue like some other red states have or did the politicians decide for them?My dollars do Jack.
Of course the holy-rollers don't even take into account the social damage.
In my AO there is one, count it one, foster care family. It's so bad that children placed into foster care are being kept at the county social services building at county (my tax dollars) expense. Thank goodness Virginia is a still abortion state.
I wonder what TX's foster care situation is like?
They don't dare. Any time its been put to a vote its been rolled, including in the South.And a disaster for the tax-payer that will have to support most of them from cradle to grave. Not to mention the spawn they beget.
Yes Sir, just what America needs, more single-mother households.
Anyone that does not see the social economic utility of abortion (with some guardrails) is a fuckin' idiot.
I bet if TX would put it to a public vote the holy-rollers would lose big.
Politicians, they are skeered of the public.....More to the point they are skeered that the holy-rollers will abandon them.Do you know if Texas put to vote the abortion issue like some other red states have or did the politicians decide for them?
last i checked Texas aint euthenizing people on welfare ... and before you post the a lie no republican leaders have suggested they do so .Just give it a year or two for Texas to complain about "welfare moms".
children arent the reason for single mother households ... social leftist policies are ...And a disaster for the tax-payer that will have to support most of them from cradle to grave. Not to mention the spawn they beget.
Yes Sir, just what America needs, more single-mother households.
Anyone that does not see the social economic utility of abortion (with some guardrails) is a fuckin' idiot.
I bet if TX would put it to a public vote the holy-rollers would lose big.
They didn't have a single mother households before? Is this before divorce was legal? Rape must not have existed either. Evidently widows with children didn't exist then either.children arent the reason for single mother households ... social leftist policies are ...
They are the result, no matter the chicken or the egg.children arent the reason for single mother households ... social leftist policies are ...
in the 60s less than 10% of children lived in single parent homes .They didn't have a single mother households before? Is this before divorce was legal? Rape must not have existed either. Evidently widows with children didn't exist then either.
In fact, you're kind of an idiot aren't you?
calling people an idiot Zinkfaggot ? the facts are that less than 10% of children grew up in single parent homes in the 60s ... the lefts war on the nuclear family has decimated the traditional family unit .They didn't have a single mother households before? Is this before divorce was legal? Rape must not have existed either. Evidently widows with children didn't exist then either.
In fact, you're kind of an idiot aren't you?
Thats three generations ago, before women could even have their own checking accounts. How old are you???in the 60s less than 10% of children lived in single parent homes .
Now protect them while they grow, even if they are poor, gay or trans.A victory for life.
I think you were unintentionally accurate.My dollars do Jack.
Let's see if this passes the smell test. You say that, "The reality is that when abortions are accessible, the same number of kids are born". Abortion in America has killed 63 million babies before they were born since Roe became fashionable. Is it really your contention that, had Roe NOT been passed, 63 million babies would STILL not have been born? How do you figure?WRONG.
Stopping abortions does not at all save any lives.
All it does is force people into starting families before they have any financial stability, trapping them in a life time of poverty.
The reality is that when abortions are accessible, the same number of kids are born, but the families have a lot more wealth, by delaying when they want to have children.
WRONG.
Stopping abortions does not at all save any lives.
All it does is force people into starting families before they have any financial stability, trapping them in a life time of poverty.
The reality is that when abortions are accessible, the same number of kids are born, but the families have a lot more wealth, by delaying when they want to have children.
Birth control is easy??Then practice personal responsibility. Jeebus I mean really
Why is that such a foreign concept to people? Birth control is easily free, condoms cheap.... nothing cheap about an abortion.
Personal responsibility
And it was Trump's fault how?The fentanyl problem started and skyrocketed under the Trump admin.