Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because it radically improves it. It does away with lesser-of-two-evils voting.The problem is time. Why complicate the process?
Republicans and Democrats both have been using it in primaries. At it's being adopted more and more for local and state elections.If Democrats would like to use that in a primary, more power to them.
What do mean? Of course they can. Lesser-of-two-evils is as much a problem there as it is in the Presidential race.In Congressional and Senate races, it makes no sense as third party candidates don't draw any real votes.
No - that's the two-party paranoia infecting your reasoning. RCV benefits any party that might face a split vote. For example, if we'd had RCV in '92, Clinton wouldn't have won. Most Perot voters would have listed Bush as their second choice and he would have won instead.RCV is another scam, meant to keep leftist hacks in power.....The results from Maine are in,
UBI is Universal Basic Income.They did it in Maine....Janet Mills came in 2nd in the polls, but was awarded the Governoship because she got more 2nd place votes.
It's a huge fucking scam to keep the left in power.
Fuck off....You're being sucked in by Marxist scammers yet again.Full retard. You're really all in!
Sorry....My mistake.UBI is Universal Basic Income.
WTF happened to you?Fuck off....You're being sucked in by Marxist scammers yet again.
Nothing....I saw the results of the Maine Governor election, and plainly can see that RCV is a scam meant to keep the left in power.WTF happened to you?
Apart from results you don't like - what in the world makes you think it's a "marxist scam"? Have you even looked into it? Do you understand how it works?Nothing....I saw the results of the Maine Governor election, and plainly can see that RCV is a scam meant to keep the left in power.
That's not the point.The LP will never ever have a prayer of winning, even under that goofy Rube Goldberg.....
No, it doesn't change that at all. You've been listening to idiots. Read up on it yourself. And read about from a source that isn't spoon feeding you fear.All they'll do is knock down the percentage that the republican ge (not that they're any great shakes), and allow the demoncrats to win.
Because it's clearly designed to keep the left in power.Apart from results you don't like - what in the world makes you think it's a "marxist scam"? Have you even looked into it? Do you understand how it works?
I read up on it, and thought it might be a halfway good idea, until I saw the Maine results......Mills got fewer votes than the republican, but was still awarded the election......Fuck that shit.That's not the point.
No, it doesn't change that at all. You've been listening to idiots. Read up on this yourself.
How so? Find me one feature of RCV that is partisan in any way.Because it's clearly designed to keep the left in power.
Jesus - you're claiming that RCV is a scam designed to keep the left in power because of the results of one election???I read up on it, and thought it might be a halfway good idea, until I saw the Maine results......Mills got fewer votes than the republican, but was still awarded the election......Fuck that shit.
I can see the forest for the trees.....You either win the election or you don't....Mills lost the election and was given the seat on a technicality....I repeat: fuck that shit.Jesus - you're claiming that RCV is a scam designed to keep the left in power because of the results of one election???
RCV does away with the spoiler effect when third party candidates a running. In Maine, more voters preferred the Democrat to the Republican. That's about Maine, not RCV.
C'mon. You're not this stupid.
I've come to realize that there are many on both far ends of the spectrum who don't want to improve the system. They enjoy this warlike, tribal, pound-on-each-other, winner-takes-all environment.How so? Find me one feature of RCV that is partisan in any way.
Jesus - you're claiming that RCV is a scam designed to keep the left in power because of the results of one election???
RCV does away with the spoiler effect when third party candidates a running. In Maine, more voters preferred the Democrat to the Republican. That's about Maine, not RCV.
C'mon. You're not this stupid.
I've come to realize that there are many on both far ends of the spectrum who don't want to improve the system. They enjoy this warlike, tribal, pound-on-each-other, winner-takes-all environment.
So their goals and priorities are always going to be different. "Party over country, because my party has all the answers". Between these people and those who just don't care, that's a large part of the country. This is an uphill battle. Meanwhile, the Titanic continues to sink.
The two-party circle jerk has consumed them.I've come to realize that there are many on both far ends of the spectrum who don't want to improve the system. They enjoy this warlike, tribal, pound-on-each-other, winner-takes-all environment.
So their goals and priorities are always going to be different. "Party over country, because my party has all the answers". Between these people and those who just don't care, that's a large part of the country. This is an uphill battle. Meanwhile, the Titanic continues to sink.
A disquieting percentage, yes.People wanna be led.
Your deliberately nebulous and pie-in-the-sky party won't fix anything at all....It'll only heap more polish on an already overpolished turd.I've come to realize that there are many on both far ends of the spectrum who don't want to improve the system. They enjoy this warlike, tribal, pound-on-each-other, winner-takes-all environment.
So their goals and priorities are always going to be different. "Party over country, because my party has all the answers". Between these people and those who just don't care, that's a large part of the country. This is an uphill battle. Meanwhile, the Titanic continues to sink.
That's the psychology of partisanship. It helps many feel they belong to a team, and that provides comfort. So they can't give a goddamn inch.The two-party circle jerk has consumed them.
No, she didn't. More left leaning voters chose third party candidates as their first choice, because they could. But they still favored the Democrat, so their votes ultimately went that way. If there had only been the two candidates, Mills still would have won.I can see the forest for the trees.....You either win the election or you don't....Mills lost the election and was given the seat on a technicality....I repeat: fuck that shit.
You just unwittingly explained how it's a fucking scam.....LO2E on steroids.No, she didn't. More left leaning voters chose third party candidates as their first choice, because they could. But they still favored the Democrat, so their votes ultimately went that way. If there had only been the two candidates, Mills still would have won.
You're the one seizing on a technicality to misrepresent what happened. I can't decide if you're just demagoguing to scare the dummies, or if you really don't get it.
