Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Keep telling yourself that. Then, ask-yourself why you still go to science to save your ass in literally every-other endevor but somehow think they are frauds when they don’t abide by your politics of denial. Effin Hypocrite.Or both. We know that there is a "go along to get along" requirement in academia, and the same actors willingly subscribe to whatever new theory supports their political agenda.
They ignore the empirical climate data in favor of a flawed computer model which amplifies the radiative forcing effect of CO2 by a factor of 3. Climate sensitivity to atmospheric CO2 is low. How else do you explain the planet cooling for millions of years with atmospheric CO2 greater than 600 ppm?Keep telling yourself that. Then, ask-yourself why you still go to science to save your ass in literally every-other endevor but somehow think they are frauds when they don’t abide by your politics of denial. Effin Hypocrite.
The EXACT same science we use for the military, medicine and a host of other topics we use for climate change.
Deniers are quite scientifically illiterate.
Climate sensitivity to atmospheric CO2 is low.
Data……wrong again. So you’re using NASA satellite data.According to highly correlated satellite and balloon data, it is ZERO.
Data……wrong again. So you’re using NASA satellite data.
Wonder what they have to say about AGW. Noitice, we have a link. Something sadly missing from your blather.
- “While Earth’s climate has changed throughout its history, the current warming is happening at a rate not seen in the past 10,000 years.”
- Climate Change Evidence: How Do We Know?
www.nbcnews.com
The epitome of ignorance. It was cold last night, must not be global warming.Key claim against global warming evaporates
Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.
satellite and weather balloon data have actually "suggested" the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.
Love the NBC spin here. The data was a flat line that went up and down a bit. It documented precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2, proving that increasing atmospheric Co2 did ABSOLUTELY GOD DAMN FUCKING NOTHING...
Your outside thermometer "suggested" that it was 90F outside today, but a conflicted taxpayer funded liar has "corrected" that to 100F to match the narrative...
The epitome of ignorance. It was cold last night, must not be global warming.
Theory - increasing atmospheric Co2 warms atmosphere
DATA - two and only two sources : satellites and balloons - both show NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2
THEORY REJECTED
Which satellite band are they using as a proxy for temperature? ...
Ask NBC, they reported it. Weather Channel and other sources have long since pulled their documentation of it. It is a TRUTH the warmers want to hide, that they FUDGED the atmospheric temp data in 2005 with laughable bullshit you will not even attempt to defend...
Can you explain a map of the Arctic yet??
Is Hawaii "warming?"
LOL!!!
SO BUSTED ON HAWAII!!!!!!
except, you can't post a link to the data. Feel free, I'm happy to go look. My money would be on you not having one. You merely comply to feel good about something you know nothing about.It’s the hottest year on record. And things have been getting progressively warmer for decades.
want money, follow the script. Ask Judith Curry.Or both. We know that there is a "go along to get along" requirement in academia, and the same actors willingly subscribe to whatever new theory supports their political agenda.
dude, they just can't figure out the entire arctic thing at the top of the globe will always be ice. Always, no sun for six months cannot in any way shape or form mean warming. They are literally stupid.The hard data shows the earth is uniquely configured for colder temperatures which is why 900,000 of the past 1 million years has been 5 to 8C colder than today, ya science denier.
Right IS_JESS_AN_ACCOUNT ?
Not always. Based on the earth's present landmass configuration, the threshold for glaciation in the northern hemisphere is 2C warmer than today. At the end of the previous interglacial cycle the arctic circle was ice free and the seas were 26 ft higher than today.dude, they just can't figure out the entire arctic thing at the top of the globe will always be ice. Always, no sun for six months cannot in any way shape or form mean warming. They are literally stupid.
What exactly do you believe this means? Because I might be saying the same thing to you.
Are you ignorantly repeating things you don't understand? ...
www.usmessageboard.com
Here is the question your side cannot answer....
WHY is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
Jeopardy! music still playing...
The warmers need to explain the Arctic Circle's ice pattern, and how Co2 is responsible...
The map is clear. 7% of Earth ice is on Greenland. Why is there ice on Greenland south of the Arctic Circle, and no ice north of the Arctic Circle on Alaska? Co2 and sun do not explain this. The only explanation is the Greenland is within 600 miles of the pole at the top, and hence...
Can we use adiabatic cooling? ... or are you just ignorantly repeating what you don't understand ...
