Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On top of that, Japan relies on our military for protection.The Japanese are much more of one culture. They have their ways like most people of the world. But they are much more respectful and clean up behind themselves just to start. There is more garbage in the streets of a few blocks of Baltimore then in the whole city of Tokyo. I always love the comparisons when it is in the favor of Progs. Progs hate the whites and then compare the socialism that seems to work in nations affected. Tell that to the nations of Central America, the Islands, Mexico, South America, Africa, parts of Europe and many parts of Asia where it does not.Again, the fate of world freedom is on the brink, and American gun ownership is the only thing holding back the oppressors.
.
Japan is a democracy, a free country. But when it comes to firearms, they have the same laws that are proposed here. Freedom is not about gun ownership.
Half the world relies on our military for protection.
Our military is under the control of our government, and WE THE PEOPLE keep it in check because we are armed.
I am SICK of this FACT being ignored and dismissed.
.
Only 31% of households in the United States have guns. They don't keep anything in check, let alone the U.S. military that would easily slaughter them in a shoot out.
Good luck with that. There were an estimated 357 million firearms in this country in 2013, with a population of 317 million. That rounds out to about 113 guns per 100 people, or 1.13 guns per person. And since gun sales have been increasing faster than the population, the divide has likely only massively widened since then.
Now your statistics give a 31% number, which would mean that those 31% own an average of 3 firearms. That's BS. I don't know anyone who owns a measly 3 firearms. Most people in my neck of the woods own anywhere between 10-50.
Someone's math isn't adding up.
And how will CLEO know the gunowner is consistently following the law with regard to safely storing a firearm?“09. When a gun owner dies, their relatives must surrender the deceased members firearms”The Gun Control Laws The United States Needs
In order to purchase a firearm, an individual must do the following:
01. Attend three month class on firearms
02. Pass a written test when the class has been completed
03. Achieve at least 95% accuracy during a shooting-range test
04. Pass a Mental Health evaluation at a hospital
05. Pass a background check in which the government digs into their criminal record
06. Pass a background check involving interviews with friends and family
07. Only shotguns and Air Rifles may be purchased, no handguns
08. New magazines can only be purchased by trading in empty ones
09. When a gun owner dies, their relatives must surrender the deceased members firearms
10. Every three years, the individual must pass the above tests and investigations
To whom?
The government?
“Must surrender” means through force of law – and absent due process and just compensation such a law would be in violation of the 5th Amendment’s Takings Clause.
To make the Takings Clause moot, the possession of all guns must be made illegal, rendering firearms contraband – which would violate the Second Amendment.
Moreover, how would government know where the guns of a deceased family member are, how would government enforce the “must surrender” law? In order to enforce the law a search warrant would be needed predicated upon probable cause as to the location of the now illegal guns.
Are you proposing to amend the Constitution to repeal the 4th and 5th Amendments along with the Second?
In order to own a shotgun or Air Rifle, the owner must show the local police department where he safely stores his weapon.
The constitution can be amended as needed so society can be safer from firearm owning civilians.
Why do you think you can get 38 states to agree with you?The constitution can be amended as needed so society can be safer from firearm owning civilians.
The Gun Control Laws The United States Needs
In order to purchase a firearm, an individual must do the following:
01. Attend three month class on firearms
02. Pass a written test when the class has been completed
03. Achieve at least 95% accuracy during a shooting-range test
04. Pass a Mental Health evaluation at a hospital
05. Pass a background check in which the government digs into their criminal record
06. Pass a background check involving interviews with friends and family
07. Only shotguns and Air Rifles may be purchased, no handguns
08. New magazines can only be purchased by trading in empty ones
09. When a gun owner dies, their relatives must surrender the deceased members firearms
10. Every three years, the individual must pass the above tests and investigations
OK then:You would say that about any gun law for any country, but its not true.Heh.If Japan is not a good enough demonstration, then Canada will do. Sensible gun control, reducing the number of guns available to civilians, does reduce firearm violence.Given the realities of Japanese history and culture, it is impossible to demonstrate a necessary relationship between the gun laws they have the their low-level of gun-related crime.The Japanese are much more of one culture. They have their ways like most people of the world
You also cannot demonstrate the necessary relationship between Canada's gun laws and its relatively low rate of gun violence.
What the United States needs are constructive, viable solutions to the problem of gun crime and violence unrelated to the regulation of firearms.The Gun Control Laws The United States Needs
In order to purchase a firearm, an individual must do the following:
01. Attend three month class on firearms
02. Pass a written test when the class has been completed
03. Achieve at least 95% accuracy during a shooting-range test
04. Pass a Mental Health evaluation at a hospital
05. Pass a background check in which the government digs into their criminal record
06. Pass a background check involving interviews with friends and family
07. Only shotguns and Air Rifles may be purchased, no handguns
08. New magazines can only be purchased by trading in empty ones
09. When a gun owner dies, their relatives must surrender the deceased members firearms
10. Every three years, the individual must pass the above tests and investigations
I assume you know that ALL firearms are designed for military use, or were derived from those designed for military use. So, what you're saying is, you want a complete ban?The Gun Control Laws The United States Needs
In order to purchase a firearm, an individual must do the following:
01. Attend three month class on firearms
02. Pass a written test when the class has been completed
03. Achieve at least 95% accuracy during a shooting-range test
04. Pass a Mental Health evaluation at a hospital
05. Pass a background check in which the government digs into their criminal record
06. Pass a background check involving interviews with friends and family
07. Only shotguns and Air Rifles may be purchased, no handguns
08. New magazines can only be purchased by trading in empty ones
09. When a gun owner dies, their relatives must surrender the deceased members firearms
10. Every three years, the individual must pass the above tests and investigations
We should focus on trying to keep weapons from hate mongers not educating them.
1. Military style weapons should be banned and any other variants should be banned.
2. Magazines should be limited to 15 rounds maximum.
3. Background checks should include social media posts
.
But mostly, according to your inability to make such a demonstration.According to you and gun nuts.For no demonstrably necessary or effective reason whatsoever.I would say at 100 meters. Again, were trying to reduce the number of civilians that own firearms.
Why do you think you can get 38 states to agree with you?The constitution can be amended as needed so society can be safer from firearm owning civilians.
I assume you know that ALL firearms are designed for military use, or were derived from those designed for military use. So, what you're saying is, you want a complete ban?The Gun Control Laws The United States Needs
In order to purchase a firearm, an individual must do the following:
01. Attend three month class on firearms
02. Pass a written test when the class has been completed
03. Achieve at least 95% accuracy during a shooting-range test
04. Pass a Mental Health evaluation at a hospital
05. Pass a background check in which the government digs into their criminal record
06. Pass a background check involving interviews with friends and family
07. Only shotguns and Air Rifles may be purchased, no handguns
08. New magazines can only be purchased by trading in empty ones
09. When a gun owner dies, their relatives must surrender the deceased members firearms
10. Every three years, the individual must pass the above tests and investigations
We should focus on trying to keep weapons from hate mongers not educating them.
1. Military style weapons should be banned and any other variants should be banned.
2. Magazines should be limited to 15 rounds maximum.
3. Background checks should include social media posts
.
Everyone knows what we are talking about you idiot.
The United States is a Constitutional Republic, not a democracy – citizens’ rights and protected liberties are not subject to majority rule.On top of that, Japan relies on our military for protection.The Japanese are much more of one culture. They have their ways like most people of the world. But they are much more respectful and clean up behind themselves just to start. There is more garbage in the streets of a few blocks of Baltimore then in the whole city of Tokyo. I always love the comparisons when it is in the favor of Progs. Progs hate the whites and then compare the socialism that seems to work in nations affected. Tell that to the nations of Central America, the Islands, Mexico, South America, Africa, parts of Europe and many parts of Asia where it does not.Japan is a democracy, a free country. But when it comes to firearms, they have the same laws that are proposed here. Freedom is not about gun ownership.
Half the world relies on our military for protection.
Our military is under the control of our government, and WE THE PEOPLE keep it in check because we are armed.
I am SICK of this FACT being ignored and dismissed.
.
Only 31% of households in the United States have guns. They don't keep anything in check, let alone the U.S. military that would easily slaughter them in a shoot out.
Good luck with that. There were an estimated 357 million firearms in this country in 2013, with a population of 317 million. That rounds out to about 113 guns per 100 people, or 1.13 guns per person. And since gun sales have been increasing faster than the population, the divide has likely only massively widened since then.
Now your statistics give a 31% number, which would mean that those 31% own an average of 3 firearms. That's BS. I don't know anyone who owns a measly 3 firearms. Most people in my neck of the woods own anywhere between 10-50.
Someone's math isn't adding up.
Well, then according to your math I guess as little as 2% of the households in the United States own firearms. Or maybe its 10%. Either way, the non-gun owning households have the numbers to change the laws and restrict gun ownership for the smaller minority!
But mostly, according to your inability to make such a demonstration.According to you and gun nuts.For no demonstrably necessary or effective reason whatsoever.I would say at 100 meters. Again, were trying to reduce the number of civilians that own firearms.
So, you have no - rational - reason to believe 38 states will agree with you and repeal the 2nd.01. Because the number of households that own guns has fallen from 50% in 1977 to 31% in 2014.Why do you think you can get 38 states to agree with you?The constitution can be amended as needed so society can be safer from firearm owning civilians.
02. The non-gun owning population have the numbers on their side.
03. It will be the majority vs. the minority.
04. The NRA and gun owners continue to resist any regulation while mass shootings increase shocking the public.
05. The media and non-gun owning population will eventually be able to get the laws and regulations in place that they want. Its only a matter of time.
That is one hell of a shitty standard.Everyone knows what we are talking about you idiot.
The United States is a Constitutional Republic, not a democracy – citizens’ rights and protected liberties are not subject to majority rule.On top of that, Japan relies on our military for protection.The Japanese are much more of one culture. They have their ways like most people of the world. But they are much more respectful and clean up behind themselves just to start. There is more garbage in the streets of a few blocks of Baltimore then in the whole city of Tokyo. I always love the comparisons when it is in the favor of Progs. Progs hate the whites and then compare the socialism that seems to work in nations affected. Tell that to the nations of Central America, the Islands, Mexico, South America, Africa, parts of Europe and many parts of Asia where it does not.
Half the world relies on our military for protection.
Our military is under the control of our government, and WE THE PEOPLE keep it in check because we are armed.
I am SICK of this FACT being ignored and dismissed.
.
Only 31% of households in the United States have guns. They don't keep anything in check, let alone the U.S. military that would easily slaughter them in a shoot out.
Good luck with that. There were an estimated 357 million firearms in this country in 2013, with a population of 317 million. That rounds out to about 113 guns per 100 people, or 1.13 guns per person. And since gun sales have been increasing faster than the population, the divide has likely only massively widened since then.
Now your statistics give a 31% number, which would mean that those 31% own an average of 3 firearms. That's BS. I don't know anyone who owns a measly 3 firearms. Most people in my neck of the woods own anywhere between 10-50.
Someone's math isn't adding up.
Well, then according to your math I guess as little as 2% of the households in the United States own firearms. Or maybe its 10%. Either way, the non-gun owning households have the numbers to change the laws and restrict gun ownership for the smaller minority!
Indeed, Constitutional case law exists to protect the minority from government excess and overreach, to protect the minority from the capricious whims of the majority.
No... according to YOU, as evidenced by your inability to demonstrate the necessity and efficacy of the nonsense you present here.According to you.But mostly, according to your inability to make such a demonstration.According to you and gun nuts.For no demonstrably necessary or effective reason whatsoever.I would say at 100 meters. Again, were trying to reduce the number of civilians that own firearms.
The Gun Control Laws The United States Needs
In order to purchase a firearm, an individual must do the following:
01. Attend three month class on firearms
02. Pass a written test when the class has been completed
03. Achieve at least 95% accuracy during a shooting-range test
04. Pass a Mental Health evaluation at a hospital
05. Pass a background check in which the government digs into their criminal record
06. Pass a background check involving interviews with friends and family
07. Only shotguns and Air Rifles may be purchased, no handguns
08. New magazines can only be purchased by trading in empty ones
09. When a gun owner dies, their relatives must surrender the deceased members firearms
10. Every three years, the individual must pass the above tests and investigations
95% accuracy? from what distance? most cases of self defense are within a couple feet ....not 50 yards so please specify.
Not everyone can wield a shotgun so if your some disabled person in a wheelchair it would be much more difficult to protect yourself. An air rifle? what good is that going to do you in a home invasion?
Competency tests and background checks are fine. thats about it, no need to harass people though as you would like.
I would say at 100 meters. Again, were trying to reduce the number of civilians that own firearms. What will save and defend people is the reduction of the number of weapons in circulation. You can still kill someone with an Air Rifle. But hopefully you'll be using other methods because the home invader will not be armed with a firearm.
We want to make it more difficult for the average civilian to use firearms and own them. Its civilians that cause the most problems with firearms in society. That's why these gun control measures are needed.
It takes 13 states to stop an amendment.Any part of the constitution can be amended if you get enough votes. That's the reality. The non-gun owning population, at 70% and rising, will at some point in the future, demand these laws and regulations. Its only a matter of time.
So, you have no - rational - reason to believe 38 states will agree with you and repeal the 2nd.01. Because the number of households that own guns has fallen from 50% in 1977 to 31% in 2014.Why do you think you can get 38 states to agree with you?The constitution can be amended as needed so society can be safer from firearm owning civilians.
02. The non-gun owning population have the numbers on their side.
03. It will be the majority vs. the minority.
04. The NRA and gun owners continue to resist any regulation while mass shootings increase shocking the public.
05. The media and non-gun owning population will eventually be able to get the laws and regulations in place that they want. Its only a matter of time.
Thanks.
