The Democrat Party Just Slit Their Own Wrist

[eagle1462010]

The majority of Americans view the fascist Drumpfisti unfavorably.

Well his favorability just went up, like I said, feel free to attack all the republican rallies, it will cost you.

BlackLivesMatter has disrupted Bernie and Hillary rallies, too.

So much for your argument.

Poor things.............were they ripping up signs too........

 

[Papageorgio]

What happened in Chicago is the equivalent of the Dems slitting a wrist

This was a Republican rally, dumbass.

You aren't the sharpest tool in the shed. Dumbass!

 

[bripat9643]

Yep, tearing up someone else's sign is assault. It's a crime. The thugs in Shitcago committed a lot of crimes on video.

That's not assault, dumbfuck.

I know, infants don't understand words so you're forgiven, this time.

Yes, it is assault. laying a single finger on a person if he doesn't want you to is assault.

You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground when it comes to the law.

 

[JoeB131]

And he's gaining on the other side of the equation............as the left loses the same...........high turn outs one side and low on the other will he gain more than he loses and will the Dems lose even more.............that is the equation.

Most polls show Hillary or Bernie beating the Orange One easily. and it just gets worse for him when people who aren't tuned into this process until after the conventions see what a nut Trump is.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Yep, tearing up someone else's sign is assault. It's a crime. The thugs in Shitcago committed a lot of crimes on video.

That's not assault, dumbfuck.

I know, infants don't understand words so you're forgiven, this time.

Yes, it is assault. laying a single finger on a person if he doesn't want you to is assault.

You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground when it comes to the law.

Why must we always go though this with you?

"Assault
At Common Law, an intentional act by one person that creates an apprehension in another of an imminent harmful or offensive contact.

An assault is carried out by a threat of bodily harm coupled with an apparent, present ability to cause the harm. It is both a crime and a tort and, therefore, may result in either criminal or civil liability. Generally, the common law definition is the same in criminal and Tort Law. There is, however, an additional Criminal Law category of assault consisting of an attempted but unsuccessful Battery.

Statutory definitions of assault in the various jurisdictions throughout the United States are not substantially different from the common-law definition.

Elements
Generally, the essential elements of assault consist of an act intended to cause an apprehension of harmful or offensive contact that causes apprehension of such contact in the victim.

The act required for an assault must be overt. Although words alone are insufficient, they might create an assault when coupled with some action that indicates the ability to carry out the threat. A mere threat to harm is not an assault; however, a threat combined with a raised fist might be sufficient if it causes a reasonable apprehension of harm in the victim.Intent is an essential element of assault. In tort law, it can be specific intent—if the assailant intends to cause the apprehension of harmful or offensive contact in the victim—or general intent—if he or she intends to do the act that causes such apprehension. In addition, the intent element is satisfied if it is substantially certain, to a reasonable person, that the act will cause the result. A defendant who holds a gun to a victim's head possesses the requisite intent, since it is substantially certain that this act will produce an apprehension in the victim. In all cases, intent to kill or harm is irrelevant.

In criminal law, the attempted battery type of assault requires a Specific Intent to commit battery. An intent to frighten will not suffice for this form of assault.

There can be no assault if the act does not produce a true apprehension of harm in the victim. There must be a reasonable fear of injury. The usual test applied is whether the act would induce such apprehension in the mind of a reasonable person. The status of the victim is taken into account. A threat made to a child might be sufficient to constitute an assault, while an identical threat made to an adult might not.

Virtually all jurisdictions agree that the victim must be aware of the danger. This element is not required, however, for the attempted battery type of assault. A defendant who throws a rock at a sleeping victim can only be guilty of the attempted battery assault, since the victim would not be aware of the possible harm."
assault

 

[eagle1462010]

And he's gaining on the other side of the equation............as the left loses the same...........high turn outs one side and low on the other will he gain more than he loses and will the Dems lose even more.............that is the equation.

Most polls show Hillary or Bernie beating the Orange One easily. and it just gets worse for him when people who aren't tuned into this process until after the conventions see what a nut Trump is.

Yeah....I heard about those polls........100 Democrats surveyed............the media has been saying.......Trump will never run.........Trump will quit........Trump can never win...................How does it feel to be wrong so many times.

 

[bripat9643]

And he's gaining on the other side of the equation............as the left loses the same...........high turn outs one side and low on the other will he gain more than he loses and will the Dems lose even more.............that is the equation.

Most polls show Hillary or Bernie beating the Orange One easily. and it just gets worse for him when people who aren't tuned into this process until after the conventions see what a nut Trump is.

They showed the same thing with Reagan and Carter.

 

[bripat9643]

Yep, tearing up someone else's sign is assault. It's a crime. The thugs in Shitcago committed a lot of crimes on video.

That's not assault, dumbfuck.

I know, infants don't understand words so you're forgiven, this time.

Yes, it is assault. laying a single finger on a person if he doesn't want you to is assault.

You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground when it comes to the law.

Why must we always go though this with you?

"Assault
At Common Law, an intentional act by one person that creates an apprehension in another of an imminent harmful or offensive contact.

An assault is carried out by a threat of bodily harm coupled with an apparent, present ability to cause the harm. It is both a crime and a tort and, therefore, may result in either criminal or civil liability. Generally, the common law definition is the same in criminal and Tort Law. There is, however, an additional Criminal Law category of assault consisting of an attempted but unsuccessful Battery.

Statutory definitions of assault in the various jurisdictions throughout the United States are not substantially different from the common-law definition.

Elements
Generally, the essential elements of assault consist of an act intended to cause an apprehension of harmful or offensive contact that causes apprehension of such contact in the victim.

The act required for an assault must be overt. Although words alone are insufficient, they might create an assault when coupled with some action that indicates the ability to carry out the threat. A mere threat to harm is not an assault; however, a threat combined with a raised fist might be sufficient if it causes a reasonable apprehension of harm in the victim.Intent is an essential element of assault. In tort law, it can be specific intent—if the assailant intends to cause the apprehension of harmful or offensive contact in the victim—or general intent—if he or she intends to do the act that causes such apprehension. In addition, the intent element is satisfied if it is substantially certain, to a reasonable person, that the act will cause the result. A defendant who holds a gun to a victim's head possesses the requisite intent, since it is substantially certain that this act will produce an apprehension in the victim. In all cases, intent to kill or harm is irrelevant.

In criminal law, the attempted battery type of assault requires a Specific Intent to commit battery. An intent to frighten will not suffice for this form of assault.

There can be no assault if the act does not produce a true apprehension of harm in the victim. There must be a reasonable fear of injury. The usual test applied is whether the act would induce such apprehension in the mind of a reasonable person. The status of the victim is taken into account. A threat made to a child might be sufficient to constitute an assault, while an identical threat made to an adult might not.

Virtually all jurisdictions agree that the victim must be aware of the danger. This element is not required, however, for the attempted battery type of assault. A defendant who throws a rock at a sleeping victim can only be guilty of the attempted battery assault, since the victim would not be aware of the possible harm."
assault

You only proved my point.

 

[JoeB131]

Yeah....I heard about those polls........100 Democrats surveyed............the media has been saying.......Trump will never run.........Trump will quit........Trump can never win...................How does it feel to be wrong so many times.

Hey, guy, I am delighted Trump is running. He's already effectively destroyed the Republican Party.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Yep, tearing up someone else's sign is assault. It's a crime. The thugs in Shitcago committed a lot of crimes on video.

That's not assault, dumbfuck.

I know, infants don't understand words so you're forgiven, this time.

Yes, it is assault. laying a single finger on a person if he doesn't want you to is assault.

You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground when it comes to the law.

Why must we always go though this with you?

"Assault
At Common Law, an intentional act by one person that creates an apprehension in another of an imminent harmful or offensive contact.

An assault is carried out by a threat of bodily harm coupled with an apparent, present ability to cause the harm. It is both a crime and a tort and, therefore, may result in either criminal or civil liability. Generally, the common law definition is the same in criminal and Tort Law. There is, however, an additional Criminal Law category of assault consisting of an attempted but unsuccessful Battery.

Statutory definitions of assault in the various jurisdictions throughout the United States are not substantially different from the common-law definition.

Elements
Generally, the essential elements of assault consist of an act intended to cause an apprehension of harmful or offensive contact that causes apprehension of such contact in the victim.

The act required for an assault must be overt. Although words alone are insufficient, they might create an assault when coupled with some action that indicates the ability to carry out the threat. A mere threat to harm is not an assault; however, a threat combined with a raised fist might be sufficient if it causes a reasonable apprehension of harm in the victim.Intent is an essential element of assault. In tort law, it can be specific intent—if the assailant intends to cause the apprehension of harmful or offensive contact in the victim—or general intent—if he or she intends to do the act that causes such apprehension. In addition, the intent element is satisfied if it is substantially certain, to a reasonable person, that the act will cause the result. A defendant who holds a gun to a victim's head possesses the requisite intent, since it is substantially certain that this act will produce an apprehension in the victim. In all cases, intent to kill or harm is irrelevant.

In criminal law, the attempted battery type of assault requires a Specific Intent to commit battery. An intent to frighten will not suffice for this form of assault.

There can be no assault if the act does not produce a true apprehension of harm in the victim. There must be a reasonable fear of injury. The usual test applied is whether the act would induce such apprehension in the mind of a reasonable person. The status of the victim is taken into account. A threat made to a child might be sufficient to constitute an assault, while an identical threat made to an adult might not.

Virtually all jurisdictions agree that the victim must be aware of the danger. This element is not required, however, for the attempted battery type of assault. A defendant who throws a rock at a sleeping victim can only be guilty of the attempted battery assault, since the victim would not be aware of the possible harm."
assault

You only proved my point.

Nope. Kicking someone's car isn't assault either...

 

[eagle1462010]

Yeah....I heard about those polls........100 Democrats surveyed............the media has been saying.......Trump will never run.........Trump will quit........Trump can never win...................How does it feel to be wrong so many times.

Hey, guy, I am delighted Trump is running. He's already effectively destroyed the Republican Party.

I'm sure you do..................that is what your side keeps saying............and then instead of helping him because they want to run against him..............they show up trying to make him lose the primaries....

Perhaps one day your side will make up it's mind.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Yeah....I heard about those polls........100 Democrats surveyed............the media has been saying.......Trump will never run.........Trump will quit........Trump can never win...................How does it feel to be wrong so many times.

Hey, guy, I am delighted Trump is running. He's already effectively destroyed the Republican Party.

For now.

And he's giving the White House to Hillary...

 

[Manonthestreet]

 

[bripat9643]

Yep, tearing up someone else's sign is assault. It's a crime. The thugs in Shitcago committed a lot of crimes on video.

That's not assault, dumbfuck.

I know, infants don't understand words so you're forgiven, this time.

Yes, it is assault. laying a single finger on a person if he doesn't want you to is assault.

You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground when it comes to the law.

Why must we always go though this with you?

"Assault
At Common Law, an intentional act by one person that creates an apprehension in another of an imminent harmful or offensive contact.

An assault is carried out by a threat of bodily harm coupled with an apparent, present ability to cause the harm. It is both a crime and a tort and, therefore, may result in either criminal or civil liability. Generally, the common law definition is the same in criminal and Tort Law. There is, however, an additional Criminal Law category of assault consisting of an attempted but unsuccessful Battery.

Statutory definitions of assault in the various jurisdictions throughout the United States are not substantially different from the common-law definition.

Elements
Generally, the essential elements of assault consist of an act intended to cause an apprehension of harmful or offensive contact that causes apprehension of such contact in the victim.

The act required for an assault must be overt. Although words alone are insufficient, they might create an assault when coupled with some action that indicates the ability to carry out the threat. A mere threat to harm is not an assault; however, a threat combined with a raised fist might be sufficient if it causes a reasonable apprehension of harm in the victim.Intent is an essential element of assault. In tort law, it can be specific intent—if the assailant intends to cause the apprehension of harmful or offensive contact in the victim—or general intent—if he or she intends to do the act that causes such apprehension. In addition, the intent element is satisfied if it is substantially certain, to a reasonable person, that the act will cause the result. A defendant who holds a gun to a victim's head possesses the requisite intent, since it is substantially certain that this act will produce an apprehension in the victim. In all cases, intent to kill or harm is irrelevant.

In criminal law, the attempted battery type of assault requires a Specific Intent to commit battery. An intent to frighten will not suffice for this form of assault.

There can be no assault if the act does not produce a true apprehension of harm in the victim. There must be a reasonable fear of injury. The usual test applied is whether the act would induce such apprehension in the mind of a reasonable person. The status of the victim is taken into account. A threat made to a child might be sufficient to constitute an assault, while an identical threat made to an adult might not.

Virtually all jurisdictions agree that the victim must be aware of the danger. This element is not required, however, for the attempted battery type of assault. A defendant who throws a rock at a sleeping victim can only be guilty of the attempted battery assault, since the victim would not be aware of the possible harm."
assault

You only proved my point.

Nope. Kicking someone's car isn't assault either...

It's vandalism, which is also a crime. The bottom line is that anything short of leaving people and their stuff alone is a crime.

 

[bripat9643]

Yeah....I heard about those polls........100 Democrats surveyed............the media has been saying.......Trump will never run.........Trump will quit........Trump can never win...................How does it feel to be wrong so many times.

Hey, guy, I am delighted Trump is running. He's already effectively destroyed the Republican Party.

For now.

And he's giving the White House to Hillary...

You turds are delusional if you think the thugs in Shitcago hurt Trump's campaign. Trump is getting more free publicity than he could have ever dreamed of. People are on Trump's side, not the side of Bernie and MoveOn.org thugs.

 

[eagle1462010]

Yeah....I heard about those polls........100 Democrats surveyed............the media has been saying.......Trump will never run.........Trump will quit........Trump can never win...................How does it feel to be wrong so many times.

Hey, guy, I am delighted Trump is running. He's already effectively destroyed the Republican Party.

For now.

And he's giving the White House to Hillary...

You turds are delusional if you think the thugs in Shitcago hurt Trump's campaign.

The more they do the more the Mob in this country gets angry.............They just upped Trumps numbers by trying to attack it.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

You turds are delusional if you think the thugs in Shitcago hurt Trump's campaign.

I don't. And we want Trump to be the GOP candidate. He can't win...

 

[bripat9643]

You turds are delusional if you think the thugs in Shitcago hurt Trump's campaign.

I don't. And we want Trump to be the GOP candidate. He can't win...

ROFL! If you really want him to be the nominee, then why all the vitriol directed at him?

 

[eagle1462010]

Finally realized that invisible man poster was...............back to not watching Paint dry.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

You turds are delusional if you think the thugs in Shitcago hurt Trump's campaign.

I don't. And we want Trump to be the GOP candidate. He can't win...

ROFL! If you really want him to be the nominee, then why all the vitriol directed at him?

I actually don't bother with him that much and he's a worthless **** like Palin. Easy target, the new MILF of the fucking morons.