The country is being run by "low informed Liberals"

[Vandalshandle]

I want to help out the low informed people out there, so I will translate:


"Low informed"="those that disagree with me"

 

[JRK]

I want to help out the low informed people out there, so I will translate:


"Low informed"="those that disagree with me"

Really?
why do you think Obama and the Dems in the senate are the answer to our problems?
what plan do they have to balance our budget?
can you explain to me with the war in Iraq won with that expense gone we spend 1.1 trillion dollars more today than we did in 2007?
Lets not forget the 80 billion GM went through (UAW)
Where did that money go?
take away Iraq and were spending 1.3 trillion more today than in 07
explain to us where that wealth has went please

Why is it we could run the federal govt and finance the victory in Iraq in 2007 with a 5% UE rate
and today we cannot fund the same with 3.8 trillion?

 

[Mac1958]

I want to help out the low informed people out there, so I will translate:

"Low informed"="those that disagree with me"

Bingo. Only Rush and his dittoheads know "The Truth".

Anyone who dares to disagree with them is "dumb".

Kinda takes you back to third grade, huh?

.

 

[Billo_Really]

Romney offered very little in terms of anything new; that's true.

He might be a better rapper than Obama?


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dX_1B0w7Hzc]Barack Obama vs Mitt Romney. Epic Rap Battles Of History Season 2. - YouTube[/ame]

 

[HomeInspect]

"Like it or not, republicans have to realize the voter is always right"

That is true. And what is today's American vogter looking for? More entitlements. More hand outs. More free shit. They will vote the country into ruin.

 

[rightwinger]

That the low informed liberals are running the federal govt
in the booth
and in person

and that transplantes from states that libs have all ready screwed up are making swing states from red to blue
case in point
Florida
NC

Republicans had every chance to educate those "low informed liberals" on why their policies are good for the country. They failed miserably because those "low informed liberals" were smart enough to realize that Republican policies were only good for the wealthy

Do you really think the people would buy into that "Job Creator" nonsense you were selling?

It worked from 82 through Jan 08
Reagan
GOP congress 94-7 except the senate 00-02
both Bushes
about 40 million jobs

We are 4 million short of 08 levels

not to mention we did that with minimal deficits
like 07? 162 billion
by 09 its 1.4 trillion
we spent 2.7 trillion in 07
we spent 3.5 in 09
3.8 last year
Ronald Reagan R 1981–1985 91,031 91,471 96,353 98,023 +5,322
Ronald Reagan R 1985–1989 96,353 98,023 107,133 108,326 +10,780 +10,303
George H. W. Bush R 1989–1993 107,133 108,326 109,726 111,358 +2,593 +3,032
Bill Clinton D 1993–1997 109,725 111,360 121,233 123,418 +11,507 +12,060
Bill Clinton D 1997–2001 121,231 123,418 132,466 131,524 +11,233 +8,106
George W. Bush R 2001–2005 132,466 131,524 132,453 134,240 -13 +2,716
George W. Bush R 2005–2008 132,453 134,240 133,561 129,734 +1,108 -4,506
we were up 8 million with W before the left took over congress
that is some educating information
40 million jobs created until the Dems took over congress in 07 and the white house in 09
we are still short of 08 levels
4 million
Jobs created during U.S. presidential terms - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

were also had over 8 million people leave work force sense Obama took office

That is the facts
The GDP is in negative mode

You really think voters are going to vote Republican because of some Wikinumbers?

They don't care about jobs ten years ago they care about NOW. They look at their lives. They look at the job they were doing ten years ago vs what they are doing now. They struggle to pay medical bills, they look at retirement and see nothing on the horizon, they look at their college educated kids and see no future

They look to Republicans and say......What can you do to help us?

All they get in reply is that they are lazy, dependent on government, think they are victims.....While Republicans jump all over themselves to give more tax breaks to billionaires

 

[editec]

The country is being run by "low informed Liberals"

The country is being run by immoral Banksters.

 

[rightwinger]

"Like it or not, republicans have to realize the voter is always right"

That is true. And what is today's American vogter looking for? More entitlements. More hand outs. More free shit. They will vote the country into ruin.

I'll tell you what todays voter is looking for

A decent job at a decent pay.
To be able to comfortably retire some day
Their kids being able to grow up, be educated and make it on their own
To be able to get sick without going bankrupt
To be able to take care of their family

Many Americans used to be able to do that and now they can't. They turned to republicans and Republicans replied..........Stop being so lazy, stop looking for government handouts.....Stop acting like a VICTIM

 

[IlarMeilyr]

....

The low informed lib ....

Is there another kind of liberal?

 

[Billo_Really]

Really?
why do you think Obama and the Dems in the senate are the answer to our problems?
what plan do they have to balance our budget?
can you explain to me with the war in Iraq won with that expense gone we spend 1.1 trillion dollars more today than we did in 2007?
Lets not forget the 80 billion GM went through (UAW)
Where did that money go?
take away Iraq and were spending 1.3 trillion more today than in 07
explain to us where that wealth has went please

Why is it we could run the federal govt and finance the victory in Iraq in 2007 with a 5% UE rate
and today we cannot fund the same with 3.8 trillion?

What did we win in Iraq 2007?
What did we get in return for our 1.1 trillion dollar investment?
How did that investment benefit me personally?
How has that investment made my life better?
And if we won, as you say, then why did we leave in the middle of the night and not tell the members of the Iraqi government (we had been working with), that we were going?


As far as what is running the country, parroting Pumpkin-head's latest BS about "low-informed liberals" is not too bright in itself. Obama is not a liberal and his policies do embrace liberal values. He has no liberals in his cabinet and his foreign policy is basically the neocon PNAC agenda. But that was obvious in his first term when he kept the last Administrations Defense Secretary.

If he was running the country with a liberal agenda:

both wars would be over,
we wouldn't be violating the air-space of sovereign nations with our terrorist drones,
he would've veto'd the NDAA,
be pushing Congress to repeal the MCA and PA,
investigating the former Administration for war crimes,
not offering compromises to the right before they even asked for any,
wouldn't be kissing so much Israeli ass,
would be telling AIPAC to go to hell,
wouldn't have kill lists,
would have the "public option" in the healthcare bill.​

That's what would be happening if he was running the country with a liberal agenda.

I wouldn't be talking so much about liberals being uninformed, seeing how in this entire thread, you haven't said anything specific we are uninformed about? Especially coming from a group that believes:

• Obama's a Kenyan
• he's a socialist
• a marxist
• the existance of death panels
• he's trying to take your guns away
• a threat of Sharia Law in a country that separates church and state
• thinks the states have equal sovereignty to the federal government

Then you have the "bagger nation" making Albert Einstein signs that say,

"Say NO to socialized medicine"
"And don't touch my Medicare"

 

[Billo_Really]

I'll tell you what todays voter is looking for

A decent job at a decent pay.
To be able to comfortably retire some day
Their kids being able to grow up, be educated and make it on their own
To be able to get sick without going bankrupt
To be able to take care of their family

Many Americans used to be able to do that and now they can't. They turned to republicans and Republicans replied..........Stop being so lazy, stop looking for government handouts.....Stop acting like a VICTIM

We're also looking for those in government that do things "for" the country and not "to" the country.

And on the subject of who has done something for the country, the republican's get a big fat "0" (zero) since 2006.

 

[Mr. Peepers]

can you explain to me with the war in Iraq won with that expense gone we spend 1.1 trillion dollars more today than we did in 2007?

We WON??? Wow, I didn't know that. Cool beans! What did we win? Oh, right. Trillions of dollars of nothing.

 

[HomeInspect]

"Like it or not, republicans have to realize the voter is always right"

That is true. And what is today's American vogter looking for? More entitlements. More hand outs. More free shit. They will vote the country into ruin.

I'll tell you what todays voter is looking for

A decent job at a decent pay.
To be able to comfortably retire some day
Their kids being able to grow up, be educated and make it on their own
To be able to get sick without going bankrupt
To be able to take care of their family

Many Americans used to be able to do that and now they can't. They turned to republicans and Republicans replied..........Stop being so lazy, stop looking for government handouts.....Stop acting like a VICTIM

So instead they vote in Dems who make more of them victims. Have you seen the dependency rise since Obama's been in office? or did you miss that? Keeping people enslaved to goverment dependency is a Dem politician's dream.

 

[rightwinger]

"Like it or not, republicans have to realize the voter is always right"

That is true. And what is today's American vogter looking for? More entitlements. More hand outs. More free shit. They will vote the country into ruin.

I'll tell you what todays voter is looking for

A decent job at a decent pay.
To be able to comfortably retire some day
Their kids being able to grow up, be educated and make it on their own
To be able to get sick without going bankrupt
To be able to take care of their family

Many Americans used to be able to do that and now they can't. They turned to republicans and Republicans replied..........Stop being so lazy, stop looking for government handouts.....Stop acting like a VICTIM

So instead they vote in Dems who make more of them victims. Have you seen the dependency rise since Obama's been in office? or did you miss that? Keeping people enslaved to goverment dependency is a Dem politician's dream.

You can call it dependency or you can call it not having a job

Since I don't see Republicans actually offering jobs to these "victims" , dependency is the best hope the have

 

[rightwinger]

I'll tell you what voters are looking for and it ain't a handout

Americans want security
They want a job that pays a decent wage. They want to be taken care of if they get sick. They want to someday retire. They want their kids to grow up and take care of themselves

It used to be called the American dream

Until Republicans stop calling those who no longer have the American dream a bunch of moochers......they will not get elected

 

[uscitizen]

The country is being run by "low informed Liberals"

As opposed to "low informed cons"?


It is in reality being run by corporatists.

 

[jgarden]

The country is being run by "low informed Liberals"

"Low informed Liberals" must be running the country - how else would you explain why America hasn't become involved in another unnecessary war over the last 5 years!

At least "low informed Liberals" aren't attending political meetings where the keynote speaker refers to them as the "Stupid Party" - and they applaud!

 

[JRK]

The country is being run by "low informed Liberals"

"Low informed Liberals" must be running the country - how else would you explain why America hasn't become involved in another unnecessary war over the last 5 years!

At least "low informed Liberals" aren't attending political meetings where the keynote speaker refers to them as the "Stupid Party" - and they applaud!

which unnecessary war would that be?
Who called what stupid?

Were did the 1.1 trillion dollars we added to the baseline budget of 2007 go?
the 800 billion from 2009 base line (before the libs got ahold of it) go?
why did the war in Iraq end, but the budget went up?
why is it we had a avg of 5% UE through 2007 from 1983 and today it is well over 7?
why is it we have removed over 8 million people from the work force sense 2009?
what would the UE rate look like then?

 

[JRK]

Really?
why do you think Obama and the Dems in the senate are the answer to our problems?
what plan do they have to balance our budget?
can you explain to me with the war in Iraq won with that expense gone we spend 1.1 trillion dollars more today than we did in 2007?
Lets not forget the 80 billion GM went through (UAW)
Where did that money go?
take away Iraq and were spending 1.3 trillion more today than in 07
explain to us where that wealth has went please

Why is it we could run the federal govt and finance the victory in Iraq in 2007 with a 5% UE rate
and today we cannot fund the same with 3.8 trillion?

What did we win in Iraq 2007?
What did we get in return for our 1.1 trillion dollar investment?
How did that investment benefit me personally?
How has that investment made my life better?
And if we won, as you say, then why did we leave in the middle of the night and not tell the members of the Iraqi government (we had been working with), that we were going?


As far as what is running the country, parroting Pumpkin-head's latest BS about "low-informed liberals" is not too bright in itself. Obama is not a liberal and his policies do embrace liberal values. He has no liberals in his cabinet and his foreign policy is basically the neocon PNAC agenda. But that was obvious in his first term when he kept the last Administrations Defense Secretary.

If he was running the country with a liberal agenda:

both wars would be over,
we wouldn't be violating the air-space of sovereign nations with our terrorist drones,
he would've veto'd the NDAA,
be pushing Congress to repeal the MCA and PA,
investigating the former Administration for war crimes,
not offering compromises to the right before they even asked for any,
wouldn't be kissing so much Israeli ass,
would be telling AIPAC to go to hell,
wouldn't have kill lists,
would have the "public option" in the healthcare bill.​

That's what would be happening if he was running the country with a liberal agenda.

I wouldn't be talking so much about liberals being uninformed, seeing how in this entire thread, you haven't said anything specific we are uninformed about? Especially coming from a group that believes:

• Obama's a Kenyan
• he's a socialist
• a marxist
• the existance of death panels
• he's trying to take your guns away
• a threat of Sharia Law in a country that separates church and state
• thinks the states have equal sovereignty to the federal government

Then you have the "bagger nation" making Albert Einstein signs that say,

"Say NO to socialized medicine"
"And don't touch my Medicare"

The comment about Iraq was the expense. The war ended in 2011 as I recall
BHO is a socialist, (see GM and the number of laws he ignored to give tax payers welath to the UAW) after GWB loned them 20 biillion
Death panel and a small group of people deciding what your ins covers is different?
If he is not after the "assault weapon" then what is it he is after? Is that a gun?
States should have more sovereign over there issues than the federal govt. Thats the intent of the fore fathers

Medicare and socialized medicine are the same
who said different? what does that have to do with a 30 year old male worth 5 million dollars deciding not to buy health ins?
The libs voted for the Iraq in 2002, 29-21
with that
what war crimes?
The CIA has a kill list, he has no choice

 

[Political Junky]

"Like it or not, republicans have to realize the voter is always right"

That is true. And what is today's American vogter looking for? More entitlements. More hand outs. More free shit. They will vote the country into ruin.

That worked so well for Romney, didn't it? That 47%.