Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The politicians and politicos and media whores who have done this to these people are largely to blame. The rubes, while absolutely responsible for their actions, have been victimized by people who know exactly how to manipulate them, which strings to pull, which emotions to attack.Sweetie, your hatred of America is what makes your life a hell hole.
America is gonna be fine. You're only hurting yourself with these chicken little hysterics of America's impending doom.
The politicians and politicos and media whores who have done this to these people are largely to blame. The rubes, while absolutely responsible for their actions, have been victimized by people who know exactly how to manipulate them, which strings to pull, which emotions to attack.
That's one of the saddest parts of this whole ugly mess.
Sue you are waaaaaaaay out in left field. Your rejection of my statement to not drag Black people into this scenario because it doesn't fit (meaning you're comparing apples to oranges) means nothing to me as neither does Donald Trump.No, your request is rejected. You want to invoke the injustice done to Black people and I acknowledge that and have cited it pretty accurately in how Blacks are pulled over and charged with traffic crimes unjustly. But you DO NOT want that applied to Trump, somehow it couldn't happen to him because he is white and rich.
the
No.
Rejected.
That's first.
Use your imagination to figure out how there might not, indeed, be a "lot of dirt" on him if Mueller and the Steele Dossier and everything else was unable to get serious convictions, but here they come again with document crimes. Did he "commit crimes"? Sure. Again. So did all the Blacks pulled over for "traffic violations".
You're smart enough to know this which is why, I suspect, you don't want it brought up. But it cuts ALL ways.
Trump is definitely a result, because he's filling a profound need that has been building over the decades. It started the day Limbaugh went national and has fed on itself.Sue is not the product of Trump. Trump is the product of people like Sue.
She and her ilk are the one's who have empowered Trump and demagogues like him. Trump is merely a symptom of the conservative detachment from reality and embrace of batshit conspiracy.
Sue you are waaaaaaaay out in left field. Your rejection of my statement to not drag Black people into this scenario because it doesn't fit (meaning you're comparing apples to oranges) means nothing to me as neither does Donald Trump.
He's been circling the drain for a while and the only thing left to see as far as I'm concerned is how many of his minions he will be able to summon to do his bidding after they presumably saw what happened to the first batch that took a hit for him (January 6th storming of the U.S. Capital).
It's funny to me on one hand because investigations by their very nature are supposed to be kind of hush hush but based on just has been shown in the news ALL ALONG regarding Trump having classified documents at Mar-a-Lago the whole world has seen a glimpse of what he's done. That doesn't take into account what we don't know about that they may have uncovered.
It's one thing when there is no credible evidence of any violations, to go digging looking for evidence you can use to charge someone however in Trump's case, we know from NEWS reports
/——/
The Indictment of Former President Trump Is An
Abuse of Prosecutorial Power For Political Purposes
–
The Motive Is Clear on Its Face
The Indictment of Former President Trump Is An Abuse of Prosecutorial Power For Political Purposes - The Motive Is Clear on Its Face
Taking 49 Pages To Unnecessarily Describe Details Exposes The Real Purpose of The Indictment -- To Serve As A Press Releaseshipwreckedcrew.substack.com
The purpose of an indictment is to provide notice to the defendant of the nature and circumstances of the charges. The content of an indictment is 100% the result of decisions made by the prosecutor. The document is drafted by the prosecutor and presented to the grand jury. The grand jury does not itself make changes to the language or allegations in the indictment.
The legal requirement with regard to the content of an indictment is that there be sufficient specificity that the defendant is advised of the time, place, and details of the charges so as to allow a defendant to claim “double jeopardy” in circumstances where the subject of the prosecution has been previously adjudicated against him.
Beyond that, federal courts at all levels have held that the charging language in an indictment combined with the detailed information and evidence provided to he defendant and his counsel in discovery, satisfies the “notice” required by due process.
What is absolutely certain is that the content of any indictment is not a reflection of any “right” of the public to see a litany of detailed ALLEGATIONS that form the basis for the charges, especially where those allegations are not presented in the context of the ACTUAL EVIDENCE that may — or may not — support the claims alleged.
~Snip~
What is absolutely certain is that the content of any indictment is not a reflection of any “right” of the public to see a litany of detailed ALLEGATIONS that form the basis of the charges, especially where those allegations are not presented in the context of the ACTUAL EVIDENCE that may — or may not — support the claims alleged.
What the Department of Justice has done more and more often in the past 20 years — particularly since the dawn of internet era — is to use what are called “speaking indictments” to manufacture a public narrative concerning the alleged crimes of the defendant. The more high profile the case, the more effort DOJ puts into crafting an extensive narrative for public consumption. With the allegations set forth in a public record, Department of Justice officials can discuss them in the press without violating DOJ policy.
Because the allegations will be published far and wide long before they are subject to the crucible of the adversarial system of justice, the narrative takes hold in the public consciousness as “fact” and often becomes impervious to contrary evidence.
Before turning to the Trump indictment, let me provide you a real world example that I was just involved in over the past few months.
Commentary:
The FSB and Stasi story keeps continues to change.
FLASHBACK:
WaPo interviewed the same witnesses as Jack Smith and originally reported the Mar-a-Lago storage room was secured by lock and key. The indictment omits this fact. No where does it say the storage room had a lock, leaving court to believe it was unsecured.
Never was it documented boxes were taken from anywhere but the storage room or Trumps office. Now a ballroom and bathroom, deep faked or staged photos? Yet all the boxes were more secure than where Bidens stolen documents at the University office. the China Town Office and strewn a garage with a crack heads access.
Meanwhile, the Stasi/FBI has covered up and buried the fact that Joey Xi Bai Dung took a $5 million dollar bribe while Vice President.
DOJ Covers Up $5M Biden Bribe From Burisma While Indicting Trump | Frontpage Mag
"$5 million for one Biden, $5 million for the other Biden"www.frontpagemag.com
They do not. They don't care. He is their leader.So you don't want Trump to be held accountable? For ANY of the things he's done?
You mean like doing 57 in a 55?What if he broke the law?
What should happen to him?
37 felonies are a tad more serious than speeding.You mean like doing 57 in a 55?
Sue you are waaaaaaaay out in left field. Your rejection of my statement to not drag Black people into this scenario because it doesn't fit (meaning you're comparing apples to oranges) means nothing to me as neither does Donald Trump.
He's been circling the drain for a while and the only thing left to see as far as I'm concerned is how many of his minions he will be able to summon to do his bidding after they presumably saw what happened to the first batch that took a hit for him (January 6th storming of the U.S. Capital).
It's funny to me on one hand because investigations by their very nature are supposed to be kind of hush hush but based on just has been shown in the news ALL ALONG regarding Trump having classified documents at Mar-a-Lago the whole world has seen a glimpse of what he's done. That doesn't take into account what we don't know about that they may have uncovered.
It's one thing when there is no credible evidence of any violations, to go digging looking for evidence you can use to charge someone however in Trump's case, we know from NEWS reports
How is it justice to let Trump flagrantly violate the law with no accountability?Our justice system is supposed to be above characteristics or individuals. This is my point. It's supposed to be above race. When it's not, you are rightly appalled. It's supposed to be above individuals. Trump "circling the drain" might be true but it's not a crime. These cretins are going after the individual because, basically, they're offended.
That's a perversion of justice.
Drug possession laws are prosecuted at the state level. Unless I've missed something Trump is being prosecuted at the federal level.Unequal application of the law is perverted justice.
None of your vapid words are gonna cover for that and you know it.
No, I mean like being guilty of the charges of this indictment.You mean like doing 57 in a 55?
You're a schoolteacher right? Then surely you know that words are important in the meanings that they convey.Killing George Floyd for resisting arrest is also perverted justice, and I stated this.
But look at your last paragraph above. Does justice only require following the law or is it also how the law is APPLIED to people?
If certain people are pulled over more than others for traffic violations, and thus have to pay more fines and eventually lose their licenses and have warrants, is this justice? After all, they DID break the law for the rolling stop/failing to yield/five miles over the speed limit.
